Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.15367 v1 pith:XPIGC3ZI submitted 2025-04-21 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumoptimizationbranch-and-boundcounterdiabaticbbb-dcqodigitizedproblemssimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Branch-and-bound algorithms effectively solve combinatorial optimization problems, relying on the relaxation of the objective function to obtain tight lower bounds. While this is straightforward for convex objective functions, higher-order formulations pose challenges due to their inherent non-convexity. In this work, we propose branch-and-bound digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BB-DCQO), a quantum algorithm that addresses the relaxation difficulties in higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. By employing bias fields as approximate solutions to the relaxed problem, we iteratively enhance the quality of the results compared to the bare bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm. We refer to this enhanced method as BBB-DCQO. In order to benchmark it against simulated annealing (SA), we apply it on sparse HUBO instances with up to $156$ qubits using tensor network simulations. To explore regimes that are less tractable for classical simulations, we experimentally apply BBB-DCQO to denser problems using up to 100 qubits on IBM quantum hardware. We compare our results with SA and a greedy-tuned quantum annealing baseline. In both simulations and experiments, BBB-DCQO consistently achieved higher-quality solutions with significantly reduced computational overhead, showcasing the effectiveness of integrating counterdiabatic quantum methods into branch-and-bound to address hard non-convex optimization tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large-scale portfolio optimization with variational neural annealing

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    VNA produces Sharpe-ratio-competitive portfolios on indices up to 2,008 assets, but the claimed speed advantage and universal finite-size scaling are not robustly supported.

  2. Protein folding with an all-to-all trapped-ion quantum computer

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BF-DCQO on IonQ's trapped-ion processors solves dense HUBO instances (protein folding up to 33 qubits, MAX 4-SAT and spin-glasses at 36 qubits) when followed by classical post-processing.

  3. Hybrid Quantum Branch-and-Bound Method for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization

    math.OC 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid quantum-classical branch-and-bound solver for QUBO shows that a classical degree-based branching rule delivers the largest speedups (11% time, 17% nodes), while D-Wave warm starts contribute only a few percen...

  4. Sequential Quantum Computing

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Feeding a quantum annealer's approximate solutions into a digital quantum computer's counterdiabatic optimization finds the exact ground state of a 156-qubit problem that neither standalone machine found.

Pith tools