Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 69 references

On the global well-posedness for the nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation with the weighted Sobolev initial data on the line

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For initial data with small effective potential, the reverse space-time nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation is globally well-posed.

desk verdict The IST/RH framework is real, but the main theorem is false: Prop. 3.8 uses the target equation to prove scattering decay, and admissible Gaussians give a concrete counterexample. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19649 v1 pith:X7LEJERW submitted 2026-07-22 nlin.SI math-phmath.APmath.MPphysics.opticsquant-ph

Zhenya Yan , Guoqiang Zhang , Guancheng Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.APmath.MPphysics.opticsquant-ph MSC 35P2535Q5135Q1535A0135G2537K15
keywords nonlocalFokas-Lenellsequationreversespace-timesymmetryglobalwell-posednessRiemann-HilbertprobleminversescatteringtransformweightedSobolevspacecoercivityLipschitzcontinuoussolutionmap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that the reverse space-time nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation — q_xt − q + i q q(−x,−t) q_x = 0 — is globally well posed: for any initial profile q0 in the weighted Sobolev space H^3(R) ∩ H^{2,1}(R) whose derivative-built effective potential has L^1 norm below ln(3/2), there is a unique solution q(x,t) defined for every real t and remaining in the same space. The intended payoff is both existential and structural: uniqueness holds, the solution map q0 ↦ q is Lipschitz continuous, and the analysis supplies a coercive inverse-scattering framework despite the loss of Hermitian-conjugation symmetry typical of nonlocal reductions. If the proof is right, a whole class of small effective-potential data evolves uniquely in both time directions, with weighted Sobolev regularity preserved at all times.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the spectral uniformization z = λ^2 together with a gauge-transformed Zakharov-Shabat problem whose potential is the effective 2×2 matrix built from q_x and (q(−x))_x. Volterra estimates for this problem convert the smallness condition ∥Q~0∥_{L1} < ln(3/2) into uniform pointwise bounds |r1|, |r2| ≤ c0 < 1 on the continuous spectrum. Those bounds are exactly what turn the Hermitian part of the otherwise non-Hermitian jump matrix I + V into a uniformly positive definite matrix, yielding the coercivity needed for the Fredholm and vanishing-lemma argument. This coercivity gives bounded invertibility of the Beals-Coifman singular integral operator associated with the

What would settle it

Compute the coefficient b3 in the expansion b(λ) = b3 λ^3 + b5 λ^5 + ⋯ directly from the Wronskian for q0(x) = ε e^{−x^2}. For small ε the theorem's smallness condition is satisfied, but the calculation gives b3 = 2√π ε ≠ 0, directly contradicting the claim in Prop. 3.8 that b(λ) = O(λ^5).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 states: if q0 ∈ H3 ∩ H2,1 and the L1 norm of its derivative-built effective potential is below ln(3/2), the reverse space-time nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation has a unique global solution in the same weighted Sobolev class, and the solution map is Lipschitz continuous. The proof constructs the solution by inverse scattering: a gauge transformation together with the uniformizing variable z = λ^2 converts the singular spectral problem into a Zakharov-Shabat-type problem; the smallness condition makes the non-Hermitian jump matrix coercive; a Fredholm alternative and vanishing-lemma argument then invert the associated singular integral operator; and the reconstruction formulas recov

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for every admissible initial datum, the scattering coefficient b(λ) vanishes to fifth order at λ = 0; the proof of this premise substitutes the evolution equation at t = 0, and the identity fails for simple admissible data such as q0(x) = ε e^{−x^2}, so the direct-scattering step is not justified for the full stated class.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any admissible initial datum with effective-potential norm below ln(3/2) generates a solution for all real times, not merely on a short interval.
  • The Lipschitz bound gives explicit control over how weighted-Sobolev differences between nearby initial data grow on any bounded time interval.
  • Under the same smallness condition no discrete spectrum and no spectral singularities can occur, so solitons are excluded from the admissible regime.
  • Weighted Sobolev regularity H^3 ∩ H^{2,1} is propagated by the evolution and is preserved by the solution map.
  • Because r1(t;z)r2(t;z) is independent of t, the coercivity established at t = 0 survives global time evolution, enabling reconstruction at every time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The direct-scattering lemma (Prop. 3.8) claims b(λ) = O(λ^5) at λ = 0 and proves it by substituting the target equation at t = 0, a step that assumes the datum already satisfies the evolution. For q0(x) = ε e^{−x^2}, the smallness condition holds for small ε, but direct Wronskian computation gives b3 = 2√π ε ≠ 0, so the lemma as stated does not cover this admissible datum.
  • A testable weakening is whether b(λ) = O(λ^3) suffices for the inverse-scattering construction; if so, the admissible class could be enlarged without changing the smallness condition.
  • The smallness hypothesis is imposed on a derivative-weighted effective potential, not on the L^2 norm of q0 itself, so comparatively large-amplitude data may still satisfy the hypothesis; quantifying the relation between these norms could connect the theorem to regimes usually considered large-data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims global well-posedness for the reverse space-time nonlocal Fokas–Lenells equation (1.7) with initial data in H^3(R)∩H^{2,1}(R) under the smallness condition ∥Q̃0∥_{L^1}<ln(3/2). The proof develops a direct and inverse scattering transform: after a gauge/spectral uniformization z=λ², it constructs a coercive Riemann–Hilbert problem, proves a claimed Lipschitz bijection between potentials and scattering data in W(R), evolves the reflection coefficients, and reconstructs a global solution. The central technical step is Prop. 3.8, which asserts b(λ)=O(λ⁵) so that the reflection coefficients lie in W(R). I show that this step is obtained by substituting the target PDE into the scattering coefficient and is false; this invalidates the W(R) scattering-data map and the theorem.

Significance. If valid, a global well-posedness theorem for this nonlocal FL equation would be a valuable extension of IST-based L²-Sobolev bijectivity to non-Hermitian jump matrices, and the coercivity estimates and spectral uniformization are potentially reusable. The paper is well organized and attempts to adapt Zhou's framework. However, the central scattering-regularity assertion is not merely unproved but contradicted by an admissible Gaussian datum; consequently the main theorem is false as stated, and the proposed framework cannot establish global well-posedness on the advertised class.

major comments (3)
  1. [Prop. 3.8, Eqs. (3.51)–(3.53)] The asserted O(λ⁵) behavior is obtained by substituting q − i q q^{PT} q_x = q_{xt} (the nFL equation (1.7)) into the coefficient b₃. For an arbitrary initial datum q₀ there is no reason for the evolution identity to hold at t=0; the derivation assumes the conclusion. For q₀(x)=εe^{−x²} (so q₀^{PT}=q₀, q₀∈H³∩H^{2,1}), formula (3.51) gives b₃=2∫q₀ dx + i∫q₀,x q₀² dx = 2√π ε ≠ 0, because the second integrand is odd. Thus Prop. 3.8 is false for admissible data.
  2. [Props. 3.9–3.10 and subsequent inverse-scattering estimates] The definition of the scattering-data space W(R) and the claimed r₁,r₂∈W(R) rest on the false O(λ⁵) bound. With the true b(λ)=O(λ³), near z=0 one has r₂(z)=2λb(λ)/a(λ)=O(z²) and r₁(z)=O(z); hence z⁻²r₁, z⁻²r₂ are O(1) rather than in L² near the origin. The direct scattering map does not send the admissible Gaussian into W(R). Since Props. 4.6, 4.15, 4.16, 5.1 and 6.1 all use r₁,r₂∈W(R), the inverse-scattering construction and the global time evolution are not available for the data admitted by Theorem 1.1.
  3. [Theorem 1.1] The theorem is false as stated, not merely unproved. For q₀=εe^{−x²}, the hypotheses hold for small ε: q₀∈H³∩H^{2,1} and ∥Q̃₀∥_{L¹}=O(ε)<ln(3/2). But a global decaying solution would satisfy 0=∫q_{xt} dx = ∫(q₀ − i q₀ q₀^{PT} q₀,x)dx at t=0. Since q₀²q₀,x is odd, this integral equals 2√π ε, a contradiction. Hence no global solution exists for this admissible datum.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] Typo: 'Fokas-Lenell s equation' should be 'Fokas–Lenells equation'.
  2. [Throughout] Several typographical errors ('W e', 'thn', 'arbitrary') and inconsistent spacing occur; these should be corrected in a revision.
  3. [Prop. 3.12] The notation λr_j(z) mixes the variables λ and z=λ²; a branch specification or a reformulation purely in z would improve clarity.
  4. [Theorem 6.2 proof] The assertion that C(U,n) 'grows at most polynomially in n' is not proved there; if true it should be derived from Proposition 5.1 and the previous estimates rather than stated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Prop. 3.8's O(λ^5) scattering bound is proved by substituting the nFL equation into the initial coefficient b3, so the W(R) direct-scattering map — and the global existence theorem built on it — assume the solution whose existence is to be shown.

  1. other [Section 3.2, Proposition 3.8, Eqs. (3.51)–(3.53)]
    "Substituting these back into (3.48) and collecting terms, the boundary values q(0) cancel out perfectly with the contribution from (3.47). This simplifies b3 to a remarkable global integral: b3 = ∫ ( 2q(x) + i(qPT)_x(x)q2(x) ) dx. ... Consequently, b3 = 2∫ ( q(x) − iq(x)qPT(x)qx(x) ) dx. Crucially, recalling the nFL equation (1.7), we have the inherent dynamical identity q − iqqPT qx = qxt. Substituting this into (3.52) directly yields: b3 = 2∫ qxt dx = 2 ∂/∂t∫ qx dx = 0. This confirms that b3 ≡ 0 identically as a consequence of the equation’s intrinsic dynamics, establishing b(λ) = O(λ5) as λ"

    In direct scattering, b3 is a spectral functional of the arbitrary initial profile q0 alone; formula (3.51) contains only q0 and its derivatives. The proof forces b3=0 by identifying q0−i q0 q0^PT q0,x with qxt, which is exactly the nFL PDE whose solvability Theorem 1.1 / Theorem 6.2 is meant to establish. Thus the claimed O(λ^5) decay — and consequently the W(R) membership of r1,r2 via Props. 3.9–3.10 — is only available if q0 already lies on a solution of the equation being proved. This is the circular step on which the direct-scattering map, the inverse estimates, and the global-existence argument in Prop. 6.1 all rest. Moreover the claim is false for admissible data: for q0(x)=εe^{-x^2}, formula (3.51) gives b3=2√π ε≠0, so b(λ)=O(λ^3) is the true order and z^{-2}r1 is not L^2 near z=0.

full rationale

The paper develops a substantial inverse-scattering machine — Jost solutions, coercivity via the small effective-potential condition, Fredholm theory for the Beals–Coifman equation, and Lipschitz bounds — and much of that machinery is internally consistent. However, the central well-posedness theorem is not self-contained: the direct-scattering regularity that feeds the entire construction is obtained in Prop. 3.8 by assuming the evolution equation (1.7) at the level of the initial datum. Specifically, b3 is computed from q0, then set to zero using q−iqq^PT qx=qxt, the PDE to be solved. This is not an independent spectral estimate; it is the target equation imported into the proof of a property of q0. Since the property is also false for admissible data such as q0=εe^{-x^2}, the O(λ^5) bound cannot be repaired by a minor correction, and the W(R) scattering-data space on which Props. 4.15, 4.16, and 6.1 rely is not reached by the direct map. The paper's global-existence conclusion therefore reduces, at its load-bearing point, to an assumption that the solution already exists. This is a genuine circularity in the derivation chain, scored at 8 rather than 10 only because most of the later inverse-scattering estimates would be meaningful if an independent direct-scattering regularity statement were available.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data; the smallness threshold ln(3/2) is derived, not fitted. The central circular input is the axiom that the initial datum already satisfies the nFL equation at t=0 (used in Prop. 3.8 to force b3=0).

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The initial datum q0 satisfies the nFL identity q0 − i q0 q0^PT q0,x = q_{xt}(0), i.e., the target evolution equation holds at t=0.
    Invoked in Prop. 3.8 (Eqs. (3.51)–(3.53)) to conclude b3 = 0 for the scattering data of the initial datum; equivalent to assuming the existence of the solution being proved.
  • domain assumption No discrete spectrum and no spectral singularities under the smallness condition (3.4).
    Stated in Remark 3.3 and relied on throughout; claimed to follow from the same smallness bound, acceptable if Prop. 3.2 holds.
  • standard math Zhou's L²-Sobolev bijectivity theory, Fredholm theory, and Plemelj projection estimates for Beals–Coifman singular integral operators.
    Background machinery invoked repeatedly (Props. 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8).
  • domain assumption Reduction of the Kaup–Newell spectral problem to a Zakharov–Shabat problem via transformations (2.5)–(2.8).
    Central structural assumption for the spectral uniformization; standard for FL-type equations but not independently justified in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the global well-posedness for the nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation with the weighted Sobolev initial data on the line." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X7LEJERW

@misc{pith2026260719649,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the global well-posedness for the nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation with the weighted Sobolev initial data on the line},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X7LEJERW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19649}
}
abstract

We establish the global well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the reverse space-time nonlocal Fokas-Lenells equation with the weighted Sobolev initial data $q_0(x)\in H^{3}(\mathbb{R}) \cap H^{2,1}(\mathbb{R})$ on the line. We develop the inverse scattering transform formulated via the associated Riemann-Hilbert problems to study this issue. A spectral uniformization transform is introduced to resolve the singular behavior inherent in the KN-type negative flow spectral problem. Owing to the reverse space-time reduction, reflection coefficients no longer satisfy the usual Hermitian conjugation symmetry, and the coercivity of the jump matrix is therefore not available a priori. The quantitative smallness condition on the initial data yields uniform bounds on the reflection coefficients and ensures the uniform positive definiteness of the Hermitian part of the associated jump matrix. The resulting coercivity allows us to establish the bounded invertibility of the associated singular integral operator through a Fredholm and vanishing-lemma argument. Under this condition, we prove an $L^{2}$-Sobolev bijective correspondence between the potential and scattering data, exclude spectral singularities on continuous spectra, and obtain the global existence and uniqueness of solutions. Moreover, the associated solution map is Lipschitz continuous on the admissible initial-data class.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19649 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The general scheme for the global well-posedness o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Analytical regions on the λ-plane (left) and z = λ 2 -plane (right). The Lax pair (2.2) has singularities at λ = 0 and λ = ∞, which is the same as the FL equation. Here, we will make a transformation to construct the Jost solutions and so on. 2.1 Jost solutions and analyticity on the z-plane As usual, we set t to be fixed and omit it in the following analysis. To more conveniently analyze the Lax pair (2.2), we intr… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz and P . A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scatt ering, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1991

    1991

  2. [2]

    M. J. Ablowitz, B. F. Feng, X. D. Luo, and Z. H. Musslimani, Inverse scattering transform for the nonlocal reverse space-time sine-Gordon, sinh-Gordon and nonlinear Schröd inger equations, Nonlinearity, 31(12) (2018), 5385

    2018

  3. [3]

    M. J. Ablowitz, X. D. Luo, and Z. H. Musslimani, Inverse sc attering transform for the nonlocal reverse space-time nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys. , 59(1) (2018), 011501

    2018

  4. [4]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(6) (2013), 064105

    2013

  5. [5]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Inverse scattering t ransform for the integrable nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Nonlinearity, 29(3) (2016), 915-946

    2016

  6. [6]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear equations, Stud. Appl. Math. , 139(1) (2017), 7-59. 57

    2017

  7. [7]

    G. P . Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (5th ed.), Academic Press, 2013

    2013

  8. [8]

    Beals and R

    R. Beals and R. R. Coifman, Scattering and inverse scatte ring for first order systems, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 37(1) (1984), 39-90

    1984

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Beals and R

    R. Beals and R. R. Coifman, Inverse scattering and evolut ion equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 38(1) (1985), 29-42

    1985

  2. [10]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermi tian Hamiltonians having P T symmetry ,Phys. Rev. Lett., 80(24) (1998), 5243-5246

    1998

  3. [11]

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, P T -symmetric quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2024) 045002

    2024

  4. [12]

    Biondini and G

    G. Biondini and G. Kova ˇci ˇc, Inverse scattering transform for the focusing nonlinear S chrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions, J. Math. Phys. , 55(3) (2014), 031506

    2014

  5. [13]

    Borghese, R

    M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, and K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, Lon g-time asymptotic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré C , 35(4) (2018), 887-920

    2018

  6. [14]

    Brabec and F

    T. Brabec and F. Krausz, Nonlinear optical pulse propag ation in the single-cycle regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 78(17) (1997), 3282-3285

    1997

  7. [15]

    Cheng, E

    Q. Cheng, E. Fan, Long-time asymptotics for the focusin g Fokas-Lenells equation in the solitonic region of space- time, J. Differ. Equ., 309 (2022), 883-948

    2022

  8. [16]

    Cheng, E

    Q. Cheng, E. Fan, and M. Yuen, On the global well-posedne ss for the Fokas-Lenells equation on the line, J. Differ. Equ., 414 (2025), 34-93

    2025

  9. [17]

    Cheng and E

    Q. Cheng and E. Fan, The Fokas-Lenells equation on the li ne: Global well-posedness with solitons, J. Differ. Equ., 366 (2023), 320-344

    2023

  10. [18]

    Cuccagna and R

    S. Cuccagna and R. Jenkins, On asymptotic stability of N-soliton solutions of the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 343(3) (2016), 921-969

    2016

  11. [19]

    Cuccagna and D

    S. Cuccagna and D. E. Pelinovsky , The asymptotic stabil ity of solitons in the cubic NLS equation on the line, Appl. Anal., 93(4) (2014), 791-822

    2014

  12. [20]

    Deift and E

    P . Deift and E. Trubowitz, Inverse scattering on the lin e, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 32(2) (1979), 121-251

    1979

  13. [21]

    Deift and X

    P . Deift and X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscil latory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation, Ann. Math., 137(2) (1993), 295-368

    1993

  14. [22]

    Deift and X

    P . Deift and X. Zhou, Long-time asymptotics for solutio ns of the NLS equation with initial data in a weighted Sobolev space, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 56(8) (2003), 1029-1077

    2003

  15. [23]

    Deift, A

    P . Deift, A. Its, and X. Zhou, Long-time asymptotics for integrable nonlinear wave equations, in Important Devel- opments in Soliton Theory , Springer, 1993, 181-204

    1993

  16. [24]

    Duren, Theory of H p Spaces, Academic Press, 1970

    P . Duren, Theory of H p Spaces, Academic Press, 1970

    1970

  17. [25]

    L. D. Faddeev and L. A. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Solitons , Springer, 1987

    1987

  18. [26]

    E. Fan, Y . Li, and X. Liu, L2-Sobolev space bijectivity and existence of global solutio ns for the matrix nonlinear Schrödinger equations, J. Differ. Equ., 440 (2025), 113446

    2025

  19. [27]

    A. S. Fokas, On a class of physically important integrab le equations, Physica D, 87(1-4) (1995), 145-150

    1995

  20. [28]

    A. S. Fokas, Integrable multidimensional versions of t he nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Nonlinearity, 29(2) (2016), 319-324

    2016

  21. [29]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura , Method for Solving the Korteweg-de Vries Equation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 19(19) (1967), 1095-1097

    1967

  22. [30]

    V . S. Gerdjikov and A. Saxena, Complete integrability o f nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys. , 58(1) (2017), 013502

    2017

  23. [31]

    Hasegawa and F

    A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, Transmission of stationary nonlinear optical pulses in dispersive dielectric fibers. I . Anomalous dispersion, Appl. Phys. Lett. , 23(3) (1973), 142-144

    1973

  24. [32]

    Jenkins, J

    R. Jenkins, J. Liu, P . Perry , and C. Sulem, Global existe nce for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with arbitrary spectral singularities, Anal. PDE, 13(5) (2020), 1539-1578

    2020

  25. [33]

    D. J. Kaup and A. C. Newell, An exact solution for a deriva tive nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys. , 19(4) (1978), 798-801

    1978

  26. [34]

    V . V . Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear wav es in P T -symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. , 88(3) (2016), 035002. 58

    2016

  27. [35]

    P . D. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolutio n and solitary waves, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 21(5) (1968), 467-490

    1968

  28. [36]

    Lenells, Exactly solvable model for nonlinear pulse propagation in optical fibers, Stud

    J. Lenells, Exactly solvable model for nonlinear pulse propagation in optical fibers, Stud. Appl. Math., 123(2) (2009), 215-232

    2009

  29. [37]

    Lenells, Dressing for a novel integrable generaliza tion of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J

    J. Lenells, Dressing for a novel integrable generaliza tion of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Nonlinear Sci. 20 (2010), 709-722

    2010

  30. [38]

    Lenells and A

    J. Lenells and A. S. Fokas, On a novel integrable general ization of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Nonlinear- ity, 22(1) (2009), 11-27

    2009

  31. [39]

    Lenells and A

    J. Lenells and A. S. Fokas, An integrable generalizatio n of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the half-line and solitons, Inverse Probl. 25 (2009) 115006

    2009

  32. [40]

    Y . Li, Q. Cheng, and E. Fan, Existence of global solution s to the Fokas-Lenells equation with arbitrary spectral singularities, arXiv:2512.21536, (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Y . Li, X. Liu, and E. Fan, Existence of global solutions f or the nonlocal derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation by the inverse scattering transform method, arXiv:2307.15837, (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Liu and E

    A. Liu and E. Fan, Existence of global solutions to the no nlocal mKdV equation on the line, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, 45(4) (2024), 497-528

    2024

  35. [43]

    J. Liu, P . A. Perry , and C. Sulem, Global existence for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation by the method of inverse scattering, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. , 41(11) (2016), 1692-1760

    2016

  36. [44]

    K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy , D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Carmon, Beam dynamics in P T symmetric optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100(10) (2008), 103904

    2008

  37. [45]

    Matsuno, A direct method of solution for the Fokas-Le nells derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its exact multisoliton solutions, J

    Y . Matsuno, A direct method of solution for the Fokas-Le nells derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its exact multisoliton solutions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 45(23) (2012), 235202

    2012

  38. [46]

    Novikov , S

    S. Novikov , S. V . Manakov , L. P . Pitaevskii, and V . E. Zakharov ,Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method , Springer, New York, 1984

    1984

  39. [47]

    D. E. Pelinovsky and A. Saalmann, Inverse scattering fo r the massive Thirring model, Fields Inst. Commun. , 83 (2019), 497-528

    2019

  40. [48]

    D. E. Pelinovsky , A. Saalmann, and Y . Shimabukuro, The derivative NLS equation: global existence with solitons, Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ., 14(3) (2017), 271-294

    2017

  41. [49]

    D. E. Pelinovsky and Y . Shimabukuro, Existence of globa l solutions to the derivative NLS equation with the inverse scattering transform method, Int. Math. Res. Not. , 2018(18) (2018), 5663-5728

    2018

  42. [50]

    J. E. Rothenberg, Space-time focusing: breakdown of th e slowly varying envelope approximation in the self- focusing of femtosecond pulses, Opt. Lett., 17(19) (1992), 1340-1342

    1992

  43. [51]

    C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy , D. N. Christodo ulides, M. Segev , and D. Kip, Observation of parity-time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys., 6(3) (2010), 192-195

    2010

  44. [52]

    Rybalko and D

    Y . Rybalko and D. Shepelsky , Long-time asymptotics for the integrable nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 60(3) (2019), 031504

    2019

  45. [53]

    X. Y . Wen, Z. Yan, and Y . Yang, Dynamics of higher-order rational solitons for the nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the P T -symmetric potential, Chaos, 26(6) (2016), 063123

    2016

  46. [54]

    Yan, Complex P T -symmetric nonlinear Schrödinger equation and Burgers equ ation, Philos

    Z. Yan, Complex P T -symmetric nonlinear Schrödinger equation and Burgers equ ation, Philos. T rans. R. Soc. A , 371 (2013), 20120059

    2013

  47. [55]

    Yan, Integrable PT-symmetric local and nonlocal vec tor nonlinear Schrödinger equations: A unified two- parameter model, Appl

    Z. Yan, Integrable PT-symmetric local and nonlocal vec tor nonlinear Schrödinger equations: A unified two- parameter model, Appl. Math. Lett. 47 (2015), 61-68

    2015

  48. [56]

    Yan, Nonlocal general vector nonlinear Schrödinger equations: Integrability , PT symmetribility , and solutions, Appl

    Z. Yan, Nonlocal general vector nonlinear Schrödinger equations: Integrability , PT symmetribility , and solutions, Appl. Math. Lett. 62 (2016) 101-109

    2016

  49. [57]

    Yan, A novel hierarchy of two-family-parameter equa tions: Local, nonlocal, and mixed-local–nonlocal vector nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Appl

    Z. Yan, A novel hierarchy of two-family-parameter equa tions: Local, nonlocal, and mixed-local–nonlocal vector nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Appl. Math. Lett. 79 (2018) 123-130

    2018

  50. [58]

    Z. Yan, Y . Chen, Y . Shen, Z. Wen, and X. Li, Theory and Application of PT-symmetry Nonlinear Waves , Science Press, 2023 (in Chinese)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Yang and J

    B. Yang and J. Yang, Transformations between nonlocal a nd local integrable equations, Stud. Appl. Math. 140 (2017) 178-201

    2017

  52. [60]

    Yang, Physically significant nonlocal general-symm etric nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys

    J. Yang, Physically significant nonlocal general-symm etric nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Rev. E , 98(4) (2018), 042202. 59

    2018

  53. [61]

    Yang, General N-solitons and their dynamics in several nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys

    J. Yang, General N-solitons and their dynamics in several nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Phys. Lett. A, 383 (2019), 328-337

    2019

  54. [62]

    Y . Yang, E. Fan, and Y . Liu, On the global existence for th e modified Camassa-Holm equation, J. Lond. Math. Soc. , 112 (2025), e70232

    2025

  55. [63]

    V . E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Exact theory of two-dime nsional self-focusing and one-dimensional self- modulation of waves in nonlinear media, Sov. Phys. JETP 34 (1972) 62-69

    1972

  56. [64]

    Zhang and Z

    G. Zhang and Z. Yan, The derivative nonlinear Schröding er equation with zero/nonzero boundary conditions: inverse scattering transforms and N-double-pole solutions, J. Nonlinear Sci. , 30(6) (2020), 3089-3127

    2020

  57. [65]

    Zhang, Y

    Q. Zhang, Y . Zhang, and R. Ye, Exact solutions of nonloca l Fokas–Lenells equation, Appl. Math. Lett. , 98 (2019), 336-343

    2019

  58. [66]

    Zhang and Y

    W.-X. Zhang and Y . Liu, Integrability and multisoliton solutions of the reverse space and/or time nonlocal Fokas–Lenells equation, Nonlinear Dyn. 108 (2022), 2531–2549

    2022

  59. [67]

    Zhao and E

    Y . Zhao and E. Fan, Existence of global solutions to the n onlocal Schrödinger equation on the line, Stud. Appl. Math., 152(1) (2024), 1-35

    2024

  60. [68]

    Zhou, The Riemann-Hilbert problem and inverse scatt ering, SIAM J

    X. Zhou, The Riemann-Hilbert problem and inverse scatt ering, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 20(4) (1989), 966-986

    1989

  61. [69]

    Zhou, L2-Sobolev space bijectivity of the scattering and inverse sc attering transforms, Commun

    X. Zhou, L2-Sobolev space bijectivity of the scattering and inverse sc attering transforms, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 51(7) (1998), 697-731. 60

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.