Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Euler topology in classical spin liquids

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Higher bands can change the topology of classical spin liquids

desk verdict Brings Euler class and node braiding into classical spin liquids, but the key braiding flip is described, not computed; a solid proof-of-concept that needs a check. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09683 v1 pith:XJPDG23D submitted 2025-05-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech

Luca Rüegg , Arthur Morris , Han Yan , Robert-Jan Slager This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords classicalspinliquidsEulerclassmulti-gaptopologynon-Abelianbraidingpinchpointsstructurefactorsoft-spinapproximationhomotopyclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that multi-gap topology, exemplified by the Euler class, belongs in the homotopy-based classification of classical spin liquids, and that the topology of higher, unoccupied bands can change the topology of the ground-state manifold. It constructs a three-band Heisenberg model whose interaction matrix has a flat band and two dispersive bands, with finite-Euler-class nodes where the flat band touches the lowest dispersive band. Braiding nodes between the two upper bands around these Euler nodes flips the patch Euler class, switching the mutual stability of the corresponding pinch points in the spin structure factor while leaving the emergent Gauss laws untouched. If right, the low-energy physics of classical spin liquids is not fixed by the lowest bands alone; it can be altered by band-node braiding among excited states.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multi-gap homotopy classification of a real three-band spectrum, quantified by the patch Euler class $$χ(D) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\left(\int_D \mathrm{Eu} - \int_{\partial D} a\right)$$ for a two-band subspace on a domain $D$; it is an integer whenever $D$ contains an even number of band nodes and signals nodes that cannot annihilate. Around each node the eigenvector frame carries non-Abelian quaternion charges, and Dirac strings attached to the nodes track gauge discontinuities. The argument's engine is a braiding process: creating and annihilating nodes between the two upper bands in pairs whose Dirac strings must pass through a lower Euler node flips that node's patch Euler class, which changes the mutual stability of the pinch points without touching the Gauss laws.

What would settle it

Evaluate the patch Euler class explicitly on the interpolation path of Eq. (5): if the sign of the lower-band patch Euler class does not flip when the upper-band nodes are braided around the $\pm Y$ Euler nodes, the mechanism fails. Equivalently, in a Monte Carlo or metamaterial realization, if the mutual stability of the pinch points in $S(k)$ is unchanged after a full braiding cycle while the upper-band nodes have encircled the lower nodes, the proposed link is absent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper shows that the full homotopy structure of the spectrum, not just the lowest-band subspace, can be physically relevant in a classical spin liquid: braiding Weyl nodes in the two upper dispersive bands around an Euler node in the flat-band/dispersive-band gap changes the sign of the patch Euler class of that node, thereby changing the mutual stability of pinch points while the generalized Gauss laws and the n-foldness of the pinch points remain invariant. Concretely, in the three-band square-lattice model the total Euler class jumps from 0 to 2 under this braiding, and the same mechanism, reinterpreted in the Kagome-star model, shows that its Skyrmion number equals the Euler class. Monte Carlo spin structure factors computed around $T = 0.1$ confirm that pinch points persist through the interpolation, so the topology change is compatible with a stable finite-temperature spin liquid phase.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central mechanism assumes, without a full derivation, that the non-Abelian braiding rules and patch Euler class defined for eigenvectors of a real band Hamiltonian directly govern the stability of pinch points in the thermal classical spin liquid described by soft-spin eigenvectors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Classical spin liquids with three or more bands carry a Euler-class label in addition to existing single-gap invariants, so their phase diagrams acquire transitions invisible to single-gap classifications.
  • The mutual stability of pinch points can be switched by braiding nodes in higher bands, giving a concrete observable signature in the spin structure factor.
  • In the Kagome-star model, the Skyrmion-number label of fragile-topological classical spin liquids coincides with the Euler class, so existing classification diagrams can be reinterpreted in multi-gap terms.
  • Braiding processes in the upper bands do not alter the generalized Gauss laws governing low-energy conservation, so low-energy physics can change topology while preserving its algebraic form.
  • Because pinch points persist across the braiding interpolation in Monte Carlo simulations, the topology change is compatible with a stable finite-temperature spin liquid phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same braiding mechanism could be probed in metamaterial or phononic analogues of the model, where node braiding has already been demonstrated; the analogue of the spin structure factor would reveal the predicted stability switch.
  • The paper's claim that high-band topology controls ground-state stability suggests a design principle: engineering the upper bands of a frustrated magnet is a route to tuning pinch-point fragility without changing the low-energy constraints, which could guide searches in candidate pyrochlore and kagome materials.
  • Because the model is a proof of concept, a testable extension is to scan bilinear spin models on other lattices for the same braiding-induced Euler-class flips and to check whether the effect persists for hard-spin O(3) constraints at the ordering temperature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an extension of the homotopy classification of classical spin liquids to include multi-gap topological invariants, specifically the Euler class. The authors construct an explicit three-band, three-site square-lattice Heisenberg model whose interaction matrix is given in Eq. (3), with one flat zero-energy band and two dispersive bands. They identify stable pinch-point nodes between the flat and first dispersive bands that carry patch Euler classes ±1, and they argue that a parameter interpolation in Eq. (5) realizes a non-Abelian braiding of nodes between the two upper dispersive bands, flipping the sign of the patch Euler class and changing the mutual stability of the pinch points while leaving the emergent Gauss laws invariant. The analytic Luttinger-Tisza/soft-spin analysis is supplemented by finite-temperature Monte Carlo simulations of the spin structure factor, which show pinch points consistent with the analytic zero-temperature result.

Significance. If the central braiding claim is correct, the paper establishes a genuinely new point for classical spin liquids: higher-energy dispersive bands, which are not thermally populated, can nevertheless change the topological character of the lower-band subspace that contains the ground-state manifold. This would broaden the scope of band-theoretic classifications of classical spin liquids beyond the single-gap setting. The model itself is explicit and does not rely on fitting to numerical data; the Monte Carlo comparison is an independent check, and the analytic structure factors provide falsifiable predictions. However, the central mechanism is currently supported by a narrative description rather than by an explicit computation of the Euler class along the interpolation path, so the significance remains conditional on that missing calculation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, paragraph following Eq. (5)] The central claim that the interpolation in Eq. (5) realizes a braiding process that flips the patch Euler class of the ±Y nodes is asserted but not demonstrated. No evaluation of the patch Euler class in Eq. (2) is presented at any value of ε, and in particular not immediately before and after the creation and annihilation of the band-2/3 nodes described narratively in Fig. 2. This is not a minor omission: the lower two-band frame (u1,u2) is only well-defined where the middle and top bands are gapped, so the sign of the Euler class must be tracked through the node-creation and node-annihilation sequence, not inferred from the endpoint values χ=0 at ε=0 and χ=2 at ε=1, which are already fixed by the phase diagram of Eq. (3). Please provide explicit node trajectories, the frame charges of the four Weyl nodes, and an evaluation of the patch Euler class after the annihilation events; without this, the claim that braiding changes the mutual stability of the pinch points lacks its only constructive support.
  2. [Monte Carlo calculations and Fig. 4] The paper claims that the braiding process alters the topology and stability of the pinch points in the spin structure factor, but no quantitative comparison of S(k) between the χ=0 and χ=2 regimes of the actual three-band model is shown. Fig. 4 displays pinch points at ε=0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8, but it does not quantify mutual stability or show a predicted difference between the two sides of the braiding process. The two-band model in Eq. (7) and Fig. 3 is a separate construction and is not derived from Eq. (5). To support the statement that higher dispersive bands can change the ground-state topology in an observable way, the authors should directly compare the analytically predicted pinch-point structure of Eq. (5) before and after the braiding event, and show that the Monte Carlo structure factors indeed differ in the predicted manner.
  3. [Euler CSL model, Eq. (3) and phase diagram] The phase-diagram statement that the band touching at m=-1 'changes the sign of the corresponding Euler nodes' is the foundation for the χ=2 regime, but the sign assignments of the patch Euler classes for the ±X and ±Y nodes are not shown by an explicit computation. In particular, the text does not present the values of Eq. (2) on patches around each node for m=-1.2 and m=-0.8. Since the entire braiding argument builds on these sign assignments, a direct evaluation of the patch Euler class on both sides of m=-1 and m=1 should be included, either analytically from the explicit eigenvectors or numerically from Eq. (3).
  4. [Eq. (5), rank property] The statement that J̃_ε(k) has rank 2 everywhere except at high-symmetry points, where it has rank 1 for all ε, is asserted without proof. Since the vectors w3_ε and w2_ε defined in Eq. (5) are not orthogonal in general, the eigenvectors of J̃_ε are not simply these vectors, and locating the band-2/3 nodes requires an explicit diagonalization of J̃_ε. Providing the spectrum of J̃_ε (or at least the condition for a zero eigenvalue of the upper two-band block) along the interpolation would make the claimed node creation and annihilation events verifiable and would also clarify how the flat-band eigenvector evolves through the process.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Classification of CSLs] There is a typo in the sentence 'the the homotopy class' which should read 'the homotopy class'.
  2. [Abstract and Euler CSL model section] The phrase 'the pinch points themselves do not change their n-foldness' is unclear; 'n-foldness' should be replaced by a more standard phrase such as 'the number of branches' or 'the order of the pinch point'.
  3. [Pinch-point structure, Eq. (7)] The presentation of the two-band model in Eq. (7) would benefit from a brief derivation of why Z1 and Z2 correspond to opposite versus equal winding numbers, and how the resulting structure factors in Fig. 3 are computed from the eigenvectors.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption and braiding narrative] The caption of Fig. 2 refers to a braiding process 'realised at the Y point' but the figure panels are not described in enough detail to identify which curves correspond to bands 2 and 3, or at which ε values the nodes are created and annihilated. A short quantitative description of the node trajectories would help the reader follow the argument.
  5. [References] The main text states that the Gauss-law calculations are in the Supplemental Material (Ref. [59]), but in the present arXiv version the relevant details are in Appendix B; this reference should be updated for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Euler-class phase diagram is computed directly from the model Hamiltonian, and the Monte Carlo comparison is an independent check rather than an input.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained against the model it defines. The interaction matrix in Eq. (3) is constructed from explicit vectors, and the claimed Euler classes are set by applying the standard patch Euler class definition in Eq. (2) to the eigenvectors of that Hamiltonian. No parameter is fitted to the spin structure factor, and the Monte Carlo results in Fig. 4 are presented as a qualitative check, not as data used to determine the topology. The interpolation in Eq. (5) is a constructed path between two explicitly defined endpoints, and the claimed braiding-induced change of the patch Euler class is imported from established non-Abelian band topology, including independent work such as Wu, Soluyanov, and Bzdušek (Science 365, 1273 (2019)), rather than being defined into existence by the present model. Self-citations to previous band-theory papers provide background machinery, but the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation chain: the model, the Euler-class phases, and the observable signatures are independently specified in this paper. The main caveat is that the braiding process around Eq. (5) is described narratively rather than by explicit evaluation of Eq. (2) along the interpolation path, but that is a rigor or completeness concern, not circularity. Under the stated criteria, no step exhibits self-definitional fitting, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation that replaces a derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The control parameters m and epsilon are hand-chosen model parameters that set the phase diagram and interpolation path. The main axioms are the soft-spin approximation, the equivalence of eigenvector homotopy with CSL phases, and the transfer of multi-gap braiding rules from band theory. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • m = phase boundaries at m=-1 and m=1; example braiding uses m1=-1.2 and m2=-0.8
    Tuning parameter of the Euler CSL Hamiltonian in Eqs. (3)-(4); chosen by hand to control gap closings and Euler class, not fitted to data.
  • epsilon = interpolation ranges 0 to 1; band nodes form near 0.49 and annihilate near 0.57
    Interpolation parameter in Eq. (5) that realizes the braiding path; values are read off the model, not fitted to external data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Soft-spin approximation with the average constraint ⟨S^2(r)⟩=1 replaces the hard-spin constraint |S(r)|=1.
    Invoked in the Classification of CSLs section to write the Hamiltonian as a bilinear form in momentum space and to attach meaning to eigenvectors of J(k).
  • domain assumption The homotopy class of the eigenvector frame of J(k) classifies CSL phases.
    The paper extends the single-gap classification of Ref. [7] to multi-gap invariants without proving that the soft-spin eigenvectors faithfully represent the thermal spin liquid's phase content.
  • domain assumption Non-Abelian braiding rules, Dirac strings, and patch Euler classes from real band theory apply to the eigenvectors of the classical spin interaction matrix.
    The central braiding mechanism and sign flip of the patch Euler class are imported from Refs. [32,38,42] and assumed to control pinch-point stability in the CSL context.
  • domain assumption The finite-temperature Monte Carlo sampling at T=0.1 equilibrates and represents the spin liquid; 10^4 sweeps and the stated update mix suffice.
    No autocorrelation or convergence analysis is shown, and the comparison to the Luttinger-Tisza structure factor is qualitative.
  • standard math Fourier transform identities connect the real-space Hamiltonians in Appendix A to the momentum-space matrices in Eqs. (3) and (5).
    The real-space expressions are stated without derivation; standard lattice Fourier analysis is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Euler topology in classical spin liquids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJPDG23D

@misc{pith2026250509683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Euler topology in classical spin liquids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJPDG23D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09683}
}
read the original abstract

Classical spin liquids have recently been analyzed in view of the single-gap homotopy classification of their dispersive eigenvectors. We show that the recent progress in defining multi-gap topologies, notably exemplified by the Euler class, can be naturally included in these homotopy-based classification schemes and present phases that change topology by band node braiding. This process alters the topology of the pinch points in the spin structure factor and consequently their stability. Furthermore, we discuss how these notions also pertain to models discussed previously in the literature and have a broader range of application beyond our specific results. Our work thus opens up an uncharted avenue in the understanding of spin liquids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09683 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Illustration of the braiding process realised at the Y point due to the coupling in Eq. (5); see main text for details. (b) Dirac strings attached to the nodes keep track of gauge discontinuities. (c) After the nodes have been annihi￾lated, the Dirac strings can only be removed by moving them past the node at the Y point, thereby flipping its charge. (1 − ϵ) v 2 (k) + ϵ v 3 m=−0.8 (k), and define J˜ ϵ(k) = w3 ϵ … view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Spectrum and spin structure factor when (a) m = −1.2 (b) m = −1 and (c) m = −0.8. Coloured rings in the structure factor indicate the patch Euler class of the node: red [blue] indicates χ(D) = +1 [χ(D) = −1], while nodes where the top band touches the bottom band are shown in white m > 1. Gap closings (such as the one at m = −1) are necessary for topological invariants such as χ to change. These transitions may be o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Characteristic spin structure factors of a pair of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spin structure factors corresponding to the model defined by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry-Protected Pinch Curves in Classical Spin Liquids

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Inversion symmetry reduces Gauss-law zero conditions to two real equations, protecting programmable pinch curves in classical spin liquids, including curved loci and order-changing IR transitions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    This approximation has the effect of decoupling the individual spin components, meaning that they can each be treated as real scalars. A classical spin model with bilinear interactions can then be written in momentum space as H= 1 2 X k ˜S(k)⊺J(k) ˜S(k),(1) where ˜S(k)is the Fourier-transformed vector of theN scalar spins in a unit cell. The interaction m...

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Spin ice state in frustrated magnetic py- rochlore materials,

    Steven T. Bramwell and Michel J. P. Gin- gras, “Spin ice state in frustrated magnetic py- rochlore materials,” Science294, 1495–1501 (2001), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1064761

    doi:10.1126/science.1064761 2001

  3. [3]

    Magnetic monopoles in spin ice,

    C.Castelnovo, R.Moessner, andS.L.Sondhi,“Magnetic monopoles in spin ice,” Nature451, 42–45 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets,

    M J P Gingras and P A McClarty, “Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets,” Reports on Progress in Physics77, 056501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids,

    Xiao-Gang Wen, “Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. B65, 165113 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Classifying frac- tionalization: Symmetry classification of gappedz2 spin liquids in two dimensions,

    Andrew M. Essin and Michael Hermele, “Classifying frac- tionalization: Symmetry classification of gappedz2 spin liquids in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B87, 104406 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases,

    Maissam Barkeshli, Parsa Bonderson, Meng Cheng, and Zhenghan Wang, “Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B100, 115147 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Classification of classical spin liq- uids: Typology and resulting landscape,

    Han Yan, Owen Benton, Roderich Moessner, and An- driy H. Nevidomskyy, “Classification of classical spin liq- uids: Typology and resulting landscape,” Phys. Rev. B 110, L020402 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Classification of classical spin liq- uids: Detailed formalism and suite of examples,

    Han Yan, Owen Benton, Andriy H. Nevidomskyy, and Roderich Moessner, “Classification of classical spin liq- uids: Detailed formalism and suite of examples,” Phys. Rev. B109, 174421 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Classification of classical spin liquids: Topo- logical quantum chemistry and crystalline symmetry,

    Yuan Fang, Jennifer Cano, Andriy H. Nevidomskyy, and Han Yan, “Classification of classical spin liquids: Topo- logical quantum chemistry and crystalline symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B110, 054421 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Combined approach to analyze and classify families of classical spin liquids,

    N. Davier, F. A. Gómez Albarracín, H. D. Rosales, and P. Pujol, “Combined approach to analyze and classify families of classical spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. B108, 054408 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Fractionalizedz2 classical heisenberg spin liquids,

    J. Rehn, Arnab Sen, and R. Moessner, “Fractionalizedz2 classical heisenberg spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 047201 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Fragile spin liquid in three dimensions,

    Anna Fancelli, R. Flores-Calderón, Owen Benton, Bella Lake, Roderich Moessner, and Johannes Reuther, “Fragile spin liquid in three dimensions,” (2024), arXiv:2410.17720 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Topological in- sulators and superconductors,

    Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Topological in- sulators and superconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 6 1057–1110 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Colloquium,

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Colloquium,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045–3067 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids,

    P. Armitage, E.J. Mele, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids,” Re- views of Modern Physics90(2018), 10.1103/revmod- phys.90.015001

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Fragile Topology and Wannier Obstructions,

    Hoi Chun Po, Haruki Watanabe, and Ashvin Vish- wanath, “Fragile Topology and Wannier Obstructions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 126402 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topologi- cal crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry,

    Adrien Bouhon, Annica M. Black-Schaffer, and Robert- Jan Slager, “Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topologi- cal crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B100, 195135 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    A spin-liquid with pinch-line singularities on the pyrochlore lattice,

    Owen Benton, L.D.C. Jaubert, Han Yan, and Nic Shan- non, “A spin-liquid with pinch-line singularities on the pyrochlore lattice,” Nature Communications7(2016), 10.1038/ncomms11572

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Rank–2u(1)spin liquid on the breathing py- rochlore lattice,

    Han Yan, Owen Benton, L. D. C. Jaubert, and Nic Shannon, “Rank–2u(1)spin liquid on the breathing py- rochlore lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 127203 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Pinch point singu- larities of tensor spin liquids,

    Abhinav Prem, Sagar Vijay, Yang-Zhi Chou, Michael Pretko, and Rahul M. Nandkishore, “Pinch point singu- larities of tensor spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. B98, 165140 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Quantum effects on unconventional pinch point singu- larities,

    Nils Niggemann, Yasir Iqbal, and Johannes Reuther, “Quantum effects on unconventional pinch point singu- larities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 196601 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Topological route to new and unusual coulomb spin liquids,

    Owen Benton and Roderich Moessner, “Topological route to new and unusual coulomb spin liquids,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 107202 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Ising fracton spin liquid on the honeycomb lattice,

    Benedikt Placke, Owen Benton, and Roderich Moess- ner, “Ising fracton spin liquid on the honeycomb lattice,” Phys. Rev. B110, L020401 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Topological Crystalline Insulators,

    Liang Fu, “Topological Crystalline Insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 106802 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries,

    Ching-Kai Chiu, Jeffrey C. Y. Teo, Andreas P. Schnyder, and Shinsei Ryu, “Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    The translational side of topological band insulators,

    Robert-Jan Slager, “The translational side of topological band insulators,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids128, 24 – 38 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    The space group classification of topo- logical band-insulators,

    Robert-Jan Slager, Andrej Mesaros, Vladimir Juričić, and Jan Zaanen, “The space group classification of topo- logical band-insulators,” Nat. Phys.9, 98–102 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond,

    Alexei Kitaev, “Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond,” Annals of Physics321, 2–111 (2006), january Special Issue

    2006

  22. [30]

    Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band struc- ture combinatorics,

    Jorrit Kruthoff, Jan de Boer, Jasper van Wezel, Charles L. Kane, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band struc- ture combinatorics,” Phys. Rev. X7, 041069 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups,

    Hoi Chun Po, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Haruki Watan- abe, “Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups,” Nat. Commun.8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Topological quantum chemistry,

    Barry Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, Jennifer Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Zhijun Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Topological quantum chemistry,” Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Geometric approach to fragile topology beyond symme- try indicators,

    Adrien Bouhon, Tomáš Bzdušek, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Geometric approach to fragile topology beyond symme- try indicators,” Phys. Rev. B102, 115135 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Multi-gap topo- logical conversion of Euler class via band-node braiding: minimal models,PT-linked nodal rings, and chiral heirs,

    Adrien Bouhon and Robert-Jan Slager, “Multi-gap topo- logical conversion of Euler class via band-node braiding: minimal models,PT-linked nodal rings, and chiral heirs,” (2022), arXiv:2203.16741 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Three-dimensionalPT- symmetric topological phases with a pontryagin index,

    Zory Davoyan, Wojciech J. Jankowski, Adrien Bouhon, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Three-dimensionalPT- symmetric topological phases with a pontryagin index,” Phys. Rev. B109, 165125 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Quantum geometry beyond projective single bands,

    Adrien Bouhon, Abigail Timmel, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Quantum geometry beyond projective single bands,” (2023), arXiv:2303.02180 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Real Hopf insulator,

    Hyeongmuk Lim, Sunje Kim, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Real Hopf insulator,” Phys. Rev. B108, 125101 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Non-abelian hopf-euler insulators,

    Wojciech J. Jankowski, Arthur S. Morris, Zory Davoyan, Adrien Bouhon, F. Nur Ünal, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Non-abelian hopf-euler insulators,” Phys. Rev. B110, 075135 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Non-Abelian reciprocal braiding of Weyl points and its manifestation in ZrTe,

    Adrien Bouhon, QuanSheng Wu, Robert-Jan Slager, Hongming Weng, Oleg V. Yazyev, and Tomáš Bzdušek, “Non-Abelian reciprocal braiding of Weyl points and its manifestation in ZrTe,” Nature Physics16, 1137–1143 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Failure of Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem and fragile topol- ogy in two-dimensional systems with space-time inver- sion symmetry: Application to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle,

    Junyeong Ahn, Sungjoon Park, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Failure of Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem and fragile topol- ogy in two-dimensional systems with space-time inver- sion symmetry: Application to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle,” Phys. Rev. X9, 021013 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    pt-symmetric real dirac fermions and semimetals,

    Y. X. Zhao and Y. Lu, “pt-symmetric real dirac fermions and semimetals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 056401 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Band topology and linking structure of nodal line semimetals withZ 2 monopole charges,

    Junyeong Ahn, Dongwook Kim, Youngkuk Kim, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Band topology and linking structure of nodal line semimetals withZ 2 monopole charges,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 106403 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals,

    QuanSheng Wu, Alexey A. Soluyanov, and Tomas Bz- dusek, “Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals,” Science365, 1273–1277 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Topological Euler class as a dynamical observable in op- tical lattices,

    F. Nur Ünal, Adrien Bouhon, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Topological Euler class as a dynamical observable in op- tical lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 053601 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Non-Abelian Floquet braiding and anomalous Dirac string phase in periodically driven systems,

    Robert-Jan Slager, Adrien Bouhon, and F. Nur Ünal, “Non-Abelian Floquet braiding and anomalous Dirac string phase in periodically driven systems,” Nat Com- mun15, 1144 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Quan- tum simulation for topological Euler insulators,

    Wending Zhao, Yan-Bin Yang, Yue Jiang, Zhichao Mao, Weixuan Guo, Liyuan Qiu, Gangxi Wang, Lin Yao, LiHe, ZichaoZhou, YongXu, andLumingDuan,“Quan- tum simulation for topological Euler insulators,” Com- munications Physics5, 223 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    In- terferometry of non-abelian band singularities and euler class topology,

    Oliver Breach, Robert-Jan Slager, and F. Nur Ünal, “In- terferometry of non-abelian band singularities and euler class topology,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 093404 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Phonons as a platform for non- Abelian braiding and its manifestation in layered sili- cates,

    Bo Peng, Adrien Bouhon, Bartomeu Monserrat, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Phonons as a platform for non- Abelian braiding and its manifestation in layered sili- cates,” Nature Communications13, 423 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Euler band topology in spin-orbit coupled magnetic sys- tems,

    Seung Hun Lee, Yuting Qian, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Euler band topology in spin-orbit coupled magnetic sys- tems,” (2024), arXiv:2404.16383 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Topological correspondence between magnetic space group representations and subdimensions,

    Adrien Bouhon, Gunnar F. Lange, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Topological correspondence between magnetic space group representations and subdimensions,” Phys. Rev. B103, 245127 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Experimental observation of non-Abelian topo- logical acoustic semimetals and their phase transitions,

    Bin Jiang, Adrien Bouhon, Zhi-Kang Lin, Xiaoxi Zhou, Bo Hou, Feng Li, Robert-Jan Slager, and Jian-Hua 7 Jiang, “Experimental observation of non-Abelian topo- logical acoustic semimetals and their phase transitions,” Nature Physics17, 1239–1246 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Four-band non-abelian topological insulator and its experimental re- alization,

    Tianshu Jiang, Qinghua Guo, Ruo-Yang Zhang, Zhao- Qing Zhang, Biao Yang, and C. T. Chan, “Four-band non-abelian topological insulator and its experimental re- alization,” Nature Communications12, 6471 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Observation of an acoustic topological euler insulator with meronic waves,

    Bin Jiang, Adrien Bouhon, Shi-Qiao Wu, Ze-Lin Kong, Zhi-Kang Lin, Robert-Jan Slager, and Jian-Hua Jiang, “Observation of an acoustic topological euler insulator with meronic waves,” Science Bulletin69, 1653–1659 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Experimental observation of non- Abelian topological charges and edge states,

    Qinghua Guo, Tianshu Jiang, Ruo-Yang Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zhao-Qing Zhang, Biao Yang, Shuang Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Experimental observation of non- Abelian topological charges and edge states,” Nature 594, 195–200 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Exact projected entangled pair ground states with topo- logical euler invariant,

    Thorsten B. Wahl, Wojciech J. Jankowski, Adrien Bouhon, Gaurav Chaudhary, and Robert-Jan Slager, “Exact projected entangled pair ground states with topo- logical euler invariant,” Nature Communications16, 284 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Colloquium: Disclination loops, point defects, and all that in nematic liquid crystals,

    Gareth P. Alexander, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Elisabetta A. Matsumoto, and Randall D. Kamien, “Colloquium: Disclination loops, point defects, and all that in nematic liquid crystals,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 497–514 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Generalized liquid crystals: Giant fluc- tuations and the vestigial chiral order ofi,o, andtmat- ter,

    Ke Liu, Jaakko Nissinen, Robert-Jan Slager, Kai Wu, and Jan Zaanen, “Generalized liquid crystals: Giant fluc- tuations and the vestigial chiral order ofi,o, andtmat- ter,” Phys. Rev. X6, 041025 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    Investigation of singulari- ties in superfluid He3 in liquid crystals by the homotopic topology methods,

    GE Volovik and VP Mineev, “Investigation of singulari- ties in superfluid He3 in liquid crystals by the homotopic topology methods,” inBasic Notions Of Condensed Mat- ter Physics(CRC Press, 2018) pp. 392–401

    2018

  51. [59]

    Dual gauge field theory of quantum liquid crystals in two dimensions,

    Aron J. Beekman, Jaakko Nissinen, Kai Wu, Ke Liu, Robert-Jan Slager, Zohar Nussinov, Vladimir Cvetkovic, and Jan Zaanen, “Dual gauge field theory of quantum liquid crystals in two dimensions,” Phys. Rep.683, 1 – 110 (2017), dual gauge field theory of quantum liquid crystals in...

    2017

  52. [60]

    8 a b,c 1 2 1 2 Figure A.1

    See Supplemental Material for more information about the real-space expressions of the models used, and details about the Gauss’s law calculations. 8 a b,c 1 2 1 2 Figure A.1. Positions of orbitals in the unit cell. Appendix A: Real-space model The system we consider is a squa...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.