Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Prior choice affects ability of Bayesian neural networks to identify unknowns

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.04987 v1 pith:XFCGBFZH submitted 2020-05-11 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords priorbnnschoiceabilitynetworksneuralaffectsbayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) are a powerful tool, though computationally demanding, to perform parameter estimation while jointly estimating uncertainty around predictions. BNNs are typically implemented using arbitrary normal-distributed prior distributions on the model parameters. Here, we explore the effects of different prior distributions on classification tasks in BNNs and evaluate the evidence supporting the predictions based on posterior probabilities approximated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and by computing Bayes factors. We show that the choice of priors has a substantial impact on the ability of the model to confidently assign data to the correct class (true positive rates). Prior choice also affects significantly the ability of a BNN to identify out-of-distribution instances as unknown (false positive rates). When comparing our results against neural networks (NN) with Monte Carlo dropout we found that BNNs generally outperform NNs. Finally, in our tests we did not find a single best choice as prior distribution. Instead, each dataset yielded the best results under a different prior, indicating that testing alternative options can improve the performance of BNNs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. B-PL-PINN: Stabilizing PINN Training with Bayesian Pseudo Labeling

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Bayesian PINN with posterior-variance-based pseudo labeling stabilizes PINN training and outperforms the ensemble baseline on six of eight benchmark PDE problems.

Pith tools