REVIEW 2 cited by
Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been extensively used in various real-world applications. However, the predictive uncertainty of GNNs stemming from diverse sources such as inherent randomness in data and model training errors can lead to unstable and erroneous predictions. Therefore, identifying, quantifying, and utilizing uncertainty are essential to enhance the performance of the model for the downstream tasks as well as the reliability of the GNN predictions. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the GNNs from the perspective of uncertainty with an emphasis on its integration in graph learning. We compare and summarize existing graph uncertainty theory and methods, alongside the corresponding downstream tasks. Thereby, we bridge the gap between theory and practice, meanwhile connecting different GNN communities. Moreover, our work provides valuable insights into promising directions in this field.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Is Your Explanation Reliable: Confidence-Aware Explanation on Graph Neural Networks
ConfExplainer adds a confidence score to GNN edge explanations via a graph information bottleneck variant, claiming better explanation accuracy and reliability.
-
GNN's Uncertainty Quantification using Self-Distillation
A self-distilled multi-classifier GNN with a depth-weighted JSD disagreement metric quantifies predictive uncertainty efficiently.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.