Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

UCTopic: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning for Phrase Representations and Topic Mining

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13469 v1 pith:XJ2ST5NH submitted 2022-02-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords phraserepresentationstopicuctopiclearningminingcontrastivenegatives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

High-quality phrase representations are essential to finding topics and related terms in documents (a.k.a. topic mining). Existing phrase representation learning methods either simply combine unigram representations in a context-free manner or rely on extensive annotations to learn context-aware knowledge. In this paper, we propose UCTopic, a novel unsupervised contrastive learning framework for context-aware phrase representations and topic mining. UCTopic is pretrained in a large scale to distinguish if the contexts of two phrase mentions have the same semantics. The key to pretraining is positive pair construction from our phrase-oriented assumptions. However, we find traditional in-batch negatives cause performance decay when finetuning on a dataset with small topic numbers. Hence, we propose cluster-assisted contrastive learning(CCL) which largely reduces noisy negatives by selecting negatives from clusters and further improves phrase representations for topics accordingly. UCTopic outperforms the state-of-the-art phrase representation model by 38.2% NMI in average on four entity cluster-ing tasks. Comprehensive evaluation on topic mining shows that UCTopic can extract coherent and diverse topical phrases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Accuracy: Are Time Series Foundation Models Well-Calibrated?

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Time-series foundation models are better calibrated than ARIMA and N-BEATS baselines on the tested datasets, and their calibration does not show the systematic overconfidence seen in image and language models.

  2. HMamba: Hyperbolic Mamba for Sequential Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    HMamba is an architecture that runs Mamba's selective state space model in hyperbolic space for sequential recommendation, claiming 3-11% gains over baselines on four benchmarks.

  3. M2Rec: Multi-scale Mamba for Efficient Sequential Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    M2Rec blends Mamba sequence modeling, a learnable FFT noise filter, and LLM text embeddings through two scalar weights, reporting 3% HR@10 gains over Mamba baselines.

Pith tools