Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Plausible Deniability for Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1708.07975 v1 pith:X3PMVUC2 submitted 2017-08-26 cs.CR cs.DBcs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CRcs.DBcs.LGstat.ML
keywords dataprivacydeniabilityplausiblereleasingbackgrounddatasetshand
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Releasing full data records is one of the most challenging problems in data privacy. On the one hand, many of the popular techniques such as data de-identification are problematic because of their dependence on the background knowledge of adversaries. On the other hand, rigorous methods such as the exponential mechanism for differential privacy are often computationally impractical to use for releasing high dimensional data or cannot preserve high utility of original data due to their extensive data perturbation. This paper presents a criterion called plausible deniability that provides a formal privacy guarantee, notably for releasing sensitive datasets: an output record can be released only if a certain amount of input records are indistinguishable, up to a privacy parameter. This notion does not depend on the background knowledge of an adversary. Also, it can efficiently be checked by privacy tests. We present mechanisms to generate synthetic datasets with similar statistical properties to the input data and the same format. We study this technique both theoretically and experimentally. A key theoretical result shows that, with proper randomization, the plausible deniability mechanism generates differentially private synthetic data. We demonstrate the efficiency of this generative technique on a large dataset; it is shown to preserve the utility of original data with respect to various statistical analysis and machine learning measures.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synthetic Tabular Data Generation: A Comparative Survey for Modern Techniques

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes tabular data synthesis by generation objectives and adds a benchmark comparison of six models on Adult and CreditRisk.

Pith tools