Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A new approach to principal-agent problems with volatility control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.09471 v2 pith:XIAZAMAA submitted 2024-07-12 math.OC econ.GNmath.PRq-fin.EC

classification math.OCecon.GNmath.PRq-fin.EC
keywords problemsprincipal-agentapproachcontinuous-timecontrolfirst-bestbsdesprincipal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent work by Cvitani\'c, Possama\"i, and Touzi (2018) [9] presents a general approach for continuous-time principal-agent problems, through dynamic programming and second-order backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs). In this paper, we provide an alternative formulation of the principal-agent problem, which can be solved simply by relying on the theory of BSDEs. This reformulation is strongly inspired by an important remark in [9], namely that if the principal observes the output process in continuous-time, she can compute its quadratic variation pathwise. While in [9], this information is used in the contract, our reformulation consists in assuming that the principal could directly control this process, in a `first-best' fashion. The resolution approach for this alternative problem actually follows the line of the so-called `Sannikov's trick' in the literature on continuous-time principal-agent problems, as originally introduced by Sannikov (2008) [28]. We then show that the solution to this `first-best' formulation is identical to the solution of the original problem. More precisely, using the contract form introduced in [9] as `penalisation contracts', we highlight that this `first-best' scenario can be achieved even if the principal cannot directly control the quadratic variation. Nevertheless, we do not have to rely on the theory of 2BSDEs to prove that such contracts are optimal, as their optimality is ensured by showing that the `first-best' scenario is achieved. We believe that this more straightforward approach to solve continuous-time principal-agent problems with volatility control will facilitate the dissemination of these problems across many fields, and its extension to even more intricate problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mind the jumps: when 2BSDEs meet semi-martingales

    math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Semi-martingale second-order BSDEs with jumps are proved well-posed over a unified class of diffusions, pure-jump processes, and discrete-time processes, while the jump-measure integrands resist model-independent aggregation.

  2. Regulation or Competition:Major-Minor Optimal Liquidation across Dark and Lit Pools

    q-fin.MF 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dynamic make-take fee and compensation scheme is constructed for optimal liquidation across lit and dark pools and is claimed to reduce market impact relative to a competitive major-minor market.

Pith tools