pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1110.2249 · v1 · pith:XJG3BDGNnew · submitted 2011-10-11 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Revisiting Axial-Vector Meson Mixing

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords thetacircanglemixingaxial-vectormesonsdependsmaller
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Various phenomenological studies indicate that the mixing angle $\theta_{K_1}$ of $K_{1A}$ and $K_{1B}$, the strange partners of the axial-vector mesons $a_1(1260)$ and $b_1(1235)$, respectively, lies in the vicinity of $35^\circ$ or $55^\circ$, but whether this angle is larger or smaller than $45^\circ$ still remains controversial. When the $f_1(1285)$-$f_1(1420)$ mixing angle $\theta_{^3P_1}$ and the $h_1(1170)$-$h_1(1380)$ mixing angle $\theta_{^1P_1}$ are determined from the mass relations, they depend on the masses of $K_{1A}$ and $K_{1B}$, which in turn depend on the mixing angle $\theta_{K_1}$. We show that the approximate decoupling of the light $q\bar q$ state from the heavier $s \bar s$ state, which is empirically valid for vector, tensor and $3^{--}$ mesons, when applied to isoscalar axial-vector mesons, will enable us to discriminate different solutions of $\theta_{^3P_1}$ and $\theta_{^1P_1}$ and pick up $\theta_{K_1}\sim 35^\circ$. Indeed, for $\theta_{K_1}\sim 55^\circ$, the predicted $\theta_{^1P_1}$ disagrees sharply with the recent lattice calculation and the implied large $s\bar s$ content of $h_1(1170)$ and $q\bar q$ component of $h_1(1380)$ cannot explain the observation of their strong decays. We conclude that $\theta_{K_1}$ is smaller than $45^\circ$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Systematic analysis of $D_{(s)}$ meson semi-leptonic decays in the covariant light-front quark model

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CLFQM calculations of D(s) to P/S/V/A form factors and branching ratios agree with data for most P and V channels but show notable discrepancies for several S and A channels.