Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 23 references

In Paris, dense local services are associated with less driving and more walking and cycling, though the link weakens in the outer suburbs.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-05 00:47 UTC pith:X5SD4E3E

load-bearing objection A promising abstract that hinges entirely on whether the stop/mode segmentation is validated; without that, the main association could be an artifact. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00815 v2 pith:X5SD4E3E submitted 2026-08-01 cs.LG

Paris as a 15-Minute City: An Explainable AI Perspective

Andr\'as J. Moln\'ar , Csaba I. Sidl\'o , Rita R\'onai , Domonkos R\'ozsay This is my paper
classification cs.LG
keywords 15-minute cityexplainable AIactive mobilitypoints of interesttrip mode choiceParisurban mobilitygradient-boosted trees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the central assumption of the 15-minute city—that everyday services within a short walk or cycle reduce car dependence—holds in a real metropolis. Using roughly 70,000 trip segments from mobile-phone trajectories in the Paris area, enriched with census and mapping data, the authors build walking- and cycling-based service-availability indicators and relate them to trip duration, transport mode, and short-trip car use. They find that higher service availability is associated with less private motorized travel and more active mobility, but the association is substantially weaker in the outer agglomeration. Gradient-boosted tree models, interpreted with explainable-AI methods, consistently identify trip purpose, home–work distance, service availability, vehicle ownership, transit subscription, and sociodemographic context as key predictors. For short trips, high service density is associated with lower car use, while car ownership and licence availability work in the opposite direction.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that local service availability, measured by the density of points of interest within walking and cycling distance, is empirically associated with mobility behaviour in the direction the 15-minute-city concept predicts: more services coincide with fewer private motorized trips and more active mobility in the Paris metropolitan area. This relationship is not homogeneous; it is substantially weaker in the outer agglomeration. The paper also shows that machine-learning models with explainable-AI attribution methods rank trip purpose, home–work distance, service availability, vehicle ownership, public-transport subscription, and sociodemographics as the principal pre

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on two linked instruments. First, walking- and cycling-based service-availability indicators, built from the density of points of interest within reachable distance, operationalize the 15-minute-city idea as a measurable neighbourhood attribute. Second, gradient-boosted tree models capture the non-linear and interacting relationships between these availability indicators and trip outcomes, and explainable-AI feature-attribution methods reveal which predictors matter and how their attributions shift under alternative variable orderings. Together they turn an abstract planning concept into a quantitative, interpretable empirical association.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the assumption that the stop-based segmentation and data cleaning of mobile-phone trajectories correctly identify trip origins, destinations, and modes, and that service density within walking or cycling distance correctly measures what residents can actually reach; misclassified short car trips would make the service–active-travel link look stronger than it is.

What would settle it

Validating the trajectory-derived modes and trip purposes against a ground-truth travel diary on a sample of the same trips, or running a randomized before-and-after comparison where services close in one area and open in a comparable area, would settle whether the reported association is real. If mode misclassification systematically converts short car trips into active trips, the association would weaken or disappear.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If the central association is causal rather than merely correlational, then filling local service gaps in dense neighbourhoods should shift short trips from cars to walking and cycling.
  • The weaker effect in the outer agglomeration implies that 15-minute-city policies cannot be a one-size-fits-all zoning rule; peripheries likely need complementary measures such as better transit connections.
  • For short trips, car ownership and licence availability are the strongest forces pushing back against service density, suggesting that policies addressing household car dependence are needed even where services are dense.
  • In service-sparse areas, public-transport subscription is associated with lower predicted car dependence, pointing to transit as a substitute for local services.
  • The consistent ranking of non-availability predictors (trip purpose, home–work distance, sociodemographics) indicates that service availability alone cannot explain mobility; any policy built on the 15-minute-city concept must account for these structural factors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observational cross-sectional design cannot rule out residential self-selection: people who prefer active travel may choose service-rich neighbourhoods, which would make the association partly a reflection of preferences rather than services causing behaviour.
  • A natural testable extension is a temporal analysis of neighbourhoods that gain or lose a substantial share of everyday services, to see whether trip-mode shares shift in the predicted direction.
  • The weak outer-agglomeration effect might be explained by intervening variables such as employment decentralization or parking availability; adding those measures to the model could locate where service density stops mattering.
  • The paper's ordering-robustness analysis for feature attributions points to a broader methodological practice: any XAI-based feature ranking in mobility research should be paired with a check of how sensitive it is to the order in which variables are considered.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper examines the relationship between local service availability and observed mobility in the Paris metropolitan area. Using NetMob 2025 mobility trajectories, INSEE sociodemographic data, and OpenStreetMap points of interest (POIs), the authors construct walking- and cycling-based accessibility indicators and analyze roughly 70,000 trip segments. They report that higher POI availability is associated with less private motorized travel and more active mobility, with weaker effects in the outer agglomeration. Gradient-boosted tree models with explainable AI methods identify trip purpose, home–work distance, service availability, vehicle ownership, public-transport subscription, and sociodemographic context as important predictors. For short trips, high POI density is associated with lower predicted car use, while car ownership and licence availability are associated with higher predicted car use. The authors suggest the results are consistent with 15-minute city assumptions and demonstrate the value of explainable ML for urban policy.

Significance. If the measurement pipeline is valid, the paper offers a large-scale, data-rich complement to accessibility indicators and provides a template for using explainable ML in urban mobility analysis. The explicit use of spatial and demographic heterogeneity, the large sample size, and the attempt to examine robustness to variable orderings in XAI are commendable. The findings would be policy-relevant and could motivate local hypotheses for further study. However, the significance is conditional on the validity of trip segmentation and mode inference, which the abstract does not document.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, data description] The central claim—that higher POI availability is associated with less car use and more active mobility—rests entirely on the stop-based segmentation and mode inference applied to NetMob trajectories. The abstract provides no validation of this pipeline. Mobile-location data of this type typically require heuristic segmentation; short car trips in dense urban traffic have low average speeds and can easily be misclassified as walking or cycling. Such misclassification would be non-random and more likely exactly in high-POI, short-trip settings, directly creating the reported negative association. The manuscript must report a confusion matrix or other ground-truth validation on a labeled sample, or present a sensitivity analysis bounding the effect of plausible misclassification rates.
  2. [Abstract, model results] The abstract reports that gradient-boosted models 'consistently identify' several predictors, but gives no information on model validation: no cross-validation scheme, no held-out performance metrics, no confidence intervals or error bars, and no stability analysis of feature attributions. Without these, the reader cannot distinguish robust associations from overfitted artifacts. Details of hyperparameter tuning, data splitting, and uncertainty quantification are essential to support the claim of consistency.
  3. [Abstract, sociodemographic controls] The abstract mentions inclusion of INSEE sociodemographic data but does not state how confounding is addressed. The association between POI availability and mode choice may be confounded by residential sorting, land-use patterns, public-transport supply, and neighborhood wealth. The manuscript should clarify whether associations are adjusted for these factors, and if so, how; if not, the causal language implicit in 'associated with' should be softened and a discussion of residual confounding added.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, sample] The abstract reports 'approximately 70,000 trip segments after stop-based segmentation and data cleaning.' Please report the attrition rate and any exclusion criteria, as selective cleaning may bias the sample toward certain trip types or areas.
  2. [Abstract, XAI ordering] The phrase 'alternative assumed variable orderings' is unclear. Please specify the XAI method (e.g., SHAP, LIME, permutation importance) and what orderings are varied, so that readers can assess the robustness claim.
  3. [Abstract, spatial definition] The term 'outer agglomeration' is used but not defined. Specify which administrative or functional zones are included in this category, as boundary choices can affect the reported heterogeneity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified from the abstract; the associations are empirical findings rather than fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The abstract describes an empirical study of the Paris metropolitan area using NetMob trajectories, INSEE sociodemographic data, and OpenStreetMap POIs. The central results are reported associations between POI availability and mobility outcomes, derived from data rather than from a first-principles derivation that could reduce to its own inputs. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are visible. The use of gradient-boosted trees and XAI identifies predictive importance from the data; this is model description, not a circular claim. The skeptical concern about trip-segmentation misclassification of short car trips as active trips is a measurement-validity threat and a potential source of bias, but it is not a circularity: the paper does not define its segmentation in terms of the outcome, and the abstract does not claim the segmentation was validated. Without the full text, no specific reduction of a claimed result to an input by construction can be exhibited. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

From the abstract alone, no explicit free parameters are visible. The analysis relies on unstated thresholds for stop segmentation, data cleaning, and model hyperparameters, which would be free parameters in the full text. The main domain assumptions are that POI density proxies accessibility and that cleaned trajectories represent real trip behavior.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption POI density within walking/cycling distance is a valid proxy for local service accessibility
    The paper constructs walking- and cycling-based indicators from OSM POIs; if this proxy is poor, the association results are weakened.
  • domain assumption The cleaned NetMob trip segments are representative of Paris mobility after stop-based segmentation
    Data cleaning and segmentation could introduce selection bias; full details unavailable in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 638 in / 6438 out tokens · 68223 ms · 2026-08-05T00:47:59.745557+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Paris as a 15-Minute City: An Explainable AI Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X5SD4E3E

@misc{pith2026260800815,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Paris as a 15-Minute City: An Explainable AI Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X5SD4E3E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00815}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The 15-minute city promotes access to everyday services within a short walk or bicycle ride, but its relationship with observed mobility remains difficult to quantify. We investigate this relationship in the Paris metropolitan area using mobility trajectories from the NetMob 2025 Data Challenge, enriched with INSEE sociodemographic data and OpenStreetMap points of interest (POIs), yielding approximately 70,000 trip segments after stop-based segmentation and data cleaning. We construct walking- and cycling-based indicators of local service availability and examine their associations with trip duration, transport mode, and short-trip car use. Higher POI availability is associated with less private motorized travel and more active mobility, although this relationship is substantially weaker in the outer agglomeration. Gradient-boosted tree models interpreted with explainable machine-learning methods consistently identify trip purpose, home--work distance, local service availability, vehicle ownership, public-transport subscription, and sociodemographic context as important predictors. For short trips, high POI density is associated with lower car use, while car ownership and driving-licence availability are associated with higher predicted car use; where services are sparse, public-transport subscription is associated with lower predicted car dependence. Finally, explainable AI (XAI) methods are used to examine how feature attributions change under alternative assumed variable orderings. The results are consistent with central assumptions of the 15-minute city while revealing substantial spatial and demographic heterogeneity. They also demonstrate how explainable machine-learning methods can complement accessibility indicators and identify locally relevant hypotheses for urban-mobility policy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00815 by Andr\'as J. Moln\'ar, Csaba I. Sidl\'o, Domonkos R\'ozsay, Rita R\'onai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Correspondence map between the duration of all private motorized trips per person and the 15-minute POI availability In the third step of our correlation analysis, multiple variables were taken into account. Here, the three-way trip categorization offered clearer insights: public transport time negatively correlated with private motorized trips (suggesting a ’car user’/’public transport user’ divide), and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pearson correlations of important features: 15-minute POIs, total and trip-grouped travel times, number of leisure-aimed trips, age, higher education (4-5 years or more) and living arrangement (alone or with family) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relationship between 15-minute POI availability and private motorized travel, shown by metropolitan zone. Several XGBoost models were trained and evaluated to predict the duration of trip segments, using descriptive features of the trips themselves, along with sociodemographic and 15-minute POI accessibility features of participant’s homes and the segment start points. We deliberately excluded features tha… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relationship between 15-minute POI availability and the proportion of trips made by walking or cycling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SHAP beeswarm plot with the most important input features and their impact on an XGBoost model trained to predict segment length differs from going to work). The most important INSEE feature that did not rank among the ten most important features is DISP_S80S20S20, which is the "S80/S20" ratio of disposable income. In this model, higher values of the local disposable-income S80/S20 ratio are associated wit… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diversity of transport-mode choices, measured by normalised Shannon entropy, by trip-segment duration and average speed. Higher values indicate more diverse mode choices. the frequency of "WALKING" as a trip mode. The data aligns well with the 15-minute city concept regarding average speed, as 5 km/h appears to be a good threshold, except for very short durations. However, the duration behaves differently,… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Proportion of trip segments whose recorded mode is walking, by duration and average speed. 3.6 Transport Modes of 15-minute Trips Predicting the transport modes of trip segments results in models with AUC values between 0.70 and 0.85. Similar groups of highly ranked features emerge across the tested model configurations. Given this, it is particularly interesting to analyse the key factors associated with … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SHAP beeswarm plot for an XGBoost model predicting whether a trip segment falls within the defined 15-minute walking envelope. • P urpose_OD: the merged origin and destination purposes of the trip • C20_H15P_CS3: an INSEE statistic for user home location, the number of men aged 15 or older who are classified as "Managers and higher intellectual professions" according to the 2020 census • DEC_P P EN20: an I… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SHAP beeswarm plot for an XGBoost model predicting whether a trip segment falls within the defined 15-minute cycling envelope. • Conversely, in areas with a low density of POIs, having a public-transport subscription is associated with a lower predicted probability of car use. This suggests that the availability and ease of access to such subscriptions may be linked to transport-mode choice. • Business-to-… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: SHAP beeswarm plot for an XGBoost model predicting walking as the main trip mode. of the attribution method to correlated inputs. These results should be interpreted as sensitivity of model explanations to assumed variable orderings, rather than as identification of causal effects. 4 Conclusion and Future Work The NetMob dataset, enriched with sociodemographic and geographic data, provides a useful basis … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SHAP beeswarm plot for an XGBoost model predicting car use among trips within the defined 15-minute cycling envelope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Percentage of maximum 15-minute trips no faster than the average cycling speed, according to the source and destination purposes. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Percentage of trips with walking or bicycle modes, according to the source and destination purposes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: An example decision tree for predicting car use for trip segments no longer than 15 minutes and no faster than the defined cycling-speed threshold. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: An example decision tree for predicting car use for trip segments no longer than 15 minutes and no faster than the defined cycling-speed threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparison of conventional SHAP and two asymmetric SHAP orderings for the model predicting private car use on short, low-speed trip segments. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The 15-minute city quantified using mobility data

    Timur Abbiasov, Cate Heine, Edward L Glaeser, Carlo Ratti, Sadegh Sabouri, Arianna Salazar Miranda, and Paolo Santi. The 15-minute city quantified using mobility data. Working Paper 30752, National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2022. URLhttp://www.nber.org/papers/w30752

    2022

  2. [2]

    The 15-minute city: Interpreting the model to bring out urban resiliencies.Transportation Research Procedia, 60:330–337, 2022

    Lamia Abdelfattah, Diego Deponte, and Giovanna Fossa. The 15-minute city: Interpreting the model to bring out urban resiliencies.Transportation Research Procedia, 60:330–337, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro. 2021.12.043

    doi:10.1016/j.trpro 2022

  3. [3]

    Mapping the Implementation Practices of the 15-Minute City: A Review and Framework.Smart Cities, 7(4):83, 2024

    Zaheer Allam and Simon Elias Bibri. Mapping the Implementation Practices of the 15-Minute City: A Review and Framework.Smart Cities, 7(4):83, 2024. doi: 10.3390/smartcities7040083

    doi:10.3390/smartcities7040083 2024

  4. [4]

    The 15-minute city as paranoid urbanism: Ten critical reflections.Cities, 155:105497, 2024

    Federico Caprotti, Catalina Duarte, and Simon Joss. The 15-minute city as paranoid urbanism: Ten critical reflections.Cities, 155:105497, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105497

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Kouam, Aline C

    Alexandre Chasse, Anne J. Kouam, Aline C. Viana, Razvan Stanica, Wellington V. Lobato, Geymerson Ramos, Geoffrey Deperle, Abdelmounaim Bouroudi, Suzanne Bussod, and Fernando Molano. The netmob25 dataset: A high-resolution multi-layered view of individual mobility in greater paris region,

  6. [6]

    15-minute city mapping report.https://dutpartnership.eu/ wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DUT_15-minute-City-Mapping_04-2024.pdf , 2024

    Driving Urban Transitions Partnership. 15-minute city mapping report.https://dutpartnership.eu/ wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DUT_15-minute-City-Mapping_04-2024.pdf , 2024. Accessed: 2025- 07-14

    2024

  7. [7]

    15-minute city: A transition pathway for mobility and neigh- bourhood living

    Driving Urban Transitions Partnership. 15-minute city: A transition pathway for mobility and neigh- bourhood living. https://dutpartnership.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DUT_Partnership_ 15-minute_City_PositionPaper.pdf, 2024. Accessed: 2025-07-14

    2024

  8. [8]

    Movingpandas: efficient structures for movement data in python.GIForum, 1:54–68, 2019

    Anita Graser. Movingpandas: efficient structures for movement data in python.GIForum, 1:54–68, 2019

    2019

  9. [9]

    Population en 2020: Recensement de la population – base infracommunale (iris)

    INSEE. Population en 2020: Recensement de la population – base infracommunale (iris). https: //www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7704076, 2023. Accessed: 2025-07-14

    arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Causal explanations for performance in radio networks

    Domokos Miklós Kelen, Péter Kersch, András Benczúr, et al. Causal explanations for performance in radio networks. InCEUR WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, volume 3189, 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    Geurs, Alex Mulders, and Sander van der Drift

    Elizabeth Knap, Mehmet Baran Ulak, Karst T. Geurs, Alex Mulders, and Sander van der Drift. A composite x-minute city cycling accessibility metric and its role in assessing spatial and socioeconomic inequalities – a case study in utrecht, the netherlands.Journal of Urban Mobility, 3:100043, 2023. ISSN 2667-0917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.1...

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) 2.0: A manifesto of open challenges and interdisciplinary research directions.Information Fusion, 106:102301, 2024

    Luca Longo, Mario Brcic, Federico Cabitza, Jaesik Choi, Roberto Confalonieri, Javier Del Ser, Riccardo Guidotti, Yoichi Hayashi, Francisco Herrera, Andreas Holzinger, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) 2.0: A manifesto of open challenges and interdisciplinary research directions.Information Fusion, 106:102301, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    A unified approach to interpreting model predictions

    Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pages 4765–4774. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URLhttp: //papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpr...

    2017

  14. [14]

    15-Minute City

    Carlos Moreno, Zaheer Allam, Didier Chabaud, Catherine Gall, and Florent Pratlong. Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4(1):93–111, 2021. ISSN 2624-6511. doi: 10.3390/smartcities4010006. URL https: //www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/4/1/6

    doi:10.3390/smartcities4010006 2021

  15. [15]

    Time to challenge the 15-minute city: Seven pitfalls for sustainability, equity, livability, and spatial analysis.Cities, 153:105274, 2024

    Kostas Mouratidis. Time to challenge the 15-minute city: Seven pitfalls for sustainability, equity, livability, and spatial analysis.Cities, 153:105274, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105274. 16

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    OpenStreetMap planet data, October 2022 extract

    OpenStreetMap contributors. OpenStreetMap planet data, October 2022 extract. https://www. openstreetmap.org, 2022

    2022

  17. [17]

    15-minute city: Decomposing the new urban planning eutopia.Sustainability, 13(2), 2021

    Georgia Pozoukidou and Zoi Chatziyiannaki. 15-minute city: Decomposing the new urban planning eutopia.Sustainability, 13(2), 2021. ISSN 2071-1050. doi: 10.3390/su13020928. URL https://www. mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/928

    doi:10.3390/su13020928 2021

  18. [18]

    Oshdb - openstreetmap history data analysis (0.7.2), Sep 2021

    Martin Raifer, Rafael Troilo, Franz-Benjamin Mocnik, and Moritz Schott. Oshdb - openstreetmap history data analysis (0.7.2), Sep 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    The 15-minute city: Assumptions, op- portunities, and limitations.Bulletin of Geography

    Daniela Szymańska, Ewa Szafrańska, and Michał Korolko. The 15-minute city: Assumptions, op- portunities, and limitations.Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 66:137–151, 2024. doi: 10.12775/bgss-2024-0038

    doi:10.12775/bgss-2024-0038 2024

  20. [20]

    City composition and accessibility statistics in and around paris.Frontiers in big Data, 7:1354007, 2024

    Marie-Olive Thaury, Simon Genet, Léopold Maurice, Paola Tubaro, and Sarah J Berkemer. City composition and accessibility statistics in and around paris.Frontiers in big Data, 7:1354007, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    A guide to 15-minute cities: why are they so controversial? https://www.ube.ac.uk/whats-happening/articles/15-minute-city/, 2023

    University of the Built Environment. A guide to 15-minute cities: why are they so controversial? https://www.ube.ac.uk/whats-happening/articles/15-minute-city/, 2023. Accessed: 2025-07- 14

    2023

  22. [22]

    Min Weng, Ning Ding, Jing Li, Xianfeng Jin, He Xiao, Zhiming He, and Shiliang Su. The 15-minute walk- able neighborhoods: Measurement, social inequalities and implications for building healthy communities in urban china.Journal of Transport & Health, 13:259–273, 2019. 17

    2019

  23. [2025]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05903

    Pith/arXiv arXiv