The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2104.08324 · v1 · pith:XEU7OJQ4 · submitted 2021-04-16 · stat.ML · cs.LG· math.ST· stat.TH

On the Robustness to Misspecification of α-Posteriors and Their Variational Approximations

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:XEU7OJQ4record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords misspecificationalphadivergenceposteriorsvariationalapproximationsposteriorbecomes
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

$\alpha$-posteriors and their variational approximations distort standard posterior inference by downweighting the likelihood and introducing variational approximation errors. We show that such distortions, if tuned appropriately, reduce the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence from the true, but perhaps infeasible, posterior distribution when there is potential parametric model misspecification. To make this point, we derive a Bernstein-von Mises theorem showing convergence in total variation distance of $\alpha$-posteriors and their variational approximations to limiting Gaussian distributions. We use these distributions to evaluate the KL divergence between true and reported posteriors. We show this divergence is minimized by choosing $\alpha$ strictly smaller than one, assuming there is a vanishingly small probability of model misspecification. The optimized value becomes smaller as the the misspecification becomes more severe. The optimized KL divergence increases logarithmically in the degree of misspecification and not linearly as with the usual posterior.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.