REVIEW 2 cited by
What makes math problems hard for reinforcement learning: a case study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Using a long-standing conjecture from combinatorial group theory, we explore, from multiple perspectives, the challenges of finding rare instances carrying disproportionately high rewards. Based on lessons learned in the context defined by the Andrews-Curtis conjecture, we propose algorithmic enhancements and a topological hardness measure with implications for a broad class of search problems. As part of our study, we also address several open mathematical questions. Notably, we demonstrate the length reducibility of all but two presentations in the Akbulut-Kirby series (1981), and resolve various potential counterexamples in the Miller-Schupp series (1991), including three infinite subfamilies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Machine-checkable equivalence certificates at the length-14 Andrews-Curtis frontier
Explicit elementary-move certificates prove two MS(3) presentations AC-equivalent to AK(3) and realize the automorphism σ on the two remaining open MS(2) classes at length 14.
-
Andrews-Curtis groups
For torsion-free non-elementary hyperbolic groups, every non-identity Andrews-Curtis transformation moves some nontrivial k-tuple, making the full and ordinary Andrews-Curtis groups isomorphic.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.