Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Guide to Designing Future Ground-based CMB Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1402.4108 v1 pith:XCSMEDEM submitted 2014-02-17 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

A Guide to Designing Future Ground-based CMB Experiments

classification astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords sigmaconstraintsfutureparameterscountcoveragedetectorenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In this follow-up work to the High Energy Physics Community Summer Study 2013 (HEP CSS 2013, a.k.a. Snowmass), we explore the scientific capabilities of a future Stage-IV Cosmic Microwave Background polarization experiment (CMB-S4) under various assumptions on detector count, resolution, and sky coverage. We use the Fisher matrix technique to calculate the expected uncertainties in cosmological parameters in $\nu \Lambda$CDM that are especially relevant to the physics of fundamental interactions, including neutrino masses, effective number of relativistic species, dark-energy equation of state, dark-matter annihilation, and inflationary parameters. To further chart the landscape of future cosmology probes, we include forecasted results from the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) signal as measured by DESI to constrain parameters that would benefit from low redshift information. We find the following best 1-sigma constraints: $\sigma$ constraints: $\sigma(M_{\nu})= 15$ meV, $\sigma(N_{\rm eff})= 0.0156$, Dark energy Figure of Merit = 303, $\sigma(p_{ann})= 0.00588\times3\times10^{-26}$ cm$^3$/s/GeV, $\sigma(\Omega_K)= 0.00074$, $\sigma(n_s)= 0.00110$, $\sigma(\alpha_s)= 0.00145$, and $\sigma(r)= 0.00009$. We also detail the dependences of the parameter constraints on detector count, resolution, and sky coverage.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond thermal approximations: Precise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Solving the momentum-dependent Boltzmann equation and propagating the exact non-thermal ALP spectrum into CMB analyses yields 95% limits f_a>1.63e6 GeV (e), 9.41e6 GeV (mu), 8.06e4 GeV (tau), and g_a_gamma<1.98e-8 GeV^-1.

  2. Neutrino self-interactions in post-reionization era: Lyman-$\alpha$, 21-cm and cross-spectra

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fisher forecasts indicate that Lyα-21cm cross-spectra with PUMA and CMB data can improve constraints on neutrino self-interaction strength G_eff by 1-2 orders of magnitude over CMB alone.

  3. Starobinsky Inflation and the Latest CMB Data: A Subtle Tension?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0

    When implemented directly in CLASS, Starobinsky inflation remains consistent with Planck+ACT+BAO data at the 2σ level, but the inferred e-fold range sits above the reheating-motivated window, and a fitted R³ correctio...