Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Model independent reconstruction of cosmological accelerated-decelerated phase

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.15579 v2 pith:XHTGA3I7 submitted 2021-06-29 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Model independent reconstruction of cosmological accelerated-decelerated phase

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords hubbleconfidencecosmicdarkdatadiscussenergyequivalence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We propose two model independent methods to obtain constraints on the transition and equivalence redshifts $z_{tr}$, $z_{eq}$. In particular, we consider $z_{tr}$ as the onset of cosmic acceleration, whereas $z_{eq}$ the redshift at which the densities of dark energy and pressureless matter are equated. With this prescription, we expand the Hubble and deceleration parameters up to two hierarchical orders and show a linear correlation between transition and equivalence, from which we propose exclusion plots where $z_{eq}$ is not allowed to span. To this end, we discuss how to build up cosmographic expansions in terms of $z_{tr}$ and compute the corresponding observable quantities directly fitting the luminosity and angular distances and the Hubble rate with cosmic data. We make our computations through Monte Carlo fits involving type Ia supernova, baryonic acoustic oscillation and Hubble most recent data catalogs. We show at $1\sigma$ confidence level the $\Lambda$CDM predictions on $z_{tr}$ and $z_{eq}$ are slightly confirmed, although at $2\sigma$ confidence level dark energy expectations cannot be excluded. Finally, we theoretically interpret our outcomes and discuss possible limitations of our overall approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmological consequences of scale-dependent Barrow-Tsallis entropy

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A scale-dependent Barrow-Tsallis entropy cosmology fits cosmic data but is statistically disfavored versus ΛCDM, with only a modest and partially circular Hubble-tension 'alleviation'.

  2. Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.

  3. Transit dark energy cosmological models in generalized matter-geometry coupling theory using a non-linear form of $f(R,T,L_{m})$ function

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    A modified f(R,T,L_m) gravity model, fitted to CC and Pantheon data, yields an accelerating late-time universe with transition redshift near 0.6 and an effective dark energy equation of state within 1e-5 of -1.