Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Power attenuation in millimeter-wave and terahertz superconducting rectangular waveguides: linear response, TLS loss, and Higgs-mode nonlinearity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper develops a microscopic framework that predicts the attenuation of superconducting rectangular waveguides from 100 GHz into the terahertz band for arbitrary mean free path, and identifies a Higgs-mode peak in the attenuation near

desk verdict Useful waveguide-attenuation framework with a real typo in Eq. (29) and a Higgs claim that depends on an earlier paper; the stress-test note about Eq. (14) is wrong. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.17000 v1 pith:XJ5HMC7C submitted 2026-02-19 cond-mat.supr-con physics.acc-phphysics.ins-detquant-ph

Takayuki Kubo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-conphysics.acc-phphysics.ins-detquant-ph
keywords superconductingwaveguidesattenuationconstantcomplexconductivityEilenbergertheorytwo-levelsystemsHiggsmodeterahertzsurfaceresistance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to give a first-principles way to compute the attenuation constant of superconducting rectangular waveguides in the 100 GHz–THz band, valid for any electronic mean free path from dirty to clean. The intended payoff is a design tool: which material purity and waveguide size give ultralow transmission loss for cryogenic astronomy and quantum hardware. The paper also derives a compact analytic formula for loss from two-level systems in native oxide layers, and argues this loss only matters below roughly one-tenth of the critical temperature. Under strong drive, the same framework produces a peak in the attenuation at f ≈ Δ/h, which the paper identifies as a measurable hallmark of the Higgs mode, a collective oscillation of the superconducting gap.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the impurity-scattering-renormalized complex conductivity σ(ℓ,T,ω) from the Eilenberger/Keldysh–Usadel theory, replacing the dirty-limit Mattis–Bardeen expressions; it is the only place microscopic superconductivity enters. It feeds the surface impedance Zs = sqrt(−iμ0ω/σ), then the perturbative TE10 attenuation formula. Two supporting pieces are the TLS attenuation formula that reduces the surface-oxide loss to complete elliptic integrals, and the third-order nonlinear response coefficient whose Higgs term produces the attenuation peak near f = Δ/h.

What would settle it

Measure the attenuation of a Ta WR5 rectangular waveguide near 160 GHz at T/Tc ≈ 0.2 with an applied ac field of order B0/Bc ≈ 0.02: the theory predicts a drive-amplitude-dependent peak in attenuation at f ≈ Δ/h; a clean measurement showing no such peak would falsify the Higgs-mode claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the attenuation of a superconducting rectangular waveguide can be obtained from the microscopic complex conductivity σ(ℓ,T,ω) computed within the Eilenberger formalism, which interpolates between the Mattis–Bardeen dirty limit and the clean limit, so no mean-free-path assumption is needed. Feeding that conductivity into the standard surface-impedance formula and the TE10-mode attenuation formula gives the attenuation constant for materials such as Nb, NbN, and Nb3Sn across standard waveguide sizes from WR15 to WR1. The paper further claims that, in the strong-excitation regime, the amplitude dependence of the dissipative conductivity—computed to third order in the f

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the superconductor responds locally to the electromagnetic field (penetration depth much longer than coherence length), an assumption the paper acknowledges breaks down for clean niobium, where the predicted numbers are therefore only qualitative.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For f ≳ 0.5Δ/h, low attenuation requires clean material with ℓ ≳ ξ0; high-purity Nb should sustain very low loss up to its gap frequency near 720 GHz.
  • Below T/Tc ≈ 0.1–0.2, native-oxide two-level systems, not quasiparticles, set the loss floor; above that, quasiparticle dissipation dominates.
  • A drive-dependent peak in attenuation at f ≈ Δ/h appears at accessible frequencies (~160 GHz in a WR5 Ta guide, ~730 GHz in a WR1 Nb3Sn guide), giving a microwave-domain signature of the Higgs mode distinct from third-harmonic generation.
  • The commonly used low-frequency relation σ2 ≈ 1/(μ0ωλ²) and the dirty-limit Mattis–Bardeen formulas are insufficient near the gap frequency; the general expression must be used there.
  • A simple exponential scaling lets measured attenuation at one temperature be extrapolated to other temperatures once the gap ratio is known.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted Higgs peak survives nonperturbative checks, a simple transmitted-power measurement on a short waveguide could become a practical Higgs-mode detector, complementing optical-pump terahertz experiments.
  • The clean-limit Nb curves are the least trustworthy quantitative predictions; extending the framework to nonlocal electrodynamics would either confirm or correct the design rule that pure Nb gives ultra-low attenuation approaching 700 GHz.
  • For two-gap superconductors like MgB2, the single-gap assumption may need generalization; the smaller π-band gap (~900 GHz) is likely the relevant loss scale, so the framework's predictions would need adaptation rather than direct application.
  • The TLS formula's dependence on filling factor and loss tangent suggests that surface-oxide engineering, already pursued for cavities, becomes directly relevant to millimeter-wave interconnect loss at millikelvin temperatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a quasiclassical/Eilenberger linear-response framework for the power attenuation constant α of rectangular superconducting waveguides, valid for arbitrary mean free path within local electrodynamics, and derives an analytic TLS-loss formula. It evaluates NbN, Nb3Sn, and Nb waveguides over standard WR15–WR1 sizes, and then uses the author’s recent Keldysh–Usadel nonlinear-response theory [23] to predict a Higgs-mode peak in α near f ≃ Δ/h. Appendices validate the low-frequency σ2 approximation and document when σ1/σ2 is not small.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, the paper provides a useful design tool for low-loss millimeter/THz superconducting waveguides and a concrete, falsifiable prediction of a Higgs-mode signature in attenuation. The linear-response core is standard Eilenberger theory with clear equations; the TLS attenuation is an elegant analytic result; and the Higgs prediction is based on a published microscopic calculation. However, several normalization and self-consistency issues in the surface-resistance formulas and in the nonlinear section must be resolved before the quantitative claims can be trusted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II C, Eqs. (12) and (14)] Eq. (12) is dimensionally inconsistent as written: R_s = sqrt(μ0ω/2) sqrt((|σ|−σ2)/|σ|) has units Ω^{1/2} m^{−1/2}, not Ω. The exact local result is R_s = sqrt(μ0ω/(2σ2)) sqrt((|σ|−σ2)/|σ|). Eq. (14) is not generally equivalent to this exact expression; it reduces to the standard result only for σ1/σ2 ≪ 1. Since Figs. 5–7 extend to f ≲ 2Δ/h and Appendix B shows σ1/σ2 is not small there, the reported attenuation near the gap is an uncontrolled approximation unless the exact surface impedance is used.
  2. [Sec. IV A, Eq. (29)] Eq. (29) is internally inconsistent with Eq. (14). In the low-frequency limit Eq. (14) reduces to R_s/R0 = (1/2π)(ℏω/Δ0)^2 (σ1/σn) (λ/λ0,dirty)^3 / sqrt(ℓ/ξ0), using λ0,dirty² = (ξ0/ℓ)λ0² from the paper’s own dirty-limit definition. Eq. (29) instead has sqrt(ℓ/ξ0) in place of 1/sqrt(ℓ/ξ0), i.e. it is larger by a factor ℓ/ξ0. This changes the linear baselines and the Higgs-peak contrast in Fig. 10 by a factor 10 for ℓ/ξ0=10 and by 0.1 for ℓ/ξ0=0.1. The nonlinear section needs re-evaluation with the corrected prefactor.
  3. [Sec. II A and Sec. III B] The stated assumption λ ≫ ξ, which justifies local electrodynamics, is violated for clean-limit Nb. The paper notes this and labels clean Nb curves as qualitative, but the design recommendation for high-purity Nb in Sec. V and the comparison with Nakajima et al. rely on those numbers. A nonlocal/anomalous-skin-effect calculation is needed for quantitative clean-Nb attenuation; otherwise the claims should be restricted to the local regime or the clean-Nb values presented only as indicative.
  4. [Sec. IV A, Eqs. (25)–(29)] The explicit forms of I^{qqq}_{1H}, I^{Higgs}_{1H}, and I^{Eliash}_{1H} are omitted, with a pointer to Eq. (84) of Ref. [23]. Because the Higgs peak is a central new claim, the manuscript should include or reproduce these kernels, at least in an appendix. As written, the nonlinear results cannot be verified from the manuscript alone, especially given the normalization inconsistency in Eq. (29).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (22)] The filling-factor interpretation after Eq. (22) is helpful, but the appearance of ε′_r in the denominator of the prefactor should be checked: the final αTLS expression already contains 1/(ε′_r b), so the text should ensure the effective filling factor is stated without double counting.
  2. [Fig. 10] The text uses both B0 and Bac for the drive amplitude; the figure caption should define the quantity plotted and the relation Bac = μ0 sqrt(⟨H_∥²⟩) explicitly.
  3. [Title/Abstract] Typos and formatting artifacts such as 'superc onducting' in the title should be corrected.
  4. [Appendix A] The comparison of σ2 with σ2,low is useful; stating the low-frequency expansion in Eq. (10) more explicitly would help readers apply it.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Linear-response and TLS attenuation calculations are self-contained; the nonlinear/Higgs-mode section, however, is a load-bearing self-citation that imports all of its microscopic content from the author's own Ref. [23] without derivation.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV.A, Eqs. (25)-(29) and Fig. 10]
    "According to the nonlinear response theory [23], the amplitude-dependent correction to the dissipative conductivity is given by δσ1/σn = u(T,ω)(q0/qξ)^2, ... Their explicit forms are lengthy and are therefore omitted here; they can be found in Eq. (84) of Ref. [23]."

    The paper's claimed new prediction of a Higgs-mode peak in waveguide attenuation is not derived from the present first-principles framework. The nonlinear conductivity u(T,ω), the three I-integrals, the surface-resistance correction Eq. (28), and the final normalized expression Eq. (29) are all taken from the author's own Ref. [23], with the explicit integrands deferred to that reference. Thus the central nonlinear result is a restatement of Ref. [23]'s prior result in rectangular-waveguide variables rather than an independent derivation shown here. This makes the self-citation load-bearing for the Higgs-peak claim, although the rest of the paper's linear-response and TLS framework is independently constructed.

full rationale

The linear-response attenuation chain is self-contained. The complex conductivity Eq. (3) is a standard Eilenberger/Keldysh-Usadel expression, with reductions to Drude and Mattis-Bardeen limits shown; the surface resistance Eq. (12), normalization Eq. (14), and waveguide attenuation Eq. (18) follow by electrodynamics. No parameter in these sections is fitted to the attenuation values being predicted; the Nakajima et al. comparison is a post-hoc consistency check. The TLS attenuation Eq. (22) is a direct analytic integration of the standard TLS loss tangent over the TE10 field, with input parameters taken from independent cavity measurements; this is transfer, not circularity. The only significant circularity concern is the nonlinear/Higgs section, where the microscopic nonlinear conductivity and its Higgs peak are imported wholesale from the author's own Ref. [23] and the paper explicitly omits the integrals, directing the reader to Eq. (84) of that reference. This is a load-bearing self-citation for the Higgs-peak prediction. However, it is not a fitted-input-called-prediction or a definitional equivalence: Ref. [23] is a prior theoretical derivation with its own assumptions, and the linear/TLS parts of this paper remain independently grounded. The paper also explicitly admits that clean-limit Nb lies outside the local-electrodynamics assumption (Sec. III.B), which is a correctness/validity limitation rather than a circularity. Overall the circularity is partial and localized to the nonlinear section, so a score of 4 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fundamentally new entities are invented. The free parameters are standard material inputs and one ad hoc strong-coupling rescaling. The most important assumed inputs are the material constants (lambda_0, gap frequency, gap ratio) and TLS parameters, all taken from the literature without error bars. The nonlinear theory is imported from the author's own Ref. [23].

free parameters (5)
  • Strong-coupling gap rescaling factor A = A_Nb = 1.9, A_NbN = 2.0, A_Nb3Sn = 2.0
    Used in Sec. III to rescale the BCS gap via Eq. (23) (Delta -> (A/A_BCS) Delta) to account for strong-coupling effects. Values are taken from literature/material assumptions, not derived in the paper.
  • Clean-limit penetration depth lambda_0 = Nb: 40 nm; NbN: 130 nm; Nb3Sn: 90 nm; Ta: 22 nm
    Material input used to set R0 in Eq. (13) and to convert normalized Rs to dimensional alpha. Assumed from literature, no error bars.
  • Gap frequency 2 Delta_0 / h = Nb: 720 GHz; NbN: 1.4 THz; Nb3Sn: 1.46 THz; Ta: 320 GHz
    Material input used throughout Secs. III-IV to set the frequency scale. Assumed from literature.
  • TLS layer parameters = t_diel = 5 nm; eps'_r = 40; tan delta_0 = 1e-3
    Used for Fig. 8 and the TLS crossover estimates in Sec. III.D. The paper notes tan delta_0 can vary by orders of magnitude.
  • Drive amplitude B_ac / B_c = 0.02
    Chosen for the nonlinear-response figures (Figs. 9-10); not fitted to data, but a representative input.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local electrodynamics: London penetration depth much larger than coherence length (lambda >> xi).
    Stated in Sec. II.A. Used to justify the local conductivity-surface impedance formulation. The paper admits it fails for clean-limit Nb (lambda comparable to xi), a stated caveat.
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling BCS gap equation with Anderson's theorem (gap independent of impurity scattering).
    Invoked in Sec. II.A; the gap is computed via Eq. (1) with the weak-coupling relation Delta_0 = A_BCS k_B T_c. The paper then patches strong-coupling materials with an ad hoc rescaling, Eq. (23).
  • domain assumption Weak-loss perturbative treatment: wall surface impedance is a small perturbation to the lossless waveguide fields (|Zs| << Z0).
    Invoked in Sec. II.D to derive Eq. (18); standard for superconducting walls, stated in the text.
  • domain assumption Standard TLS model with loss tangent given by Eq. (19).
    Standard model from Refs. [17-19]; not derived here, used for alpha_TLS.
  • ad hoc to paper Nonlinear response theory of Ref. [23] (Keldysh-Usadel, dirty limit, perturbative to O(E^3)).
    The Higgs-peak prediction explicitly relies on this imported theory; the integrals are not written in the paper. It is applied only in the dirty limit, restricting the generality of the nonlinear claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Power attenuation in millimeter-wave and terahertz superconducting rectangular waveguides: linear response, TLS loss, and Higgs-mode nonlinearity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJ5HMC7C

@misc{pith2026260217000,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Power attenuation in millimeter-wave and terahertz superconducting rectangular waveguides: linear response, TLS loss, and Higgs-mode nonlinearity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJ5HMC7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.17000}
}
abstract

Superconducting waveguides are a promising platform for ultralow-loss transmission in the millimeter-wave to terahertz band under cryogenic conditions, with potential applications in astronomical instrumentation and emerging quantum technologies. We develop a framework, based on microscopic superconductivity theory, to evaluate the power-flow attenuation constant $\alpha$ of superconducting rectangular waveguides in the $100~\mathrm{GHz}$--THz range, applicable to arbitrary electronic mean free paths $\ell$ from the dirty limit $\ell\ll\xi_0$ to the clean limit $\ell\gg\xi_0$. We also derive an analytical expression for two-level-system (TLS)-induced attenuation $\alpha_{\rm TLS}$ in thin native oxide layers within the standard TLS model. Using this framework, we perform numerical evaluations of $\alpha$ for representative materials over standard waveguide sizes from WR15 to WR1. In the high-frequency regime $f \gtrsim 0.5 \Delta/h$, low attenuation favors the clean regime $\ell\gtrsim\xi_0$, indicating that high-purity materials can achieve very low attenuation below their gap frequency. For the TLS contribution, using parameter values representative of native Nb oxides, we find that $\alpha_{\rm TLS}$ can become relevant at sufficiently low temperatures $T/T_c\lesssim 0.1$-0.2, where quasiparticle dissipation is exponentially suppressed. Finally, we extend the discussion to the strong-excitation regime using a recently developed nonlinear-response theory within the Keldysh--Usadel framework of nonequilibrium superconductivity and show that nonlinear dissipation produces a Higgs-mode peak in $\alpha$ near $f\simeq \Delta/h$ via a Kerr-type nonlinearity of the dissipative conductivity. This peak provides a distinct hallmark of the Higgs mode that has been largely overlooked so far.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17000 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of a superconducting rectangular waveg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Surface resistance as a function of frequency for diffe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Complex conductivity as a function of frequency for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Surface resistance as a function of frequency for diffe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Attenuation constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ), we obtain α|T /Tc=0.2 ≃ 1.5 × 10−6 . This es￾timate is in good agreement with the directly computed value α|T /Tc=0.2 = 1.3 × 10−6 shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows αTLS as a function of frequency ob￾tained from Eq. (22) for several waveguide sizes and for two temperatures, T = 20 mK (blue) and T = 1 K (red). We assume tdiel = 5 nm, ε ′ r = 40, tan δ0 = 10−3 [50], and a weak-field condition E0/E˜ c = 0.01. Combining these re…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the surface resistance Rs in the linear￾response regime (i.e., the weak-signal limit) and in the nonlinear-response regime for a moderately large ac magnetic-field amplitude, Bac/Bc = 0.02. The dashed and solid curves correspond to the linear and nonlin￾ear respo…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Attenuation constant of superconducting rectangu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: shows the ratio σ2/σ2 low. Here σ2 is ob￾tained from the general expression, while σ2 low is evalu￾ated using the low-frequency formula σ2 low = 1/(µ0ωλ2 ). For T /Tc = 0.2 in the clean case, σ2 low agrees well with σ2 up to frequencies close to 2∆, whereas at higher …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the ratio (σ1/σ2)(ω) for different mean free paths and temperatures. At low temperature (T /Tc = 0.2), σ1/σ2 remains negligibly small for all mean free paths as long as the frequency is below the gap fre￾quency ~ω = 2∆. As the temperature increases, how￾ever, th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Takayuki Kubo, Nonequilibrium nonlinear response the - ory of amplitude-dependent dissipative conductivity in disordered superconductors, Physical Review Applied 24, 064061 (2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    J. Li, X. Deng, Y. Li, J. Hu, W. Miao, C. Lin, J. Jiang, and S. Shi, Terahertz Science and Technology in Astron- omy, Telecommunications, and Biophysics, Research, 8, 0586 (2025)

    2025

  3. [2]

    Suleymanzade, A

    A. Suleymanzade, A. Anferov, M. Stone, R. K. Naik, A. Oriani, J. Simon, and D. Schuster, A tunable high-Q millimeter wave cavity for hybrid circuit and cavity QED experiments, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 104001 (2020)

    2020

  4. [3]

    Anferov, F

    A. Anferov, F. Wan, S. P. Harvey, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, Millimeter-Wave Superconducting Qubit, PRX Quantum 6, 020336 (2025)

    2025

  5. [4]

    Tan, Q.-Y

    Z. Tan, Q.-Y. Zhang, Y.-L. Lei, Y. Zhao, J.-Q. Ding, Terahertz waveguide multiplexers: A review, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 65, 1925 (2023)

    1925

  6. [5]

    Nakajima, K

    T. Nakajima, K. Haratani, A. Mizuno, K. Suzuki, T. Kojima, Y. Uzawa, S. Asayama, and I. Watanabe, 14 Waveguide-Type Multiplexer for Multiline Observation of Atmospheric Molecules using Millimeter-Wave Spec- troradiometer, Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Ter- ahertz Waves 41, 1530 (2020)

    2020

  7. [6]

    Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A1 (2020)

    2018

  8. [7]

    A. G. G. M. Tielens, The molecular universe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1021 (2013)

    2013

Show all 83 references
  1. [8]

    C. M. Casey, D. Narayanan, and A. Cooray, Dusty star- forming galaxies at high redshift, Phys. Rep. 541, 45 (2014)

    2014

  2. [9]

    N. S. Kardashev, Optimal wavelength region for commu- nication with extraterrestrial intelligence: λ = 1 .5 mm, Nature 278, 28 (1979)

    1979

  3. [10]

    Gelino and J

    D. Gelino and J. Wright, NASA and the Search for Technosignatures: A Report from the NASA Technosig- natures Workshop, (NASA Technosignatures Workshop, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX, 2018), arXiv:1812.08681

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    L. A. Mason, M. A. Garrett, K. Wandia, A. P. V. Siemion, Conducting high-frequency radio SETI searches using ALMA Open Access, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 536, 2127 (2025)

    2025

  5. [12]

    J. D. Garrett and C.-Y. E. Tong, Measuring Cryogenic Waveguide Loss in the Terahertz Regime, IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol. 12, 293 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Kurpiers, T

    P. Kurpiers, T. Walter, P. Magnard, Y. Salathe, and A. Wallraff, Characterizing the attenuation of coax- ial and rectangular microwave-frequency waveguides at cryogenic temperatures, EPJ Quantum Technol. 4, 8 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    Nakajima, K

    T. Nakajima, K. Suzuki, T. Kojima, Y. Uzawa, M. Ishino, and I. Watanabe, Propagation in Superconduct- ing Niobium Rectangular Waveguide in the 100 GHz band, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2545, 012021 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    Yassin, C

    G. Yassin, C. Y. Tham, S. Withington, Propagation in lossy and superconducting cylindrical waveguides, in Pro- ceedings of the 14th Int. Symp. on THz Technology (Tuc- son, Arizona, 2003), p. 516

    2003

  10. [17]

    W. A. Phillips, Tunneling States in Amorphous Solids, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 7, 351, (1972)

    1972

  11. [18]

    M. V. Schickfus, S. Hunklinger, and L. Pich´ e, Anomalous Dielectric Dispersion in Glasses at Low Temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 876 (1975)

    1975

  12. [19]

    M. V. Schickfus and S. Hunklinger, Saturation of the di- electric absorption of vitreous silica at low temperatures , Physics Letters A 64, 144 (1977)

    1977

  13. [20]

    Rainer and J

    D. Rainer and J. A. Sauls, Strong coupling theory of superconductivity, in Superconductivity: From Ba- sic Physics to the Latest Developments , edited by P. N. Butcher and Y. Lu (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 45

    1995

  14. [21]

    Kubo, Effects of Nonmagnetic Impurities and Subgap States on the Kinetic Inductance, Complex Conductivity, Quality Factor, and Depairing Current Density, Phys

    T. Kubo, Effects of Nonmagnetic Impurities and Subgap States on the Kinetic Inductance, Complex Conductivity, Quality Factor, and Depairing Current Density, Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 014018 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    H. Ueki, M. Zarea, and J. A. Sauls, Electromagnetic re- sponse of superconducting RF cavities, JPS Conf. Proc. 38, 011068 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Shimano and N

    R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, Higgs mode in superconduc- tors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 103 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Matsunaga, Y

    R. Matsunaga, Y. I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, Higgs Amplitude Mode in the BCS Superconductors Nb 1−xTixN Induced by Ter- ahertz Pulse Excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057002 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Murotani and R

    Y. Murotani and R. Shimano, Nonlinear optical response of collective modes in multiband superconductors as- sisted by nonmagnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224510 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Tsuji and Y

    N. Tsuji and Y. Nomura, Higgs-mode resonance in third harmonic generation in NbN superconductors: Multi- band electron-phonon coupling, impurity scattering, and polarization-angle dependence, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043029 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Seibold, M

    G. Seibold, M. Udina, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, Third harmonic generation from collective modes in dis- ordered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014512 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Silaev, Nonlinear electromagnetic response and Hig gs- mode excitation in BCS superconductors with impurities, Phys

    M. Silaev, Nonlinear electromagnetic response and Hig gs- mode excitation in BCS superconductors with impurities, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224511 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Jujo, Quasiclassical Theory on Third-Harmonic Gen- eration in Conventional Superconductors with Paramag- netic Impurities, J

    T. Jujo, Quasiclassical Theory on Third-Harmonic Gen- eration in Conventional Superconductors with Paramag- netic Impurities, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 024704 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Li, and M

    Y. Li, and M. Dzero, Amplitude Higgs mode in super- conductors with magnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. B 109, 054520 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Derendorf, A

    P. Derendorf, A. F. Volkov, and I. M. Eremin, Nonlinear response of diffusive superconductors to ac electromag- netic fields, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024510 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Tsuji, Two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of di s- ordered superconductors in the narrow-band and broad- band limits, arXiv:2509.03936

    N. Tsuji, Two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of di s- ordered superconductors in the narrow-band and broad- band limits, arXiv:2509.03936

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. Moor, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Amplitude Higgs Mode and Admittance in Superconductors with a Moving Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 047001 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Nakamura, Y

    S. Nakamura, Y. Iida, Y. Murotani, R. Matsunaga, H. Terai, and R. Shimano, Infrared Activation of the Higgs Mode by Supercurrent Injection in Superconduct- ing NbN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257001 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Jujo, Surface Resistance and Amplitude Mode under Uniform and Static External Field in Conventional Su- perconductors, J

    T. Jujo, Surface Resistance and Amplitude Mode under Uniform and Static External Field in Conventional Su- perconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 074711 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    T. Kubo, Significant contributions of the Higgs mode and impurity-scattering self-energy corrections to the low- frequency complex conductivity in dc-biased supercon- ducting devices, Physical Review Applied 22, 044042 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Kubo, Higgs-mode-induced instability and kinetic i n- ductance in strongly dc-biased dirty-limit superconduc- tors, Physical Review Applied 23, 054091 (2025)

    T. Kubo, Higgs-mode-induced instability and kinetic i n- ductance in strongly dc-biased dirty-limit superconduc- tors, Physical Review Applied 23, 054091 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    K. Wang, R. Boyack, and K. Levin, Higgs amplitude mode in optical conductivity in the presence of a su- percurrent: Gauge-invariant formulation with disorder, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144512 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    N. B. Kopnin, Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductiv- ity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    2001

  33. [41]

    D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, Theory of the Anoma- lous Skin Effect in Normal and Superconducting Metals, 15 Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958)

    1958

  34. [42]

    S. B. Nam, Theory of electromagnetic properties of su- perconducting and normal systems. I, Phys. Rev. 156, 470 (1967)

    1967

  35. [43]

    Zimmermann, E

    W. Zimmermann, E. Brandt, M. Bauer, E. Seider, and L. Genzel, Optical conductivity of BCS superconductors with arbitrary purity, Physica C 183, 99 (1991)

    1991

  36. [44]

    J. P. Turneaure, J. Halbritter, and H. A. Schwettman, The surface impedance of superconductors and normal conductors: The Mattis-Bardeen theory, J. Supercond. 4, 341 (1991)

    1991

  37. [45]

    Padamsee, J

    H. Padamsee, J. Knobloch, and T. Hays, RF Supercon- ductivity for Accelerators (Wiley-VCH, New York, 2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    J. T. Maniscalco, D. Gonnella, and M. Liepe, The impor- tance of the electron mean free path for superconduct- ing radio-frequency cavities, J. Appl. Phys. 121, 043910 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Romanenko , R

    A. Romanenko , R. Pilipenko, S. Zorzetti, D. Frolov, M. Awida, S. Belomestnykh, S. Posen, and A. Grassellino, Three-dimensional superconducting resonators at T < 20 mK with photon lifetimes up to τ = 2 s, Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 034032 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Heidler, C

    P. Heidler, C. M. F. Schneider, K. Kustura, C. G.-Ballestero, O. R.-Isart, and G. Kirchmair, Non- Markovian Effects of Two-Level Systems in a Niobium Coaxial Resonator with a Single-Photon Lifetime of 10 milliseconds, Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 034024 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    A. E. Oriani, F. Zhao, T. Roy, A. Anferov, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. Banerjee, S. Chakram, and D. I. Schuster, Niobium coaxial cavities with internal quality factors ex- ceeding 1 .4 × 109 for circuit quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044080 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Takenaka, T

    T. Takenaka, T. Kubo, I. Mahoob, K. Mizuno, H. Inoue, T. Saeki, and S. Saito, Three-dimensional niobium coaxial cavity with 0.1 second lifetime, arXiv:2510.01819, to be published in Physical Review Applied. https://doi.org/10.1103/5nf2-tjb9

  43. [51]

    Romanenko and D

    A. Romanenko and D. I. Schuster, Understanding Qual- ity Factor Degradation in Superconducting Niobium Cavities at Low Microwave Field Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 264801 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Kalboussi, I

    Y. Kalboussi, I. Curci, F. Miserque, D. Troadec, N. Brun , M. Walls, G. Jullien, F. Eozenou, M. Baudrier, L. Mau- rice, Q. Bertrand, P. Sahuquet, and T. Proslier, Crys- tallinity in niobium oxides: A pathway to mitigate two- level-system defects in niobium three-dimensional re...

    2025

  45. [53]

    Posen, J

    S. Posen, J. Lee, D. N. Seidman, A. Romanenko, B. Ten- nis, O. S. Melnychuk, and D. A. Sergatskov, Advances in Nb3Sn superconducting radiofrequency cavities towards first practical accelerator applications, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 34, 025007 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Eremeev, W

    G. Eremeev, W. Clemens, K. Macha, C. E. Reece, A. M. Valente-Feliciano, S. Williams, U. Pudasaini, and M. Kelley, Nb 3Sn multicell cavity coating system at Jeffer- son Lab, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 073911 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    C. Dong, Z. Lin, P. Sha, B. Liu, L. Ye, and X. He, Prelim- inary Research of Niobium Cavity Coating with Nb3Sn Film at IHEP, Physica C 600, 1354107 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    H. Ito, H. Sakai, K. Umemori, T. Yamada, and K. Taka- hashi, Development of Nb 3Sn Coating System and RF Measurement Results at KEK, in Proc. SRF2023, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (JACoW publishing, Geneva, 2023), p. 414. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-SRF2023- TUPTB014

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    X. Guo, W. K. Withanage, J. R. Paudel, G. Eremeev, F. Hannon, R. Rimmer, A. Nassiri, and X. Xi, Fabri- cation and Radio Frequency Properties of 3-GHz SRF Cavities Coated with MgB 2, J Supercond. Nov. Magn. 34, 99 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    K. Chen, X. Xu; D. A. Dikin, X. Xi, Progress on Coat- ing of Superconductor MgB 2 on Cu RF Cavities, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 36, 3500505 (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    Tajima, T

    T. Tajima, T. P. Grumstrup, J. D. Thompson, H. Ito, E. Kako, T. Okada, H. Sakai, and K. Umemori, MgB2 Coating Parameter Optimization Using a 1.3- GHz 1-Cell Cavity, in Proc. SRF2023, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (JACoW publishing, Geneva, 2023), p. 425. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW...

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    Gurevich, Tuning microwave losses in superconduct- ing resonators, Supercond

    A. Gurevich, Tuning microwave losses in superconduct- ing resonators, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36, 063002 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Kubo, How high a field has been and can be achieved in superconducting bulk niobium cavities: the role of RRR, Jpn

    T. Kubo, How high a field has been and can be achieved in superconducting bulk niobium cavities: the role of RRR, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 018002 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    T. Kubo, Y. Ajima, H. Inoue, K. Umemori, Y. Watan- abe, and M. Yamanaka, In-house Production of a Large- Grain Single-Cell Cavity at Cavity Fabrication Facility and Results of Performance Tests, in Proc. IPAC’14, Dresden, Germany (JACoW publishing, Geneva, 2014), p. 2519. http...

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    Posen, A

    S. Posen, A. Romanenko, A. Grassellino, O. S. Mel- nychuk, and D. A. Sergatskov, Ultra low Surface Re- sistance via Vacuum Heat Treatment of Superconduct- ing Radio-Frequency Cavities, Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 014024 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    H. Ito, H. Araki, K. Takahashi, and K. Umemori, In- fluence of furnace baking on Q-E behavior of supercon- ducting accelerating cavities, Progress of Theoretical an d Experimental Physics, 2021, 071G01 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Catelani and J

    G. Catelani and J. P. Sethna, Temperature dependence of the superheating field for superconductors in the high- κ London limit, Phys. Rev. B 78, 224509 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    M. K. Transtrum, G. Catelani, and J. P. Sethna, Super- heating field of superconductors within Ginzburg-Landau theory, Phys. Rev. B 83, 094505 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    F. P.-J. Lin and A. Gurevich, Effect of impurities on the superheating field of type-II superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 85, 054513 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    T. Kubo, Superfluid flow in disordered superconductors with Dynes pair-breaking scattering: Depairing current, kinetic inductance, and superheating field, Physical Re- view Research 2, 033203 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Kubo, Erratum: Superfluid flow in disordered super- conductors with Dynes pair-breaking scattering: Depair- ing current, kinetic inductance, and superheating field [Phys

    T. Kubo, Erratum: Superfluid flow in disordered super- conductors with Dynes pair-breaking scattering: Depair- ing current, kinetic inductance, and superheating field [Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033203 (2020)], Physical Review Research 6, 039002 (2024)

    2020

  62. [70]

    Superheating fields of semi-infinite superconductors a nd layered superconductors in the diffusive limit: structural optimization based on the microscopic theory, Super- cond. Sci. Technol. 34, 045006 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Romanenko, A

    A. Romanenko, A. Grassellino, A. C. Crawford, D. A. Sergatskov, and O. Melnychuk, Ultra-high quality fac- tors in superconducting niobium cavities in ambient mag- 16 netic fields up to 190 mG, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 234103 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Huang, T

    S. Huang, T. Kubo, R. L. Geng, Dependence of trapped- flux-induced surface resistance of a large-grain Nb super- conducting radio-frequency cavity on spatial temperature gradient during cooldown through T c Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 19, 082001 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    Posen, M

    S. Posen, M. Checchin, A. C. Crawford, A. Grassellino, M. Martinello, O. S. Melnychuk, A. Romanenko, D. A. Sergatskov, and Y. Trenikhina, Efficient expulsion of magnetic flux in superconducting radiofrequency cavi- ties for high Q applications, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 213903 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    S. Ooi, M. Tachiki, T. Konomi, T. Kubo, A. Kikuchi, S. Arisawa, H. Ito, and K. Umemori, Observation of in- termediate mixed state in high-purity cavity-grade Nb by magneto-optical imaging Physical Review B 104, 064504 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    S. Ooi, M. Tachiki, T. Mochiku, H. Ito, T. Kubo, A. Kikuchi, S. Arisawa, and K. Umemori, Dynamical vi- sualization of attractively interacting single vortices i n type-II/1 superconducting Nb by magneto-optical imag- ing, Phys. Rev. B 111, 094519 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Gurevich and T

    A. Gurevich and T. Kubo, Surface impedance and op- timum surface resistance of a superconductor with an imperfect surface, Phys. Rev. B 96, 184515 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Herman and R

    F. Herman and R. Hlubina, Microwave response of super- conductors that obey local electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094519 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Martinello, M

    M. Martinello, M. Checchin, A. Romanenko, A. Gras- sellino, S. Aderhold, S. K. Chandrasekeran, O. Melny- chuk, S. Posen, and D. A. Sergatskov, Field-Enhanced Superconductivity in High-Frequency Niobium Acceler- ating Cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 224801 (2018)

    2018

  71. [79]

    Dhakal, B

    P. Dhakal, B. D. Khanal, A. Gurevich, and G. Ciovati, Field, frequency, and temperature dependencies of the surface resistance of nitrogen diffused niobium super- conducting radio frequency cavities, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 062001 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    K. Saito, Niobium Superconducting Cavities and Mate- rials/Surface Sciences -Development of 50 MV/m High Gradient Superconducting Cavity, Battles in those two decades-, KASOKUKI, 2, 479 (2005) [J. Particle Acc. Soc. Jpn. 2, 479 (2005)]

    2005

  73. [81]

    Gurevich, Reduction of dissipative nonlinear condu c- tivity of superconductors by static and microwave mag- netic fields, Phys

    A. Gurevich, Reduction of dissipative nonlinear condu c- tivity of superconductors by static and microwave mag- netic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 087001 (2014)

    2014

  74. [82]

    Kubo and A

    T. Kubo and A. Gurevich, Field-dependent nonlinear surface resistance and its optimization by surface nanos- tructuring in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064522 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    Particle Acc

    T.Kubo, An Encouraging of Paternity Leave: A Physi- cist Who Has Become a Stay-at-Home Dad in New York, KASOKUKI 20, 50 (2023) [J. Particle Acc. Soc. Jpn. 20, 50 (2023)]

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.