Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A turbulent eddy-viscosity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.10878 v4 pith:XFVLYHC4 submitted 2019-10-24 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

A turbulent eddy-viscosity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations

classification physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph
keywords steady-stateequationsframeworkmodelingturbulentvelocityapplicationsconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for steady-state assessment of incompressible turbulent flows remain the workhorse for practical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applications. Consequently, improvements in speed or accuracy have the potential to affect a diverse range of applications. We introduce a machine learning framework for the {surrogate modeling of steady-state turbulent eddy viscosities for RANS simulations, given the initial conditions. This modeling strategy} is assessed for parametric interpolation, while numerically solving for the pressure and velocity equations to steady state, thus representing a framework that is hybridized with machine learning. We achieve {competitive} steady-state results with a significant reduction in solution time when compared to those obtained by the Spalart-Allmaras one-equation model. This is because the proposed methodology allows for considerably larger relaxation factors for the steady-state velocity and pressure solvers. Our assessments are made for a backward-facing step with considerable mesh anisotropy and separation to represent a practical CFD application. For test experiments with \textcolor{black}{either} varying inlet velocity conditions or step heights we see time-to-solution reductions around a factor of 5. The results represent an opportunity for the rapid exploration of parameter spaces that prove prohibitive when utilizing turbulence closure models with multiple coupled partial differential equations. \blfootnote{Code available publicly at \texttt{https://github.com/argonne-lcf/TensorFlowFoam}}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.