arxiv: 2512.20383 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Spectrum of Cosmological Rips and Their Observational Signatures

Mikel Artola , Ruth Lazkoz , Vincenzo Salzano

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

keywords dark energycosmological ripsbig ripequation of statefuture singularitiesbayesian analysisobservational constraints

0 comments

The pith

A unified dark energy model produces a spectrum of cosmological rip scenarios from Big Rip to milder variants.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework that unifies various future cosmic singularities known as rips by using a modified barotropic equation of state. This modification with a sigmoid correction ensures the dark energy density stays positive and avoids problems in the early universe, allowing analytic solutions for the density. When confronted with current cosmological observations including supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations, all these rip models fit the data as well as the standard Lambda CDM model. The mild evolution means we cannot yet tell which future rip, if any, is in store for the universe.

Core claim

By incorporating a sigmoid-like term into the barotropic equation of state for dark energy, the model yields closed-form solutions for the energy density that permit a spectrum of future singularities, all of which evolve consistently from early times and remain compatible with existing cosmological data at the one-sigma level.

What carries the argument

Barotropic equation-of-state parameter with sigmoid-like correction, which ensures positive dark energy density and enables analytic classification of rip types based on two parameters.

If this is right

Different rip scenarios are classified continuously by the signs and magnitudes of two model parameters.
Closed-form analytic expressions for energy density allow systematic study of singularities without numerical integration.
Bayesian fits to DESI BAO, cosmic chronometers, CMB, and Pantheon+ data show all rip models compatible with Lambda CDM at 1 sigma.
The mild logarithmic evolution of dark energy density prevents current probes from distinguishing among future fates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future surveys sensitive to rapid late-time transitions could make rip scenarios distinguishable from constant dark energy.
The framework may extend naturally to test additional singularity types not covered in the current classification.
Rip models would require sharper dynamical features, such as a phantom divide crossing within observable redshifts, to gain support over Lambda CDM.

Load-bearing premise

The sigmoid-like correction to the barotropic equation of state is assumed to keep dark energy density strictly positive at all times and to eliminate early-universe pathologies.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement showing negative dark energy density or early-time instabilities at redshifts above 2 would directly contradict the model's consistency guarantee.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.20383 by Mikel Artola, Ruth Lazkoz, Vincenzo Salzano.

read the original abstract

We present a unified dark energy framework capable of generating a continuous spectrum of cosmological ``rip'' scenarios -- including the Big Rip, Grand Rip, Mild Rip, Little Rip, Little Sibling of the Big Rip, and the newly found Dollhouse Rip -- while ensuring a physically consistent evolution across cosmic history. Building on earlier phenomenological proposals, we introduce a barotropic equation-of-state parameter with a sigmoid-like correction to guarantee a strictly positive dark energy density and to avoid early-time pathologies commonly present in previous models. Using this formulation, closed-form analytic expressions for the energy density can be obtained. This, in turn, enables a systematic classification of future singularities based on the signs and magnitudes of two key parameters of the model. We test these scenarios with state-of-the-art cosmological probes, including DESI DR2 BAO, cosmic chronometers, CMB compressed likelihoods, and the Pantheon+ supernovae sample. According to our Bayesian analysis, all rip scenarios yield best-fit parameters compatible with $\Lambda$CDM at the $1\sigma$ level, with Bayes factors weakly favoring $\Lambda$CDM. The mild, logarithmic evolution of the proposed dark energy density prevents current observations from distinguishing among the different future fates. We conclude that, for rip cosmologies to gain observational support over $\Lambda$CDM, they must display more accentuated late-time dynamical features -- such as perhaps rapid transitions or a phantom-divide crossing -- within the redshift range probed by present surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A clean phenomenological unification of rip scenarios via sigmoid EoS correction that yields closed-form densities, but all variants remain indistinguishable from Lambda CDM in current data.

read the letter

This paper supplies a single barotropic dark energy model with a sigmoid correction that organizes several rip futures into one framework and produces closed-form energy density expressions. It adds a new Dollhouse Rip to the list and classifies outcomes by the signs and sizes of two parameters. The fits to DESI DR2 BAO, cosmic chronometers, CMB compressed likelihoods, and Pantheon+ all land inside 1 sigma of Lambda CDM, with Bayes factors that weakly favor the standard model. That is the core result, and it is presented without overclaiming the observational reach. The analytic expressions are the real practical gain. Earlier rip models often needed numerical work or ran into negative densities at early times; the sigmoid term fixes both issues while keeping the late-time behavior under control. The parameter map then lets you move continuously from Big Rip to milder cases without changing the functional form. The data analysis follows standard Bayesian practice on recent catalogs, and the authors are straightforward that the logarithmic evolution is too slow for present surveys to separate the scenarios. The main limitation is the ad hoc character of the sigmoid correction itself. It is chosen to guarantee positivity and avoid pathologies rather than derived from a deeper principle, so the unification stays phenomenological. Because the dynamics stay mild, the paper correctly concludes that stronger late-time features would be required before these models could be tested against Lambda CDM. No internal contradictions appear in the construction or the reported posteriors. This is useful for researchers who work on dark energy parametrizations and future singularities. Anyone who needs organized analytic expressions for rip classification will find the closed forms and the two-parameter scheme convenient. It is coherent enough to deserve a full referee process rather than a desk rejection. I would send it for review. The technical convenience is real even if the observational payoff is modest for now.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a unified phenomenological dark energy model using a barotropic equation-of-state parameter with a sigmoid-like correction. This generates closed-form positive energy density expressions and a continuous spectrum of future rip scenarios (Big Rip, Grand Rip, Mild Rip, Little Rip, Little Sibling of the Big Rip, and a new Dollhouse Rip) classified by the signs and magnitudes of two key parameters. Bayesian fits to DESI DR2 BAO, cosmic chronometers, CMB compressed likelihoods, and Pantheon+ supernovae show all scenarios compatible with ΛCDM at 1σ, with Bayes factors weakly favoring ΛCDM; the mild logarithmic evolution implies current data cannot distinguish the scenarios, requiring stronger late-time features for future tests.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the work supplies a systematic, analytic classification of rip cosmologies within one consistent framework that avoids common early-time pathologies. The explicit finding that all variants remain indistinguishable from ΛCDM at present precision is useful for directing observational strategy toward models with rapid transitions or phantom-divide crossings. The closed-form energy-density expressions constitute a concrete strength for reproducibility and extension.

major comments (2)

[Bayesian analysis / results] The Bayesian analysis section reports 1σ compatibility for all rip scenarios with DESI DR2 BAO, cosmic chronometers, CMB, and Pantheon+ but supplies no explicit error-bar values, covariance treatment, or posterior summaries; this detail is load-bearing for the claim that current data cannot distinguish the scenarios.
[Model construction and data fits] The viability of all rip types rests on posterior compatibility with the same datasets used to constrain the two key parameters; while the parameters are defined independently, this introduces moderate circularity that should be addressed by showing prior robustness or independent constraints on the classification parameters.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract is information-dense; splitting the claims about closed-form expressions, parameter classification, and observational results into separate sentences would improve readability.
[Throughout] Ensure all derived equations for energy density are numbered and cross-referenced in the text when the classification by the two parameters is presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Bayesian analysis / results] The Bayesian analysis section reports 1σ compatibility for all rip scenarios with DESI DR2 BAO, cosmic chronometers, CMB, and Pantheon+ but supplies no explicit error-bar values, covariance treatment, or posterior summaries; this detail is load-bearing for the claim that current data cannot distinguish the scenarios.

Authors: We agree that additional quantitative details are needed. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit 1σ error bars on all best-fit parameters for each rip scenario, describe the covariance treatment when combining the datasets, and include posterior summary statistics (or reference to corner plots in an appendix). These additions will directly support the 1σ compatibility statement and the conclusion that current data cannot distinguish the scenarios. revision: yes
Referee: [Model construction and data fits] The viability of all rip types rests on posterior compatibility with the same datasets used to constrain the two key parameters; while the parameters are defined independently, this introduces moderate circularity that should be addressed by showing prior robustness or independent constraints on the classification parameters.

Authors: The rip classification is derived analytically from the signs and magnitudes of the two key parameters in the equation-of-state function and does not depend on the data. The fits are performed only to test viability and indistinguishability from ΛCDM. To address the concern we will add a dedicated paragraph demonstrating prior robustness: we re-run the MCMC with varied prior widths on the classification parameters and show that the scenario assignments and 1σ compatibility conclusions remain unchanged. We already note in the conclusions that stronger late-time features will be needed for future independent tests. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation or observational claims

full rationale

The paper constructs a phenomenological barotropic EoS with sigmoid correction to ensure positive DE density and closed-form expressions, then classifies rip types (including the new Dollhouse Rip) directly from signs/magnitudes of two free parameters. These steps follow from the chosen functional form without self-definition or reduction to inputs. Observational tests via Bayesian fitting to DESI, chronometers, CMB, and Pantheon+ data show parameter compatibility with ΛCDM at 1σ and weak Bayes preference for ΛCDM; this is standard model evaluation, not a fitted input relabeled as prediction. No self-citation load-bearing, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is present. The framework remains self-contained against external datasets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard FLRW cosmology plus a phenomenological barotropic fluid with an added sigmoid term; two free parameters control the rip classification and are fitted to data.

free parameters (1)

two key parameters controlling singularity type
Signs and magnitudes of these parameters determine which rip scenario occurs; they are constrained by the Bayesian fit to cosmological data.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard flat FLRW metric and barotropic fluid description of dark energy
Invoked to derive the energy-density evolution and closed-form expressions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1384 out tokens · 35570 ms · 2026-05-16T20:30:19.245592+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

barotropic equation-of-state parameter with a sigmoid-like correction... closed-form analytic expressions for the energy density... classification of future singularities based on the signs and magnitudes of two key parameters
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean costAlphaLog_fourth_deriv_at_zero unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ρ(a) = 3H₀² [n ln(η a^{3nα} + sqrt(1+η² a^{6nα}))]^{1/n}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity
astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

The w†VCDM model shows a statistically significant preference for late-time quintessence-phantom crossing dark energy, raises the Hubble constant, and satisfies neutrino mass and Neff constraints from current cosmolog...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 42 internal anchors

[1]

On the other hand, at late times we find: ρ(a)≃3H 2 0 η1/na−3|α|,(21) which scales as a quintessence fluid with constant equation-of-state parameterw≃ −1+|α|

Negativeαand positiven In the early-universe regime, the DE blows up loga- rithmically: ρ(a)≃3H 2 0 −3n|α|ln(a) 1/n .(20) This logarithmic divergence is much milder than the polynomial scalings of matter and radiation (which be- have asa −3 anda −4, respectively), so for any fixedn >0 and reasonable|α|it does not spoil the standard matter- radiation domin...

work page
[2]

area” spanned below the emission peak. This latter method has the drawback of depend- ing on how “concentrated

Negativeαandn The conclusions of the previous scenario are also valid in this case. In fact, whena≪a 0, the scaling of DE is of the form ρ(a)≃3H 2 0 η−1/|n|a−3|α|,(22) thus diverging as a quintessence fluid withw≃ −1 +|α|. For a reasonable early-time description of the Universe (dominated both by matter and radiation), one requires |α|<1. In view of to th...

work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2024
[3]

Prospects for probing the dark energy via supernova distance measurements

D. Huterer and M. S. Turner, Prospects for probing the dark energy via supernova distance measurements, Phys. Rev. D60, 081301 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9808133

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[4]

A. G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team), Observa- tional evidence from supernovae for an accelerating uni- verse and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009– 1038 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[5]

Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Super- novae, Astrophys

S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Super- novae, Astrophys. J.517, 565–586 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9812133

work page arXiv 1999
[6]

A. E. Langeet al.(Boomerang), Cosmological parame- ters from the first results of BOOMERANG, Phys. Rev. D63, 042001 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0005004

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[7]

M. R. Noltaet al.(WMAP), First year Wilkinson Mi- crowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Dark energy induced correlation with radio sources, Astrophys. J.608, 10–15 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0305097

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[8]

D. J. Eisensteinet al.(SDSS), Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, Astrophys. J.633, 560– 574 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501171

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[9]

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications

S. Coleet al.(2dFGRS), The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Sur- vey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 362, 505–534 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501174

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[10]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Struc- ture of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

work page 2023
[11]

The dS/CFT Correspondence and the Big Smash

B. McInnes, The dS/CFT correspondence and the big smash, JHEP08, 029, arXiv:hep-th/0112066

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, Phantom energy and cosmic doomsday, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 071301 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302506

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[13]

The Fate of Bound Systems in Phantom and Quintessence Cosmologies

S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, The Fate of bound systems in phantom and quintessence cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D70, 123529 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0410309

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[14]

P. H. Frampton, K. J. Ludwick, and R. J. Scher- rer, The Little Rip, Phys. Rev. D84, 063003 (2011), arXiv:1106.4996 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[15]

The little sibling of the big rip singularity

M. Bouhmadi-Lopez, A. Errahmani, P. Martin-Moruno, T. Ouali, and Y. Tavakoli, The little sibling of the big rip singularity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1550078 (2015), arXiv:1407.2446 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[16]

P. H. Frampton, K. J. Ludwick, and R. J. Scherrer, Pseudo-rip: Cosmological models intermediate between the cosmological constant and the little rip, Phys. Rev. D85, 083001 (2012), arXiv:1112.2964 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[17]

F. J. Tipler, Singularities in conformally flat spacetimes, Phys. Lett. A64, 8–10 (1977)

work page 1977
[18]

Krolak, Towards the proof of the cosmic censorship hypothesis, Class

A. Krolak, Towards the proof of the cosmic censorship hypothesis, Class. Quant. Grav.3, 267 (1986)

work page 1986
[19]

Grand Rip and Grand Bang/Crunch cosmological singularities

L. Fern´ andez-Jambrina, Grand Rip and Grand Bang/Crunch cosmological singularities, Phys. Rev. D90, 064014 (2014), arXiv:1408.6997 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[20]

Hidden past of dark energy cosmological models

L. Fernandez-Jambrina, Hidden past of dark energy cosmological models, Phys. Lett. B656, 9–14 (2007), arXiv:0704.3936 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[21]

J. D. Barrow, Sudden future singularities, Class. Quant. Grav.21, L79–L82 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0403084

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[22]

Escaping the Big Rip?

M. Bouhmadi-Lopez and J. A. Jimenez Madrid, Escaping the big rip?, JCAP05, 005, arXiv:astro-ph/0404540

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

A. A. Sen and R. J. Scherrer, Generalizing the gener- alized Chaplygin gas, Phys. Rev. D72, 063511 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507717

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[24]

Worse than a big rip?

M. Bouhmadi-Lopez, P. F. Gonzalez-Diaz, and P. Martin-Moruno, Worse than a big rip?, Phys. Lett. B659, 1–5 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0612135. 11

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[25]

Properties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Tsujikawa, Properties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe, Phys. Rev. D71, 063004 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0501025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[26]

M. P. Dabrowski and T. Denkieiwcz, Barotropic index w-singularities in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D79, 063521 (2009), arXiv:0902.3107 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[27]

$w$-singularities in cosmological models

L. Fernandez-Jambrina,w-singularities in cosmologi- cal models, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.314, 012061 (2011), arXiv:1012.3159 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[28]

M. P. Dabrowski, Are singularities the limits of cosmol- ogy? (2014), arXiv:1407.4851 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[29]

Trivedi, Recent Advances in Cosmological Singulari- ties, Symmetry16, 298 (2024), arXiv:2309.08954 [gr-qc]

O. Trivedi, Recent Advances in Cosmological Singulari- ties, Symmetry16, 298 (2024), arXiv:2309.08954 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Stefancic, Expansion around the vacuum equation of state - Sudden future singularities and asymptotic be- havior, Phys

H. Stefancic, Expansion around the vacuum equation of state - Sudden future singularities and asymptotic be- havior, Phys. Rev. D71, 084024 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0411630

work page arXiv 2005
[31]

J. D. Barrow and S. Z. W. Lip, The Classical Stability of Sudden and Big Rip Singularities, Phys. Rev. D80, 043518 (2009), arXiv:0901.1626 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[32]

A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmologi- cal constraints from the measurements of baryon acous- tic oscillations, JCAP02, 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[33]

DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cos- mological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[34]

¨Oz¨ ulker, E

E. ¨Oz¨ ulker, E. Di Valentino, and W. Giar` e, Dark Energy Crosses the Line: Quantifying and Testing the Evidence for Phantom Crossing (2025), arXiv:2506.19053 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Scherer, M

M. Scherer, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and A. De Fe- lice, Challenging the ΛCDM model: 5σevidence for a dynamical dark energy late-time transition, Phys. Rev. D112, 043513 (2025), arXiv:2504.20664 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Gonz´ alez-Fuentes and A

A. Gonz´ alez-Fuentes and A. G´ omez-Valent, Reconstruc- tion of dark energy and late-time cosmic expansion us- ing the Weighted Function Regression method (2025), arXiv:2506.11758 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10, 213– 224 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0009008

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[38]

E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the uni- verse, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0208512

work page arXiv 2003
[39]

Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys.641, A5 (2020), arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[40]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[41]

The final state and thermodynamics of dark energy universe

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, The Final state and ther- modynamics of dark energy universe, Phys. Rev. D70, 103522 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0408170

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[42]

P. H. Frampton, K. J. Ludwick, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and R. J. Scherrer, Models for Little Rip Dark Energy, Phys. Lett. B708, 204–211 (2012), arXiv:1108.0067 [hep- th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[43]

Viscous Little Rip Cosmology

I. Brevik, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Viscous Little Rip Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D84, 103508 (2011), arXiv:1107.4642 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[44]

Borislavov Vasilev, M

T. Borislavov Vasilev, M. Bouhmadi-L´ opez, and P. Mart´ ın-Moruno, Classical and Quantumf(R) Cosmol- ogy: The Big Rip, the Little Rip and the Little Sibling of the Big Rip, Universe7, 288 (2021), arXiv:2106.12050 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

Aizpuru, R

A. Aizpuru, R. Arjona, and S. Nesseris, Machine learning improved fits of the sound horizon at the baryon drag epoch, Phys. Rev. D104, 043521 (2021), arXiv:2106.00428 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

Morescoet al., Unveiling the Universe with emerg- ing cosmological probes, Living Rev

M. Morescoet al., Unveiling the Universe with emerg- ing cosmological probes, Living Rev. Rel.25, 6 (2022), arXiv:2201.07241 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

Constraining Cosmological Parameters Based on Relative Galaxy Ages

R. Jimenez and A. Loeb, Constraining cosmological pa- rameters based on relative galaxy ages, Astrophys. J. 573, 37–42 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0106145

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[48]

Constraining the expansion rate of the Universe using low-redshift ellipticals as cosmic chronometers

M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, A. Cimatti, and L. Pozzetti, Constraining the expansion rate of the Universe using low-redshift ellipticals as cosmic chronometers, JCAP03, 045, arXiv:1010.0831 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[49]

Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. I. Assessing the Impact of Young Stellar Populations on Hubble Parameter Measurements

M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, and A. Citro, Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. I. Assessing the Impact of Young Stellar Populations on Hubble Parameter Measurements, Astro- phys. J.868, 84 (2018), arXiv:1804.05864 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[50]

Moresco, R

M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti, and L. Pozzetti, Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Sys- tematics and Full Covariance Matrix, Astrophys. J.898, 82 (2020), arXiv:2003.07362 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2020
[51]

New constraints on cosmological parameters and neutrino properties using the expansion rate of the Universe to z~1.75

M. Moresco, L. Verde, L. Pozzetti, R. Jimenez, and A. Cimatti, New constraints on cosmological parameters and neutrino properties using the expansion rate of the Universe toz∼1.75, JCAP07, 053, arXiv:1201.6658 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[52]

Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z$\sim$2

M. Moresco, Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers atz∼ 2, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450, L16–L20 (2015), arXiv:1503.01116 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[53]

M. Morescoet al., Improved constraints on the expan- sion rate of the Universe up toz∼1.1 from the spectro- scopic evolution of cosmic chronometers, JCAP08, 006, arXiv:1201.3609 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[54]

Constraining the time evolution of dark energy, curvature and neutrino properties with cosmic chronometers

M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti, L. Pozzetti, C. Maraston, and D. Thomas, Constraining the time evolution of dark energy, curvature and neu- trino properties with cosmic chronometers, JCAP12, 039, arXiv:1604.00183 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[55]

Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic growth and expansion

M. Moresco and F. Marulli, Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic growth and expansion, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.471, L82–L86 (2017), arXiv:1705.07903 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[56]

The local and distant Universe: stellar ages and $H_0$

R. Jimenez, A. Cimatti, L. Verde, M. Moresco, and B. Wandelt, The local and distant Universe: stellar ages andH 0, JCAP03, 043, arXiv:1902.07081 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902
[57]

K. Jiao, N. Borghi, M. Moresco, and T.-J. Zhang, New Observational H(z) Data from Full-spectrum Fitting of Cosmic Chronometers in the LEGA-C Survey, Astro- phys. J. Suppl.265, 48 (2023), arXiv:2205.05701 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Bansal and D

P. Bansal and D. Huterer, Expansion-history preferences of DESI DR2 and external data, Phys. Rev. D112, 023528 (2025), arXiv:2502.07185 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Observational Constraints on Dark Energy and Cosmic Curvature

Y. Wang and P. Mukherjee, Observational Constraints on Dark Energy and Cosmic Curvature, Phys. Rev.D76, 12 103533 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703780 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[60]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

D. Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938, 113 (2022), arXiv:2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[61]

E. R. Petersonet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Evaluat- ing Peculiar Velocity Corrections in Cosmological Analy- ses with Nearby Type Ia Supernovae, Astrophys. J.938, 112 (2022), arXiv:2110.03487 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

A. Carr, T. M. Davis, D. Scolnic, D. Scolnic, K. Said, D. Brout, E. R. Peterson, and R. Kessler, The Pan- theon+ analysis: Improving the redshifts and peculiar velocities of Type Ia supernovae used in cosmological analyses, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.39, e046 (2022), arXiv:2112.01471 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

D. Broutet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmo- logical Constraints, Astrophys. J.938, 110 (2022), arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[64]

A. Conleyet al., Supernova constraints and systematic uncertainties from the first three years of the supernova legacy survey, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Se- ries192, 1 (2010)

work page 2010
[65]

Mukherjee, D

P. Mukherjee, D. Parkinson, and A. R. Liddle, A nested sampling algorithm for cosmological model selection, Astrophys. J. Lett.638, L51–L54 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0508461

work page arXiv 2006
[66]

Jeffreys,Theory of Probability, 3rd ed

H. Jeffreys,Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. (Oxford, Ox- ford, England, 1961)

work page 1961