Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Empirical Study of Automated Mislabel Detection in Real World Vision Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.02200 v1 pith:XLMG72LS submitted 2023-12-02 cs.CV cs.AIstat.AP

classification cs.CVcs.AIstat.AP
keywords datasetsmislabelrealmethodsvisionworlddetectionperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Major advancements in computer vision can primarily be attributed to the use of labeled datasets. However, acquiring labels for datasets often results in errors which can harm model performance. Recent works have proposed methods to automatically identify mislabeled images, but developing strategies to effectively implement them in real world datasets has been sparsely explored. Towards improved data-centric methods for cleaning real world vision datasets, we first conduct more than 200 experiments carefully benchmarking recently developed automated mislabel detection methods on multiple datasets under a variety of synthetic and real noise settings with varying noise levels. We compare these methods to a Simple and Efficient Mislabel Detector (SEMD) that we craft, and find that SEMD performs similarly to or outperforms prior mislabel detection approaches. We then apply SEMD to multiple real world computer vision datasets and test how dataset size, mislabel removal strategy, and mislabel removal amount further affect model performance after retraining on the cleaned data. With careful design of the approach, we find that mislabel removal leads per-class performance improvements of up to 8% of a retrained classifier in smaller data regimes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Noisy Ostracods: A Fine-Grained, Imbalanced Real-World Dataset for Benchmarking Robust Machine Learning and Label Correction Methods

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new fine-grained benchmark dataset of ostracod images shows that existing robust-learning and label-correction methods do not outperform cross-entropy or a naive ensemble baseline.

  2. Class-wise Autoencoders Measure Classification Difficulty And Detect Label Mistakes

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reconstruction error ratios from class-wise autoencoders correlate with dataset classification difficulty and detect mislabeled images on hard datasets.

Pith tools