pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21284 · v1 · pith:XBE6YUJEnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.str-el

Ligand-mediated Origin of Altermagnetic Spin-Splitting

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismspin splittingligand hybridizationtight-binding modelCo1/4NbSe2Wannier Hamiltonianmagnetic anisotropyspintronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ligand-mediated hybridization rather than direct ion hopping produces altermagnetic spin splitting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the microscopic origin of spin-split bands in altermagnets, which break time-reversal symmetry without net magnetization. First-principles calculations on the g-wave altermagnet Co1/4NbSe2 are reduced to a short-range tight-binding model built from Wannier functions. Selectively disabling hopping channels shows that the splitting survives only when ligand-mediated paths remain active, while direct cobalt-cobalt hopping contributes far less. This identifies a local bonding mechanism that transfers magnetic anisotropy to mobile electrons. A reader would care because the result points to concrete ways to engineer spintronic responses by choosing ligands rather than solely by tuning magnetic atoms.

Core claim

The dominant contribution to altermagnetic spin splitting arises from ligand-mediated hybridization that transfers anisotropy to itinerant states. First-principles results establish that a short-range tight-binding model already captures the full splitting. By turning individual hopping channels on and off inside the Wannier Hamiltonian, the authors isolate the ligand-assisted term as the leading source and show that direct magnetic-ion hopping is secondary.

What carries the argument

Ligand-mediated hybridization in a short-range tight-binding model constructed from Wannier functions, which transmits local magnetic anisotropy to delocalized electrons through controlled hopping channels.

If this is right

  • Altermagnetic spin splitting has a local origin that short-range tight-binding models can reproduce.
  • Ligand hopping terms dominate the hierarchy of contributions over direct magnetic-ion interactions.
  • The mechanism supplies a microscopic link between symmetry-allowed terms and concrete material properties.
  • Real-space design of altermagnetic responses becomes possible by engineering ligand bonding.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Material searches for altermagnets could prioritize compounds whose ligands form strong hybridization channels with the magnetic ions.
  • The same ligand-assisted transfer may influence spin splitting or anisotropy in other classes of compensated magnets.
  • Varying ligand species or bond lengths in related crystal structures offers a direct experimental test of the mechanism's generality.

Load-bearing premise

Selectively disabling specific hopping channels inside the Wannier Hamiltonian cleanly separates physical contributions without introducing artifacts from the projection or basis choice.

What would settle it

A calculation in which ligand hopping channels are suppressed while direct cobalt-cobalt hopping is preserved: if the spin splitting disappears, the ligand mechanism is supported; if the splitting remains, the claim is challenged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21284 by Federico Bisti, Gianni Profeta, Luigi Camerano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. a) Atom-resolved projected band structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) Absolute value of the hopping amplitudes as a function of interatomic distance. b) Histogram of the hopping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. a–d) Wannier-interpolated band structures obtained by selectively excluding specific hopping terms: a) excluding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spin-resolved band structure as a function of the strength of the Co–Se hopping parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets host spin-split electronic bands despite zero net magnetization, opening new routes for spintronics beyond conventional ferromagnets. Going beyond symmetry-based classifications, which specify allowed terms but not their hierarchy, here we use first-principles calculations and Wannier Hamiltonian engineering to uncover the microscopic bonding contributions of altermagnetic spin splitting in the $g$-wave altermagnet Co$_{1/4}$NbSe$_2$. We show that the splitting is captured by a short-range tight-binding model, establishing its local origin. By selectively controlling hopping channels, we demonstrate that the dominant contribution arises not from direct magnetic-ion hopping, but from ligand-mediated hybridization that transfers anisotropy to itinerant states. This identifies ligand-assisted coupling as the key mechanism of altermagnetic spin splitting and provides a microscopic bridge between minimal models and symmetry guided first-principles material searches, enabling real-space design of altermagnetic functionality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses first-principles DFT calculations on the g-wave altermagnet Co_{1/4}NbSe_2 to construct a short-range tight-binding model via Wannier functions. By selectively disabling specific hopping channels (ligand-mediated versus direct magnetic-ion terms) in this Hamiltonian, it concludes that ligand-mediated hybridization is the dominant source of the altermagnetic spin splitting, transferring anisotropy to the itinerant states rather than direct hopping between magnetic ions.

Significance. If the isolation of contributions holds, the result supplies a concrete microscopic mechanism that links symmetry-allowed altermagnetic terms to real-space bonding, which could inform material searches and design. The combination of ab initio data with controlled model engineering is a positive feature that yields testable predictions about which hopping terms control the splitting magnitude.

major comments (1)
  1. [section describing the short-range tight-binding model and selective hopping control] The central claim that ligand-mediated terms dominate rests on the validity of zeroing selected matrix elements inside the projected Wannier Hamiltonian. This procedure risks projection artifacts or unintended changes to effective hybridization that do not map cleanly onto physical bonding channels; explicit checks (e.g., dependence on Wannier spread or comparison with supercell calculations that remove ligands) are needed to confirm the separation is artifact-free.
minor comments (2)
  1. Quantitative values for the spin-splitting magnitude before and after each hopping-channel modification should be reported with error bars or convergence data to allow readers to judge the size of the effect.
  2. A short statement on the range cutoff chosen for the tight-binding model and its impact on the g-wave character would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comment on the robustness of our selective hopping analysis. We address the concern point by point below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that ligand-mediated terms dominate rests on the validity of zeroing selected matrix elements inside the projected Wannier Hamiltonian. This procedure risks projection artifacts or unintended changes to effective hybridization that do not map cleanly onto physical bonding channels; explicit checks (e.g., dependence on Wannier spread or comparison with supercell calculations that remove ligands) are needed to confirm the separation is artifact-free.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the selective matrix-element zeroing is important to rule out projection artifacts. In the manuscript we already show that the short-range Wannier Hamiltonian reproduces the DFT bands and spin splitting to high accuracy, providing initial support for the physical character of the decomposition. To strengthen this, we have performed additional calculations in which the Wannier spread is systematically varied; the dominance of the ligand-mediated channels remains unchanged. We have also carried out a supercell comparison in which selected ligand atoms are displaced or removed while preserving the overall symmetry, confirming that the anisotropy transfer to the itinerant states tracks the physical ligand-mediated hybridization rather than numerical projection effects. These checks and the associated discussion will be added to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from independent DFT input via explicit model interventions

full rationale

The paper derives its central claim from first-principles DFT calculations that generate the Wannier Hamiltonian, followed by explicit, user-defined modifications to selected hopping channels within that Hamiltonian to observe effects on spin splitting. This constitutes an independent dissection step rather than any reduction of the output to the input by construction, self-definition, or self-citation. No equations are presented as equivalent to prior fits, no uniqueness theorems are imported from the authors' own prior work, and the ligand-mediated conclusion is reached by comparing outcomes of controlled modifications against the unmodified model. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks (DFT data) without presupposing the final attribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard DFT approximations and the interpretability of the Wannier projection; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Density-functional theory with standard functionals and pseudopotentials yields an electronic structure accurate enough for subsequent Wannier downfolding.
    Invoked implicitly by the use of first-principles calculations to generate the tight-binding model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5689 in / 1175 out tokens · 41976 ms · 2026-05-21T03:38:21.624313+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    By selectively controlling hopping channels, we demonstrate that the dominant contribution arises not from direct magnetic-ion hopping, but from ligand-mediated hybridization that transfers anisotropy to itinerant states.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    W., et al., 2019, Science, DOI: 10.1126/sci- ence.aaw5903 Barsdell et al., 2010, MNRAS, 408,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jung- wirth, and J. Sinova, “Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear anti- ferromagnets,” Science Advances6(2020), 10.1126/sci- adv.aaz8809

  2. [2]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal ro- tation symmetry,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal ro- tation symmetry,” Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

  3. [3]

    Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

  4. [4]

    Tensorial approach to altermag- netism,

    Paolo G. Radaelli, “Tensorial approach to altermag- netism,” Phys. Rev. B110, 214428 (2024)

  5. [5]

    Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materi- als with negligible spin-orbit coupling,

    Pengfei Liu, Jiayu Li, Jingzhi Han, Xiangang Wan, and Qihang Liu, “Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materi- als with negligible spin-orbit coupling,” Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

  6. [6]

    Altermagnets as a new class of functional ma- terials,

    Cheng Song, Hua Bai, Zhiyuan Zhou, Lei Han, Helena Reichlova, J. Hugo Dil, Junwei Liu, Xianzhe Chen, and Feng Pan, “Altermagnets as a new class of functional ma- terials,” Nature Reviews Materials10, 473–485 (2025)

  7. [7]

    Multifunctional an- tiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current,

    Hai-Yang Ma, Mengli Hu, Nana Li, Jianpeng Liu, Wang Yao, Jin-Feng Jia, and Junwei Liu, “Multifunctional an- tiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current,” Nature Communications12 (2021), 10.1038/s41467-021-23127-7

  8. [8]

    Catalog ofc-paired spin-momentum locking in anti- ferromagnetic systems,

    Mengli Hu, Xingkai Cheng, Zhenqiao Huang, and Junwei Liu, “Catalog ofc-paired spin-momentum locking in anti- ferromagnetic systems,” Phys. Rev. X15, 021083 (2025)

  9. [9]

    Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups,

    Xiaobing Chen, Jun Ren, Yanzhou Zhu, Yutong Yu, Ao Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Jiayu Li, Yuntian Liu, Caiheng Li, and Qihang Liu, “Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups,” Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

  10. [10]

    Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders,

    Yi Jiang, Ziyin Song, Tiannian Zhu, Zhong Fang, Hong- ming Weng, Zheng-Xin Liu, Jian Yang, and Chen Fang, “Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders,” Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

  11. [11]

    npj Quantum Materials , year=

    Sang-Wook Cheong and Fei-Ting Huang, “Altermag- netism with non-collinear spins,” npj Quantum Materials 9(2024), 10.1038/s41535-024-00626-6

  12. [12]

    Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromag- netism,

    Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, Libor ˇSmejkal, Karel V´ yborn´ y, Yuta Yahagi, Jairo Sinova, Tom´ a ˇ s Jung- wirth, and Jakub ˇZelezn´ y, “Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromag- netism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

  13. [13]

    Spin-neutral currents for spintronics,

    Ding-Fu Shao, Shu-Hui Zhang, Ming Li, Chang-Beom Eom, and Evgeny Y. Tsymbal, “Spin-neutral currents for spintronics,” Nature Communications12(2021), 10.1038/s41467-021-26915-3

  14. [14]

    Quantum materi- als for spintronic applications,

    Yaqin Guo, Xu Zhang, Zhi Huang, Jinyan Chen, Zijun Luo, Jing Zhang, Jingfeng Li, Zhaowei Zhang, Jinkui Zhao, Xiufeng Han, and Hao Wu, “Quantum materi- als for spintronic applications,” npj Spintronics2(2024), 10.1038/s44306-024-00038-z

  15. [15]

    Spin- polarized antiferromagnets for spintronics,

    Zhenzhou Guo, Xiaotian Wang, Wenhong Wang, Gang Zhang, Xiaodong Zhou, and Zhenxiang Cheng, “Spin- polarized antiferromagnets for spintronics,” Advanced Materials37(2025), 10.1002/adma.202505779

  16. [16]

    Transport theory and spin-transfer physics ind-wave altermagnets,

    Ricardo Zarzuela, Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Olena Gomonay, Libor ˇSmejkal, and Jairo Sinova, “Transport theory and spin-transfer physics ind-wave altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B111, 064422 (2025)

  17. [17]

    Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy,

    Juraj Krempask` y, L ˇSmejkal, SW D’souza, M Hajlaoui, G Springholz, K Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F Alarab, PC Constantinou, V Strocov, D Usanov,et al., “Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy,” Nature626, 517–522 (2024)

  18. [18]

    Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic mnte,

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, “Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic mnte,” Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

  19. [19]

    Observation of plaid- like spin splitting in a noncoplanar antiferromagnet,

    Yu-Peng Zhu, Xiaobing Chen, Xiang-Rui Liu, Yuntian Liu, Pengfei Liu, Heming Zha, Gexing Qu, Caiyun Hong, Jiayu Li, Zhicheng Jiang, Xiao-Ming Ma, Yu-Jie Hao, Ming-Yuan Zhu, Wenjing Liu, Meng Zeng, Sreehari Ja- yaram, Malik Lenger, Jianyang Ding, Shu Mo, Kiyohisa Tanaka, Masashi Arita, Zhengtai Liu, Mao Ye, Dawei Shen, J¨ org Wrachtrup, Yaobo Huang, Rui-Hua...

  20. [20]

    Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in mnte,

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, “Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in mnte,” Nature6...

  21. [21]

    A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet,

    Bei Jiang, Mingzhe Hu, Jianli Bai, Ziyin Song, Chao Mu, Gexing Qu, Wan Li, Wenliang Zhu, Hanqi Pi, Zhongxu Wei, Yu-Jie Sun, Yaobo Huang, Xiquan Zheng, Yingy- ing Peng, Lunhua He, Shiliang Li, Jianlin Luo, Zheng Li, Genfu Chen, Hang Li, Hongming Weng, and Tian Qian, “A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet,” Na- ture Physics21, 754–759 (2025)

  22. [22]

    Crystal- symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room- temperature metallic altermagnet candidate,

    Fayuan Zhang, Xingkai Cheng, Zhouyi Yin, Changchao Liu, Liwei Deng, Yuxi Qiao, Zheng Shi, Shuxuan Zhang, Junhao Lin, Zhengtai Liu, Mao Ye, Yaobo Huang, Xiangyu Meng, Cheng Zhang, Taichi Okuda, Kenya Shimada, Shengtao Cui, Yue Zhao, Guang-Han Cao, Shan Qiao, Junwei Liu, and Chaoyu Chen, “Crystal- symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room- tempe...

  23. [23]

    Electronic structure of a layered altermagnetic compound conb4se8,

    Anup Pradhan Sakhya, Mazharul Islam Mondal, Milo Sprague, Resham Babu Regmi, Arun K Kumay, Hi- manshu Sheokand, Igor. I. Mazin, Nirmal J. Ghimire, and Madhab Neupane, “Electronic structure of a layered altermagnetic compound conb4se8,” (2025), 10.48550/ARXIV.2503.16670

  24. [24]

    Relativistic and non- relativistic spin splitting above and below the fermi level in ag-wave altermagnet,

    Nicholas Dale, Omar A. Ashour, Marc Vila, Resham B. Regmi, Justin Fox, Cameron W. Johnson, Edward S. Barnard, Alexei Fedorov, Alexander Stibor, Nirmal J. Ghimire, and Sin´ ead M. Griffin, “Relativistic and non- relativistic spin splitting above and below the fermi level in ag-wave altermagnet,” (2024)

  25. [25]

    De Vita, C

    Alessandro De Vita, Chiara Bigi, Davide Romanin, Matthew D. Watson, Vincent Polewczyk, Marta Zonno, 7 Fran¸ cois Bertran, My Bang Petersen, Federico Motti, Giovanni Vinai, Manuel Tuniz, Federico Cilento, Mario Cuoco, Brian M. Andersen, Andreas Kreisel, Lu- ciano Jacopo D’Onofrio, Oliver J. Clark, Mark T. Edmonds, Christopher Candelora, Muxian Xu, Siyu Che...

  26. [26]

    Anisotropic spin transport enhanced by zero- dimensional weyl nodes in altermagnetic weyl semimetals,

    Xiang-Feng Yang, Zhe-Qi Wang, and Hua-Hua Fu, “Anisotropic spin transport enhanced by zero- dimensional weyl nodes in altermagnetic weyl semimetals,” Advanced Functional Materials36(2025), 10.1002/adfm.202502516

  27. [27]

    Signature of topological surface bands in altermagnetic weyl semimetal crsb,

    Wenlong Lu, Shiyu Feng, Yuzhi Wang, Dong Chen, Zihan Lin, Xin Liang, Siyuan Liu, Wanxiang Feng, Kohei Yam- agami, Junwei Liu, Claudia Felser, Quansheng Wu, and Junzhang Ma, “Signature of topological surface bands in altermagnetic weyl semimetal crsb,” Nano Letters25, 7343–7350 (2025)

  28. [28]

    Spin hall magnetoresistance at the altermag- netic insulator/pt interface,

    Miina Leivisk¨ a, Reza Firouzmandi, Kyo-Hoon Ahn, Pe- ter Kubaˇ sˇ cik, Zbynek Soban, Satya Prakash Bomman- aboyena, Christoph M¨ uller, Dominik Kriegner, Sebastian Sailler, Denise Reustlen, Michaela Lammel, Kranthi Ku- mar Bestha, Mat ˇ ej H´ yvl, LiborˇSmejkal, Jakub ˇZelezn´ y, Anja U. B. Wolter, Monika Scheufele, Johanna Fischer, Matthias Opel, Stepha...

  29. [29]

    Symmetry-driven unconventional magnetoelectric cou- pling in perovskite altermagnets: From bulk to the two-dimensional limit,

    Zhou Cui, Ziye Zhu, Xunkai Duan, Bowen Hao, Xi- anzhang Chen, Jiayong Zhang, and Tong Zhou, “Symmetry-driven unconventional magnetoelectric cou- pling in perovskite altermagnets: From bulk to the two-dimensional limit,” Advanced Science (2026), 10.1002/advs.202600004

  30. [30]

    Tunable hidden al- termagnetic spin splitting in layered ruddlesden–popper oxides,

    Tongxie Zhang, Linding Yuan, James M. Rondinelli, H. A. Fertig, and Shixiong Zhang, “Tunable hidden al- termagnetic spin splitting in layered ruddlesden–popper oxides,” Nano Letters26, 2778–2786 (2026)

  31. [31]

    Designing nonrelativistic spin splitting in oxide perovskites,

    Subhadeep Bandyopadhyay, Silvia Picozzi, and Sayan- tika Bhowal, “Designing nonrelativistic spin splitting in oxide perovskites,” Phys. Rev. B112, 064405 (2025)

  32. [32]

    Multiferroic nematic d-wave altermagnetism driven by orbital-order on the honeycomb lattice,

    Luigi Camerano, Adolfo O. Fumega, Jose L. Lado, Alessandro Stroppa, and Gianni Profeta, “Multiferroic nematic d-wave altermagnetism driven by orbital-order on the honeycomb lattice,” npj 2D Materials and Appli- cations9(2025), 10.1038/s41699-025-00599-5

  33. [33]

    Intrinsic i-wave altermagnetism in 2D graphene superlattices

    Cuiju Yu and Jose L. Lado, “Intrinsic i-wave al- termagnetism in 2d graphene superlattices,” (2026), 10.48550/ARXIV.2604.19661

  34. [34]

    Two-dimensional ferroelectric altermagnets: From model to material realization,

    Ziye Zhu, Xunkai Duan, Jiayong Zhang, Bowen Hao, Igor Zutic, and Tong Zhou, “Two-dimensional ferroelectric altermagnets: From model to material realization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06258 (2025)

  35. [35]

    Sødequist and T

    Joachim Sødequist and Thomas Olsen, “Two-dimensional altermagnets from high throughput computational screening: Symmetry requirements, chiral magnons, and spin-orbit effects,” Applied Physics Letters124(2024), 10.1063/5.0198285

  36. [36]

    Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism,

    Yichen Liu, Junxi Yu, and Cheng-Cheng Liu, “Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism,” Physical Review Letters133(2024), 10.1103/physrevlett.133.206702

  37. [37]

    Minimal models for al- termagnetism,

    Merc` e Roig, Andreas Kreisel, Yue Yu, Brian M. Ander- sen, and Daniel F. Agterberg, “Minimal models for al- termagnetism,” Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

  38. [38]

    Model hamiltonian for altermagnetic topological insulators,

    Rafael Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez and Bernardo Uribe, “Model hamiltonian for altermagnetic topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B112, 184101 (2025)

  39. [39]

    Altermagnetic phase transition in a lieb metal,

    Matteo D¨ urrnagel, Hendrik Hohmann, Atanu Maity, Jannis Seufert, Michael Klett, Lennart Klebl, and Ronny Thomale, “Altermagnetic phase transition in a lieb metal,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036502 (2025)

  40. [40]

    Extended s-wave alter- magnets,

    Matteo D¨ urrnagel, Lennart Klebl, Tobias M¨ uller, Ronny Thomale, and Michael Klett, “Extended s-wave alter- magnets,” (2025)

  41. [41]

    Engineering altermagnetic orders on the square- kagome lattice through sublattice interference,

    Jonas Issing, Jannis Seufert, Michael Klett, Sarbajit Mazumdar, Yasir Iqbal, Ronny Thomale, and Atanu Maity, “Engineering altermagnetic orders on the square- kagome lattice through sublattice interference,” (2026)

  42. [42]

    Spontaneous formation of altermag- netism from orbital ordering,

    Valentin Leeb, Alexander Mook, Libor ˇSmejkal, and Johannes Knolle, “Spontaneous formation of altermag- netism from orbital ordering,” Physical Review Letters 132(2024), 10.1103/physrevlett.132.236701

  43. [43]

    Realizing altermagnetism in fermi- hubbard models with ultracold atoms,

    Purnendu Das, Valentin Leeb, Johannes Knolle, and Michael Knap, “Realizing altermagnetism in fermi- hubbard models with ultracold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 263402 (2024)

  44. [44]

    Chiral magnetic excitations and domain textures ofg-wave altermagnets,

    Volodymyr P. Kravchuk, Kostiantyn V. Yershov, Jorge I. Facio, Yaqian Guo, Oleg Janson, Olena Gomonay, Jairo Sinova, and Jeroen van den Brink, “Chiral magnetic excitations and domain textures ofg-wave altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B112, 144421 (2025)

  45. [45]

    Ferroically or- dered magnetic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets,

    Sayantika Bhowal and Nicola A. Spaldin, “Ferroically or- dered magnetic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. X14, 011019 (2024)

  46. [46]

    Harnessing mag- netic octupole hall effect to induce torque in altermag- nets,

    Seungyun Han, Daegeun Jo, Insu Baek, Suik Cheon, Pe- ter M. Oppeneer, and Hyun-Woo Lee, “Harnessing mag- netic octupole hall effect to induce torque in altermag- nets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 076705 (2025)

  47. [47]

    Atomic altermagnetism,

    Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Venkata-Krishna Bharadwaj, Warlley Campos, Ricardo Zarzuela, Nikolaos Biniskos, Rafael M. Fernandes, Tomas Jungwirth, Jairo Sinova, and Libor ˇSmejkal, “Atomic altermagnetism,” (2025), 10.48550/ARXIV.2503.10797

  48. [48]

    Darkness in interlayer and charge density wave states of 2h-tas 2,

    Luigi Camerano, Dario Mastrippolito, Debora Pierucci, Ji Dai, Massimo Tallarida, Luca Ottaviano, Gianni Pro- feta, and Federico Bisti, “Darkness in interlayer and charge density wave states of 2h-tas 2,” Phys. Rev. B111, L121112 (2025)

  49. [49]

    Electronic origin of delicate antiferromagnetism 8 in fe xnbs2,

    Wenxin Li, Jonathan T. Reichanadter, Shan Wu, Ji Seop Oh, Rourav Basak, Shannon C. Haley, Siqi Wang, Joshua E. Chaparro Mata, Elio Vescovo, Donghui Lu, Makoto Hashimoto, Christoph Klewe, Suchismita Sarker, Jessica L. McChesney, Alex Fra˜ n´ o, James G. Ana- lytis, Robert J. Birgeneau, Jeffrey B. Neaton, and Yu He, “Electronic origin of delicate antiferrom...

  50. [50]

    Emergent 3d fermiology and magnetism in an intercalated van der waals system,

    Luigi Camerano, Emanuel A. Mart ´ ınez, Victor Por´ ee, Laura Martella, Dario Mastrippolito, Debora Pierucci, Franco D’Orazio, Polina M. Sheverdyaeva, Paolo Moras, Enrico Della Valle, Tianlun Yu, Moritz Hoesch, Craig M. Polley, Thiagarajan Balasubramanian, Alessandro Nico- laou, Luca Ottaviano, Vladimir N. Strocov, Gianni Pro- feta, and Federico Bisti, “E...

  51. [51]

    Altermagnetism in the layered intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide conb4se8,

    Resham Babu Regmi, Hari Bhandari, Bishal Thapa, Yiqing Hao, Nileema Sharma, James McKenzie, Xin- glong Chen, Abhijeet Nayak, Mohamed El Gazzah, Bence G. M´ arkus, L´ aszl´ o Forr´ o, Xiaolong Liu, Huibo Cao, J. F. Mitchell, Igor I. Mazin, and Nirmal J. Ghimire, “Altermagnetism in the layered intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide conb4se8,” Nature C...

  52. [52]

    An altermagnetic materials library in in- tercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides,

    Ezra Day-Roberts, Huan Wu, Onur Erten, and A. S Botana, “An altermagnetic materials library in in- tercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides,” (2026), 10.48550/ARXIV.2601.02481

  53. [53]

    Observation of altermagnetic spin splitting in an intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide,

    Milo Sprague, Mazharul Islam Mondal, Anup Prad- han Sakhya, Resham Babu Regmi, Surasree Sadhukhan, Arun K. Kumay, Himanshu Sheokand, Igor I. Mazin, Nir- mal J. Ghimire, and Madhab Neupane, “Observation of altermagnetic spin splitting in an intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide,” (2025)

  54. [54]

    Local probe evidence supporting altermagnetism in co1/4nbse2,

    J. N. Graham, T. J. Hicken, R. B. Regmi, M. Janoschek, I. Mazin, H. Luetkens, N. J. Ghimire, and Z. Guguchia, “Local probe evidence supporting altermagnetism in co1/4nbse2,” (2025), 10.48550/ARXIV.2503.09193

  55. [55]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Phys. Rev. B47, 558–561 (1993)

  56. [56]

    From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B59, 1758–1775 (1999)

  57. [57]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple,

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzer- hof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868 (1996)

  58. [58]

    Maximally local- ized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands,

    Nicola Marzari and David Vanderbilt, “Maximally local- ized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands,” Phys. Rev. B56, 12847–12865 (1997)

  59. [59]

    Max- imally localized wannier functions for entangled energy bands,

    Ivo Souza, Nicola Marzari, and David Vanderbilt, “Max- imally localized wannier functions for entangled energy bands,” Phys. Rev. B65, 035109 (2001)

  60. [60]

    Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications,

    Nicola Marzari, Arash A. Mostofi, Jonathan R. Yates, Ivo Souza, and David Vanderbilt, “Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419–1475 (2012)

  61. [61]

    Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications,

    Giovanni Pizzi, Valerio Vitale, Ryotaro Arita, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, Frank Freimuth, Guillaume G´ eranton, Marco Gibertini, Dominik Gresch, Charles Johnson, Takashi Koretsune, Julen Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, Hyungjun Lee, Jae- Mo Lihm, Daniel Marchand, Antimo Marrazzo, Yuriy Mokrousov, Jamal I Mustafa, Yoshiro Nohara, Yusuke Nomura, Lorenzo Paulatto, Samuel Ponc´ e, T...

  62. [62]

    Python Tight Binding (PythTB),

    Trey Cole, Sinisa Coh, and David Vanderbilt, “Python Tight Binding (PythTB),” (2025)

  63. [63]

    Tetrahedral triple-q magnetic ordering and large spon- taneous hall conductivity in the metallic triangular an- tiferromagnet co1/3tas2,

    Pyeongjae Park, Woonghee Cho, Chaebin Kim, Yeochan An, Yoon-Gu Kang, Maxim A vdeev, Romain Sibille, Kazuki Iida, Ryoichi Kajimoto, Ki Hoon Lee, Woori Ju, En-Jin Cho, Han-Jin Noh, Myung Joon Han, Shang- Shun Zhang, Cristian D. Batista, and Je-Geun Park, “Tetrahedral triple-q magnetic ordering and large spon- taneous hall conductivity in the metallic triang...

  64. [64]

    Spon- taneous topological hall effect induced by non-coplanar antiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der waals ma- terials,

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y. Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube, H. Saito, D. Hashizume, R. Kiyanagi, Y. Tokura, R. Arita, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, “Spon- taneous topological hall effect induced by non-coplanar antiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der waals ma- terials,” Nature Physics19, 961–968 (2023)

  65. [65]

    Three-dimensional fermi surface of 2h−NbSe2: Implications for the mechanism of charge density waves,

    F. Weber, R. Hott, R. Heid, L. L. Lev, M. Caputo, T. Schmitt, and V. N. Strocov, “Three-dimensional fermi surface of 2h−NbSe2: Implications for the mechanism of charge density waves,” Phys. Rev. B97, 235122 (2018)