Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 63 references

Pinned Boundaries Delay Contraction and Shape Stress Relaxation in Active Gels

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pinned boundaries in actomyosin gels build internal stress that delays contraction and produces intermittent relaxation through detachment and rupture.

desk verdict Pinned boundaries in these gels do produce delayed and intermittent contraction via stress buildup, but the causal link rests on missing controls and the abstract gives no numbers or equations to check the model. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.11850 v1 pith:XHUZN72U submitted 2026-06-10 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Aniket Marne , James Clarke , Aravind Rao , Hyunjae Lee , Kyla Wong , Aditya Sriram , Rae Robertson-Anderson , Moumita Das
show 1 more author
José Alvarado
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords actomyosingelspinnedboundariesstressrelaxationactivecontractionhydrodynamicmodelintermittentdynamicsboundarydetachmentstrainfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tests how fixing the sides of reconstituted actomyosin gels changes their contraction compared with free gels. Pinned edges cause stress to accumulate, which postpones overall shortening, creates jerky motion, and produces uneven stretching across the material. A hydrodynamic model that adds elastic, viscous, and active stresses accounts for the buildup phase and the later release phase, and it matches the measured energy dissipation rates before and after detachment. The setup mimics the mechanical constraints cells experience in tissues, so the results bear on how living systems regulate force and on how to engineer responsive soft materials.

What carries the argument

Pinned boundary conditions combined with a hydrodynamic model of elastic, viscous, and active stress that separates accumulation from release phases.

What would settle it

Observation of smooth, continuous contraction without stress buildup, detachment events, or spatially nonuniform strain in pinned gels would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Pinned boundary conditions cause stress to accumulate in the gel, delaying overall contraction and producing intermittent dynamics with nonuniform strains; stress is relieved by symmetric constriction, boundary detachment, and internal rupture, as captured by a hydrodynamic model that distinguishes accumulation and release phases and matches experimental observations of energy relaxation rates.

Load-bearing premise

The intermittent dynamics and stress-relief pathways are produced by the pinned boundaries and active-stress variations rather than by differences in gel preparation or imaging artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Boundary constraints generate spatially varying strains inside active contractile materials.
  • Stress relief proceeds through multiple distinct pathways including symmetric constriction, detachment, and rupture.
  • Energy relaxation rates change sharply after detachment events.
  • Boundary conditions and spatial heterogeneity together control the mechanical response of contractile active gels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pinning mechanism may operate in embryonic tissues where actomyosin networks adhere to fixed extracellular structures.
  • Tuning active-stress magnitude in the model could predict how to control the timing of stress-release events in engineered actuators.
  • Internal rupture as a relief route may connect to fracture behavior observed in other soft active materials.
  • Three-dimensional versions of the pinned geometry would test whether the same accumulation-release cycle persists beyond the quasi-two-dimensional case studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines contraction dynamics in pinned actomyosin gels, claiming that pinned boundaries cause stress buildup, delayed and intermittent contraction, nonuniform strain fields, with stress relief through symmetric constriction, boundary detachment, and internal rupture. A hydrodynamic model is introduced to distinguish accumulation and release phases, predict different energy relaxation rates, and is compared to simulations that reproduce the experimental behavior.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this study would be significant for understanding how mechanical constraints influence active contractile materials, with implications for cellular mechanics, tissue development, and the design of adaptive soft materials. The combination of experiments, modeling, and simulations is a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental setup] Abstract and experimental setup: The attribution of intermittent dynamics and stress buildup specifically to pinned boundary conditions requires a matched control with free boundaries under identical gel preparation, actin/myosin concentrations, and imaging conditions. The abstract references prior work on free contraction but does not describe such a control within this study, leaving open the possibility that the observed phenomenology arises from uncontrolled variables rather than pinning.
  2. [Hydrodynamic model] Hydrodynamic model: The model is described as distinguishing accumulation and release phases and linking active stress variations to intermittent dynamics with distinct energy relaxation rates, but without the explicit equations, parameter definitions, or derivation steps shown, it is not possible to verify whether these predictions are independent of the fitted data or reduce to post-hoc descriptions of the same observations.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract could include brief quantitative indicators (e.g., typical delay times or strain magnitudes) to strengthen the claims.
  2. Ensure all figures in the full manuscript include appropriate scale bars, error bars, and statistical details for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive evaluation of the work's significance. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and experimental setup] Abstract and experimental setup: The attribution of intermittent dynamics and stress buildup specifically to pinned boundary conditions requires a matched control with free boundaries under identical gel preparation, actin/myosin concentrations, and imaging conditions. The abstract references prior work on free contraction but does not describe such a control within this study, leaving open the possibility that the observed phenomenology arises from uncontrolled variables rather than pinning.

    Authors: We agree that a matched control experiment with free boundaries under identical conditions would provide stronger direct evidence. The current manuscript relies on comparison to prior published studies on free contraction in similar actomyosin gels rather than new control experiments performed here. We have revised the abstract, introduction, and discussion to explicitly state this reliance on the literature, to highlight key differences in boundary conditions, and to note that the pinned setup is the novel focus of this work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hydrodynamic model] Hydrodynamic model: The model is described as distinguishing accumulation and release phases and linking active stress variations to intermittent dynamics with distinct energy relaxation rates, but without the explicit equations, parameter definitions, or derivation steps shown, it is not possible to verify whether these predictions are independent of the fitted data or reduce to post-hoc descriptions of the same observations.

    Authors: The hydrodynamic model equations, parameter definitions, and derivation from active gel hydrodynamics are presented in the Methods section. The accumulation/release phases and distinct relaxation rates follow directly from the time-dependent active stress term in the constitutive equations. To improve clarity and allow independent verification, we have added a supplementary note containing the full derivation and parameter table. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected; model and claims remain independent of inputs.

full rationale

The paper reports experimental observations under pinned boundaries and introduces a hydrodynamic model incorporating elastic, viscous, and active stresses to distinguish accumulation/release phases and predict distinct relaxation rates. No equations, self-citations, or derivations are quoted that reduce these predictions to fitted parameters by construction, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claims rest on direct experimental phenomenology and numerical simulations that reproduce observed behavior, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks rather than circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents identification of specific free parameters or axioms; the hydrodynamic model is presumed to rest on standard continuum assumptions for active gels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pinned Boundaries Delay Contraction and Shape Stress Relaxation in Active Gels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHUZN72U

@misc{pith2026260611850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pinned Boundaries Delay Contraction and Shape Stress Relaxation in Active Gels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHUZN72U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.11850}
}
read the original abstract

Cells dynamically generate, transmit, and dissipate stress. Central to these processes is the actomyosin cortex, an active contractile material that drives cellular mechanical behavior. While prior studies have focused on freely contracting actomyosin systems, the role of mechanical constraints such as adhesion to boundaries remains less explored. To address this, we employ reconstituted actomyosin gels to investigate cellular contractility. We study contraction dynamics under pinned boundary conditions, where the gel is adhered transversely to two opposing surfaces, mimicking supracellular actomyosin networks in tissues and embryos. We find that pinned contraction leads to stress buildup, delaying contraction, producing intermittent dynamics, and generating spatially nonuniform strain fields. Stress is relieved through several pathways, including active-stress-driven symmetric constriction and defect-driven processes such as boundary detachment and internal rupture. We develop a hydrodynamic model incorporating elastic, viscous, and active stress contributions that distinguishes between stress-accumulation and stress-release phases and links variations in active stress to the observed intermittent dynamics. The model predicts distinct energy relaxation rates before and after detachment events, providing insight into stress dissipation. We compare experiments with numerical simulations, which reproduce the observed behavior and reveal how internal energy is generated and dissipated during stress buildup and relaxation. Together, our results demonstrate how boundary conditions and spatial heterogeneity govern the mechanical behavior of contractile active gels. These findings provide insight into stress regulation in cellular and tissue-scale systems and may inform the design of adaptive soft materials and bioinspired robotic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11850 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison between strain responses between experiments and simulations for both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Energy density changes shows relaxation via local structural rearrangement within [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Principal strain direction defines nematic order. (a) Representative visualization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pinned contraction results in intermittent dynamics. (a) Autocorrelation matrix of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Experimental visualizations of pinned-contraction experiments, illustrating the dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pulsed actomyosin contractions in morphogenesis

    Ann Sutherland and Alyssa Lesko. Pulsed actomyosin contractions in morphogenesis. F1000Research, 9:F1000 Faculty Rev–142, February 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Assembly of a persistent apical actin network by the formin Frl/Fmnl tunes epithelial cell deformability.bioRxiv, page 680033, June 2019

    Benoit Dehapiot, Rapha ¨el Cl ´ement, Gabriella Gazs ´o-Gerh´at, Jean-Marc Philippe, and Thomas Lecuit. Assembly of a persistent apical actin network by the formin Frl/Fmnl tunes epithelial cell deformability.bioRxiv, page 680033, June 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    T. J. Mitchison and L. P. Cramer. Actin-Based Cell Motility and Cell Locomotion.Cell, 84(3):371–379, February 1996

    1996

  4. [4]

    Oakes, Martin Lenz, and Margaret L

    Michael Murrell, Patrick W. Oakes, Martin Lenz, and Margaret L. Gardel. Forcing cells into shape: The mechanics of actomyosin contractility.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 16(8):486–498, August 2015

    2015

  5. [5]

    Architecture shapes contractility in actomyosin networks.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 50:79–85, February 2018

    Gijsje H Koenderink and Ewa K Paluch. Architecture shapes contractility in actomyosin networks.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 50:79–85, February 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    Arnold, Rachel E

    Torey R. Arnold, Rachel E. Stephenson, and Ann L. Miller. Rho GTPases and actomyosin: Partners in regulating epithelial cell-cell junction structure and function.Experimental Cell Research, 358(1):20–30, September 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    James Nelson

    W. James Nelson. Regulation of cell–cell adhesion by the cadherin–catenin complex. Biochemical Society Transactions, 36(2):149–155, March 2008

    2008

  8. [8]

    Leckband and J

    D.E. Leckband and J. de Rooij. Cadherin Adhesion and Mechanotransduction.Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 30(1):1–25, 2014. 37

    2014

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Humphrey, Eric R

    Jay D. Humphrey, Eric R. Dufresne, and Martin A. Schwartz. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15(12):802– 812, December 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Kechagia, Johanna Ivaska, and Pere Roca-Cusachs

    Jenny Z. Kechagia, Johanna Ivaska, and Pere Roca-Cusachs. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment.Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 20(8):457–473, August 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    MacKintosh, and Gijsje H

    Jos ´e Alvarado, Michael Sheinman, Abhinav Sharma, Fred C. MacKintosh, and Gijsje H. Koenderink. Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state. Nature Physics, 9(9):591–597, September 2013

    2013

  4. [12]

    A contractile nuclear actin network drives chromosome con- gression in oocytes.Nature, 436(7052):812 818, August 2005

    P ´eter L ´en´art, Christian P Bacher, Nathalie Daigle, Arthur R Hand, Roland Eils, Mark Terasaki, and Jan Ellenberg. A contractile nuclear actin network drives chromosome con- gression in oocytes.Nature, 436(7052):812 818, August 2005

    2005

  5. [13]

    MacKintosh, and Gijsje H

    Jos ´e Alvarado, Michael Sheinman, Abhinav Sharma, Fred C. MacKintosh, and Gijsje H. Koenderink. Force percolation of contractile active gels.Soft Matter, 13(34):5624– 5644, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Murrell and Margaret L

    Michael P. Murrell and Margaret L. Gardel. F-actin buckling coordinates contractility and severing in a biomimetic actomyosin cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(51):20820–20825, December 2012

    2012

  7. [15]

    Koen- derink, and Cecile Sykes

    Kevin Carvalho, Feng-Ching Tsai, Edouard Lees, Rapha ¨el V oituriez, Gijsje H. Koen- derink, and Cecile Sykes. Cell-sized liposomes reveal how actomyosin cortical tension drives shape change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41):16456– 16461, October 2013. 38

    2013

  8. [16]

    Sakamoto and M

    R. Sakamoto and M. P. Murrell. Active tension and membrane friction mediate cortical flows and blebbing in a model actomyosin cortex.Physical Review Research, 6(3):033024, July 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Oakes, Wonyeong Jung, Taeyoon Kim, and Michael P

    Ian Linsmeier, Shiladitya Banerjee, Patrick W. Oakes, Wonyeong Jung, Taeyoon Kim, and Michael P. Murrell. Disordered actomyosin networks are sufficient to produce cooperative and telescopic contractility.Nature Communications, 7(1):1–9, August 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Bendix, Gijsje H

    Poul M. Bendix, Gijsje H. Koenderink, Damien Cuvelier, Zvonimir Dogic, Bernard N. Koeleman, William M. Brieher, Christine M. Field, L. Mahadevan, and David A. Weitz. A Quantitative Analysis of Contractility in Active Cytoskeletal Protein Networks.Bio- physical Journal, 94(8):3...

    2008

  11. [19]

    Koenderink

    Jos ´e Alvarado, Luca Cipelletti, and Gijsje H. Koenderink. Uncovering the dynamic precur- sors to motor-driven contraction of active gels.Soft Matter, 15(42):8552–8565, October 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    An, Daniel Navajas, Daniel J

    Xavier Trepat, Linhong Deng, Steven S. An, Daniel Navajas, Daniel J. Tschumperlin, William T. Gerthoffer, James P. Butler, and Jeffrey J. Fredberg. Universal physical re- sponses to stretch in the living cell.Nature, 447(7144):592–595, May 2007

    2007

  13. [21]

    Gardel, and Ed Munro

    Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, and Ed Munro. Determinants of Fluidlike Behavior and Effective Viscosity in Cross-Linked Actin Networks.Biophysical Journal, 106(3):526– 534, February 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    Mu ˜noz, Mark Miodownik, 39 and Guillaume Charras

    Nargess Khalilgharibi, Jonathan Fouchard, Nina Asadipour, Ricardo Barrientos, Maria Duda, Alessandra Bonfanti, Amina Yonis, Andrew Harris, Payman Mosaffa, Yasuyuki Fujita, Alexandre Kabla, Yanlan Mao, Buzz Baum, Jos ´e J. Mu ˜noz, Mark Miodownik, 39 and Guillaume Charras. Stre...

    2019

  15. [23]

    A question of time: Tissue adaptation to mechanical forces.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 38:68–73, February 2016

    Tom Wyatt, Buzz Baum, and Guillaume Charras. A question of time: Tissue adaptation to mechanical forces.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 38:68–73, February 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Molecular motors stiffen non-affine semiflexible poly- mer networks.Soft Matter, 7(7):3186–3191, 2011

    CP Broedersz and FC MacKintosh. Molecular motors stiffen non-affine semiflexible poly- mer networks.Soft Matter, 7(7):3186–3191, 2011

    2011

  17. [25]

    Range and strength of mechanical interactions of force dipoles in elastic fiber networks.Soft Matter, 19(30):5805–5823, 2023

    Abhinav Kumar, David A Quint, and Kinjal Dasbiswas. Range and strength of mechanical interactions of force dipoles in elastic fiber networks.Soft Matter, 19(30):5805–5823, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Active cytoskeletal composites display emergent tunable contractility and restructuring

    Gloria Lee, Gregor Leech, Pancy Lwin, Jonathan Michel, Christopher Currie, Michael J Rust, Jennifer L Ross, Ryan J McGorty, Moumita Das, and Rae M Robertson-Anderson. Active cytoskeletal composites display emergent tunable contractility and restructuring. Soft Matter, 17(47):1...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Nonlinear contractile response of actomyosin active gels to control signals, 2025

    James Clarke, Francis Cavanna, Aniket Marne, Anthony Davolio, and Jos ´e Alvarado. Nonlinear contractile response of actomyosin active gels to control signals, 2025

    2025

  20. [28]

    Investigating active dynamics of contrac- tile actomyosin gels with micro particle image velocimetry (micro-PIV) analysis

    Sakshi Choudhary, Subhaya Bose, Yuval Amit, Daniel Sevilla Sanchez, Gefen Livne, Kin- jal Dasbiswas, and Anne Bernheim-Groswasser. Investigating active dynamics of contrac- tile actomyosin gels with micro particle image velocimetry (micro-PIV) analysis

  21. [29]

    Oakes, Wonyeong Jung, Taeyoon Kim, and Michael P

    Ian Linsmeier, Shiladitya Banerjee, Patrick W. Oakes, Wonyeong Jung, Taeyoon Kim, and Michael P. Murrell. Disordered actomyosin networks are sufficient to produce cooperative and telescopic contractility. 7(1):12615. 40

  22. [30]

    Crowell, Jiho Kang, Diana L

    Anne D. Crowell, Jiho Kang, Diana L. Conrad, Thomas M. FitzSimons, Eric V . Anslyn, Delia J. Milliron, and Adrianne M. Rosales. Leveraging bond dissociation kinetics to tune shear-thickening behavior in dynamic covalent tetra-PEG hydrogels. 12(10):eadz9563

  23. [31]

    Ofosu, William D

    Charles K. Ofosu, William D. Brackett, Diana L. Conrad, Dingwen Qian, Tsung-Lun Lee, Jiho Kang, Jinny Choi, Anna Bessmertnaya, Jessica D. Oberlander, Allison M. Green, Felix Lehmk ¨uhler, Andrei Fluerasu, Suresh Narayanan, Qingteng Zhang, Miaoqi Chu, Eric V . Anslyn, Thomas M....

  24. [32]

    Conrad, Jessica D

    Jiho Kang, Dingwen Qian, Jayoon Lee, Diana L. Conrad, Jessica D. Ober- lander, M. Wren Berry, Jeffrey Liu, Eric V . Anslyn, Thomas M. Truskett, and Delia J. Milliron. Colloidal phase control in plasmonic metal oxide nanocrystals via competitive metal–ligand equilibria. 64(52):...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Stefano Aime, Laurence Ramos, and Luca Cipelletti. Microscopic dynamics and failure precursors of a gel under mechanical load.Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America, 115(14):3587 3592, April 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Tambe, Elsa Bazellieres, James P

    Xavier Serra-Picamal, Vito Conte, Romaric Vincent, Ester Anon, Dhananjay T. Tambe, Elsa Bazellieres, James P. Butler, Jeffrey J. Fredberg, and Xavier Trepat. Mechanical waves during tissue expansion. 8(8):628–634

  27. [35]

    Duclos, C

    G. Duclos, C. Blanch-Mercader, V . Yashunsky, G. Salbreux, J.-F. Joanny, J. Prost, and P. Silberzan. Spontaneous shear flow in confined cellular nematics. 14(7):728–732. 41

  28. [36]

    Murrell and Margaret L

    Michael P. Murrell and Margaret L. Gardel. F-actin buckling coordinates contractility and severing in a biomimetic actomyosin cortex. 109(51):20820–20825

  29. [37]

    Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows.Na- ture, 467(7315):617 621, September 2010

    Mirjam Mayer, Martin Depken, Justin S Bois, Frank J ¨ulicher, and Stephan W Grill. Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows.Na- ture, 467(7315):617 621, September 2010

    2010

  30. [38]

    Discher, Paul Janmey, and Yu-Li Wang

    Dennis E. Discher, Paul Janmey, and Yu-Li Wang. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.Science (New York, N.Y.), 310(5751):1139–1143, November 2005

    2005

  31. [39]

    Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis.Nat

    Thomas Lecuit and Pierre-Franc ¸ois Lenne. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8(8):633–644, 2007

    2007

  32. [40]

    Martin, Matthias Kaschube, and Eric F

    Adam C. Martin, Matthias Kaschube, and Eric F. Wieschaus. Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction.Nature, 457(7228):495–499, January 2009

    2009

  33. [41]

    V ogel, Henri G

    Haiyang Jia, Johannes Flommersfeld, Michael Heymann, Sven K. V ogel, Henri G. Fran- quelim, David B. Br ¨uckner, Hiromune Eto, Chase P. Broedersz, and Petra Schwille. 3D printed protein-based robotic structures actuated by molecular motor assemblies.Nature Materials, 21(6):703...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Koenderink

    Jos ´e Alvarado and Gijsje H. Koenderink. Chapter 6 - Reconstituting cytoskeletal contrac- tion events with biomimetic actin–myosin active gels. In Jennifer Ross and Wallace F. Marshall, editors,Methods in Cell Biology, volume 128 ofBuilding a Cell from Its Com- ponent Parts, ...

    2015

  35. [43]

    Supracellular actomyosin assemblies during development.BioArchitecture, 3(2):45–49, March 2013

    Katja R ¨oper. Supracellular actomyosin assemblies during development.BioArchitecture, 3(2):45–49, March 2013. 42

    2013

  36. [44]

    Decker, Ayanna Matthews, Jack A

    Jacob R. Decker, Ayanna Matthews, Jack A. Govaerts, Todd A. Schoborg, Margaret L. Gardel, and Ilaria Rebay. Tension transmission across a supracellular network drives in- creased tissue rigidity in the drosophila retina. 44(10)

  37. [45]

    Rho1 activation recapitulates early gastrulation events in the ventral, but not dorsal, epithelium of Drosophila embryos.eLife, 9:e56893, November 2020

    Ashley Rich, Richard G Fehon, and Michael Glotzer. Rho1 activation recapitulates early gastrulation events in the ventral, but not dorsal, epithelium of Drosophila embryos.eLife, 9:e56893, November 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    Gastrulation in Drosophila: The formation of the ventral furrow and posterior midgut invaginations.De- velopment, 112(3):775–789, July 1991

    Dari Sweeton, Suki Parks, Michael Costa, and Eric Wieschaus. Gastrulation in Drosophila: The formation of the ventral furrow and posterior midgut invaginations.De- velopment, 112(3):775–789, July 1991

    1991

  39. [47]

    Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex.Molecular Biology of the Cell, 24(6):757–767, March 2013

    Marco Fritzsche, Alexandre Lewalle, Tom Duke, Karsten Kruse, and Guillaume Charras. Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex.Molecular Biology of the Cell, 24(6):757–767, March 2013

    2013

  40. [48]

    Wigbers, Fridtjof Brauns, Ching Yee Leung, and Erwin Frey

    Manon C. Wigbers, Fridtjof Brauns, Ching Yee Leung, and Erwin Frey. Flow induced symmetry breaking in a conceptual polarity model. 9(6):1524

  41. [49]

    Koenderink

    Marina Soares e Silva, Bj ¨orn Stuhrmann, Timo Betz, and Gijsje H. Koenderink. Time- resolved microrheology of actively remodeling actomyosin networks.New Journal of Physics, 16(7):075010, July 2014

    2014

  42. [50]

    Humphrey, C

    D. Humphrey, C. Duggan, D. Saha, D. Smith, and J. K ¨as. Active fluidization of polymer networks through molecular motors. 416(6879):413–416

  43. [51]

    Actin stress fibers – assembly, dynamics and biological roles.Journal of Cell Science, 125(8):1855–1864, April 2012

    Sari Tojkander, Gergana Gateva, and Pekka Lappalainen. Actin stress fibers – assembly, dynamics and biological roles.Journal of Cell Science, 125(8):1855–1864, April 2012. 43

    2012

  44. [52]

    Smith, Elizabeth Blankman, Margaret L

    Mark A. Smith, Elizabeth Blankman, Margaret L. Gardel, Laura Luettjohann, Clare M. Waterman, and Mary C. Beckerle. A Zyxin-Mediated Mechanism for Actin Stress Fiber Maintenance and Repair.Developmental Cell, 19(3):365–376, September 2010

    2010

  45. [53]

    Hoffman, Carsten Grashoff, and Martin A

    Brenton D. Hoffman, Carsten Grashoff, and Martin A. Schwartz. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. 475(7356):316–323

  46. [54]

    Donovan Y . Z. Phua, Xiaoyu Sun, and Gregory M. Alushin. Force-activated zyxin assem- blies coordinate actin nucleation and crosslinking to orchestrate stress fiber repair.Current biology: CB, 35(4):854–870.e9, February 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament

    Kimihide Hayakawa, Hitoshi Tatsumi, and Masahiro Sokabe. Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament. 195(5):721–727

  48. [56]

    Colloidal Liquid Crystals Confined to Synthetic Tactoids.Scientific reports, 9(1):20391, 2019

    Ioana C G ˆarlea, Oliver Dammone, Jos´e Alvarado, Valerie Notenboom, Yunfei Jia, Gijsje H Koenderink, Dirk G A L Aarts, M Paul Lettinga, and Bela M Mulder. Colloidal Liquid Crystals Confined to Synthetic Tactoids.Scientific reports, 9(1):20391, 2019

    2019

  49. [57]

    Adaptive rheology and ordering of cell cytoskeleton govern matrix rigidity sensing

    Mukund Gupta, Bibhu Ranjan Sarangi, Joran Deschamps, Yasaman Nematbakhsh, An- drew Callan-Jones, Felix Margadant, Ren ´e-Marc M`ege, Chwee Teck Lim, Rapha ¨el V oi- turiez, and Benoˆıt Ladoux. Adaptive rheology and ordering of cell cytoskeleton govern matrix rigidity sensing. ...

  50. [58]

    Prost, F

    J. Prost, F. J ¨ulicher, and J-F. Joanny. Active gel physics. 11(2):111–117

  51. [59]

    Hydrodynamic theory of active matter

    Frank J ¨ulicher, Stephan W Grill, and Guillaume Salbreux. Hydrodynamic theory of active matter. 81(7):076601

  52. [60]

    Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis.Trends in Cell Biology, 22(10):536–545, October 2012

    Guillaume Salbreux, Guillaume Charras, and Ewa Paluch. Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis.Trends in Cell Biology, 22(10):536–545, October 2012. 44

    2012

  53. [61]

    Generic theory of active polar gels: A paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics.The European Physical Journal E, 16(1):5 16, January 2005

    K Kruse, J F Joanny, F J ¨ulicher, J Prost, and K Sekimoto. Generic theory of active polar gels: A paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics.The European Physical Journal E, 16(1):5 16, January 2005

    2005

  54. [62]

    Bement, Marcin Leda, Alison M

    William M. Bement, Marcin Leda, Alison M. Moe, Angela M. Kita, Matthew E. Larson, Adriana E. Golding, Courtney Pfeuti, Kuan-Chung Su, Ann L. Miller, Andrew B. Gory- achev, and George von Dassow. Activator–inhibitor coupling between rho signalling and actin assembly makes the c...

  55. [63]

    Daisuke Mizuno, Catherine Tardin, C. F. Schmidt, and F. C. MacKintosh. Nonequilibrium Mechanics of Active Cytoskeletal Networks.Science, 315(5810):370–373, January 2007. 45

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.