REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring and Improving the Spatial Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) represent formidable tools for sequence modeling, boasting an innate capacity for general pattern recognition. Nevertheless, their broader spatial reasoning capabilities, especially applied to numerical trajectory data, remain insufficiently explored. In this paper, we investigate the out-of-the-box performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4 and Llama 2 7B models when confronted with 3D robotic trajectory data from the CALVIN baseline and associated tasks, including 2D directional and shape labeling. Additionally, we introduce a novel prefix-based prompting mechanism, which yields a 33% improvement on the 3D trajectory data and an increase of up to 10% on SpartQA tasks over zero-shot prompting (with gains for other prompting types as well). The experimentation with 3D trajectory data offers an intriguing glimpse into the manner in which LLMs engage with numerical and spatial information, thus laying a solid foundation for the identification of target areas for future enhancements.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SC2Arena and StarEvolve: Benchmark and Self-Improvement Framework for LLMs in Complex Decision-Making Tasks
The authors propose SC2Arena, a full-coverage StarCraft II benchmark for LLMs, and StarEvolve, a planner-executor-verifier self-improvement framework, claiming superior strategic planning.
-
MazeEval: A Benchmark for Testing Sequential Decision-Making in Language Models
A new maze-navigation benchmark claims LLM spatial reasoning is language-dependent, with O3 exceptional and other models failing by looping, but the looping result is an artifact of the termination rule.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.