Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Analysis of time dependence of DAMA annual modulation amplitude

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.06724 v2 pith:X4UCEQ3B submitted 2021-06-12 astro-ph.CO hep-exhep-ph

Bayesian Analysis of time dependence of DAMA annual modulation amplitude

classification astro-ph.CO hep-exhep-ph
keywords damabayesianamplitudesanalysisfirstlibramodulationphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We implement a test of the variability of the per-cycle annual modulation amplitude in the different phases of the DAMA/LIBRA experiment using Bayesian model comparison. Using frequentist methods, a previous study (Kelso et al 2018) had demonstrated that the DAMA amplitudes spanning over the DAMA/NaI and the first phase of the DAMA/LIBRA phases, show a mild preference for time-dependence in multiple energy bins. With that motivation, we first show using Bayesian techniques that the aforementioned data analyzed in Kelso et al, show a moderate preference for exponentially varying amplitudes in the 2-5 and 2-6 keV energy intervals. We then carry out a similar analysis on the latest modulation amplitudes released by the DAMA collaboration from the first two phases of the upgraded DAMA/LIBRA experiment. We also analyze the single-hit residual rates released by the DAMA collaboration to further look for any possible time-dependency. However, we do not find any evidence for variability of either of the two datasets by using Bayesian model selection. All our analysis codes and datasets have been made publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for Annual Modulation in Combined ANAIS 112 and COSINE 100 Data using Bayesian Model Comparison

    hep-ex 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    Bayesian model comparison of combined ANAIS-112/COSINE-100 residuals finds no meaningful support for an annual cosine modulation (ln Bayes factor < 1.2).