Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An exact algorithm for biobjective integer programming problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.07428 v2 pith:X6MZ5QVL submitted 2019-05-17 math.OC

An exact algorithm for biobjective integer programming problems

classification math.OC
keywords algorithmalgorithmsdifferentexactexperimentssolutionstimeunder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an exact algorithm for solving biobjective integer programming problems, which arise in various applications of operations research. The algorithm is based on solving Pascoletti-Serafini scalarizations to search specified regions (boxes) in the objective space and returns the set of nondominated points. We implement the algorithm with different strategies, where the choices of the scalarization model parameters and splitting rule differ. We then derive bounds on the number of scalarization models solved; and demonstrate the performances of the variants through computational experiments both as exact algorithms and as solution approaches under time restriction. The experiments demonstrate that different strategies have advantages in different aspects: while some are quicker in finding the whole set of nondominated solutions, others return good-quality solutions in terms of representativeness when run under time restriction. We also compare the proposed approach with existing algorithms. The results of our experiments show the satisfactory behaviour of our algorithm, especially when run under time limit, as it achieves better coverage of the whole frontier with a smaller number of solutions compared to the existing algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.