REVIEW 4 cited by
Branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Branch-and-bound algorithms effectively solve combinatorial optimization problems, relying on the relaxation of the objective function to obtain tight lower bounds. While this is straightforward for convex objective functions, higher-order formulations pose challenges due to their inherent non-convexity. In this work, we propose branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BB-DCQO), a quantum algorithm that addresses the relaxation difficulties in higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. By employing bias fields as approximate solutions to the relaxed problem, we iteratively enhance the quality of the results compared to the bare bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm. We refer to this enhanced method as BBB-DCQO. In order to benchmark it against simulated annealing (SA), we apply it on sparse HUBO instances with up to $156$ qubits using tensor network simulations. To explore regimes that are less tractable for classical simulations, we experimentally apply BBB-DCQO to denser problems using up to 100 qubits on IBM quantum hardware. We compare our results with SA and a greedy-tuned quantum annealing baseline. In both simulations and experiments, BBB-DCQO consistently achieved higher-quality solutions with significantly reduced computational overhead, showcasing the effectiveness of integrating counterdiabatic quantum methods into branch-and-bound to address hard non-convex optimization tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Large-scale portfolio optimization with variational neural annealing
VNA produces Sharpe-ratio-competitive portfolios on indices up to 2,008 assets, but the claimed speed advantage and universal finite-size scaling are not robustly supported.
-
Protein folding with an all-to-all trapped-ion quantum computer
BF-DCQO on IonQ's trapped-ion processors solves dense HUBO instances (protein folding up to 33 qubits, MAX 4-SAT and spin-glasses at 36 qubits) when followed by classical post-processing.
-
Hybrid Quantum Branch-and-Bound Method for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization
A hybrid quantum-classical branch-and-bound solver for QUBO shows that a classical degree-based branching rule delivers the largest speedups (11% time, 17% nodes), while D-Wave warm starts contribute only a few percen...
-
Sequential Quantum Computing
Feeding a quantum annealer's approximate solutions into a digital quantum computer's counterdiabatic optimization finds the exact ground state of a 156-qubit problem that neither standalone machine found.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.