Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

G-ZAP: A Generalizable Zero-Shot Framework for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read G-ZAP learns arbitrary-scale pansharpening from a single test pair and reuses those weights on new scenes without large pretraining or per-image retraining.

desk verdict Useful packaging of INR + multi-scale internal learning for arbitrary-scale zero-shot pansharpening, but the supplied manuscript is too incomplete to verify the SOTA and weight-reuse claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.14412 v2 pith:XBZKRP2K submitted 2026-03-15 cs.CV

Zhiqi Yang , Shan Yin , Jingze Liang , Liang-Jian Deng This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords pansharpeningzero-shotlearningarbitraryscaleimplicitneuralrepresentationgeneralizationimagefusionremotesensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Pansharpening fuses a sharp panchromatic image with a coarser multispectral image to make a sharp multispectral product. Deep models usually need big external training sets and then falter on real full-resolution pairs; prior zero-shot methods fix the distribution gap but must retrain for every pair and stay locked to one fixed scale. This paper claims that a feature-based continuous (INR) fusion network, trained only on the test pair with a three-level multi-scale semi-supervised scheme, can produce high-quality results at any requested scale, transfer its weights across scenes and sensors with little loss, and still match or beat methods that retrain per pair. The practical payoff is efficient real-world use: operators need only the images they already have, can request custom resolutions, and need not re-optimize for every new acquisition. Experiments on multiple real satellite datasets are reported to support state-of-the-art PAN-scale quality and competitive weight reuse.

What carries the argument

The three-level G-ZAP training scheme on a feature-based INR fusion backbone: Level-0 preserves full-resolution features, Level-1 learns standard 4× upsampling under constructed ground-truth supervision, and Level-2 adds variable-scale degradations so the same continuous decoder also learns a 16× relation back to Level-0, combining unsupervised and constructed supervised losses.

What would settle it

Train once on a single real pair (e.g., WorldView-2), freeze the weights, apply them without fine-tuning to a held-out pair from a different sensor (e.g., WorldView-3 or GaoFen) at full resolution, and compare QNR / spectral–spatial distortion scores against the same model retrained from scratch on that new pair; a large gap would falsify the claimed cross-sensor weight-reuse competitiveness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

G-ZAP demonstrates that a feature-enhanced implicit neural representation fusion network, trained zero-shot via a three-level multi-scale semi-supervised loop on a single image pair, achieves state-of-the-art pansharpening at the native PAN scale on real-world data while supporting continuous arbitrary output scales and weight reuse across pairs that remains competitive with full per-pair retraining, without external pretraining or explicit spatial-fidelity constraints.

Load-bearing premise

Multi-scale self-degradation of one test pair plus constructed mid-level labels is assumed enough for the network to learn fusion rules that stay accurate under true cross-sensor and full-resolution shift without external data or spatial-fidelity terms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single trained weight set can be reused on new image pairs instead of retraining for every acquisition.
  • Output resolution can be chosen continuously, not only at the native PAN size.
  • Cross-scene and cross-sensor generalization becomes possible from test data alone, without large external corpora.
  • Prior zero-shot reliance on explicit spatial-fidelity estimation can be dropped under this training scheme.
  • Deployment cost falls because only the test pair is required and the reported training stabilizes within a few hundred epochs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multi-scale self-supervision pattern could be tried on related remote-sensing fusion problems (e.g., hyperspectral–multispectral) that still rely on fixed-scale pretrained networks.
  • If weight reuse holds across sensors, a lightweight edge or on-board model could be updated from one pair and then applied to a stream of later acquisitions.
  • Continuous INR querying would let analysts request intermediate resolutions for inspection without re-running a full discrete pipeline.
  • Measuring failure under extreme spectral mismatch or very large scale gaps is a natural next test the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes G-ZAP, a zero-shot pansharpening framework that uses a feature-based implicit neural representation (INR) fusion backbone together with a three-level multi-scale semi-supervised training scheme (Level-0 full-resolution feature preservation, Level-1 4 imes with constructed mid-level supervision, Level-2 multi-scale degradation enabling relative 16 imes learning). The goal is arbitrary-scale HRMS reconstruction from a single PAN–LRMS pair without external pretraining, while also supporting weight reuse across pairs and cross-scene/cross-sensor generalization. The abstract and contribution list claim SOTA PAN-scale results on real-world data, competitiveness of reused weights with per-pair retraining, and that strong performance is obtained without explicit spatial-fidelity constraints.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work would be a useful step for practical remote-sensing pansharpening: zero-shot internal learning that still reuses weights, plus continuous-scale output via INR, addresses two real deployment frictions (train–test mismatch and fixed-scale pipelines). The multi-level self-degradation idea is a coherent extension of internal-learning pansharpening (ZS-Pan, PsDip) and feature-based INR fusion (LIIF-style, INF3/FeINFN). The manuscript as supplied, however, does not contain the architecture, losses, GT construction, or quantitative tables needed to verify those claims, so significance remains conditional on a complete experimental package.

major comments (3)
  1. The supplied manuscript is incomplete for peer review of the central claims. After Related Work the text jumps to references and supplementary figures (loss curve Fig. 8; qualitative arbitrary-scale Figs. 9–10). There is no method section with the INR fusion architecture, coordinate/feature injection, Level-0/1/2 loss definitions, construction of the mid-level supervised GT, degradation operators/scales, or training schedule. Without these, Contributions 1–3 and the Abstract SOTA / weight-reuse / “no spatial fidelity” claims cannot be audited.
  2. No quantitative experimental tables or ablations appear in the provided text. Claims of SOTA under PAN-scale fusion, competitiveness of weight reuse vs per-pair retraining, and cross-sensor generalization are therefore unsupported in the document under review. The only concrete artifacts (Fig. 8 convergence; Figs. 9–10 visual comparisons to nearest/bicubic at non-integer scales) do not report standard full-resolution metrics (e.g., QNR, D_λ, D_s) or transfer experiments.
  3. Introduction framing of Level-1/2 relies on “constructed ground truth” from self-degradation of the test pair. That is standard for internal learning but is load-bearing for the transferability claim. The paper must specify the exact degradation model and show that the resulting supervised terms do not simply encourage identity/upsampling behavior that fails under true cross-sensor or full-resolution shift; this specification is missing from the supplied text.
minor comments (4)
  1. Duplicate bibliography entries: Vivone et al. full-scale regression injection appears twice (refs. 32 and 33); Yang et al. Implicit Transformer Network appears twice (refs. 41 and 42).
  2. Fig. 1 is described in the introduction but not present in the supplied text; ensure the figure and its efficiency/scale axes are included and consistent with the later claims.
  3. Notation for the three levels (L0/L1/L2) appears only in the supplementary loss curve caption; define symbols consistently when the method section is restored.
  4. Abstract and contributions assert “first” integration of feature-enhanced INR into zero-shot pansharpening; related work already cites INF3/FeINFN and zero-shot pansharpening—clarify the precise novelty boundary once the method is fully written.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; standard zero-shot self-degradation training with empirical SOTA claims, not a tautological derivation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Introduction, three-level scheme description (Level-1)]
    "Level-1 learns the standard 4�upsampling capability at one degraded resolution level, where a constructed ground truth is used as supervision to enhance the model’s learning capacity. Building upon Level-1, Level-2 further introduces resolution degradation with varying scale factors..."

    The mid-level supervised signal is generated by degrading the same test pair that will later be fused; the network is therefore fitted to reconstruct self-generated lower-resolution versions. Application of the resulting weights at full or arbitrary scale is presented as generalization/prediction. This is the ordinary internal-learning construction rather than a novel tautology, and performance is still evaluated externally, so the circularity is minor and non-load-bearing for the SOTA/weight-reuse claims.

full rationale

The paper is a methods/empirical contribution proposing a three-level multi-scale semi-supervised scheme around a feature-based INR fusion backbone for zero-shot arbitrary-scale pansharpening. There is no first-principles derivation, uniqueness theorem, or closed-form prediction whose output reduces by construction to a fitted input or self-defined quantity. Level-1/2 supervision uses a ground-truth constructed by degrading the single test pair (standard internal-learning practice, following Shocher et al. and prior zero-shot pansharpening), after which the model is applied at full/arbitrary scale; success is then measured by external visual and quantitative metrics on real datasets, not by re-reporting the fit. Self-citations to co-author prior work (e.g., Deng-group pansharpening and INR fusion papers) appear in Related Work and references but are not invoked as load-bearing uniqueness results that force the present architecture or claims. The incomplete manuscript text supplies no equations that equate a claimed prediction to its training target, so no reduction can be exhibited. The central claims (SOTA PAN-scale results, weight reuse competitive with per-pair retraining, no need for spatial-fidelity constraints) remain experimental and falsifiable rather than definitional. Minor residual self-supervision flavor of the paradigm does not rise above score 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain conventions of pansharpening and internal learning, plus paper-specific training design choices (three nested degradation levels, semi-supervised mix, INR backbone hyperparameters). No new physical entities are introduced; free parameters are the usual deep-learning knobs and the constructed multi-scale supervision schedule. Independent external evidence for the transfer claim is limited to the authors’ reported experiments, which are not fully present in the supplied text.

free parameters (4)
  • training_epochs_and_schedule = ~500 epochs (reported stabilization)
    Supplementary Fig. 8 indicates losses stabilize after ~500 epochs; epoch count and schedule are fitted/chosen for convergence on the test pair.
  • loss_term_weights_L0_L1_L2
    Relative weighting of unsupervised Level-0 and constructed supervised Level-1/2 losses is a free design choice that balances spectral/spatial behavior; not derived from first principles in the available text.
  • degradation_scale_factors_and_operators = 4× mid-level; variable coarser scales
    Level-1 uses a fixed 4× path and Level-2 uses varying further scales; exact kernels, noise, and sampling operators act as free modeling choices that define the constructed supervision.
  • INR_fusion_architecture_hyperparameters
    Feature encoder depth/width, MLP decoder size, coordinate encoding, and feature injection pattern are chosen by the authors and control capacity/generalization.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Internal statistics of a single remote-sensing pair (plus multi-scale self-degradation) contain enough information to learn a fusion mapping that generalizes across scenes/sensors.
    Inherited from internal-learning / zero-shot SR and pansharpening literature cited in Related Work; load-bearing for weight reuse.
  • domain assumption Constructed mid-level targets obtained by degrading LRMS/PAN pairs are valid supervisory signals for learning true full-resolution fusion behavior.
    Standard reduced-resolution / Wald-style assumption underlying Level-1/2 supervision; if degradation mismatches real sensor MTF, transfer fails.
  • domain assumption A shared feature-based INR continuous function can represent multi-band fused imagery at arbitrary coordinates without fixed-grid upsamplers.
    Taken from LIIF-style and INR fusion prior work (LIIF, INF3, FeINFN) used as backbone premise.
  • ad hoc to paper Superior pansharpening can be obtained without explicit spatial-fidelity constraints under the proposed multi-level scheme.
    Stated as contribution 3 / experimental claim; not a standard necessity of the field and depends on their loss design.
invented entities (2)
  • G-ZAP three-level collaborative training framework (Level-0/1/2)
    purpose: Organize unsupervised full-resolution feature preservation with constructed multi-scale supervision so one zero-shot INR can do arbitrary scale and transfer weights.
    Paper-specific training scaffold; not an independently measured physical object. Evidence is only the authors’ experiments.
  • Feature-based INR fusion backbone specialized for zero-shot pansharpening
    purpose: Map continuous coordinates and multi-modal features to HRMS values without fixed-scale heads.
    Adaptation of existing INR fusion ideas to the zero-shot pansharpening setting; independent evidence outside this paper is limited to related INR fusion literature, not this exact system.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of G-ZAP: A Generalizable Zero-Shot Framework for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XBZKRP2K

@misc{pith2026260314412,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: G-ZAP: A Generalizable Zero-Shot Framework for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XBZKRP2K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.14412}
}
read the original abstract

Pansharpening aims to fuse a high-resolution panchromatic (PAN) image and a low-resolution multispectral (LRMS) image to produce a high-resolution multispectral (HRMS) image. Recent deep models have achieved strong performance, yet they typically rely on large-scale pretraining and often generalize poorly to unseen real-world image pairs. Prior zero-shot approaches improve real-scene generalization but require per-image optimization, hindering weight reuse, and the above methods are usually limited to a fixed scale. To address this issue, we propose G-ZAP, a generalizable zero-shot framework for arbitrary-scale pansharpening, designed to handle cross-resolution, cross-scene, and cross-sensor generalization. G-ZAP adopts a feature-based implicit neural representation (INR) fusion network as the backbone and introduces a multi-scale, semi-supervised training scheme to enable robust generalization. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets show that G-ZAP achieves state-of-the-art results under PAN-scale fusion in both visual quality and quantitative metrics. Notably, G-ZAP supports weight reuse across image pairs while maintaining competitiveness with per-pair retraining, demonstrating strong potential for efficient real-world deployment.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GSPan: A Continuous Gaussian Primitive Representation for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GSPan introduces continuous 2D Gaussian primitives for band-wise residuals in pansharpening to support arbitrary-scale fusion without retraining.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    In: Image and signal processing for remote sensing XX

    Aiazzi, B., Alparone, L., Baronti, S., Carlà, R., Garzelli, A., Santurri, L.: Full-scale assessment of pansharpening methods and data products. In: Image and signal processing for remote sensing XX. vol. 9244, p. 924402. SPIE (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    Information Fusion101, 102001 (2024)

    Cao, Q., Deng, L.J., Wang, W., Hou, J., Vivone, G.: Zero-shot semi-supervised learning for pansharpening. Information Fusion101, 102001 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Chen, Y., Liu, S., Wang, X.: Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 8628–8638 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Chen, Y., Wang, X.: Transformers as meta-learners for implicit neural representa- tions. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 170–187. Springer (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing49(1), 295–309 (2010)

    Choi, J., Yu, K., Kim, Y.: A new adaptive component-substitution-based satellite image fusion by using partial replacement. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing49(1), 295–309 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–17 (2022).����������������������������� ������������

    Ciotola, M., Vitale, S., Mazza, A., Poggi, G., Scarpa, G.: Pansharpening by convo- lutional neural networks in the full resolution framework. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–17 (2022).����������������������������� ������������

    2022

  7. [7]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing59(8), 6995–7010 (2020)

    Deng, L.J., Vivone, G., Jin, C., Chanussot, J.: Detail injection-based deep convolu- tional neural networks for pansharpening. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing59(8), 6995–7010 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine10(3), 279–315 (2022)

    Deng, L.J., Vivone, G., Paoletti, M.E., Scarpa, G., He, J., Zhang, Y., Chanussot, J., Plaza, A.: Machine learning in pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine10(3), 279–315 (2022)

    2022

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Fu, X., Lin, Z., Huang, Y., Ding, X.: A variational pan-sharpening with local gradient constraints. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 10265–10274 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Gao, S., Liu, X., Zeng, B., Xu, S., Li, Y., Luo, X., Liu, J., Zhen, X., Zhang, B.: Implicit diffusion models for continuous super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10021–10030 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing53(4), 2096– 2107 (2014)

    Garzelli, A.: Pansharpening of multispectral images based on nonlocal parameter optimization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing53(4), 2096– 2107 (2014)

  4. [12]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing12(4), 1188–1204 (2019)

    He, L., Rao, Y., Li, J., Chanussot, J., Plaza, A., Zhu, J., Li, B.: Pansharpening via detail injection based convolutional neural networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing12(4), 1188–1204 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–21 (2021)

    He, L., Zhu, J., Li, J., Plaza, A., Chanussot, J., Yu, Z.: Cnn-based hyperspectral pansharpening with arbitrary resolution. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–21 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Huang, J., Huang, R., Xu, J., Peng, S., Duan, Y., Deng, L.J.: Wavelet-assisted multi-frequency attention network for pansharpening. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 39, pp. 3662–3670 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Jin, Z.R., Zhang, T.J., Jiang, T.X., Vivone, G., Deng, L.J.: Lagconv: Local-context adaptive convolution kernels with global harmonic bias for pansharpening. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 36, pp. 1113–1121 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Photogramm

    Kwarteng, P., Chavez, A.: Extracting spectral contrast in landsat thematic mapper image data using selective principal component analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens55(1), 339–348 (1989) 16 Z. Yang et al

    1989

  9. [17]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Lee, J., Jin, K.H.: Local texture estimator for implicit representation function. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 1929–1938 (2022)

    1929

  10. [18]

    Remote Sensing12(7), 1130 (2020)

    Li, J., Pei, Y., Zhao, S., Xiao, R., Sang, X., Zhang, C.: A review of remote sensing for environmental monitoring in china. Remote Sensing12(7), 1130 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 63441–63465 (2024)

    Liang, Y., Cao, Z., Deng, S., Dou, H.X., Deng, L.J.: Fourier-enhanced implicit neural fusion network for multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 63441–63465 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops

    Lim, B., Son, S., Kim, H., Nah, S., Mu Lee, K.: Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. pp. 136–144 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters14(12), 2255–2259 (2017)

    Lolli, S., Alparone, L., Garzelli, A., Vivone, G.: Haze correction for contrast-based multispectral pansharpening. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters14(12), 2255–2259 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Remote Sensing8(7), 594 (2016)

    Masi, G., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Scarpa, G.: Pansharpening by convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing8(7), 594 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

    Peng, S., Zhu, X., Deng, H., Deng, L.J., Lei, Z.: Fusionmamba: Efficient remote sensing image fusion with state space model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing25(6), 2882–2895 (2016)

    Restaino, R., Vivone, G., Dalla Mura, M., Chanussot, J.: Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images based on morphological operators. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing25(6), 2882–2895 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

    Rui,X.,Cao,X.,Li,Y.,Meng,D.:Variationalzero-shotmultispectralpansharpening. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    zero-shot

    Shocher, A., Cohen, N., Irani, M.: “zero-shot” super-resolution using deep internal learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3118–3126 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 7462–7473 (2020)

    Sitzmann, V., Martel, J., Bergman, A., Lindell, D., Wetzstein, G.: Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 7462–7473 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60, 1–16 (2021)

    Tian, X., Chen, Y., Yang, C., Ma, J.: Variational pansharpening by exploiting cartoon-texture similarities. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60, 1–16 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing57(9), 6421–6433 (2019)

    Vivone, G.: Robust band-dependent spatial-detail approaches for panchromatic sharpening. IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing57(9), 6421–6433 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine9(1), 53–81 (2020)

    Vivone, G., Dalla Mura, M., Garzelli, A., Restaino, R., Scarpa, G., Ulfarsson, M.O., Alparone, L., Chanussot, J.: A new benchmark based on recent advances in multispectral pansharpening: Revisiting pansharpening with classical and emerging pansharpening methods. IEEE Geoscienc...

    2020

  23. [31]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine (2024)

    Vivone, G., Deng, L.J., Deng, S., Hong, D., Jiang, M., Li, C., Li, W., Shen, H., Wu, X., Xiao, J.L., et al.: Deep learning in remote sensing image fusion: Methods, protocols, data, and future perspectives. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing27(7), 3418–3431 (2018)

    Vivone, G., Restaino, R., Chanussot, J.: Full scale regression-based injection coeffi- cients for panchromatic sharpening. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing27(7), 3418–3431 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing27(7), 3418–3431 (2018) G-ZAP for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening 17

    Vivone, G., Restaino, R., Chanussot, J.: Full scale regression-based injection coeffi- cients for panchromatic sharpening. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing27(7), 3418–3431 (2018) G-ZAP for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening 17

    2018

  26. [34]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters11(5), 930–934 (2013)

    Vivone, G., Restaino, R., Dalla Mura, M., Licciardi, G., Chanussot, J.: Contrast and error-based fusion schemes for multispectral image pansharpening. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters11(5), 930–934 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    wang et al

    Wang, T., Yan, Z., Li, J., Zhao, X., Wang, C., Ng, M.: Hyperspectral and multispec- tral image fusion with arbitrary resolution through self-supervised representations: T. wang et al. International Journal of Computer Vision133(11), 7515–7535 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Remote Sensing15(23), 5503 (2023)

    Wang, Y., Shao, Z., Lu, T., Huang, X., Wang, J., Chen, X., Huang, H., Zuo, X.: Remote sensing image super-resolution via multi-scale texture transfer network. Remote Sensing15(23), 5503 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging10, 1547–1558 (2024)

    Wu, R.C., Deng, S., Ran, R., Dou, H.X., Deng, L.J.: Inf 3: Implicit neural feature fusion function for multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging10, 1547–1558 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Information Fusion p

    Xiao, J.L., Huang, T.Z., Deng, L.J., Jiang, H., Zhao, Q., Vivone, G.: Unsupervised coefficient learning framework for variational pansharpening. Information Fusion p. 103790 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    International Journal of Computer Vision133(1), 106–128 (2025)

    Xu, R., Yao, M., Chen, C., Wang, L., Xiong, Z.: Continuous spatial-spectral reconstruction via implicit neural representation. International Journal of Computer Vision133(1), 106–128 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12716 (2021)

    Xu, X., Wang, Z., Shi, H.: Ultrasr: Spatial encoding is a missing key for implicit im- age function-based arbitrary-scale super-resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12716 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems34, 13304–13315 (2021)

    Yang, J., Shen, S., Yue, H., Li, K.: Implicit transformer network for screen content image continuous super-resolution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems34, 13304–13315 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision

    Yang, J., Fu, X., Hu, Y., Huang, Y., Ding, X., Paisley, J.: Pannet: A deep net- work architecture for pan-sharpening. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. pp. 5449–5457 (2017) G-ZAP for Arbitrary-Scale Pansharpening 19 Fig. 8:Loss–epoch conv...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.