Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Anomalous Boundary Modes in a Floquet Hyperbolic System

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A driven tight-binding model on the hyperbolic {8,3} lattice exhibits chiral boundary modes in both quasienergy gaps, realizing an anomalous Floquet phase.

desk verdict A credible Hamiltonian route to anomalous Floquet boundary modes on a hyperbolic lattice, with a genuinely useful puncture-based diagnostic; the main weakness is the single finite quotient behind the phase map, which needs a convergence check but is not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28719 v1 pith:X3KZULNV submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.otherquant-ph

Ali Fahimniya , Hossein Dehghani , Alicia J. Kollár , Alexey V. Gorshkov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.otherquant-ph
keywords hyperboliclatticeFloquettopologicalinsulatoranomalousphasechiralboundarymodesquasienergygapsspectralflowfour-colorhopping{83}tiling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a periodically driven tight-binding model on the hyperbolic {8,3} lattice can realize an anomalous Floquet topological phase – a phase whose boundary modes come from the entire time-evolution sequence rather than from static band topology. Near a perfect-hopping parameter value, the four-color hopping schedule makes bulk amplitude circulate in clockwise octagon loops, while truncated loops at a boundary produce counterclockwise chiral edge motion. In this regime both quasienergy gaps at εT=0 and εT=π are populated by boundary-localized states; near a different parameter value (two full hops per pulse) the same gaps are empty. The authors support this distinction with open-patch spectra, wave-packet dynamics, and a new puncture-based spectral-flow diagnostic that avoids the complications of hyperbolic lattices' extensive outer boundaries. If correct, the result shows that a synthetic hyperbolic lattice can host a boundary-dominated Floquet topological phase, a natural target for resonator and circuit implementations.

What carries the argument

The central object is a periodic four-coloring of the {8,3} edges with a 16-site fundamental domain: blue and red edges each form a perfect matching, and green plus orange edges form the third matching. The Floquet operator U_F = U_δ (U_o U_r U_g U_b)^4 (each U_μ a hopping pulse of duration T_s, followed by the sublattice-staggered U_δ) generates quasienergies via its eigenphases. At the perfect-hopping point JTs=π/2 each pulse becomes a perfect transfer, making the bulk dynamics deterministic octagon loops and boundary dynamics counterpropagating chiral motion. The puncture diagnostic removes one vertex from a compact 2048-site quotient, creating a seven-site boundary cycle; after seven Flo

What would settle it

A concrete check: compute the same quasienergy gap phase diagram on a different compact quotient (e.g., a larger symmetric graph or a supercell sequence converging to the infinite lattice). If a robust parameter region appears where the net chiral content of the ε=0 and ε=π gaps is unequal, the claimed absence of a Chern-band regime would be falsified. Alternatively, if the seven puncture-boundary branches at the quoted slope do not appear in the flux-resolved spectrum at JTs=1.1π/2, the boundary-mode diagnosis would be wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the {8,3} tiling, a 17-step Floquet drive (four color hops plus staggered potential) yields a topological regime near perfect hopping JTs=π/2: bulk amplitude loops clockwise around octagons while interrupted boundary cycles move counterclockwise, filling the εT=0 and εT=π gaps with chiral boundary states. Near JTs≈π the gaps are empty (trivial). A compact 2048-site quotient and a puncture spectral-flow diagnostic support this phase and show no Chern-band regime.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the two regimes relies on the assumption that the single 2048-site compact periodic quotient of the {8,3} tiling accurately represents the bulk gap structure of the infinite hyperbolic lattice, so that regions where the numerical gap measure is small truly correspond to gap closings rather than to finite-size artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the topological regime, boundary states appear in both quasienergy gaps with the same chirality, indicating vanishing Floquet-band Chern numbers and topology carried by the full time evolution.
  • The puncture-based spectral-flow diagnostic provides a way to detect anomalous boundary modes in hyperbolic lattices without relying on an extensive outer boundary, which is applicable to other topological hyperbolic models.
  • The model constitutes a hyperbolic analogue of the anomalous Floquet insulator, with real-space dynamics exhibiting persistent counterclockwise boundary propagation and no bulk penetration.
  • The four-color construction generalizes to any trivalent hyperbolic tiling whose faces admit a proper three-coloring, suggesting a broader class of hyperbolic Floquet models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to compute a bulk invariant—such as a translation-independent bulk-edge index or a real-space Floquet topological marker—for this hyperbolic model; the paper does not assign a numerical invariant, and such a computation would test whether the anomaly is captured by a bulk index in the infinite-lattice limit.
  • The predicted puncture-boundary slope d(εT)/d(φ/φ0)=2π×12/7 is a sharp, quantitative fingerprint; searching for these seven branches in an experimental implementation (e.g., a resonator or circuit lattice) would confirm the hyperbolic anomalous phase directly.
  • Because hyperbolic patches have extensive boundaries, the distinction between 'boundary' and 'bulk' is blurred; this model may serve as a testbed for real-space invariants that do not rely on momentum-space quantization, potentially extending recent many-body Chern-marker ideas to driven hyperbolic systems.
  • If the 2048-site quotient misrepresents the infinite-lattice gap structure, the phase boundaries shown in the gap map could shift; a convergence study using larger or differently constructed periodic quotients would sharpen the phase diagram and could reveal additional narrow phases that the finite-size diagnostic cannot resolve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a periodically driven tight-binding model on the hyperbolic {8,3} lattice, using a four-color edge-hopping sequence and a sublattice-staggered onsite potential. Near the perfect-hopping point JTs=π/2, exact diagonalization of open patches shows states inside both quasienergy gaps (εT=0 and εT=π), a wave packet built from an in-gap state propagates counterclockwise along the outer boundary, and a punctured 2048-site compact quotient displays seven spectral-flow branches crossing both gaps under magnetic flux. The authors interpret these observations as an anomalous (Rudner-type) Floquet phase with vanishing Floquet-band Chern numbers, separated from a trivial regime near JTs=π. They also propose a puncture-based spectral-flow diagnostic to sidestep the extensive boundary of finite hyperbolic flakes.

Significance. If the bulk-gap identification is robust, this is a timely and valuable contribution: it provides a concrete Hamiltonian Floquet realization of anomalous boundary modes on a negatively curved lattice, with no fitted parameters, exact diagonalization on large open patches (N=10800) and a compact quotient (N=2048), and a novel puncture diagnostic that avoids the extensive-boundary problem. The model is simple enough to be adapted to circuit or photonic platforms. However, the central phase classification currently relies on a single finite quotient for the bulk gap diagram and on diagnostics anchored to the perfect-hopping limit, so the claim that a genuine bulk anomalous Floquet phase has been constructed is not yet fully supported. The paper's own Sec. IV acknowledges the finite-size caveat, but the manuscript does not supply the convergence evidence needed to make that caveat harmless.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Fig. 3, Eq. (12)] The bulk phase identification rests entirely on the finite periodic spectrum of a single 2048-site genus-129 quotient from Ref. [40]. The dark gapped regions in Fig. 3, including the anomalous-regime point (JTs=1.1π/2, δTs=0.8π/2), are defined as having nonzero Δ̄=√(Δ0Δπ) on this one graph. No comparison with other quotients or with converging supercell sequences (Refs. [29,30]) is provided, despite the paper's own Sec. IV caveat that the diagram 'should be viewed as a practical finite-size bulk diagnostic.' If, on a different quotient or larger supercell, the 0 or π gap closes or the phase boundary shifts, the in-gap states in open patches and the seven puncture branches could be finite-graph artifacts rather than protected bulk-gap topology. Please add a convergence check: compute Δ0 and Δπ for at least two additional quotients of different size (and ideally along the phase boundaries)
  2. [§III.D, Eqs. (17)-(20)] The puncture spectral-flow slope d(εT)/d(φ/φ0)=24π/7 in Eq. (20) is derived analytically from the perfect-hopping site dynamics (Eqs. (17)-(18)), i.e., from the defining protocol itself. The numerical branches in Fig. 5(c) are an independent exact-diagonalization output, but the interpretation of equal chiral content in both gaps as 'anomalous' rather than 'Chern' is made without computing a Floquet winding number or any bulk invariant; the paper explicitly says 'We do not assign a numerical winding invariant.' The Rudner criterion requires knowing the gap labels and that the branch content is quantized in each gap. Since the branches hybridize with bulk bands away from perfect hopping, the seven-branch count and slopes are only approximate at JTs=1.1π/2. I recommend either computing a spectral-flow or winding invariant, or softening the claim from 'constructs an anomalous phase' to 'obs
  3. [§III.B, §IV] The statement that 'we find no numerical evidence for a separate Chern-band regime' is a negative conclusion drawn from one 2048-site graph and a handful of Hofstadter points (Appendix E). The phase diagram's geometric-mean gap by construction requires both Δ0 and Δπ to be large; a Chern-insulating regime in which one gap is small but topologically nontrivial could be missed. This claim should be removed or explicitly restricted to 'no evidence in the resolved gaps of the specific quotient studied,' unless a systematic parameter search and finite-size analysis is performed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§III.B] The text gives the Fig. 2 representative point as 'JTs=1.1π/2 with δTs=π/4', but Fig. 2's caption and Fig. 3's caption both specify δTs=0.8π/2 for the same curves; reconcile this inconsistency.
  2. [Appendix B, Fig. A2] The caption uses 'δT 1h = π/4'; the subscript is garbled and should be δTs, with the value matching the main text.
  3. [§II.A] The estimate that ~43% of sites participate in propagating boundary motion is stated without a quantitative extrapolation procedure; specify the fitted functional form, the finite-size values, and an uncertainty estimate.
  4. [Eq. (13)] The angular envelope uses the Euclidean polar angle in the Poincaré disk; clarify that this is a coordinate-space localization device rather than a geodesic-distance envelope, since wave-packet dynamics may depend on this choice.
  5. [References] The reference list contains numerous LaTeX artifacts (e.g., 'Koll´ ar', 'Schl¨ afli', 'Bzduˇ sek', 'F AR-Qu') and Ref. [33] is missing volume and page details; please fix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Floquet operator is explicitly defined, all diagnostics are exact-diagonalization outputs, and the perfect-hopping formulas are parameter-free predictions.

full rationale

The core derivation chain is self-contained. The model is a concrete Floquet operator, UF = Uδ(UoUrUgUb)^4 (Eq. 6), with no free parameters fitted to the target quantities. The bulk gap maps, open-boundary densities of states, wave-packet dynamics, and Hofstadter spectral-flow maps are all obtained by exact diagonalization of this defined operator. The perfect-hopping-point statements (bulk clockwise loops, boundary counterclockwise motion, and the seven-site puncture slope in Eq. 20) are analytical consequences of the protocol at JTs = π/2, derived from Eqs. (17)-(18), and are then compared with numerics at nearby parameters such as JTs = 1.1π/2. This is a parameter-free prediction followed by numerical confirmation, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The classification as an anomalous Floquet phase is made by applying the external Rudner criterion (chiral boundary states appearing in both 0 and π gaps with equal chiral content) to computed spectra; the paper explicitly states it does not assign a numerical winding invariant, which is a limitation but not a circular step. The only substantive weakness is the use of a single 2048-site periodic quotient for the bulk gap phase diagram, and the paper itself acknowledges this: 'The bulk phase diagram obtained from finite periodic lattices should be viewed as a practical finite-size bulk diagnostic.' This is a finite-size/correctness risk, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [19], [27], [48]) supply lattice constructions and outlook tools but are not load-bearing in a way that assumes the target result; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has no fitted parameters: J, δ, and Ts are inputs, and numerical choices (Lorentzian width, angular envelope, 401x401 grid) are resolution settings rather than quantities tuned to data. The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dynamical entities; the 'puncture-boundary cycle' is a geometric configuration, not a new physical object. The main unstated inputs are the existence of the specific coloring and the representativeness of the chosen finite quotient.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The {8,3} tiling admits the described 16-site periodic four-color edge coloring with blue/red perfect matchings and green+orange alternating matching.
    The entire drive depends on this coloring, stated in Sec. II A and Fig. 1, but it is not proven or tabulated in the text.
  • domain assumption The 2048-site genus-129 quotient graph from Ref. [40] is a faithful closed representation of the infinite {8,3} bulk for gap topology.
    Sec. III B uses a single finite quotient to map the bulk gap diagram; finite-size effects are acknowledged in Sec. IV but not quantified.
  • domain assumption Uniform magnetic flux can be implemented on the compact quotient with all noncontractible AB holonomies set to zero without affecting spectral-flow conclusions.
    Appendix C fixes one AB-flux configuration; the puncture cycle is contractible, but robustness to this gauge choice is not tested.
  • domain assumption The seven sites around a deleted vertex form a closed propagating puncture-boundary cycle at the perfect-hopping point.
    Sec. III D defines the diagnostic from this cycle; it is checked visually on the periodic graph, not by exhaustive enumeration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous Boundary Modes in a Floquet Hyperbolic System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X3KZULNV

@misc{pith2026260728719,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous Boundary Modes in a Floquet Hyperbolic System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X3KZULNV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28719}
}
abstract

We construct an anomalous Floquet topological phase on a negatively curved hyperbolic lattice. The model is a tight-binding Hamiltonian with a periodically repeated four-color edge-hopping sequence and a sublattice-staggered onsite potential step. The topological regime is reached near the limit in which a single hopping step transfers amplitude completely across an active edge, while the trivial regime is reached near the point where two full hops occur along an active edge during a single hopping step, returning the amplitude to its starting site. In finite open patches, the topological regime is characterized by bulk quasienergy gaps at $0$ and $\pi$ that are populated by in-gap states, in contrast to a trivial regime where these gaps remain empty. Using compact periodic lattices, we map the bulk $0$ and $\pi$ quasienergy gaps and identify the gapped regions connected to the trivial and anomalous open-boundary spectra. We diagnose the in-gap states as chiral boundary modes by their real-space dynamics. Finally, we introduce a small-boundary spectral-flow diagnostic based on punctured periodic hyperbolic lattices, which avoids the ambiguity associated with the extensive outer boundary of finite hyperbolic patches. This puncture-based diagnostic should be useful for studying other topological hyperbolic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28719 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows extended regions in which both the 0 and π bulk gaps are resolved, separated by regions where at least one of the two gaps becomes numerically small. The individual gap maps, ∆0 and ∆π, are shown in Ap￾pendix A. The two parameter points used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [40]

    Stegmaier, L

    A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, R. Thomale, and I. Boettcher, Universality of Hofstadter Butterflies on Hyperbolic Lattices, Physical Review Letters128, 166402 (2022)

    2022

  2. [1]

    Peierls phases are introduced only in the spectral- flow calculations discussed in Sec

    The hopping is real and thus reciprocal in the main model. Peierls phases are introduced only in the spectral- flow calculations discussed in Sec. III D. The hopping part of the drive consists of a 16-step se- quence obtained by repeating the four-step blue–green– red–orange hopping schedule four times. Each step has durationT s. The hopping sequence is f...

  3. [2]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically Driven Quan- tum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields, Physical Review X4, 031027 (2014)

    2014

  4. [3]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: From dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  5. [4]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 011004 (2017)

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  6. [5]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature Reviews Physics2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  7. [6]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Physical Review B79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  8. [7]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nature Physics7, 490 (2011)

    2011

Show all 52 references
  1. [8]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topo- logical characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Physical Review B82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  2. [9]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous Edge States and the Bulk-Edge Correspon- dence for Periodically Driven Two-Dimensional Systems, Physical Review X3, 031005 (2013)

    2013

  3. [10]

    Titum, E

    P. Titum, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Anomalous Floquet-Anderson Insulator as a Nonadiabatic Quantized Charge Pump, Physical Review X6, 021013 (2016)

    2016

  4. [11]

    Nathan and M

    F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, Topological singularities and the general classification of Floquet–Bloch systems, New Journal of Physics17, 125014 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    Roy and F

    R. Roy and F. Harper, Periodic table for Floquet topo- logical insulators, Physical Review B96, 155118 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  7. [14]

    L. J. Maczewsky, J. M. Zeuner, S. Nolte, and A. Szameit, Observation of photonic anomalous Floquet topological 10 insulators, Nature Communications8, 13756 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    Mukherjee, A

    S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, M. Valiente, E. Andersson, P. ¨Ohberg, N. Goldman, and R. R. Thomson, Experimen- tal observation of anomalous topological edge modes in a slowly driven photonic lattice, Nature Communications 8, 13918 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    Peng, C.-Z

    Y.-G. Peng, C.-Z. Qin, D.-G. Zhao, Y.-X. Shen, X.-Y. Xu, M. Bao, H. Jia, and X.-F. Zhu, Experimental demon- stration of anomalous Floquet topological insulator for sound, Nature Communications7, 13368 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    Wintersperger, C

    K. Wintersperger, C. Braun, F. N. ¨Unal, A. Eckardt, M. D. Liberto, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidels- burger, Realization of an anomalous Floquet topological system with ultracold atoms, Nature Physics16, 1058 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Afzal, T

    S. Afzal, T. J. Zimmerling, Y. Ren, D. Perron, and V. Van, Realization of Anomalous Floquet Insulators in Strongly Coupled Nanophotonic Lattices, Physical Re- view Letters124, 253601 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    V. A. Blatov, M. O’Keeffe, and D. M. Proserpio, Vertex- , face-, point-, Schl¨ afli-, and Delaney-symbols in nets, polyhedra and tilings: Recommended terminology, Crys- tEngComm12, 44 (2010)

    2010

  13. [20]

    A. J. Koll´ ar, M. Fitzpatrick, and A. A. Houck, Hyper- bolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature 571, 45 (2019)

    2019

  14. [21]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Hof- mann, T. Helbig, A. Vollhardt, M. Greiter, C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, H. Brand, T. Kießling, I. Boettcher, T. Ne- upert, R. Thomale, and T. Bzduˇ sek, Simulating hyper- bolic space on a circuit board, Nature Communications 13, ...

    2022

  15. [22]

    A. Chen, H. Brand, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, A. Fritzsche, T. Kießling, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Neupert, T. Bzduˇ sek, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and I. Boettcher, Hyperbolic matter in electrical circuits with tunable complex phases, Nature Communications14, 622 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Zhang, H

    W. Zhang, H. Yuan, N. Sun, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Ob- servation of novel topological states in hyperbolic lattices, Nature Communications13, 2937 (2022)

    2022

  17. [24]

    Huang, L

    L. Huang, L. He, W. Zhang, H. Zhang, D. Liu, X. Feng, F. Liu, K. Cui, Y. Huang, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Hy- perbolic photonic topological insulators, Nature Commu- nications15, 1647 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    H. Park, X. Piao, and S. Yu, Scalable and Programmable Emulation of Photonic Hyperbolic Lattices, ACS Pho- tonics11, 3890 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Maciejko and S

    J. Maciejko and S. Rayan, Hyperbolic band theory, Sci- ence Advances7(2021), arXiv:2008.05489

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Maciejko and S

    J. Maciejko and S. Rayan, Automorphic Bloch theo- rems for hyperbolic lattices, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences119, e2116869119 (2022), arXiv:2108.09314

    2022 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Boettcher, A

    I. Boettcher, A. V. Gorshkov, A. J. Koll´ ar, J. Maciejko, S. Rayan, and R. Thomale, Crystallography of hyperbolic lattices, Physical Review B105, 125118 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    Cheng, F

    N. Cheng, F. Serafin, J. McInerney, Z. Rocklin, K. Sun, and X. Mao, Band Theory and Boundary Modes of High- Dimensional Representations of Infinite Hyperbolic Lat- tices, Physical Review Letters129, 088002 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    F. R. Lux and E. Prodan, Converging Periodic Boundary Conditions and Detection of Topological Gaps on Regular Hyperbolic Tessellations, Physical Review Letters131, 176603 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, J. Maciejko, and T. Bzduˇ sek, Non- Abelian Hyperbolic Band Theory from Supercells, Phys- ical Review Letters131, 226401 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    S. Yu, X. Piao, and N. Park, Topological Hyperbolic Lat- tices, Physical Review Letters125, 053901 (2020)

    2020

  26. [33]

    Liu, C.-B

    Z.-R. Liu, C.-B. Hua, T. Peng, and B. Zhou, Chern in- sulator in a hyperbolic lattice, Physical Review B105, 245301 (2022)

    2022

  27. [34]

    D. M. Urwyler, P. M. Lenggenhager, I. Boettcher, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Hyperbolic Topologi- cal Band Insulators, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS (2022)

    2022

  28. [35]

    Liu, C.-B

    Z.-R. Liu, C.-B. Hua, T. Peng, R. Chen, and B. Zhou, Higher-order topological insulators in hyperbolic lattices, Physical Review B107, 125302 (2023)

    2023

  29. [36]

    Tao and Y

    Y.-L. Tao and Y. Xu, Higher-order topological hyperbolic lattices, Physical Review B107, 184201 (2023)

    2023

  30. [37]

    Zhang, F

    W. Zhang, F. Di, X. Zheng, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Hy- perbolic band topology with non-trivial second Chern numbers, Nature Communications14, 1083 (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    C. Sun, A. Chen, T. Bzduˇ sek, and J. Maciejko, Topolog- ical linear response of hyperbolic Chern insulators, Sci- Post Physics17, 124 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Q. Chen, Z. Zhang, H. Qin, A. Bossart, Y. Yang, H. Chen, and R. Fleury, Anomalous and Chern topo- logical waves in hyperbolic networks, Nature Communi- cations15, 2293 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Conder and P

    M. Conder and P. Dobcs´ anyi, Trivalent symmetric graphs on up to 768 vertices, Journal of Combinatorial Mathe- matics and Combinatorial Computing40, 41 (2002)

    2002

  34. [42]

    J. K. Asb´ oth and A. Alberti, Spectral Flow and Global Topology of the Hofstadter Butterfly, Physical Review Letters118, 216801 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Mosseri and J

    R. Mosseri and J. Vidal, Density of states of tight-binding models in the hyperbolic plane, Physical Review B108, 035154 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Titum, N

    P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. C. Rechtsman, and G. Refael, Disorder-induced Floquet Topological Insu- lators, Physical Review Letters114, 056801 (2015), arXiv:1403.0592 [cond-mat]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bianco and R

    R. Bianco and R. Resta, Mapping topological order in coordinate space, Physical Review B84, 241106 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    M. B. Hastings and T. A. Loring, Topological insulators andC∗-algebras: Theory and numerical practice, Annals of Physics July 2011 Special Issue,326, 1699 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    T. A. Loring and M. B. Hastings, Disordered topological insulators via C*-algebras, Europhysics Letters92, 67004 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    Resta, Quantum-Mechanical Position Operator in Extended Systems, Physical Review Letters80, 1800 (1998)

    R. Resta, Quantum-Mechanical Position Operator in Extended Systems, Physical Review Letters80, 1800 (1998)

    1998

  41. [49]

    Dehghani, Z.-P

    H. Dehghani, Z.-P. Cian, M. Hafezi, and M. Barkeshli, Extraction of the many-body Chern number from a single wave function, Physical Review B103, 075102 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    G. M. Graf and C. Tauber, Bulk–Edge Correspondence for Two-Dimensional Floquet Topological Insulators, An- nales Henri Poincar´ e19, 709 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    A. K. Ghosh, R. Arouca, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Lo- 11 cal and energy-resolved topological invariants for Floquet systems, Physical Review B110, 245306 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    bulk state

    L. Peralta Gavensky, G. Usaj, and N. Goldman, Stˇ reda Formula for Floquet Systems: Topological Invariants and Quantized Anomalies from Ces` aro Summation, Physical Review X15, 031067 (2025). Appendix A: Individual quasienergy gaps In the main text, the bulk phase diagram is s...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.