Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Tb2Te5 gets its first crystal structure and a two-step magnetic order, plus a 3.77 THz CDW mode.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 20:46 UTC pith:XHA35EVI

load-bearing objection First structure and magnetism of Tb2Te5 are a real contribution, but the structure refinement and a cell-parameter mismatch between abstract and text need to be cleaned up before I'd trust the central claim. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.08319 v1 pith:XHA35EVI submitted 2025-09-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Comparative study of terbium tellurides Tb2Te5 and TbTe3

I. Shamova , V. Popova , D. Chareev , L. Shvanskaya , D. Ksenofontov , A. Demidov , C-W. Luo , P. Monceau
show 5 more authors
E. Pachaud E. Lorenzo A. Sinchenko A. Vasiliev O. Volkova
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Tb2Te5TbTe3charge density waveantiferromagnetismpump-probe spectroscopytorque magnetometrycrystal structurerare-earth tellurides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes the first crystallographic and magnetic characterization of Tb2Te5, a layered van der Waals terbium telluride, and compares it with the better-known TbTe3. It claims Tb2Te5 adopts the orthorhombic Cmcm (Nd2Te5-type) structure, orders antiferromagnetically in two steps at 9.0 K and 6.8 K, and keeps Tb moments predominantly in the ac plane. It further claims that a 3.77 THz oscillation seen in pump-probe reflectivity is the charge-density-wave amplitude mode, revealing coupling between the tellurium-electron subsystem and the terbium magnetic subsystem. If correct, the paper fills a gap in the R2Te5 family and sharpens the picture of how charge-density waves and magnetism interact in quasi-two-dimensional tellurides.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Tb2Te5 is not an uncharacterized sibling of TbTe3 but a distinct Nd2Te5-type antiferromagnet: orthorhombic Cmcm with a = 4.3009 Å, b = 43.107 Å, c = 4.3016 Å, two inequivalent Tb sites, two magnetic transitions at TN1 = 9.0 K and TN2 = 6.8 K, and Tb moments lying predominantly in the ac plane. In pump-probe reflectivity, a 3.77 THz coherent oscillation appears in the first few picoseconds; the paper reads this as the CDW amplitude mode and takes the sudden drop of the zero-crossing delay time at 9 K as evidence that the antiferromagnetic order and the electronic subsystem are coupled. Against TbTe3, which has three magnetic transitions and a moment switch fr

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the layered crystal structure itself: TbTe layers separated alternately by single and double square Te nets, with two crystallographically distinct Tb sites in capped tetragonal-antiprism coordination. On top of that structure, the paper's diagnosis runs through three probes: single-crystal X-ray diffraction fixes the Cmcm cell; specific heat and magnetization fix the two Neel temperatures and the AF1/AF2 phase lines; and pump-probe reflectivity contributes the 3.77 THz oscillation (assigned to the CDW amplitude mode) plus the zero-crossing delay time tm, whose drop at TN1 signals electron-magnetic coupling. For TbTe3, a crystal-field Hamiltonian in the mean-field

Load-bearing premise

The structural assignment rests on fitting one Cmcm cell to X-ray data from a crystal the authors themselves describe as a growth twin or turbostratically disordered, with only 433 independent reflections and residual electron density up to 4.84 e/Å3; if that stacking model is wrong, the structure claim and the comparison to TbTe3 lose their foundation.

What would settle it

A clean single-crystal or neutron diffraction measurement on a Tb2Te5 crystal without turbostratic disorder: if it does not reproduce the Cmcm model (or yields a different Tb stacking or Te-net ordering) at low residuals, the structural and magnetic-site interpretation is wrong; separately, resonant x-ray scattering should reveal the CDW superlattice wave vector implied by the 3.77 THz amplitude-mode assignment.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Tb2Te5 can now be studied as a defined Cmcm member of the R2Te5 family rather than by analogy with other rare-earth tellurides.
  • The AF1 and AF2 phases occupy a field-temperature region that is fully suppressed by a few tesla, providing a concrete magnetic phase diagram for future experiments.
  • Tb moments remain ac-plane oriented through both magnetic transitions, unlike TbTe3's low-temperature switch toward the b axis.
  • The 3.77 THz oscillation makes Tb2Te5 a candidate charge-density-wave system even though thermodynamic measurements showed no direct CDW signature.
  • The higher ordering temperatures in Tb2Te5 compared with TbTe3 correlate with its shorter Tb-Te and Te-Te distances, linking structure to magnetic energy scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 3.77 THz mode is genuinely the CDW amplitude mode, Tb2Te5's CDW is stiffer than the 1.5-2.5 THz modes typical of RTe3; a direct x-ray search for a CDW superlattice peak would confirm or refute that inference.
  • The two inequivalent Tb sites in the Cmcm cell make it plausible that TN1 and TN2 correspond to ordering of different Tb layers; neutron diffraction on a well-oriented crystal could test this sublattice scenario.
  • Because TbTe3's third transition is attributed to CDW-AFM locking and Tb2Te5 lacks it, a natural extension is that Tb2Te5's CDW wave vector does not lock to the AFM order; measuring that wave vector would settle the point.
  • The reported electron-magnetic coupling implies that Tb2Te5 may show magnetotransport anomalies below 9 K; field-dependent transport measurements would provide a direct test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined structural, thermodynamic, ultrafast pump-probe, and torque-magnetometry study of the layered terbium tellurides Tb2Te5 and TbTe3. The principal new claims are: (i) Tb2Te5 crystallizes in orthorhombic space group Cmcm with a = 4.3009(17), b = 43.107(18), c = 4.3016(17) Å at 100 K; (ii) it orders antiferromagnetically in two steps at TN1 = 9.0 K and TN2 = 6.8 K, with Tb moments oriented predominantly in the ac plane at low temperatures; (iii) pump-probe data reveal a 3.77 THz oscillation assigned to a CDW amplitude mode, indicating electron-magnetic coupling; and (iv) a crystal-field plus exchange model reproduces the torque and magnetization of TbTe3, including the change of easy direction from the ac plane to the b axis at low temperatures.

Significance. If the structural assignment and the two-step magnetic ordering hold, the paper would provide the first structural and magnetic phase diagram for Tb2Te5 and extend the comparative physics of the RTe3/R2Te5 families. The magnetization, specific heat, and torque data are direct and, in principle, reproducible; the phase diagrams in Fig. 3 and the systematic anisotropy in Fig. 6 are useful experimental additions. The crystal-field/exchange calculation for TbTe3, however, is a refit of the same data it is used to validate, and the CDW assignment for Tb2Te5 rests on a single pump-probe frequency. The paper is therefore significant in its experimental phenomenology, but its structural and CDW claims need stronger support before they can be regarded as established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Crystal growth and X-Ray diffraction study] The central structural claim -- orthorhombic Cmcm for Tb2Te5 -- is not supported with the confidence stated. The authors themselves note that the diffraction pattern 'can be interpreted as growth twin or the consequence of turbostratic disorder' and that this disorder causes 'systematic mistakes in intensities' that occupancy refinement cannot fix. With only 433 independent reflections, (sin θ/λ)_max = 0.594 Å^-1, R1 = 0.0894, wR2 = 0.209, and residual density +4.84 e/Å^3, the model is not uniquely established. No alternative stacking models, lower-symmetry settings, or explicit twin laws are tested. The sentence 'the experiment allows us to unambiguously prove the composition and crystal structure' contradicts the stated limitations. Please re-analyze the diffraction data with alternative models and report a comparison of R factors and residual densities; otherwise the structural claim
  2. [Abstract vs. main text and Table S1] The reported unit cell parameters are inconsistent. The abstract gives a = 4.3120(5), b = 41.0305(76), c = 4.2979(8) Å, while the main text and Table S1 give a = 4.3009(17), b = 43.107(18), c = 4.3016(17) Å for the same 100 K structure. The b-axis difference is about 2.1 Å, far beyond the stated uncertainty. Since the cell parameters are load-bearing for the structural model and for comparisons with TbTe3, this discrepancy must be resolved and the correct values used consistently.
  3. [Calculations of magnetization and torque of TbTe3] Equation (2)-(4) and Table 1: the crystal-field parameters B_q^k and the exchange constants J_ij are fit to the same susceptibility, magnetization, and torque data that the calculation is then said to 'confirm.' This is circular as an independent validation. The paper acknowledges the result is 'qualitative in the absence of infrared spectroscopy,' but the text and Fig. 6 present the calculation as support for the experimental torque interpretation. Please present the calculation explicitly as a parametrization of the same data and identify which aspects, if any, are robust predictions that could be tested by future neutron or optical experiments.
  4. [Ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy] The assignment of the 3.77 THz oscillation to a CDW amplitude mode is plausible but not 'strong evidence' as stated. The identification rests on a single Fourier peak in a pump-probe trace and on analogy with RTe3 and other CDW compounds; no static CDW superlattice reflection, transport anomaly, or optical conductivity signature is presented for Tb2Te5. The zero-crossing time tm changes near TN1, but the interpretation of this phenomenological quantity as electron-magnetic coupling is indirect. Please soften the claim to a suggestive observation or add corroborating evidence for the CDW.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] "Eq. (3) in [2 2]" (in the 'Calculations' section) should likely be 'Eq. (3) in [24]', matching the earlier citation. Please correct the citation and unify the notation for the crystal-field Hamiltonian.
  2. [Crystal structure description] The text says 'Tb1O9 and Tb2O9 share edges'; the polyhedra are formed by Te atoms, so this should read 'Tb1Te9' and 'Tb2Te9' or simply 'Tb1 and Tb2 centered polyhedra.'
  3. [Fig. 6 and Eq. (1)] The sign convention for torque is not fully defined. Please state explicitly how φ=0 aligns with the b axis and what the signs of M_b and M_ac mean in Eq. (1), so that the reader can interpret the 'negative torque at 45°' criterion.
  4. [Table 1] The exchange parameters J are listed without uncertainties and with inconsistent decimal format (e.g., '5. K' vs '5.0 K'). Since the number of fitted parameters is large relative to the data, please provide at least a statement of the stability of the fit and the estimated uncertainty of the parameters.
  5. [Powder XRD] The powder pattern contains 16% Te impurity. Because the magnetization and specific heat were measured on crystals, the impurity may not affect the bulk data, but the influence of the Te impurity on the low-field data should be explicitly discussed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Tb2Te5 experimental findings are independent, but the TbTe3 'theoretical' torque calculation refits its own input rather than testing it.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Calculations of magnetization and torque of TbTe3, after Eq. (4) and Table 1]
    "In order to determine the crystal field parameters B_q^k ... we used the experimental data of the magnetic susceptibility χ(T) and magnetization curves M(B) along the main crystallographic axes and data of torque signals τ(φ) at various temperatures. ... Calculation of magnetization and susceptibility curves with the crystal field parameters given in Eq. (4) confirms the easy ac-plane anisotropy."

    The CF parameters are explicitly fitted to the same χ(T), M(B), and τ(φ) data that the calculation is then said to 'confirm.' Similarly, Table 1 lists exchange parameters 'used for the calculation of τ(φ) dependencies' without any independent source, so they are evidently adjusted to reproduce the ordered-phase torque. The solid lines in Fig. 6 are therefore a refit of the data they are compared with, not an independent prediction; the agreement is by construction.

full rationale

The central new claims of the paper concern Tb2Te5: the Cmcm structure from single-crystal XRD, the two antiferromagnetic transitions at TN1=9.0 K and TN2=6.8 K from magnetization and specific heat, the ac-plane anisotropy from torque, and the 3.77 THz oscillation from pump-probe. These are independent experimental results and do not reduce to the model fitting. The TbTe3 crystal-field calculation is the only significant circular element: the CF parameters are fitted to the very susceptibility, magnetization, and torque data that the subsequent 'calculation' then reproduces, and the exchange constants in Table 1 are likewise inputs used to generate the torque curves rather than independently determined quantities. That makes the TbTe3 torque 'confirmation' a self-consistent fit, not a test. The structural refinements concerns—turbostratic disorder, R1=0.0894, residual density 4.84 e/Angstrom^3, and the abstract/full-text cell-parameter discrepancy—are robustness or correctness issues, not circularity. Because the central Tb2Te5 findings stand on their own experimental evidence, the overall circularity is partial rather than pervasive.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

11 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central new claims about Tb2Te5 rest on a structure model fitted to disordered XRD data and on bulk thermodynamic and torque measurements; the CF/mean-field model for TbTe3 adds many fitted parameters whose output is compared to the same data they were fitted to.

free parameters (11)
  • Crystal field parameter B20 = -20 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B22 = -117 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B40 = -596 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B42 = 1220 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B44 = 413 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B60 = 1863 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B62 = 1182 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B64 = -1992 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Crystal field parameter B66 = 1136 cm^-1
    Fitted to susceptibility, magnetization, and torque of TbTe3 (Eq. 4).
  • Exchange constants J_i,j (Table 1) = See Table 1; 12 values per AF1/AF2 phase, e.g. J11x=5 K (AF1), -5 K (AF2)
    Chosen to reproduce torque at two temperatures; 24 numbers fitted to the same data.
  • Curie-Weiss fit parameters for Tb2Te5 = chi0||=-4.6e-3 emu/mol, C||=24.4 emuK/mol, Theta||=-50 K; chi0_perp=-2.6e-3, C_perp=23.9, Theta_perp=11 K
    Fit to susceptibility 150-300 K; not load-bearing for the transition claims.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The disordered Tb2Te5 crystal can be modeled by a single ordered Cmcm unit cell.
    Invoked in 'Crystal growth and X-Ray diffraction study'; the text admits growth-twin/turbostratic disorder but concludes the structure is unambiguous.
  • domain assumption Tb3+ magnetism in TbTe3 can be described by a crystal-field Hamiltonian for the ground multiplet within mean-field theory.
    Invoked in 'Calculations of magnetization and torque of TbTe3', Eq. (2).
  • ad hoc to paper The 3.77 THz oscillation in Tb2Te5 is the amplitude mode of a charge density wave.
    No diffraction evidence for CDW in Tb2Te5 is given; the assignment relies on analogy with RTe3 and CuTe.
  • standard math Torque is given by tau = Mb*B*sin(phi) - Mac*B*cos(phi) for a purely axial system.
    Eq. (1) from Ref. 22; standard for axial anisotropy.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comparative study of terbium tellurides Tb2Te5 and TbTe3." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHA35EVI

@misc{pith2026250908319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comparative study of terbium tellurides Tb2Te5 and TbTe3},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHA35EVI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08319}
}
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Two terbium tellurides, TbTe3 and Tb2Te5, were studied by means of thermodynamics, ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy and torque magnetometry. While crystal structure and some physical properties of TbTe3 were established previously, the crystal structure of Tb2Te5 was solved only in this work in the orthorhombic space group Cmcm with the parameters of unit cell a = 4.3120(5), b = 41.0305(76) and c = 4.2979(8) {\AA}. In contrast to TbTe3, which experiences three successive magnetic phase transitions, Tb2Te5 orders antiferromagnetically in two steps at TN1 = 9.0 K and TN2 = 6.8 K, both readily suppressed by an external magnetic field. The third transition in TbTe3 is due to the interaction of the magnetic subsystem with the charge density waves. The interaction of magnetic and electronic subsystems in Tb2Te5 has been revealed by the pump probe. Torque measurements of TbTe3 show that the magnetic moments of Tb are oriented predominantly in the ac plane at high temperatures and switch to the b axis at low temperatures. In Tb2Te5, the magnetic moments of Tb are oriented predominantly in the ac plane at low temperatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08319 by A. Demidov, A. Sinchenko, A. Vasiliev, C-W. Luo, D. Chareev, D. Ksenofontov, E. Lorenzo, E. Pachaud, I. Shamova, L. Shvanskaya, O. Volkova, P. Monceau, V. Popova.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: crystal structure of Tb2Te5 in polyhedra representation. Right panel: in Ball – and – stick representation of quasi-layerered crystal structures of TbTe3 and Tb2Te5. Large spheres of different colors represent two crystallographically inequivalent sites of Tb in Tb2Te5. X-ray powder diffraction study was provided on a STOE-STADI MP (Germany) diffractometer with a curved Ge (111) monochromator u… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The left panel represents temperature dependences of magnetic susceptibility and reversal magnetic susceptibility in the inset of crystalline Tb2Te5 taken in field – cooled regim at B = 0.1 T.The middle panel represents field dependences of magnetization of powder (closed circles) and oriented crystal (open circles) of Tb2Te5 at 2 K. The inset enlarges the low-field region.The right panel represents temper… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Magnetic phase diagrams of Tb2Te5 crystal with magnetic field oriented Bac (left panel) and Bb (right panel). Ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy Although thermodynamic measurements did not reveal an interaction between magnetic order and the charge-density wave (CDW), ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy reveals a coupling between electrons in the tellurium layers and the localized terbium magnetic moments… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Transient reflectivity change (ΔR/R) spectra of a Tb2Te5 crystal at various temperatures. (b) ΔR/R spectra in (a) with longer delay time. Inset: the zero-crossing (ΔR/R = 0) delay time tm, marked by an arrow in (b), as a function of temperatures. Dashed lines guide the eye above 8 K and below 6 K. (c) Reflectance spectrum of a Tb2Te5 crystal at room temperature. (d) Zoomed plot (around zero delay time)… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TbTe9 polyhedron constituting TbTe3 and Tb2Te5 structures. Red and green arrows indicate easy directions of magnetic moment of Tb3+ in the ac-plane. The magnetic field, shown by black arrow, rotates either in the bc plane, shown in yellow, or in the ab plane. The  angle was measured from the b – axis. The azimutal torque dependencies for both TbTe3 and Tb2Te5 are summarized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A. R. Jha, Rare earth materials: properties and applications. (CRC Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    L. Hou, Y. W. Li, C. Lane, High -Throughput Search and Prediction of Layered 4f -Materials. arXiv:2409.04632

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    R. W. Cahn, Binary alloy phase diagrams–second edition. (ASM international, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Chillal , E

    S. Chillal , E. Schierle , E . Weschke, F. Yokaichiya , J. -U. Hoffmann , O. S. Volkova, A. N. Vasiliev , A. A. Sinchenko, P. Lejay, A. Hadj -Azzem, P. Monceau , B. Lake, Strongly coupled charge, orbital, and spin order in TbTe3, Phys. Rev. B 102, 241110 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    D. A. Zocco, J. J. Hamlin, K. Grube, J.-H. Chu, H.-H. Kuo, I. R. Fisher, M. B. Maple, Pressure dependence of the charge-density-wave and superconducting states in GdTe3, TbTe3, and DyTe3. Phys. Rev. B 91, 205114 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    O. S. Volkova, A. Hadj -Azzem, G. Remenyi, J.E. Lorenzo, P. Monceau, Sinchenko A.A.,Vasiliev A.N. Magnetic phase diagram of van der Waals antiferromagnet TbTe 3, Materials, 15, 8772 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Ru, J.-H

    N. Ru, J.-H. Chu, and I. R. Fisher, Magnetic properties of the charge density wave compounds RTe3 (R= Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, and Tm), Phys. Rev. B 78, 012410 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Banerjee, Y

    A. Banerjee, Y. Feng, D. M. Silevitch, J. Wang, J. C. Lang, H. H. Kuo, I.R. Fisher, T. F. Rosenbaum, Charge transfer and multiple density waves in the rare earth tellurides. Phys. Rev. B 87, 155131 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    D. A. Chareev, P. Evstigneeva, D. Phuyal, G. J. Man, H. Rensmo, A. N. Vasiliev, M. Abdel- Hafiez, Growth of transition -metal dichalcogenides by solvent evaporation technique. Crystal Growth & Design 20, 6930-6938 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Krause, R

    L. Krause, R. Herbst-Irmer, G.M. Sheldrick, D. Stalke, Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X -ray sources for single -crystal structure determination . J. Appl. Cryst. 48 3-10 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Sheldrick, SHELX -2018/3, Program package for crystal structure solution and refinement, Göttingen, Germany, 2018

    G.M. Sheldrick, SHELX -2018/3, Program package for crystal structure solution and refinement, Göttingen, Germany, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]

  13. [13]

    M. P. Pardo, J. Flahaut, Les tellurures superieurs des terres rares, de formules L 2Te5 et LTe3. Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 3658-3664 (1967)

    work page 1967

  14. [14]

    Le Bail, H

    A. Le Bail, H. Duroy, J.L. Fourquet. Ab-initio structure determination of LiSbWO6 by X-ray powder diffraction. Mater. Res. Bull., 23, 447-452 (1988)

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    Petricek, M

    V. Petricek, M. Dusek, L.Palatinus, Z. Crystallographic Computing System for Standard and Modulated Structures. Kristallogr. 229, 345−354 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    D. Chen, S. Zhang, H.X. Yang, J.Q. Li, G.F. Chen. Magnetic and transport properties of a layered compound Ce2Te5. J. Phys.: Condens. Mat. 29, 265803 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Y. Liu, M. M.Bordelon, A. Weiland, P. F. Rosa, S. M. Thomas, J. D. Thompson, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, Physical properties of the layered f-electron van der Waals magnet Ce 2 Te 5. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 094407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    C. W. Luo, Y. T. Wang, A. Yabushita, T. Kobayashi, Ultrabroadband time -resolved spectroscopy in novel types of condensed matter. Optica 3, 82-92 (2016); C. W. Luo, Y. T. Wang, F. W. Chen, H. C. Shih, T. Kobayashi, Eliminate coherence spike in reflection -type pump-probe measurements. Optics Express 17, 11321-11327 (2009)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Koopmans, G

    B. Koopmans, G. Malinowski, F. Dalla Longa, D. Steiauf, M. Fähnle, T. Roth, M. Ci nchetti, M. Aeschlimann, Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser-induced demagnetization. Nat. Mater. 9, 259 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    P. E. Dolgirev, A. V. Rozhkov, A. Zong, A. Kogar, N. Gedik, B. V. Fine. Amplitude dynamics of the charge density wave in LaTe3: Theoretical description of pump-probe experiments. Physical Review B, 101, 054203 (2020); R. V. Yusupov, T. Mertelj, J. H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, D. Mihailovic, Single-particle and collective mode couplings associated with 1 -and 2 -...

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    H. C. Shih, T. H. Lin, C. W. Luo, J. Y. Lin, T. M. Uen, J. Y. Juang, K. H. Wu, J. M. Lee, J. M. Chen, T. Kobayashi, Magnetization dynamics and the Mn 3+ d-d excitation of hexagonal HoMnO3 single crystals using wavelength-tunable time-resolved femtosecond spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B, 80, 024427 (2009); H. C. Shih, L. Y. Chen, C. W. Luo, K. H. Wu, J. Y. Lin,...

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Perfetti, M

    M. Perfetti, M. A.Sørensen, U. B. Hansen, H. Bamberger, S. Lenz, P. P. Hallmen, T. Fennell, G.G. Simeoni, A. Arauzo, J. Bartolomé, E. Bartolomé, K. Lefmann, H. Weihe, J. van Slageren, J. Bendix, Magnetic anisotropy switch: Easy axis to easy plane conversion and vice versa , Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1801846 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Popova, D.V

    E.A. Popova, D.V. Volkov, A.N. Vasiliev, A.A. Demidov, N.P. Kolmakova, I.A. Gudim, L.N. Bezmaternykh, N. Tristan, Yu. Skourski, B. Buechner, et al., Magnetization and specific heat of TbFe3(BO3)4: Experiment and crystal-field calculations, Phys. Rev. B 75, 224413 (2007)

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    Ritter, A.I

    C. Ritter, A.I. Pankrats, A.A. Demidov, D.A. Velikanov, V.L. Temerov, I.A. Gudim, Inclined magnetic structure of iron borate Pr xY1− xFe3(BO3)4: A neutron diffraction study and crystal-field calculations, Phys. Rev. B 91,134416 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Markina, K.V

    M.M. Markina, K.V. Zakharov, E.A. Ovchenkov, P.S. Berdonosov, V.A. Dolgikh, E.S. Kuznetsova, A.V. Olenev, S.A. Klimin, M.A. Kashchenko, I.V. Budkin, I.V. Yatsyk, A.A. Demidov, E.A. Zvereva and A.N. Vasiliev. Interplay of rare-earth and transition metal subsystems in Cu3Yb(SeO3)2O2Cl. Phys. Rev. B, 96, 134422 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    M. N. Popova, S. A. Klimin, E. P. Chukalina, B. Z. Malkin, R. Z. Levitin, B. V. Mill, and E. Antic-Fidancev, High-resolution spectral study of crystal -field levels and magnetic ordering in (ErxY1− x)2BaNiO5 chain compounds, Phys. Rev. B 68, 155103 (2003)

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    Perfetti, Cantilever torque magnetometry on coordination compounds: from theory to experiments

    M. Perfetti, Cantilever torque magnetometry on coordination compounds: from theory to experiments. Coord. Chem. Rev., 348, 171 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    C. D. Malliakas, M. Iavarone, J. Fedor, M. G. Kanatzidis, Coexistence and coupling of two distinct charge density waves in Sm2Te5. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3310 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    K. Y. Shin, J. Laverock, Y. Q. Wu, C. L. Condron, M. F. Toney, S. B.Dugdale, M.J. Kramer, I. R. Fisher, Charge density wave formation in R 2Te5 (R= Nd, Sm, and Gd) , Phys. Rev. B 77, 165101 (2008). SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Table S1. Experimental details Crystal data Chemical formula Tb2Te5 Mr 955.84 Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, Cmcm Temperature...

    work page 2008

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.