Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Symmetry Criterion for Van Hove Criticality at Non-Time-Reversal-Invariant Momenta

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Group theory alone predicts which band points are Van Hove critical.

desk verdict The nondegenerate VHS criterion is correct and useful, but the degenerate-band classifications in Table II are not rigorously anchored as written; fix that and the phase-diagram sweep, and this is a solid screening tool. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23985 v1 pith:XDJT3R6D submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con

Min-Quan Kuang , Hua-Yu Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con MSC 20C3582D25 PACS 71.20.-b61.50.Ah
keywords VanHovesingularitybandgradientnon-time-reversal-invariantmomentumlittlegroupvectorrepresentationWigner-Eckarttheoremspace225Fermisurfacetopology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a symmetry criterion for whether the band gradient ∇E vanishes at high-symmetry momenta that are not time-reversal invariant (non-TRIMs). For any nondegenerate band, ∇E is forced to zero if and only if the little group's vector representation lacks the trivial representation; if the trivial representation appears once, exactly one gradient component is symmetry-allowed and the band is generically noncritical. The same logic, extended through Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, classifies degenerate bands at the subband level. The result is parameter-independent and turns a band-structure question into a one-line group-theory check, verified with complete phase diagrams for space group 225 and tabulated for all space groups with non-TRIMs.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vector representation Γ_vec of the little group at the non-TRIM, decomposed into irreducible representations; the controlling number is the multiplicity of the trivial representation Γ_1 within Γ_vec. For nondegenerate bands, the Wigner–Eckart theorem collapses to Γ_vec ⊃ Γ_1 because the band representation cancels, making the criterion independent of the band's own irreducible representation. For degenerate bands, the symmetrized product [Γ⊗Γ]_sym must intersect Γ_vec, and the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients give the first-order Hamiltonian matrices V_i whose directional eigenvalues define the subband gradients. The two-tier hierarchy—symmetry fixes the linear term, pa

What would settle it

Find a single-group non-TRIM point where the little-group vector representation lacks the trivial representation, yet a tight-binding or ab initio calculation shows a one-dimensional band with nonzero ∇E at that point; or, conversely, a point where Γ_vec contains Γ_1 exactly once yet a one-dimensional band has all three gradient components zero over a finite parameter region. In space group 225, scanning the full (r1, s1) plane at W and checking whether any one-dimensional band ever acquires a nonzero gradient, or at K checking whether the vz component can be tuned to zero only on measure-zero

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At non-time-reversal-invariant momenta, time-reversal symmetry does not constrain the linear term of the dispersion, so the presence or absence of a nonzero band gradient is decided entirely by the little group. For nondegenerate bands, the intra-band Wigner-Eckart condition reduces to the purely geometric condition that the vector representation Γ_vec contain the trivial representation Γ_1: if Γ_vec does not contain Γ_1, ∇E must vanish and the band is symmetry-enforced critical; if Γ_vec contains Γ_1 exactly once, exactly one gradient component survives and the band is generically noncritical; if it contains two or three, the band is excluded from the single-band VHS classification. For deg

Load-bearing premise

For degenerate bands, the paper assumes that diagonalizing the first-order Hamiltonian direction-by-direction yields a well-defined per-subband gradient vector whose zero components can be counted, even though the paper itself notes that subband wavefunctions and gradient components can depend on the direction of approach; the nondegenerate-band half of the criterion does not rely on this assumption.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In space group 225, the W point is symmetry-enforced critical for all nondegenerate bands regardless of hopping parameters, while K and U are generically noncritical with a single allowed gradient component.
  • The critical/noncritical dichotomy at any non-TRIM can be read off the little-group vector representation without any band-structure calculation; Table II provides this classification for every space group containing non-TRIMs in the single-group limit.
  • Complete two-dimensional phase diagrams at W and K verify the prediction: the W diagram contains only critical phases, while the K diagram is dominated by noncritical phases with criticality confined to measure-zero parameter lines.
  • Parameter tuning cannot turn a nondegenerate band at W into a noncritical one, nor can it remove the single allowed gradient component at K and U except by accidental zeroing on lower-dimensional boundaries.
  • The specific VHS subtype (ordinary versus higher-order) remains parameter-dependent; symmetry alone determines only whether the linear term vanishes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Γ_vec∋Γ_1 counting could serve as a high-throughput screening rule: any material with a non-TRIM whose little group lacks a trivial vector component is guaranteed at least one symmetry-forced critical band, without requiring first-principles calculations.
  • Extending the criterion to double groups or magnetic groups should follow the same multiplicity logic, but the relevant vector representation and trivial representation change; the paper leaves that extension open, and the degenerate-band subband definition needs additional care.
  • A testable refinement for degenerate bands would be to compute the full angular dependence of the first-order Hamiltonian's eigenvalues; the paper concedes that subband wavefunctions can be direction-dependent, so the per-subband zero-component count may need a stability check against the direction of approach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a group-theoretic criterion for whether the linear term of a band dispersion vanishes at non-time-reversal-invariant momenta (non-TRIMs) in the single-group limit. For nondegenerate bands, it proves that ∇E is symmetry-forced to zero iff the little-group vector representation Γ_vec contains no trivial irrep Γ1; if Γ_vec contains Γ1 once, exactly one gradient component is allowed and the band is generically noncritical; if Γ_vec contains two or three Γ1 components, the band is placed outside the single-band VHS classification. For degenerate bands, the paper invokes Wigner–Eckart/Clebsch–Gordan analysis, constructs the matrices V_i, diagonalizes H^(1)(q̂) direction-by-direction, and classifies each subband by counting zero components of its gradient vector. The criterion is applied to space group 225 with analytic tight-binding phase diagrams and is then extended to all space groups containing non-TRIMs, with results collected in Table II.

Significance. The nondegenerate part of the criterion is an elegant and useful result: it reduces a material-specific question to a single, parameter-free property of the little group, and the SG225 phase diagrams illustrate the predicted critical/noncritical dichotomy. The paper is also honest about its single-group, paramagnetic scope. However, the degenerate-band branch, which is an essential half of the central claim and of Table II, is not rigorously defined as written. The per-subband gradient vector does not generally exist for multi-component linear k·p Hamiltonians, so the degenerate classifications are not well-founded. With a rigorous reformulation of the degenerate case, the paper would be a solid contribution; in its present form it needs substantial revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II D 3, Eq. (10), Fig. 2, Table II] The degenerate-band procedure is not well-defined. When H^(1)(q)=Σ V_i q_i has more than one nonzero matrix V_i, the branches of the dispersion are generally not differentiable at q=0. For example, H=v_x q_x σ_x + v_y q_y σ_y has eigenvalues ±√(v_x² q_x²+v_y² q_y²), so no per-subband gradient vector ∇E_α exists; the eigenstates of H^(1)(q̂) rotate with direction, making the zero-component count in Fig. 2 basis- and direction-dependent. This is not merely cosmetic: for the T representation of T_d, H=v q·J gives one branch with identically zero energy and zero gradient according to Eq. (14), yet Table II labels T_1,T_2 as Excluded. The degenerate rows of Tables I and II therefore need a rigorous definition of subband criticality, e.g., via the invariant subspaces or DOS behavior of the k·p Hamiltonian, rather than a per-subband gradient vector. Section II D 3 concedes direction dependence
  2. [Sec. II B, Fig. 2, Table II (C_s, C_1 rows)] The multiplicity-2/3 branch for nondegenerate bands is presented as an unconditional 'Non-VHS (Excluded)'. The derivation only shows that multiple gradient components are symmetry-allowed; it does not show they are nonzero. The Wigner–Eckart matrix elements are parameter-dependent functions, so on codimension-one surfaces one allowed component can vanish accidentally — exactly as the paper itself finds for the multiplicity-one case at K, where v_z=0 along the dashed lines. Consequently, rows with Γ_vec containing two or three Γ1 components should be labeled 'generically Excluded, parameter-dependent' rather than flatly Excluded. As written, the claimed completeness of the trichotomy in Fig. 2 and Table II is an overstatement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A and Fig. 3] Scanning (r_1, s_1) in [-1,1] with t_1=-1 does not exhaust the full (r_1/|t_1|, s_1/|t_1|) plane; values with |r_1/t_1|>1 or |s_1/t_1|>1 are not sampled. Please state the exact parameter domain that was scanned, or justify that all qualitative phase boundaries lie inside this square.
  2. [Fig. 3] The phase diagram at W is computed for the A_1 representation only. Since the criterion for nondegenerate bands is representation-independent, showing a second irrep (e.g., B_2 or A_2) would make the numerical verification more directly representative of the claim.
  3. [Sec. II D, after Eq. (5)] The sentence about 'Γ⊗Γ≠Γ1' is confusing because the relevant object for the Hermitian first-order Hamiltonian is the symmetric square [Γ⊗Γ]_sym, not the full product. Please rephrase to avoid implying that the ordinary product is the selection-rule object.
  4. [Sec. IV] There is a typo at the start of Sec. IV: ' .We have scanned' should be 'We have scanned.' It would also help to define 'Param.-dep.' explicitly in the Table II caption and to state that degenerate 'Excluded' entries are generic classifications, given the issue raised in the major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the vanishing-gradient criterion is derived from little-group representation theory, and the tight-binding phase diagrams are independent tests. Minor reliance on prior self-citation [11] for VHS taxonomy only.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained for the central nondegenerate criterion. Eq. (3) obtains R∇E=∇E from the symmetry En(k0+Rq)=En(k0+q); the Wigner-Eckart condition (5) reduces for 1D bands to Γvec⊃Γ1 because Γ*⊗Γ=Γ1, yielding the symmetry-enforced vanishing condition (7). This is independent of band parameters and of the tight-binding model. The phase diagrams of Fig. 3 are computed from the analytic TB Hamiltonian (Eq. 20) by scanning hopping parameters; the model is not fitted to the criterion, and the diagrams are used as tests. The self-citation [11] supplies the VHS type taxonomy (M/N/T/S) and the pyrochlore observation used as motivation; it does not supply the vanishing-gradient rule or the classification, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The main caveat, flagged by the paper itself in Sec. II D 3, is that for degenerate bands the subband gradients are obtained by diagonalizing H^(1)(qhat) and are direction-dependent; this makes the per-subband zero-component count in Table II not fully well-defined. This is a rigor/well-definedness issue, not a circular reduction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; no result is equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. The VHS type labels (M, N, T, S) are taxonomic categories from the authors' previous work, not physical entities.

free parameters (3)
  • t1 = -1 (energy unit)
    Nearest-neighbor hopping set to -1 to define energy scale in phase diagrams; not fitted to data and not used in the group-theoretic criterion.
  • r1 = scanned over [-1,1]
    Second-neighbor hopping varied to construct phase diagrams; illustrative verification only.
  • s1 = scanned over [-1,1]
    Third-neighbor hopping varied to construct phase diagrams; illustrative verification only.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Wigner-Eckart theorem applies to the intraband gradient matrix element <u_n|∇H|u_n>, giving selection rule Γ*⊗Γvec⊗Γ⊃Γ1 (Sec. II B, Eq. 5).
    Standard group theory; accepted without proof.
  • standard math The band gradient transforms as a polar vector under the little group, so a nonzero invariant gradient exists iff Γ1 appears in Γvec (Eq. 3, Neumann's principle).
    Standard result; underlies the entire criterion.
  • standard math For a nondegenerate band Γ*⊗Γ=Γ1, so the band irrep cancels from the selection rule.
    Character property of 1D representations; used to derive Eq. (6).
  • domain assumption For degenerate bands, only the symmetrized product [Γ⊗Γ]_sym couples to the linear Hamiltonian because the first-order Hamiltonian must be Hermitian (Sec. II D).
    Needed for E-band conclusion; antisymmetric Hermitian contributions are not discussed.
  • domain assumption Single-group (spinless, no SOC), weakly correlated paramagnetic limit with full space-group symmetry.
    Explicit scope stated in Sec. II E; the criterion is not directly applicable to strong SOC or magnetic ground states.
  • domain assumption The complete list of non-TRIM points, little groups, and Γvec decompositions for all 230 space groups is taken from Bradley-Cracknell and standard tables without independent verification.
    Table II extends to all space groups; an error in any entry would affect that row's classification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry Criterion for Van Hove Criticality at Non-Time-Reversal-Invariant Momenta." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XDJT3R6D

@misc{pith2026260723985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry Criterion for Van Hove Criticality at Non-Time-Reversal-Invariant Momenta},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XDJT3R6D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23985}
}
abstract

At non-time-reversal-invariant momenta (non-TRIMs), time-reversal symmetry does not constrain the linear term of the band dispersion. Whether $\nabla E$ vanishes is therefore determined entirely by the representation theory of the little group. For nondegenerate bands, $\nabla E$ is forced to zero if and only if the vector representation $\Gamma_{\mathrm{vec}}$ of the little group does not contain the trivial representation $\Gamma_1$. When $\Gamma_{\mathrm{vec}}$ does contain $\Gamma_1$, $\nabla E$ is not forced to vanish for any nondegenerate band; the classification instead depends on the multiplicity of $\Gamma_1$ in $\Gamma_{\mathrm{vec}}$. For degenerate bands, the Wigner-Eckart theorem and Clebsch--Gordan coefficients determine whether linear couplings vanish, with classification performed at the subband level. Applied to space group 225, the criterion explains why the $W$ point is critical for all nondegenerate bands, the degenerate $E$ bands are generically noncritical, and the $K$ and $U$ points host parameter-dependent criticality. Supporting phase diagrams reveal a two-tier hierarchy: symmetry enforces $\nabla E=0$, while band parameters determine higher-order character. We extend this classification to all space groups hosting non-TRIMs in the single-group limit, providing a symmetry-dictated, parameter-independent framework for engineering Van Hove singularities in three-dimensional quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23985 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Brillouin zones for the six crystal systems classified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Flowchart for classifying VHS types at non-TRIM high-symmetry points. For nondegenerate bands (dim Γ = 1), the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Tight-binding phase diagrams for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [11]

    Tamai, M

    A. Tamai, M. P. Allan, J.-F. Mercure, W. Meevasana, R. Dunkel, D. Lu, R. S. Perry, A. P. Mackenzie, D. J. Singh, and Z.-X. Shen, Fermi surface and van Hove sin- gularities in the itinerant metamagnet Sr 3Ru2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 026407 (2008)

    2008

  2. [1]

    sufficient conditions The existence of nonzero matrix elementsV i is gov- erned by the Wigner-Eckart theorem

    Wigner-Eckart analysis: necessary vs. sufficient conditions The existence of nonzero matrix elementsV i is gov- erned by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. As established in Sec. II B, the coupling between the degenerate states and the gradient operator requires the triple-product condi- tion: Γ⊗Γ vec ⊗Γ⊃Γ 1.(11) It is crucial to recognize that Eq. (11) is a nece...

  3. [2]

    This is because different subbands within the same irreducible represen- tation can have distinct gradient vectors, as determined by the CG coefficients

    Subband-resolved classification For a degenerate band, the classification must be per- formed at the level of individual subbands rather than for the degenerate multiplet as a whole. This is because different subbands within the same irreducible represen- tation can have distinct gradient vectors, as determined by the CG coefficients. The procedure is as ...

  4. [3]

    For each subbandα: count zero components of∇E α

    Direction dependence and the definition of criticality A subtle but important point is that even ifH (1)(ˆq) has zero eigenvalues for some directions ˆq, this doesnot imply that the subband is critical. The DOS divergence at a critical point requires the gradient to vanish identi- cally for all directions in the immediate neighborhood of k0. If∂E α/∂q( ˆq...

  5. [4]

    Van Hove, The occurrence of singularities in the elastic frequency distribution of a crystal, Physical Review89, 1189 (1953)

    L. Van Hove, The occurrence of singularities in the elastic frequency distribution of a crystal, Physical Review89, 1189 (1953). 12

    1953

  6. [5]

    D. V. Efremov, A. Shtyk, A. W. Rost, C. Chamon, A. P. Mackenzie, and J. J. Betouras, Multicritical Fermi sur- face topological transitions, Physical Review Letters123, 207202 (2019)

    2019

  7. [6]

    N. F. Yuan, H. Isobe, and L. Fu, Magic of high-order van Hove singularity, Nat. Commun10, 5769 (2019)

    2019

  8. [7]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Classification of critical points in energy bands based on topology, scaling, and symme- try, Physical Review B101, 125120 (2020)

    2020

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    Patra, A

    B. Patra, A. Mukherjee, and B. Singh, High-order van Hove singularities and nematic instability in the kagome superconductor CsTi 3Bi5, Physical Review B 111, 045135 (2025)

    2025

  2. [9]

    Classen and J

    L. Classen and J. J. Betouras, High-order van Hove sin- gularities and their connection to flat bands, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics16, 229 (2025)

    2025

  3. [10]

    I. M. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Soviet Physics JETP 11, 1130 (1960), translated from Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 38, 156 (1960)

    1960

  4. [12]

    X. Wu, T. Schwemmer, T. M¨ uller, A. Consiglio, G. San- giovanni, D. Di Sante, Y. Iqbal, W. Hanke, A. P. Schny- der, M. M. Denner, T. Neupert, and R. Thomale, Nature of unconventional pairing in the kagome superconductors AV3Sb5 (A= K, Rb, Cs), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 177001 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    H. Tan, Y. Jiang, G. T. McCandless, J. Y. Chan, and B. Yan, Three-dimensional higher-order saddle-point- induced flat bands in Co-based kagome metals, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043132 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    H.-Y. Li, H. Tan, H.-Y. Zhu, H.-K. Yuan, and M.- Q. Kuang, Directional criticality and higher-order flat- ness: Designing van Hove singularities in three dimen- sions, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2604.07806 (2026), arXiv:2604.07806

    2026 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    J. Liu, W. Duan, and L. Fu, Two types of surface states in topological crystalline insulators, Physical Review B 88, 241303(R) (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Luo, X.-H

    X.-J. Luo, X.-H. Pan, Y. Shi, and F. Wu, Surface- dependent Majorana vortex phases in topological crys- talline insulators, Physical Review B111, 144501 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    H. S. Sarmah, K. Dutta, S. Ghosh, and I. Dasgupta, Rashba and Zeeman splitting in non-magnetic and non- centrosymmetric MXene Ta 2CS2, Physical Review Ma- terials9, 074004 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    L. Tao, J. Li, Y. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Sui, B. Song, M. Y. Zhuravlev, and Q. Liu, Rashba spin splitting around non-time-reversal-invariant momenta, Physical Review B 107, 235138 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    J. Zhu, W. Wu, J. Zhao, H. Chen, L. Zhang, and S. A. Yang, Symmetry-enforced nodal chain phonons, npj Quantum Materials7, 52 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell,The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972) reprinted in the Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences se- ries

    1972

  13. [21]

    Herring, Effect of time-reversal symmetry on the en- ergy bands of crystals, Phys

    C. Herring, Effect of time-reversal symmetry on the en- ergy bands of crystals, Phys. Rev.52, 361 (1937)

    1937

  14. [22]

    L. P. Bouckaert, R. Smoluchowski, and E. Wigner, The- ory of Brillouin zones and symmetry properties of wave functions in crystals, Phys. Rev.50, 58 (1936)

    1936

  15. [23]

    H. Weng, C. Fang, Z. Fang, B. A. Bernevig, and X. Dai, Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition- metal monophosphides, Phys. Rev. X5, 011029 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Bradlyn, J

    B. Bradlyn, J. Cano, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Beyond Dirac and Weyl fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals, Science353, aaf5037 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    C. Fang, H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Topological nodal line semimetals, Chin. Phys. B25, 117106 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields, Phys. Rev.97, 869 (1955)

    1955

  20. [28]

    G. L. Bir and G. E. Pikus,Symmetry and Strain-Induced Effects in Semiconductors(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974) translated from the Russian by R. S. Knox

    1974

  21. [29]

    Winkler,Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol

    R. Winkler,Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 191 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    Tinkham,Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics, In- ternational Series in Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1964)

    M. Tinkham,Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics, In- ternational Series in Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1964)

    1964

  23. [31]

    Hahn, ed.,International Tables for Crystallography, Volume A: Space-Group Symmetry, 5th ed

    T. Hahn, ed.,International Tables for Crystallography, Volume A: Space-Group Symmetry, 5th ed. (Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    E. P. Wigner,Group Theory and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra, Pure and Ap- plied Physics: A Series of Monographs and Textbooks (Academic Press, New York, 1959) translated from the German by J. J. Griffin

    1959

  25. [33]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Me- chanics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK, 2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    B. J. Wieder and B. Bradlyn, SpaceGroupIrep: A Math- ematica package for irreducible representations of space groups, GitHub (2021), accessed: 2026

    2021

  27. [35]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Bilbao Crystallographic Server,https://www.cryst.ehu.es/(1997), accessed: 2026

    1997

  29. [37]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wills, Bil- bao Crystallographic Server I: Databases and crystal- lographic computing programs, Z. Kristallogr.221, 15 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    J. Gao, Q. Wu, C. Persson, and Z. Wang, IR VSP: To obtain irreducible representations of electronic states in the V ASP, Comput. Phys. Commun.261, 107760 (2021), arXiv:2011.06945 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Herath, P

    U. Herath, P. Tavadze, X. He, E. Bousquet, S. Singh, F. Mu˜ noz, and A. H. Romero, PyProcar: A python li- brary for electronic structure pre/post-processing, Com- puter Physics Communications251, 107080 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    L. Lang, P. Tavadze, A. Tellez, E. Bousquet, H. Xu, F. Mu˜ noz, N. Vasquez, U. Herath, and A. H. Romero, Expanding PyProcar for new features, maintainability, 13 and reliability, Computer Physics Communications297, 109063 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    B. J. Wieder, B. Bradlyn, L. M. Schoop, A. Topp, and R. J. Cava, ToMSGKpoint: Representation analysis for magnetic space groups, GitHub (2021), accessed: 2026

    2021

  34. [42]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Mat- ter, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 175 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    Shtyk, G

    A. Shtyk, G. Goldstein, and C. Chamon, Electrons at the monkey saddle: A multicritical lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. B95, 035137 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Zhang, Z.-M

    Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, G.-B. Liu, and Y. Yao, Magnet- icTB: A package for tight-binding model of magnetic and non-magnetic materials, Comput. Phys. Commun.270, 108153 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.