Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for One-Dimensional Quantum Well Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.05367 v1 pith:XIRUFCMZ submitted 2025-04-07 quant-ph

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for One-Dimensional Quantum Well Problems

classification quant-ph
keywords wellpinnsquantumfinitenetworksneuralbarrierconvergence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We implement physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve the time-independent Schr\"odinger equation for three canonical one-dimensional quantum potentials: an infinite square well, a finite square well, and a finite barrier. The PINN models incorporate trial wavefunctions that exactly satisfy boundary conditions (Dirichlet zeros at domain boundaries), and they optimize a loss functional combining the PDE residual with a normalization constraint. For the infinite well, the ground-state energy is known (E = pi^2 in dimensionless units) and held fixed in training, whereas for the finite well and barrier, the eigenenergy is treated as a trainable parameter. We use fully-connected neural networks with smooth activation functions to represent the wavefunction and demonstrate that PINNs can learn the ground-state eigenfunctions and eigenvalues for these quantum systems. The results show that the PINN-predicted wavefunctions closely match analytical solutions or expected behaviors, and the learned eigenenergies converge to known values. We present training logs and convergence of the energy parameter, as well as figures comparing the PINN solutions to exact results. The discussion addresses the performance of PINNs relative to traditional numerical methods, highlighting challenges such as convergence to the correct eigenvalue, sensitivity to initialization, and the difficulty of modeling discontinuous potentials. We also discuss the importance of the normalization term to resolve the scaling ambiguity of the wavefunction. Finally, we conclude that PINNs are a viable approach for quantum eigenvalue problems, and we outline future directions including extensions to higher-dimensional and time-dependent Schr\"odinger equations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Solving Hamiltonian Constraint Equation with Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    PINNs with specialized techniques solve the nonlinear Hamiltonian constraint for generic binary black hole initial data, matching traditional NR accuracy.

  2. Neural-network solution of subtracted three-body Faddeev integral equations near the Efimov limit

    nucl-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A DNN solves the symmetrized spectator form of the subtracted Faddeev equations for three identical bosons, reproducing Efimov binding scales at unitarity to within 0.022% and tracing bound-state branches versus inver...