First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Dark Energy Induced Correlation with Radio Sources
read the original abstract
The first-year WMAP data, in combination with any one of a number of other cosmic probes, show that we live in a flat \Lambda-dominated CDM universe with \Omega_m ~ 0.27 and \Omega_\Lambda ~ 0.73. In this model the late-time action of the dark energy, through the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, should produce CMB anisotropies correlated with matter density fluctuations at z<2 (Crittenden & Turok 1996). The measurement of such a signal is an important independent check of the model. We cross-correlate the NRAO VLA Sky Survey radio source catalog (Condon et al. 1998) with the WMAP data in search of this signal, and see indications of the expected correlation. Assuming a flat \Lambda-CDM cosmology, we find \Omega_\Lambda>0 (95% CL, statistical errors only) with the peak of the likelihood at \Omega_\Lambda=0.68, consistent with the preferred WMAP value. A closed model with \Omega_m=1.28, h=0.33, and no dark energy component (\Omega_\Lambda=0), marginally consistent with the WMAP CMB TT angular power spectrum, would produce an anti-correlation between the matter distribution and the CMB. Our analysis of the cross-correlation of the WMAP data with the NVSS catalog rejects this cosmology at the 3\sigma level.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Spectrum of Cosmological Rips and Their Observational Signatures
A unified dark energy model with sigmoid correction generates a spectrum of rip futures that all fit DESI, Pantheon+, and CMB data at the same level as ΛCDM.
-
Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction
Dynamical couplings in interacting dark energy models reduce deviations from LambdaCDM to 1.3-1.5 sigma and yield no Bayesian preference over the standard model.
-
Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction
Generalized interacting dark energy models with constant or dynamical couplings yield analytical density expressions but are not preferred over LambdaCDM by Bayesian evidence from DESI, Pantheon+, and CMB data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.