Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Lower bounds on the non-Clifford resources for quantum computations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.01124 v2 pith:X5IAF4ON submitted 2019-04-01 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords statesstabilizerboundsnumberresourcecomputationsconversionslower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We establish lower-bounds on the number of resource states, also known as magic states, needed to perform various quantum computing tasks, treating stabilizer operations as free. Our bounds apply to adaptive computations using measurements and an arbitrary number of stabilizer ancillas. We consider (1) resource state conversion, (2) single-qubit unitary synthesis, and (3) computational tasks. To prove our resource conversion bounds we introduce two new monotones, the stabilizer nullity and the dyadic monotone, and make use of the already-known stabilizer extent. We consider conversions that borrow resource states, known as catalyst states, and return them at the end of the algorithm. We show that catalysis is necessary for many conversions and introduce new catalytic conversions, some of which are close to optimal. By finding a canonical form for post-selected stabilizer computations, we show that approximating a single-qubit unitary to within diamond-norm precision $\varepsilon$ requires at least $1/7\cdot\log_2(1/\varepsilon) - 4/3$ $T$-states on average. This is the first lower bound that applies to synthesis protocols using fall-back, mixing techniques, and where the number of ancillas used can depend on $\varepsilon$. Up to multiplicative factors, we optimally lower bound the number of $T$ or $CCZ$ states needed to implement the ubiquitous modular adder and multiply-controlled-$Z$ operations. When the probability of Pauli measurement outcomes is 1/2, some of our bounds become tight to within a small additive constant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Magic without a phase: phase-independent stabilizer R\'enyi entropy in gluon scattering

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A phase-averaged stabilizer Rényi entropy is introduced for tree-level gluon scattering, with color-independent phase-independent magic that is larger in 3→2 than 2→2 and has a soft-limit lower bound in 2→3.

  2. Magic Gate Teleportation: Structure, Useful Resource States, and Simpler Feedforward

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    MGT protocols encode the input into a measurement-heralded stabilizer code then apply a logical non-Clifford gate; useful resource states are Clifford-equivalent to diagonal states, and feedforward can often be Pauli.

  3. Connecting Magic Dynamics in Thermofield Double States to Spectral Form Factors

    quant-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For chaotic all-to-all systems, the stabilizer Rényi entropy of thermofield double states is set by the spectral form factor and saturates through a first-order dynamical transition.

  4. Magic-protected entanglement and Clifford-irreducible structure in magic state space

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quantum states are classified by how much bipartite entanglement survives optimal simplification by classically easy Clifford operations, yielding a split into weakly protected T-magic and strongly protected W-magic regimes.

  5. No-Go Theorems for Quantum Resource Purification

    quant-ph 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Perfect purification of full-rank noisy resource states is impossible under any free protocol, and any success has an error at least λ_min(ρ)(1-f_ψ)/(1+R(ρ)) relative to the success probability.

Pith tools