Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Efficient Liquidity Providing via Margin Liquidity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.10035 v1 pith:XMAKV4FA submitted 2022-12-20 cs.CE cs.CR

Efficient Liquidity Providing via Margin Liquidity

classification cs.CE cs.CR
keywords liquiditymarginmarketexchangesdecentralizedliquidity-providingpositionproviders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The limit order book mechanism has been the core trading mechanism of the modern financial market. In the cryptocurrency market, centralized exchanges also adopt this limit order book mechanism and a centralized matching engine dynamically connects the traders to the orders of market makers. Recently, decentralized exchanges have been introduced and received considerable attention in the cryptocurrency community. A decentralized exchange typically adopts an automated market maker, which algorithmically arbitrates the trades between liquidity providers and traders through a pool of crypto assets. Meanwhile, the liquidity of the exchange is the most important factor when traders choose an exchange. However, the amount of liquidity provided by the liquidity providers in decentralized exchanges is insufficient when compared to centralized exchanges. This is because the liquidity providers in decentralized exchanges suffer from the risk of divergence loss inherent to the automated market making system. To this end, we introduce a new concept called margin liquidity and leverage this concept to propose a highly profitable margin liquidity-providing position. Then, we extend this margin liquidity-providing position to a virtual margin liquidity-providing position to alleviate the risk of divergence loss for the liquidity providers and encourage them to provide more liquidity to the pool. Furthermore, we introduce a representative strategy for the margin liquidity-providing position and backtest the strategy with historical data from the BTC/ETH market. Our strategy outperforms a simple holding baseline. We also show that our proposed margin liquidity is 8K times more capital efficient than the concentrated liquidity proposed in Uniswap V3.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.