Observational Constraints on Dark Energy and Cosmic Curvature
read the original abstract
Current observational bounds on dark energy depend on assumptions about the curvature of the universe. We present a simple and efficient method for incorporating constraints from CMB anisotropy data, and use it to derive constraints on cosmic curvature and dark energy density as a free function of cosmic time using current data. We show that there are two CMB shift parameters, R=sqrt{\Omega_m H_0^2} r(z_{CMB}) (scaled distance to recombination) and l_a=\pi r(z_{CMB})/r_s(z_{CMB})(angular scale of the sound horizon at recombination), with measured values that are nearly uncorrelated with each other. Allowing nonzero cosmic curvature, the three-year WMAP data give R =1.71 +/- 0.03, l_a =302.5 +/- 1.2, and \Omega_b h^2 = 0.02173 +/- 0.00082, independent of the dark energy model. The corresponding bounds for a flat universe are R =1.70 +/- 0.03, l_a =302.2 +/- 1.2, and \Omega_b h^2 = 0.022 +/- 0.00082. We give the covariance matrix of (R, l_a, \Omega_b h^2) from the three-year WMAP data. We find that (R, l_a, \Omega_b h^2) provide an efficient and intuitive summary of CMB data as far as dark energy constraints are concerned. Using current CMB, SN Ia, and BAO data, we find that dark energy density is consistent with a constant in cosmic time, with marginal deviations from a cosmological constant that may reflect current systematic uncertainties or true evolution in dark energy. A flat universe is allowed by current data: \Omega_k=-0.006_{-0.012}^{+0.013}_{-0.025}^{+0.025} for w_X(z)=const., and \Omega_k=-0.002_{-0.018}^{+0.018}_{-0.032}^{+0.041} for w_X(z)=w_0+w_a(1-a)(68% and 95% C.L.). The bounds on cosmic curvature are less stringent if dark energy density is allowed to be a free function of cosmic time, and are also dependent on the assumption about the early time property of dark energy.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
DESI DR2 BAO data exhibits 2.3 sigma tension with CMB in Lambda-CDM but prefers evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) at 3.1 sigma with CMB and 2.8-4.2 sigma when including supernovae.
-
Lossless Compression of Cosmological Information from Type Ia Supernova Distance Measurements
Compressing SN Ia distance-redshift data to eleven Gaussian log r_p(z) points with covariance is shown to be operationally lossless for cosmological inference across multiple models and datasets.
-
Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Smooth Transitions with Recent DESI DR2 Observations
Sign-switching dark energy with a transition at z_† fits recent DESI DR2, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ data better than ΛCDM while raising the inferred Hubble constant and easing the Hubble tension.
-
A Spectrum of Cosmological Rips and Their Observational Signatures
A unified dark energy model with sigmoid correction generates a spectrum of rip futures that all fit DESI, Pantheon+, and CMB data at the same level as ΛCDM.
-
Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction
Generalized interacting dark energy models with constant or dynamical couplings yield analytical density expressions but are not preferred over LambdaCDM by Bayesian evidence from DESI, Pantheon+, and CMB data.
-
Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction
Dynamical couplings in interacting dark energy models reduce deviations from LambdaCDM to 1.3-1.5 sigma and yield no Bayesian preference over the standard model.
-
Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model
The JCDM model yields H0 of 66.95 plus or minus 0.51 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m of 0.3419 plus or minus 0.0065 in a flat universe, rising to H0 of 69.13 plus or minus 0.56 with slight positive curvature, fitting late-time d...
-
Redshift evolution of the Hubble constant: Constraints and new insights from an interacting dark energy model
Modified IDE model with interaction parameter alpha ~0.01 from late-universe data shows H0 decreasing with redshift, tightening to 10^-5 when CMB priors are added.
-
How Complex is Dark Energy? A Bayesian Analysis of CPL Extensions with Recent DESI BAO Measurements
Bayesian evidence from DESI BAO plus CMB and SN data favors the standard CPL evolving dark energy model over both simpler constant-w and more complex higher-order extensions.
-
Revisiting the Hubble tension problem in the framework of holographic dark energy
HDE models with future event horizon IR cutoff partially ease the Hubble tension while Hubble-scale cutoffs do not, consistent across six models and multiple BAO/SN/CMB combinations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.