Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10490 v1 pith:XCTPEXUZ submitted 2024-08-20 cs.CL cs.IR

Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text Generation

classification cs.CL cs.IR
keywords generationretrievaltexthallucinationsknowledgelanguagemodelplanning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In text generation, hallucinations refer to the generation of seemingly coherent text that contradicts established knowledge. One compelling hypothesis is that hallucinations occur when a language model is given a generation task outside its parametric knowledge (due to rarity, recency, domain, etc.). A common strategy to address this limitation is to infuse the language models with retrieval mechanisms, providing the model with relevant knowledge for the task. In this paper, we leverage the planning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs and analyze how planning can be used to guide retrieval to further reduce the frequency of hallucinations. We empirically evaluate several variations of our proposed approach on long-form text generation tasks. By improving the coverage of relevant facts, plan-guided retrieval and generation can produce more informative responses while providing a higher rate of attribution to source documents.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Code Researcher: Deep Research Agent for Large Systems Code and Commit History

    cs.SE 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Code Researcher retrieves global context via multi-step reasoning on code semantics, patterns, and commit history to fix Linux kernel crashes, reaching 48% crash-resolution rate versus 31% for baselines.

  2. Only Ask What You Don't Know: Grounded Delta Planning for Efficient Multi-step RAG

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GDP-RAG targets only information deltas in multi-hop RAG through preliminary grounding, gap-conditioned prompts, and skeletal trajectories, reaching 60.63% accuracy at 0.51 cost-of-pass on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, a...