Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Tungsten Germanide Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors with Saturated Internal Detection Efficiency at Wavelengths up to 29 {\mu}m

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Tungsten germanide nanowire detectors achieve saturated single-photon efficiency at mid-infrared wavelengths up to 29 µm, pointing toward scalable large-area mid-IR cameras.

desk verdict Genuine step forward: WGe SNSPDs show saturated internal efficiency plateaus out to 29 µm with much thicker and wider wires than WSi, though the long-wavelength data need absolute calibration or at least quantified error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.20868 v2 pith:XA3Q3UPF submitted 2025-11-25 physics.ins-det cond-mat.supr-conphysics.app-phphysics.opticsquant-ph

Benedikt Hampel , Daniel Kuznesof , Andrew S. Mueller , Sahil R. Patel , Robert H. Hadfield , Emma E. Wollman , Matthew D. Shaw , Dirk Schwarzer
show 8 more authors
Alec M. Wodtke Khalid Hossain Allison V. Mis Alexana Roshko Richard P. Mirin Sae Woo Nam Martin J. Stevens Varun B. Verma
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-detcond-mat.supr-conphysics.app-phphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords tungstengermanideSNSPDmid-infraredsingle-photondetectioninternalefficiency29µmsuperconductingnanowirelarge-areadetectormid-IRspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors made from tungsten germanide (WGe) show saturated internal detection efficiency at wavelengths from 4 µm to 29 µm, as indicated by plateaus in photon count rate versus bias current. Unlike tungsten silicide devices, which require films under 3 nm thick and nanowires around 100 nm wide, the WGe detectors work with 8 nm films and 200–360 nm wide nanowires. This combination of thicker films and wider wires makes large-area fabrication far more practical, potentially enabling mid-IR single-photon cameras that could replace mercury cadmium telluride and blocked impurity band detectors in fields such as exoplanet transit spectroscopy, vibrational molecular fingerprinting, and remote sensing.

What carries the argument

The key is the WGe material's reduced characteristic energy E0 = 4N(0)(k_B T_c)^2 V0, which sets the single-photon detection threshold. Germanium-rich co-sputtered films raise the normal-state resistivity, lowering the density of states N(0) and the critical temperature T_c (~900 mK at the chosen sputtering power), thus lowering E0 and allowing low-energy mid-IR photons to trigger detection. The paper also cites a favorable ratio of electron-phonon to electron-electron timescales in WGe, which helps retain absorbed photon energy in the electron system. This material combination permits thicker films and wider wires without losing the low-energy sensitivity that previously required ultra-thin

What would settle it

Measure count rate versus bias current at 29 µm with the thermal light source blocked (or with a cold shutter) and all filters in place; if the saturated plateau persists unchanged, the apparent internal efficiency is dominated by background photons, not by the intended mid-IR signal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that germanium-rich tungsten germanide is a viable material platform for mid-infrared single-photon detection, with saturated internal detection efficiency (IDE) up to 29 µm. The paper demonstrates normalized photon count rate plateaus as a function of bias current for 360 nm-wide wires at 4–10 µm and 200 nm-wide wires at 10–29 µm. Because these devices use 2.7 times thicker films (8 nm vs 3 nm) and up to 4.5 times wider nanowires (360 nm vs 80 nm) than mid-IR-optimized WSi SNSPDs, the result implies that high-fill-factor, large-area mid-IR detectors can be fabricated with standard lithographic processes.

Load-bearing premise

The plateau in normalized photon count rate versus bias current reflects genuine unity internal detection efficiency at each wavelength, rather than being inflated by background blackbody radiation, trigger-level effects, or relaxation oscillations—an ambiguity the paper acknowledges is most severe at 29 µm, where the plateau slopes and intrinsic dark count rates cannot be measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Saturated internal detection efficiency at 29 µm in 200 nm-wide WGe wires extends the demonstrated single-photon mid-IR range to the same wavelength as WSi, but with more forgiving geometry.
  • The 8 nm film thickness and 360 nm wire width enable higher fabrication yield and lower current crowding, making large-area meanders and arrays realistic.
  • WGe compatibility with germanium-based optical cavities could improve system detection efficiency at mid-IR wavelengths.
  • Large-scale WGe SNSPD arrays could offer single-photon sensitivity and low noise for mid-IR imaging, competing with MCT and BIB detectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not report absolute system detection efficiency; the saturated internal efficiency might not translate to high system efficiency because of uncharacterized optical losses and absorption in the Ge cap, which warrants a calibrated efficiency measurement at 10 µm or beyond.
  • The 500 ns artificial hold-off limits the maximum count rate; alternative readout schemes (e.g., impedance-matched tapers or multi-pixel interleaving) could recover timing and rate performance for practical use.
  • If the plateau slope at long wavelengths comes from photon absorption in the 2 µm-wide bends, then shielding or redesigning those regions could improve the sharpness of the saturation and reduce the apparent background.
  • The high background count rates and relaxation oscillations suggest that detector operation with a cold optical filter or in a shielded housing is necessary for real single-photon counting at 29 µm; this is an engineering constraint, not a fundamental limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the development of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) based on tungsten germanide (WGe). The authors fabricate 8 nm-thick WGe films with a Ge capping layer, characterize their sheet resistance and critical temperature as a function of tungsten sputtering power, and pattern nanowires of widths 100–360 nm. The central claim is that these detectors exhibit saturated internal detection efficiency at wavelengths up to 29 µm, based on plateaus in the normalized photon count rate versus bias current at wavelengths from 4 µm to 29 µm. The paper argues that WGe offers advantages over WSi for mid-infrared detection: thicker films and wider nanowires, which should improve fabrication yield and scalability. The measurement setups for 4–10 µm and 10–29 µm are described, including a grating monochromator and a direct flood-illumination cryostat. The authors acknowledge substantial background count rates, a sloping plateau, and an inability to characterize intrinsic dark counts in the long-wavelength measurements.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this work represents a meaningful advance in mid-infrared single-photon detection: it identifies a material platform that can achieve saturated internal detection efficiency at 29 µm with relatively thick films and wide nanowires, addressing a key scalability limitation of WSi detectors. The paper also provides useful material characterization data (sheet resistance, Tc, RBS composition, STEM/EDS cross-sections) and makes the data openly available. However, the headline claim of unity internal detection efficiency rests entirely on the interpretation of plateaus in normalized count-rate curves. The manuscript itself documents high and bias-dependent background count rates, sloping plateaus, count-rate ceilings from a 500 ns hold-off, and trigger-level limitations that impair the curves. Because no absolute efficiency calibration, error bars, or source-synchronous verification are provided, the evidence for saturated internal efficiency at the longest wavelengths is underdetermined. The significance is therefore conditional on additional experimental validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Fig. 6] The central claim of saturated internal detection efficiency up to 29 µm rests on plateaus in the normalized photon count rate after background subtraction. For the 15–29 µm data, the background count rate is large and bias-dependent, and the plateau has a clear slope. The manuscript also states that 'the intrinsic dark count rates of the SNSPDs cannot be characterized' because blackbody radiation and relaxation oscillations dominate. If the background under illumination differs from the separately measured BCR (e.g., due to heating of the filter stack), the subtraction can create a spurious plateau. Please provide absolute count rates, quantify the stability of the BCR under illumination, and demonstrate that the plateau is not an artifact of background subtraction.
  2. [§3, hold-off and count-rate ceiling] The 500 ns artificial hold-off imposes a maximum count rate of about 2 MHz. No absolute photon count rates are reported for the long-wavelength measurements, which use a broadband thermal source and high background levels. If the true photon arrival rate approaches this ceiling, the observed count rate will saturate regardless of internal detection efficiency, producing a false plateau. Please report the measured count rates and confirm that the detection operates in the linear regime, for example by attenuating the source and showing that the count rate scales proportionally.
  3. [§4, trigger-level limitation] The manuscript notes that for the 4 µm and 10 µm measurements the count-rate curve is impaired below a cut-off bias current because output pulses fall below the trigger level. This raises the possibility that the apparent saturation is influenced by the readout trigger threshold and pulse-height statistics rather than purely by the intrinsic detection probability. To support the claim of unity internal efficiency, please show that the plateau is independent of trigger level and readout settings, for example by repeating measurements at different thresholds or with lower-noise amplification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 6] The figure lacks error bars, which makes it difficult to assess the significance of the slope in the plateau region. At least for representative bias currents, error bars from repeated measurements should be included.
  2. [§4, normalization] The caption states that the photon count rate is normalized to the value at the highest plotted bias current. Because the curves are normalized to a single point, the absence of a plateau at lower currents is not directly visible in absolute terms. Reporting absolute count rates or a second normalization would improve clarity.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract emphasizes 'saturated internal detection efficiency at wavelengths up to 29 µm' without mentioning the substantial background and sloping plateaus documented in §4. The abstract should be qualified to reflect the evidence presented.
  4. [§2] The choice of 20 W tungsten sputtering power is stated to be based on 'past experience with WSi,' but no specific selection criterion or comparison with other powers is shown for the device performance. A brief justification or reference would be helpful.
  5. [References] Reference [31] is cited for the ratio of electron-phonon to electron-electron timescales; the values for WGe and WSi are given as 2.6±0.5 and 2.5±0.5. This is a minuscule difference and is not clearly connected to the measured detector performance; consider elaborating on the relevance or removing the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the saturation claim rests on direct plateau measurements and an external criterion, with admitted background limitations that are validity concerns, not definitional or self-referential reduction.

full rationale

This is an experimental characterization paper with no derivation that assumes its conclusion. The central claim—saturated internal detection efficiency at wavelengths up to 29 µm—is supported by normalized photon-count-rate-versus-bias-current plateaus in Fig. 6. Normalization to the highest-bias count rate is relative, but the saturation interpretation follows an external standard (Ref. [37], Kozorezov et al.) rather than an equation fitted to the data or an imported uniqueness theorem. The choice of WGe and sputtering conditions is based on material characterization (sheet resistance, critical temperature) and prior WSi experience; it is not fitted to the efficiency plateaus. The paper itself admits important limitations at longer wavelengths: the background count rate is bias-dependent and prominent, intrinsic dark count rates cannot be characterized because blackbody radiation and relaxation oscillations dominate, and the 500 ns hold-off imposes a count-rate ceiling. These are measurement/calibration concerns that may affect the reliability of the 29 µm saturation inference, but they are not circular reasoning. Self-citations (Refs. [21], [26], [27]) are apparatus descriptions or prior-art references and do not carry the load-bearing argument. Therefore no circular step is present, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard SNSPD physics (characteristic energy model) and standard interpretation of count-rate plateaus as unity internal detection efficiency. It also assumes the optical setup rejects out-of-band light and that bulk film measurements represent the thin device film. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • W target sputtering power = 20 W
    Chosen by hand based on prior WSi experience to achieve high sheet resistance and low Tc (~900 mK); not fitted to the efficiency data but directly sets the film properties that enable mid-IR sensitivity.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Characteristic energy model E0 = 4N(0)(kB Tc)^2 V0 relates material parameters to detection threshold
    Adopted from Ref. [28]; used to motivate high-resistivity, low-Tc films but not tested in this work.
  • domain assumption Count-rate plateau indicates unity internal detection efficiency
    Standard SNSPD interpretation (Ref. [37]); employed to claim saturated IDE without absolute efficiency calibration.
  • domain assumption The optical setup isolates the intended wavelengths
    Assumes longpass/bandpass filters and monochromator reject out-of-band and higher-order radiation; background counts are subtracted but uncertainties are not quantified.
  • domain assumption Bulk film properties are representative of the 8 nm device film
    Tc measured on bulk 50 nm films; device film Tc measured separately but composition inferred from bulk RBS; possible thickness-dependent variations are not addressed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tungsten Germanide Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors with Saturated Internal Detection Efficiency at Wavelengths up to 29 {\mu}m." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XA3Q3UPF

@misc{pith2026251120868,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tungsten Germanide Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors with Saturated Internal Detection Efficiency at Wavelengths up to 29 \mum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XA3Q3UPF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20868}
}
read the original abstract

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) are among the most sensitive single-photon detectors available and have the potential to transform fields ranging from infrared astrophysics to molecular spectroscopy. However, extending their performance into the mid-infrared spectral region - crucial for applications such as exoplanet transit spectroscopy and vibrational fingerprinting of molecules - has remained a major challenge, primarily due to material limitations and scalability constraints. Here, we report on the development of SNSPDs based on tungsten germanide, a novel material system that combines high mid-infrared sensitivity with compatibility for large-scale fabrication. Our detectors exhibit saturated internal detection efficiency at wavelengths up to 29 {\mu}m, while using 2.7x thicker films (8 nm vs 3 nm) and up to 4.5x wider nanowires (360 nm vs 80 nm) compared to mid-infrared-optimized SNSPDs fabricated from tungsten silicide. This advance will enable scalable, high-performance single-photon detection in a spectral region that was previously inaccessible, opening new frontiers in remote sensing, thermal imaging, environmental monitoring, molecular physics, and astronomy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20868 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Four-probe room temperature sheet resistance of co-sputtered bulk WGe films [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Superconducting transition temperature Tc as a function of sputtering power of the tungsten target during co-sputtering of the WGe. The germanium sputtering power was fixed at 60 W. Measurements were performed on bulk films with thickness of approximately 50 nm. The insets show the tungsten (W) and germanium (Ge) film composition of some samples, which was determined by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron micrograph of an SNSPD meander with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scanning grating monochromator cryostat system based upon a blazed diffractive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Oscilloscope traces of SNSPD pulses for a bias current of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized photon count rate and background count rate (BCR) in counts per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reaching the intrinsic performance limits of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors up to 0.1 mm wide

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Current-biased rails allow SNSPDs to reach intrinsic limits, reducing dark counts by 10 orders of magnitude and enabling 0.1 mm wide devices with near-unity efficiency at 4 μm.

  2. Superconducting single-photon detectors for integrated quantum photonics

    physics.optics 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review summarizing progress in device architectures, material engineering, and integration strategies for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors in photonic integrated circuits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Superconducting single-photon detectors in the mid-infrared for physical chemistry and spectroscopy,

    J. A. Lau, V. B. Verma, D. Schwarzer, and A. M. Wodtke, “Superconducting single-photon detectors in the mid-infrared for physical chemistry and spectroscopy,” Chem. Soc. Rev.52, 921 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Current state of mid-infrared superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors,

    E. E. Wollman, G. Taylor, S. Patel,et al., “Current state of mid-infrared superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors,”inX-Ray, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy XI,vol.PC13103A.D.HollandandK.Minoglou, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2024), p. PC1310306

    2024

  3. [3]

    The large interferometer for exoplanets (life): a space mission for mid-infrared nulling interferometry,

    A. M. Glauser, S. P. Quanz, J. Hansen,et al., “The large interferometer for exoplanets (life): a space mission for mid-infrared nulling interferometry,” inOptical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging IX,vol. 13095 (SPIE, 2024), pp. 354–374

    2024

  4. [4]

    PhotoncountingLIDARat2.3 µmwavelengthwithsuperconducting nanowires,

    G.G.Taylor,D.Morozov,N.R.Gemmell,et al.,“PhotoncountingLIDARat2.3 µmwavelengthwithsuperconducting nanowires,” Opt. Express27, 38147–38158 (2019). Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2019

  5. [5]

    Infrared chemiluminescence,

    J. Polanyi, “Infrared chemiluminescence,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.3, 471–496 (1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    Intramolecular vibrational relaxation from c–h stretch fundamentals,

    G. M. Stewart and J. D. McDonald, “Intramolecular vibrational relaxation from c–h stretch fundamentals,” The J. Chem. Phys.78, 3907–3915 (1983)

    1983

  7. [7]

    Energetics of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere and the saber experiment,

    M. G. Mlynczak, “Energetics of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere and the saber experiment,” Adv. Space Res. 20, 1177–1183 (1997). Coupling and Energetics in the Stratosphere-Mesosphere-Thermosphere- Ionosphere System

    1997

  8. [8]

    Recent advances in superconducting nanowire single-photon detector technology for exoplanet transit spectroscopy in the mid-infrared,

    E. E. Wollman, V. B. Verma, A. B. Walter,et al., “Recent advances in superconducting nanowire single-photon detector technology for exoplanet transit spectroscopy in the mid-infrared,” J. Astron. Telesc. Instruments, Syst.7, 011004 (2021). Publisher: SPIE

    2021

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Real-timehigh-resolutionmid-infraredopticalcoherencetomography,

    N.M.Israelsen,C.R.Petersen,A.Barh,et al.,“Real-timehigh-resolutionmid-infraredopticalcoherencetomography,” Light. Sci. & Appl.8, 11 (2019). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2019

  2. [10]

    Mid-infrared single-photon 3D imaging,

    J. Fang, K. Huang, E. Wu,et al., “Mid-infrared single-photon 3D imaging,” Light. Sci. & Appl.12, 144 (2023). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  3. [11]

    Silicon photonic quantum computing with spin qubits,

    X. Yan, S. Gitt, B. Lin,et al., “Silicon photonic quantum computing with spin qubits,” APL Photonics6, 070901 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Quantum key distribution based on mid-infrared and telecom band two-color entanglement source,

    W.-Z. Li, C. Zhou, Y. Wang,et al., “Quantum key distribution based on mid-infrared and telecom band two-color entanglement source,” (2024). ArXiv:2408.07552 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Feasibility study of free-Space quantum key distribution in the mid-infrared,

    G. Temporao, H. Zibinden, S. Tanzilli,et al., “Feasibility study of free-Space quantum key distribution in the mid-infrared,” Quantum Inf. Comput.8, 1–11 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Infrared spectroscopic laser scanning confocal microscopy for whole-slide chemical imaging,

    K. Yeh, I. Sharma, K. Falahkheirkhah,et al., “Infrared spectroscopic laser scanning confocal microscopy for whole-slide chemical imaging,” Nat. Commun.14, 5215 (2023). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  7. [15]

    Mid–infrared laser applications in medicine and biology,

    A. R. Adams, C. T. Elliott, A. Krier,et al., “Mid–infrared laser applications in medicine and biology,” Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.359, 635–644 (2001). Publisher: Royal Society

    2001

  8. [16]

    Progress, challenges, and opportunities for HgCdTe infrared materials and detectors,

    W. Lei, J. Antoszewski, and L. Faraone, “Progress, challenges, and opportunities for HgCdTe infrared materials and detectors,” Appl. Phys. Rev.2, 041303 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing,

    R. H. Hadfield, J. Leach, F. Fleming,et al., “Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing,” Optica10, 1124–1141 (2023). Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2023

  10. [18]

    InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice infrared detectors: Future prospect,

    A. Rogalski, P. Martyniuk, and M. Kopytko, “InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice infrared detectors: Future prospect,” Appl. Phys. Rev.4, 031304 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Progressandchallengesinblockedimpuritybandinfrareddetectorsforspace-based astronomy,

    Y.Xiao,H.Zhu,K.Deng,et al.,“Progressandchallengesinblockedimpuritybandinfrareddetectorsforspace-based astronomy,” Sci. China Physics, Mech. & Astron.65, 1–17 (2022). Company: Springer Distributor: Springer Institution: Springer Label: Springer Number: 8 Publisher: Science China Press

    2022

  12. [20]

    Mid-infrared detector development for the Origins Space Telescope,

    T. L. Roellig, C. W. McMurtry, T. P. Greene,et al., “Mid-infrared detector development for the Origins Space Telescope,” J. Astron. Telesc. Instruments, Syst.6, 041503 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Low-noise single-photon counting superconducting nanowire detectors at infrared wavelengths up to 29µm,

    G. G. Taylor, A. B. Walter, B. Korzh,et al., “Low-noise single-photon counting superconducting nanowire detectors at infrared wavelengths up to 29µm,” Optica10, 1672–1678 (2023). Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2023

  14. [22]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm,

    D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm,” Optica7, 1649–1653 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,

    B. Korzh, Q.-Y. Zhao, J. P. Allmaras,et al., “Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,” Nat. Photonics14, 250–255 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    The thermally coupled imager: A scalable readout architecture for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors,

    A. N. McCaughan, Y. Zhai, B. Korzh,et al., “The thermally coupled imager: A scalable readout architecture for superconducting nanowire single photon detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett.121, 102602 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels,

    B. G. Oripov, D. S. Rampini, J. Allmaras,et al., “A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels,” Nature622, 730 – 734 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    A 64-pixel mid-infrared single-photon imager based on superconducting nanowire detectors,

    B. Hampel, R. P. Mirin, S. W. Nam, and V. B. Verma, “A 64-pixel mid-infrared single-photon imager based on superconducting nanowire detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 042602 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Single-photon detection in the mid-infrared up to 10𝜇m wavelength using tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire detectors,

    V. B. Verma, B. Korzh, A. B. Walter,et al., “Single-photon detection in the mid-infrared up to 10𝜇m wavelength using tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire detectors,” APL Photonics6, 056101 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Single-photon detection by a dirty current-carrying superconducting strip based on the kinetic- equation approach,

    D. Y. Vodolazov, “Single-photon detection by a dirty current-carrying superconducting strip based on the kinetic- equation approach,” Phys. Rev. Appl.7, 034014 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Large-area superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for operation at wavelengths up to 7.4𝜇m,

    M. Colangelo, A. B. Walter, B. A. Korzh,et al., “Large-area superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for operation at wavelengths up to 7.4𝜇m,” Nano Lett.22, 5667–5673 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Infrared properties of high-purity silicon,

    E. J. Wollack, G. Cataldo, K. H. Miller, and M. A. Quijada, “Infrared properties of high-purity silicon,” Opt. Lett.45, 4935–4938 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Magnetoconductivity of amorphous films based on molybdenum and tungsten silicide and germanide,

    P. Ercolano, X. Zhang, G. Pepe, and L. You, “Magnetoconductivity of amorphous films based on molybdenum and tungsten silicide and germanide,” Supercond. Sci. Technol.38(2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Superconducting nanowire single photon detectors fabricated from an amorphous Mo0.75Ge0.25 thin film,

    V. B. Verma, A. E. Lita, M. R. Vissers,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single photon detectors fabricated from an amorphous Mo0.75Ge0.25 thin film,” Appl. Phys. Lett.105(2014). Publisher: AIP Publishing

    2014

  25. [33]

    Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors based on amorphous tungsten germanide,

    S. Yang, Y. Chen, L. Sun,et al., “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors based on amorphous tungsten germanide,” Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 162601 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits,

    J. R. Clem and K. K. Berggren, “Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits,” Phys. Rev. B84, 174510 (2011). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2011

  27. [35]

    Mid-infrared Laser-Induced Fluorescence with Nanosecond Time Resolution Using a Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector: New Technology for Molecular Science,

    L. Chen, D. Schwarzer, V. B. Verma,et al., “Mid-infrared Laser-Induced Fluorescence with Nanosecond Time Resolution Using a Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector: New Technology for Molecular Science,” Accounts Chem. Res.50, 1400–1409 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Observation of an isomerizing double-well quantum system in the condensed phase,

    J. A. Lau, A. Choudhury, C. Li,et al., “Observation of an isomerizing double-well quantum system in the condensed phase,” Science367, 175–178 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Fano fluctuations in superconducting-nanowire single-photon detectors,

    A. G. Kozorezov, C. Lambert, F. Marsili,et al., “Fano fluctuations in superconducting-nanowire single-photon detectors,” Phys. Rev. B96, 054507 (2017). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2017

  30. [38]

    Data for

    B. Hampel, D. Kuznesof, A. S. Mueller,et al., “Data for "Tungsten Germanide Single-Photon Detectors with Saturated Internal Detection Efficiency at Wavelengths up to 29µm",” https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-4009 (2025)

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.