REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 99 references
Gravitational Waves from Accretion Disks: Turbulence, Mode Excitation and Prospects for Future Detectors
T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Turbulent accretion disks can make black holes ring, but the resulting gravitational-wave background stays just out of reach.
desk verdict First quantitative GRMHD-to-Teukolsky forecast of the accretion-disk GW background; the negative forecast for stellar-mass sources is solid, but the quantitative SMBH peak at 1e-15 rests on an undefined disk mass and a single unverified simulation template. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing mechanism is the coupling of disk turbulence to black-hole quasinormal modes through the Teukolsky master equation, the linear wave equation that governs perturbations of a Kerr black hole. A general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulation supplies the time-dependent stress-energy tensor of the turbulent disk; that tensor enters the Teukolsky source term, and time-domain integration yields the gravitational-wave strain for each azimuthal number $m$. The spectrum's peak at $M\omega\sim0.42$ identifies the excited mode as the quadrupolar $\ell=2,m=0$ quasinormal mode, and the per-mode energy spectrum is the quantity later rescaled by mass, Eddington ratio, and emission duration $\Delta t = \min(t_0 - t_{\rm birth}, M_{\rm disk}/\dot{M})$ to assemble the cosmic background.
What would settle it
A second general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulation with a different black-hole spin (for example $\chi=0.5$) or a different initial magnetic-field topology, run through the same Teukolsky pipeline, would test whether the single-template rescaling is valid; if the resulting gravitational-wave energy spectrum at fixed mass and Eddington ratio differs by more than an order of magnitude, the population-level $\Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}\sim10^{-15}$ is not robust. Likewise, a future microhertz-band observatory that sees no background at the predicted level would falsify the optimistic active-accretion population model.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that turbulent accretion flows act as a stochastic source that resonantly pumps energy into black hole quasinormal modes. In the simulation, the emitted waveform's dominant frequency $M\omega\sim0.42$ matches the quadrupolar $\ell=2,m=0$ quasinormal mode of a Kerr black hole with spin $\chi=0.94$, and the energy spectrum peaks at the quasinormal frequency for each azimuthal mode $m$, with a high-frequency tail consistent with the Kolmogorov $f^{-5/3}$ cascade. When the single-source spectrum is rescaled by black-hole mass and Eddington accretion ratio and integrated over formation rates, the stochastic background from supermassive black holes with Eddington ratios uniformly distributed in $[0,1]$ reaches $\Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}\sim10^{-15}$ near $10^{-6}\,\mathrm{Hz}$, and super-Eddington high-redshift systems reach $\sim10^{-14}$. Backgrounds from stellar-mass black holes, isolated neutron stars, and binary-neutron-star merger disks all fall far below the sensitivity of future ground-based detectors, pulsar-timing arrays, and LISA.
Load-bearing premise
The forecast rests on treating one magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a single, highly spinning, magnetically arrested disk as a universal template for every accretion disk in the universe, rescaled only by mass and Eddington ratio; if real disks differ in spin, magnetic geometry, or turbulent state, the predicted background amplitude could shift by orders of magnitude.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Actively accreting supermassive black holes should produce a stochastic gravitational-wave background peaking near $10^{-6}\,\mathrm{Hz}$ at $\Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}\sim10^{-15}$, below all planned pulsar-timing-array and LISA sensitivities.
- Disks around stellar-mass black holes, isolated neutron stars, and binary-neutron-star merger remnants contribute backgrounds far below third-generation ground-based detector thresholds, so those populations can be ignored when planning such searches.
- A single disk's waveform should be dominated by the $\ell=2,m=0$ quasinormal mode, with higher azimuthal modes carrying rapidly decreasing energy; the high-frequency tail of the energy spectrum follows an $f^{-5/3}$ Kolmogorov-like scaling.
- Super-Eddington accretion onto high-redshift supermassive black holes could raise the background to $\Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}\sim10^{-14}$, making it a relevant target for future microhertz-range observatories.
Reading between the lines
- If this excitation mechanism is generic, accretion-disk turbulence is an irreducible astrophysical foreground for any future microhertz gravitational-wave observatory, one that must be modeled even if no individual disk is resolvable.
- Because the predicted background is so sensitive to the Eddington-ratio distribution, a measured upper limit from a future microhertz detector would directly constrain the fraction of supermassive black holes that accrete near the Eddington rate.
- The same pipeline could be turned on intermediate-mass black hole disks or disks with multi-loop magnetic fields; those are the most likely cases in which the single-template prediction changes by orders of magnitude.
- The single-template assumption could be tested inexpensively by rerunning the disk simulation at lower spin or with a different magnetic field initialization and comparing the normalized energy spectrum.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This Letter studies gravitational-wave emission from turbulent accretion disks by coupling GRMHD simulations (one magnetically arrested Fishbone-Moncrief torus around a Kerr black hole with spin chi = 0.94) to a time-domain Teukolsky solver. The authors find that the turbulent flow stochastically excites the black hole quasi-normal modes, with the dominant m = 0 waveform peaking at M omega ~ 0.42, matching the l = 2, m = 0 quasinormal mode. They then rescale this single-source spectrum by mass, Eddington ratio, and an assumed emission duration, and integrate over population models to obtain Omega_GW(f) for SMBHs, stellar-mass BHs, neutron stars, and BNS merger remnants. The headline results are that the SMBH background can reach Omega_GW ~ 10^-15 at microhertz frequencies for a uniform f_Edd in [0,1], that super-Eddington z>3 populations may reach Omega_GW ~ 10^-14, and that all other disk populations are far below future detector sensitivities.
Significance. If the quantitative forecast is correct, this is the first concrete SGWB estimate from accretion-disk turbulence built on GRMHD-fed Teukolsky calculations rather than order-of-magnitude dimensional analysis. The strongest part of the paper is the mode-excitation demonstration: the extracted frequency agrees with an independent quasinormal-mode table, and the m = 0 dominance is consistent with earlier analytic work on turbulent Newtonian disks. The calculation is also honestly framed as a first estimate, and the negative conclusions for stellar-mass BH, NS, and BNS populations are likely robust. However, the positive SMBH claim in the microhertz band rests on a single simulation template and on an emission-duration prescription whose central ingredient, Mdisk in Eq. (12), is never defined. The paper also provides no convergence tests or error bars for the GRMHD run and no quantitative treatment of unresolved high-m modes. These limitations do not invalidate the mode-excitation result, but they make the reported 10^-15 peak much less robust than the phrasing of the abstract suggests.
major comments (4)
- [Stochastic GW background, Eq. (12)] The duration Delta t = min(t0 - tbirth, Mdisk/Mdot) is the factor that turns the finite 2000M simulation window into an astrophysical emission time, yet Mdisk is never defined, measured from the simulation, or taken from a cited disk model. Since Omega_GW is linear in dEs/dfs and hence in Delta t, any choice of Mdisk changes the forecast by that factor. Moreover, the normalization in Eq. (2) ties the physical torus mass to Mdot(rg/c) times a dimensionless code integral; under that reading Mdisk/Mdot would be only a few M in geometric units, i.e., a few dynamical times, which would make the SMBH background far smaller than reported. If Mdisk is instead intended as a larger reservoir mass (e.g., a quasar fuel reservoir), that choice must be stated, justified, and varied over an astrophysical range.
- [Numerical setup and Fig. 4] The population forecast is built from a single GRMHD template: one spin (chi = 0.94), one Fishbone-Moncrief torus with rin = 20M and rmax = 40M, one magnetic-field loop, an ideal-gas equation of state with Gamma = 4/3, and a magnetically arrested state. There are no convergence tests in resolution, box size, magnetic configuration, or spin, and no systematic error estimate. This matters because the f_Edd ~ 1 SMBH population is expected to be geometrically thin and radiatively efficient, whereas the simulated torus is thick and MAD; the turbulent quadrupole fluctuations that drive the m = 0 emission are not demonstrated to be representative. The authors acknowledge this issue for stellar-mass objects but not for SMBHs. At minimum the paper should reframe the SMBH curve as an order-of-magnitude illustration with an explicit range of uncertainty, or add representative runs (e.g., different spins and field topologies) to support the claimed normalization.
- [GWs from turbulently excited BHs] The energy spectrum entering the background is computed only for modes with |m| <= 5, and the text states that higher-m modes may be underestimated because the time step cannot resolve them. Since Fig. 4 is constructed from this incomplete mode sum, the total emitted energy used in Eqs. (9)-(12) is incomplete. The paper should quantify the unresolved-mode contribution using a converged high-resolution run or an analytic extrapolation, or explicitly bound the resulting uncertainty in Omega_GW. Without this, the quantitative amplitude of the reported background is not fully determined.
- [Gravitational radiation and Fig. 3] The claimed Kolmogorov f^-5/3 scaling in the high-frequency tail is not supported by a quantitative fit or convergence test. The text says the oscillatory behaviour at high frequencies can be mitigated by higher-order interpolation of the source term, leading to a spectrum that scales as f^-5/3, but no such run or fit is shown. Since this scaling is used as supporting evidence for the turbulence picture, the claim should either be demonstrated with a converged spectrum or softened to a qualitative comment.
minor comments (4)
- [Eq. (2)] The symbol M is used both for the black hole mass and for the rescaled quantity Mdot(rg/c) in Eq. (2). This is confusing, especially because Eq. (3) then introduces the black hole mass again through MdotEdd. Please use a distinct symbol, for example M0 or Mdot (rg/c).
- [After Eq. (7)] There is a typo: 'The source term T in the Teukolsky euation' should be 'equation'.
- [Stochastic GW background] In the sentence about JWST-discovered quasars at z = 6, the citation appears as the malformed string 'beginciteYang:2021imt' and must be corrected to a proper \cite command with a matching bibliography entry.
- [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says 'The BH mass is M = M⊙'; please use the standard symbol M_sun or state the convention clearly, since the body of the paper uses M for the black hole mass in geometric units.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the first-principles GRMHD-to-Teukolsky spectrum is cross-checked against an external QNM table, and self-citations are methodological or benchmark-only. The unmodeled disk lifetime in Eq. (12) does dominate the SMBH amplitude, but it is an input assumption, not a fitted prediction.
full rationale
The derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The single-source spectrum is produced from first principles: the BHAC GRMHD stress-energy tensor (Eq. 1) is rescaled by dimensional analysis (Eq. 2) and fed as the source of the time-domain Teukolsky equation (Eq. A1); no parameter is fitted to any target amplitude. The identification of the m=0 peak at Mω≈0.42 with the Kerr ℓ=2,m=0 QNM (Mω=0.416−i0.0765, Ref. [57]) is a post-hoc cross-check, and although Ref. [57] shares an author with the present paper, that frequency table is an independent, parameter-free eigenvalue computation whose assumptions do not include the target claim; it is therefore real evidence under the review rules and not load-bearing. The population stage uses the standard Phinney (2001) superposition integral (Eqs. 9–11) with externally cited formation-rate and delay-time models, so the SGWB is the integral of a computed spectrum, not an input. The weakest point is Eq. (12): the amplitude rescaling Δt = min(t0 − tbirth, Mdisk/Mdot) and the resulting ΩGW∼10−15 are linearly controlled by a duration Mdisk/Mdot that is never defined or sourced, while the single thick-MAD-χ=0.94 template may not represent the thin-disk SMBH population; but this is an input-sensitivity/correctness concern, since nothing is tuned to reach 10−15 and the paper's robust conclusion (signal below PTA/LISA sensitivities) survives order-of-magnitude duration changes. No equation reduces identity-wise to its input. Score 1.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (3)
- Eddington ratio fEdd =
10^-7, [0,1], [0,10] for SMBHs; 1 for NS/BH; BNS disks set by Mdot ~ 1e-2 Msun/s
- Black hole spin chi =
0.94
- GW emission duration Delta t =
min(t0 - tbirth(z), Mdisk/Mdot)
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The disk back-reacts weakly on the Kerr background, so matter evolves on a fixed Kerr metric and Teukolsky perturbation theory applies.
- domain assumption The single simulated disk configuration is representative of all accretion disks in the source populations.
- domain assumption The 2000M simulation segment after 10^4M of evolution is a stationary sample of the disk's turbulent state, and its gravitational-wave flux can be rescaled over the full lifetime Delta t.
- standard math The Teukolsky master equation and the Newman-Penrose source construction correctly describe first-order gravitational-wave emission from the disk.
- domain assumption The GRMHD floor values and the magnetization ceiling do not significantly alter the gravitational-wave source.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Waves from Accretion Disks: Turbulence, Mode Excitation and Prospects for Future Detectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XR2P7IZF
@misc{pith2026250207871,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Gravitational Waves from Accretion Disks: Turbulence, Mode Excitation and Prospects for Future Detectors},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XR2P7IZF}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07871}
}
abstract
We study gravitational-wave emission by turbulent flows in accretion disks around spinning black holes or neutron stars. We aim to understand how turbulence can stochastically excite black hole quasinormal ringing and contribute to a stochastic gravitational-wave background from accretion disks around compact objects. We employ general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations and feed them as the source of the Teukolsky master equation to evaluate the gravitational wave energy spectrum of a single source. The stochastic gravitational wave background from accretion disks generated by the population of stellar-mass compact objects is far below the sensitivity of third-generation ground-based detectors. In contrast, the supermassive black hole population, in particular those actively accreting, could lead to $\Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}\sim 10^{-15}$ in the microHertz. This signal remains well below the sensitivities of pulsar-timing-arrays and LISA, making direct observation infeasible.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Ob- serving Run,
B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Ob- serving Run,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 8, 039903 (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2016
-
[2]
R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2021
-
[3]
Nicol´ as Yunes and Xavier Siemens, “Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detec- tors and Pulsar Timing-Arrays,” Living Rev. Rel. 16, 9 (2013), arXiv:1304.3473 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2013
-
[4]
Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,
Emanuele Berti et al. , “Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr- qc]
arXiv 2015
-
[5]
Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,
Leor Barack et al., “Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2019
-
[6]
Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,
Vitor Cardoso and Paolo Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,” Living Rev. Rel. 22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2019
-
[7]
Cosmic Separation of Phases,
Edward Witten, “Cosmic Separation of Phases,” Phys. Rev. D 30, 272–285 (1984)
1984
-
[8]
Gravitational waves from first order cosmolog- ical phase transitions,
Arthur Kosowsky, Michael S. Turner, and Richard Watkins, “Gravitational waves from first order cosmolog- ical phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2026–2029 (1992)
1992
Show all 99 references
-
[9]
Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles,
Arthur Kosowsky, Michael S. Turner, and Richard Watkins, “Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles,” Phys. Rev. D 45, 4514–4535 (1992)
1992
-
[10]
Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,
Marc Kamionkowski, Arthur Kosowsky, and Michael S. Turner, “Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. D 49, 2837–2851 (1994), 6 arXiv:astro-ph/9310044
1994 arXiv
-
[11]
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Cosmological Phase Transi- tions with the NANOGrav 12.5-Year Dataset,
Zaven Arzoumanian et al. (NANOGrav), “Searching for Gravitational Waves from Cosmological Phase Transi- tions with the NANOGrav 12.5-Year Dataset,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251302 (2021), arXiv:2104.13930 [astro- ph.CO]
2021 arXiv
-
[12]
Constraining Cosmological Phase Tran- sitions with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,
Xiao Xue et al., “Constraining Cosmological Phase Tran- sitions with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251303 (2021), arXiv:2110.03096 [astro- ph.CO]
2021 arXiv
-
[13]
Implications for First-Order Cosmological Phase Transitions from the Third LIGO-Virgo Observing Run,
Alba Romero, Katarina Martinovic, Thomas A. Cal- lister, Huai-Ke Guo, Mario Mart ´ ınez, Mairi Sakellar- iadou, Feng-Wei Yang, and Yue Zhao, “Implications for First-Order Cosmological Phase Transitions from the Third LIGO-Virgo Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 151301 (202...
2021 arXiv
-
[14]
Constraining the gravitational-wave spectrum from cosmological first- order phase transitions using data from LIGO-Virgo first three observing runs,
Yang Jiang and Qing-Guo Huang, “Constraining the gravitational-wave spectrum from cosmological first- order phase transitions using data from LIGO-Virgo first three observing runs,” JCAP 06, 053 (2023), arXiv:2203.11781 [astro-ph.CO]
2023 arXiv
-
[15]
Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914,
Misao Sasaki, Teruaki Suyama, Takahiro Tanaka, and Shuichiro Yokoyama, “Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 061101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 059901 (2018)], arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]
2016 arXiv
-
[16]
A topic review on probing primordial black hole dark matter with scalar induced gravitational waves,
Chen Yuan and Qing-Guo Huang, “A topic review on probing primordial black hole dark matter with scalar induced gravitational waves,” iScience24, 102860 (2021), arXiv:2103.04739 [astro-ph.GA]
2021 arXiv
-
[17]
Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with NANOGrav 11-Year Dataset,
Zu-Cheng Chen, Chen Yuan, and Qing-Guo Huang, “Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on Primordial Black Holes with NANOGrav 11-Year Dataset,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 251101 (2020), arXiv:1910.12239 [astro- ph.CO]
2020 arXiv
-
[18]
Con- straints on an ultralight scalar boson from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs us- ing the stochastic gravitational-wave background,
Chen Yuan, Yang Jiang, and Qing-Guo Huang, “Con- straints on an ultralight scalar boson from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs us- ing the stochastic gravitational-wave background,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 023020 (2022), arXiv:2204.03482 [astro- ph.CO]
2022 arXiv
-
[19]
First search for a stochastic gravitational-wave background from ultralight bosons,
Leo Tsukada, Thomas Callister, Andrew Matas, and Patrick Meyers, “First search for a stochastic gravitational-wave background from ultralight bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 103015 (2019), arXiv:1812.09622 [astro- ph.HE]
2019 arXiv
-
[20]
Modeling and searching for a stochas- tic gravitational-wave background from ultralight vec- tor bosons,
Leo Tsukada, Richard Brito, William E. East, and Nils Siemonsen, “Modeling and searching for a stochas- tic gravitational-wave background from ultralight vec- tor bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 083005 (2021), arXiv:2011.06995 [astro-ph.HE]
2021 arXiv
-
[21]
Prob- ing ultralight dark matter with future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors,
Chen Yuan, Richard Brito, and Vitor Cardoso, “Prob- ing ultralight dark matter with future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 044011 (2021), arXiv:2106.00021 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[22]
Cos- mology of the Invisible Axion,
John Preskill, Mark B. Wise, and Frank Wilczek, “Cos- mology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120, 127– 132 (1983)
1983
-
[23]
A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,
L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, “A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120, 133–136 (1983)
1983
-
[24]
The Not So Harmless Axion,
Michael Dine and Willy Fischler, “The Not So Harmless Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120, 137–141 (1983)
1983
-
[25]
String Axiverse,
Asimina Arvanitaki, Savas Dimopoulos, Sergei Dubovsky, Nemanja Kaloper, and John March- Russell, “String Axiverse,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]
2010 arXiv
-
[26]
Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics,
Asimina Arvanitaki and Sergei Dubovsky, “Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 044026 (2011), arXiv:1004.3558 [hep- th]
2011 arXiv
-
[27]
Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,
Rouven Essig et al. , “Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,” in Community Sum- mer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (2013) arXiv:1311.0029 [hep-ph]
2013 arXiv
-
[28]
Super- radiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,
Richard Brito, Vitor Cardoso, and Paolo Pani, “Super- radiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,” Lect. Notes Phys. 906, pp.1–237 (2015), arXiv:1501.06570 [gr- qc]
2015 arXiv
-
[29]
Axion Cosmology,
David J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept.643, 1–79 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]
2016 arXiv
-
[30]
Ultralight scalars as cosmolog- ical dark matter,
Lam Hui, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Scott Tremaine, and Edward Witten, “Ultralight scalars as cosmolog- ical dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 043541 (2017), arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]
2017 arXiv
-
[31]
Response of ultralight dark matter to supermassive black holes and binaries,
Lorenzo Annulli, Vitor Cardoso, and Rodrigo Vicente, “Response of ultralight dark matter to supermassive black holes and binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 063022 (2020), arXiv:2009.00012 [gr-qc]
2020 arXiv
-
[32]
Axion Dark Matter: What is it and Why Now?
Francesca Chadha-Day, John Ellis, and David J. E. Marsh, “Axion Dark Matter: What is it and Why Now?” (2021), arXiv:2105.01406 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[33]
A powerful local shear instability in weakly magnetized disks. 1. Linear analysis. 2. Nonlinear evolution,
Steven A. Balbus and John F. Hawley, “A powerful local shear instability in weakly magnetized disks. 1. Linear analysis. 2. Nonlinear evolution,” Astrophys. J.376, 214– 233 (1991)
1991
-
[34]
Instability, tur- bulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks,
Steven A. Balbus and John F. Hawley, “Instability, tur- bulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1–53 (1998)
1998
-
[35]
Solar seismology. I. The stability of the solar p-modes
P. Goldreich and D. A. Keeley, “Solar seismology. I. The stability of the solar p-modes.” Astrophys. J. 211, 934– 942 (1977)
1977
-
[36]
Solar seismology. II. The stochastic excitation of the solar p-modes by turbulent convection
P. Goldreich and D. A. Keeley, “Solar seismology. II. The stochastic excitation of the solar p-modes by turbulent convection.” Astrophys. J. 212, 243–251 (1977)
1977
-
[37]
Helioseismology,
Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, “Helioseismology,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1073–1129 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0207403
2003
-
[38]
Gravitational waves from hyper-accretion onto nascent black holes,
Rafael Angel Araya-Gochez, “Gravitational waves from hyper-accretion onto nascent black holes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 355, 336 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0311001
2004
-
[39]
In LIGO’s Sight? Vigorous Coherent Gravitational Waves from Cooled Collapsar Disks,
Ore Gottlieb, Amir Levinson, and Yuri Levin, “In LIGO’s Sight? Vigorous Coherent Gravitational Waves from Cooled Collapsar Disks,” (2024), arXiv:2406.19452 [astro-ph.HE]
2024 arXiv
-
[40]
The Black Hole Accretion Code,
Oliver Porth, Hector Olivares, Yosuke Mizuno, Ziri Younsi, Luciano Rezzolla, Monika Moscibrodzka, Heino Falcke, and Michael Kramer, “The Black Hole Accretion Code,” (2016), 10.1186/s40668-017-0020-2, arXiv:1611.09720 [gr-qc]
2016 arXiv
-
[41]
Constrained transport and adap- tive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code,
Hector Olivares, Oliver Porth, Jordy Davelaar, Elias R. Most, Christian M. Fromm, Yosuke Mizuno, Ziri Younsi, and Luciano Rezzolla, “Constrained transport and adap- tive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code,” Astron. Astrophys. 629, A61 (2019), arXiv:1906.10795 [as...
2019 arXiv
-
[42]
Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes
L. G. Fishbone and V. Moncrief, “Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.” Astrophys. J. 207, 7 962–976 (1976)
1976
-
[43]
Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Ener- getically Efficient Accretion Flow,
Ramesh Narayan, Igor V. Igumenshchev, and Marek A. Abramowicz, “Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Ener- getically Efficient Accretion Flow,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 55, L69–L72 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0305029 [astro-ph]
2003 arXiv
-
[44]
Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole,
Alexander Tchekhovskoy, Ramesh Narayan, and Jonathan C. McKinney, “Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society 418, L79–L83 (2011), arXiv:1108.0412 [astro- ph.HE]
2011 arXiv
-
[45]
Com- parison of the ion-to-electron temperature ratio prescrip- tion: GRMHD simulations with electron thermodynam- ics,
Yosuke Mizuno, Christian M. Fromm, Ziri Younsi, Oliver Porth, Hector Olivares, and Luciano Rezzolla, “Com- parison of the ion-to-electron temperature ratio prescrip- tion: GRMHD simulations with electron thermodynam- ics,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506,...
2021 arXiv
-
[46]
General relativistic radiative transfer: formulation and emission from struc- tured tori around black holes,
Z. Younsi, K. Wu, and S. V. Fuerst, “General relativistic radiative transfer: formulation and emission from struc- tured tori around black holes,” Astronomy and Astro- physics 545, A13 (2012), arXiv:1207.4234 [astro-ph.HE]
2012 arXiv
-
[47]
Black Hole Images as Tests of General Relativity: Effects of Spacetime Geometry,
Ziri Younsi, Dimitrios Psaltis, and Feryal ¨Ozel, “Black Hole Images as Tests of General Relativity: Effects of Spacetime Geometry,” Astrophys. J. 942, 47 (2023), arXiv:2111.01752 [astro-ph.HE]
2023 arXiv
-
[48]
Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes,
Feng Yuan and Ramesh Narayan, “Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 529–588 (2014), arXiv:1401.0586 [astro-ph.HE]
2014 arXiv
-
[49]
Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic pertur- bations,
S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic pertur- bations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1114–1118 (1972)
1972
-
[50]
Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electro- magnetic and neutrino field perturbations,
Saul A. Teukolsky, “Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electro- magnetic and neutrino field perturbations,” Astrophys. J. 185, 635–647 (1973)
1973
-
[51]
Dynamics of perturbations of ro- tating black holes,
William Krivan, Pablo Laguna, Philippos Papadopoulos, and Nils Andersson, “Dynamics of perturbations of ro- tating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 3395–3404 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9702048
1997 arXiv
-
[52]
Perturbative evolution of particle orbits around Kerr black holes: Time domain calculation,
Ramon Lopez-Aleman, Gaurav Khanna, and Jorge Pullin, “Perturbative evolution of particle orbits around Kerr black holes: Time domain calculation,” Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3259–3268 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0303054
2003
-
[53]
Numer- ical integration of the Teukolsky equation in the time domain,
Enrique Pazos-Avalos and Carlos O. Lousto, “Numer- ical integration of the Teukolsky equation in the time domain,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 084022 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0409065
2005
-
[54]
Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes. I. A New model of the source for the time domain perturbation equation,
Pranesh A. Sundararajan, Gaurav Khanna, and Scott A. Hughes, “Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes. I. A New model of the source for the time domain perturbation equation,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 104005 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703028
2007 arXiv
-
[55]
Gravitational tuning forks and hierarchical triple systems,
Vitor Cardoso, Francisco Duque, and Gaurav Khanna, “Gravitational tuning forks and hierarchical triple systems,” Phys. Rev. D 103, L081501 (2021), arXiv:2101.01186 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[56]
Light ring and the appearance of matter accreted by black holes,
Vitor Cardoso, Francisco Duque, and Arianna Fos- chi, “Light ring and the appearance of matter accreted by black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 104044 (2021), arXiv:2102.07784 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[57]
On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,
Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Clifford M. Will, “On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512160
2006 arXiv
-
[58]
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,
Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Andrei O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]
2009 arXiv
-
[59]
The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number,
A.N. Kolmogorov, “The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 299–303 (1941), (reprinted in Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 434, 9-13, 1991)
1941
-
[60]
On degeneration (decay) of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible viscous liquid,
A.N. Kolmogorov, “On degeneration (decay) of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible viscous liquid,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 31, 538–540 (1941)
1941
-
[61]
Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence,
A.N. Kolmogorov, “Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32, 16–18 (1941), (reprinted in Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 434, 15-17, 1991)
1941
-
[62]
Chaotic Type I migration in turbulent discs,
Yinhao Wu, Yi-Xian Chen, and Douglas N. C. Lin, “Chaotic Type I migration in turbulent discs,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 528, L127–L132 (2023), arXiv:2311.15747 [astro-ph.EP]
2023 arXiv
-
[63]
Detection of polarized millimeter and submil- limeter emission from sagittarius a*,
D. K. Aitken, J. Greaves, Antonio Chrysostomou, T. Jen- ness, W. Holland, J. H. Hough, D. Pierce-Price, and J. Richer, “Detection of polarized millimeter and submil- limeter emission from sagittarius a*,” The Astrophysical Journal 534, L173 (2000)
2000
-
[64]
Interferometric detection of lin- ear polarization from sagittarius a* at 230 ghz,
Geoffrey C. Bower, Melvyn C. H. Wright, Heino Falcke, and Donald C. Backer, “Interferometric detection of lin- ear polarization from sagittarius a* at 230 ghz,” The As- trophysical Journal 588, 331 (2003)
2003
-
[65]
An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rota- tion in Sagittarius A*,
D. P. Marrone, J. M. Moran, J. H. Zhao, and R. Rao, “An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rota- tion in Sagittarius A*,” Astrophys. J. Lett.654, L57–L60 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0611791
2006 arXiv
-
[66]
The accretion of a solar mass per day by a 17-billion solar mass black hole,
Christian Wolf, Samuel Lai, Christopher A. Onken, Nee- lesh Amrutha, Fuyan Bian, Wei Jeat Hon, Patrick Tis- serand, and Rachel L. Webster, “The accretion of a solar mass per day by a 17-billion solar mass black hole,” Na- ture Astron. 8, 520–529 (2024), arXiv:2402.15101 [astro- ph.CO]
2024 arXiv
-
[67]
Feeding Hidden Monsters: a Super- Eddington accreting Black Hole ˜1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang,
Hyewon Suh et al., “Feeding Hidden Monsters: a Super- Eddington accreting Black Hole ˜1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang,” (2024), arXiv:2405.05333 [astro-ph.GA]
2024 arXiv
-
[68]
A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds,
E. S. Phinney, “A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds,” (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028
2001 arXiv
-
[69]
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,
N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]
2020 arXiv
-
[70]
Constraints on Black Hole Growth, Quasar Lifetimes, and Eddington Ratio Distributions from the SDSS Broad Line Quasar Black Hole Mass Function,
Brandon C. Kelly, Marianne Vestergaard, Xiaohui Fan, Philip Hopkins, Lars Hernquist, and Aneta Siemigi- nowska, “Constraints on Black Hole Growth, Quasar Lifetimes, and Eddington Ratio Distributions from the SDSS Broad Line Quasar Black Hole Mass Function,” Astrophys. J. 719, ...
2010 arXiv
-
[71]
Approximate Spacetime for Neutron Stars,
Francisco Frutos-Alfaro, “Approximate Spacetime for Neutron Stars,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 51, 46 (2019), arXiv:1802.02439 [gr-qc]
2019 arXiv
-
[72]
An Ultraluminous X-ray Source Pow- ered by An Accreting Neutron Star,
M. Bachetti et al., “An Ultraluminous X-ray Source Pow- ered by An Accreting Neutron Star,” Nature 514, 202– 204 (2014), arXiv:1410.3590 [astro-ph.HE]
2014 arXiv
-
[73]
An accreting pulsar with extreme 8 properties drives an ultraluminous x-ray source in NGC 5907,
G. L. Israel et al. , “An accreting pulsar with extreme 8 properties drives an ultraluminous x-ray source in NGC 5907,” Science 355, 817 (2017), arXiv:1609.07375 [astro- ph.HE]
2017 arXiv
-
[74]
Spectral Changes in the Hyperluminous Pulsar in NGC 5907 as a Function of Super-Orbital Phase,
F. F¨ urst, D. J. Walton, D. Stern, M. Bachetti, D. Barret, M. Brightman, F. A. Harrison, and V. Rana, “Spectral Changes in the Hyperluminous Pulsar in NGC 5907 as a Function of Super-Orbital Phase,” Astrophys. J. 834, 77 (2017), arXiv:1610.00258 [astro-ph.HE]
2017 arXiv
-
[75]
Breaking the limit: Super- Eddington accretion onto black holes and neutron stars,
M. Brightman et al. , “Breaking the limit: Super- Eddington accretion onto black holes and neutron stars,” (2019), arXiv:1903.06844 [astro-ph.HE]
2019 arXiv
-
[76]
Radiation and outflow properties of super-Eddington accretion flows around various mass classes of black holes: Dependence on the accretion rates,
Shogo Yoshioka, Shin Mineshige, Ken Ohsuga, Tomo- hisa Kawashima, and Takaaki Kitaki, “Radiation and outflow properties of super-Eddington accretion flows around various mass classes of black holes: Dependence on the accretion rates,” (2024), arXiv:2407.15927 [astro- ph.HE]
2024 arXiv
-
[77]
Kenta Kiuchi, Sho Fujibayashi, Kota Hayashi, Koutarou Kyutoku, Yuichiro Sekiguchi, and Masaru Shibata, “Self-Consistent Picture of the Mass Ejection from a One Second Long Binary Neutron Star Merger Leav- ing a Short-Lived Remnant in a General-Relativistic Neutrino-Radiation M...
2023 arXiv
-
[78]
GW150914: Implications for the stochastic gravitational wave back- ground from binary black holes,
B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW150914: Implications for the stochastic gravitational wave back- ground from binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 131102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03847 [gr-qc]
2016 arXiv
-
[79]
GW170817: Implications for the Stochas- tic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences,
Benjamin P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170817: Implications for the Stochas- tic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 091101 (2018), arXiv:1710.05837 [gr-qc]
2018 arXiv
-
[80]
Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,
R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), “Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. X 13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]
2023 arXiv
-
[81]
Popula- tion Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,
R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Popula- tion Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,” As- trophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021), arXiv:2010.14533 [astro- ph.HE]
2021 arXiv
-
[82]
Observational Prospects of Double Neutron Star Mergers and Their Multi- messenger Afterglows: LIGO Discovery Power, Event Rates, and Diversity,
Maryam Aghaei Abchouyeh, Maurice H. P. M. van Putten, and Lorenzo Amati, “Observational Prospects of Double Neutron Star Mergers and Their Multi- messenger Afterglows: LIGO Discovery Power, Event Rates, and Diversity,” Astrophys. J. 952, 157 (2023), arXiv:2308.07348 [astro-ph.HE]
2023 arXiv
-
[83]
Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds,
Eric Thrane and Joseph D. Romano, “Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 124032 (2013), arXiv:1310.5300 [astro-ph.IM]
2013 arXiv
-
[84]
Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna,
Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), “Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna,” (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]
2017 arXiv
-
[85]
Explor- ing the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,
Benjamin P Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), “Explor- ing the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]
2017 arXiv
-
[86]
The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,
M. Punturo et al. , “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010)
2010
-
[87]
The international pulsar timing array project: using pulsars as a gravitational wave detector,
G. Hobbs et al. , “The international pulsar timing array project: using pulsars as a gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 084013 (2010), arXiv:0911.5206 [astro-ph.SR]
2010 arXiv
-
[88]
The Five-Hundred-Meter Aperture Spherical Ra- dio Telescope (F AST) Project,
Rendong Nan, Di Li, Chengjin Jin, Qiming Wang, Lichun Zhu, Wenbai Zhu, Haiyan Zhang, Youling Yue, and Lei Qian, “The Five-Hundred-Meter Aperture Spherical Ra- dio Telescope (F AST) Project,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20, 989–1024 (2011), arXiv:1105.3794 [astro-ph.IM]
2011 arXiv
-
[89]
Pulsar Science with the SKA,
Michael Kramer and Ben Stappers, “Pulsar Science with the SKA,” (2015) arXiv:1507.04423 [astro-ph.IM]
2015 arXiv
-
[90]
Gravitational waves: Classification, Methods of detec- tion, Sensitivities, and Sources,
Kazuaki Kuroda, Wei-Tou Ni, and Wei-Ping Pan, “Gravitational waves: Classification, Methods of detec- tion, Sensitivities, and Sources,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530031 (2015), arXiv:1511.00231 [gr-qc]
2015 arXiv
-
[91]
Asteroseismology of neutron stars and black holes,
B. F. Schutz, “Asteroseismology of neutron stars and black holes,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 118, 012005 (2008)
2008
-
[92]
Second Order Perturbations of Kerr Black Holes: Reconstruction of the Metric,
Nicholas Loutrel, Justin L. Ripley, Elena Giorgi, and Frans Pretorius, “Second Order Perturbations of Kerr Black Holes: Reconstruction of the Metric,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 104017 (2021), arXiv:2008.11770 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[93]
Metallicity- constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave background,
Irina Dvorkin, Elisabeth Vangioni, Joseph Silk, Jean- Philippe Uzan, and Keith A. Olive, “Metallicity- constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave background,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 461, 3877–3885 (2016), arXiv:1604.04288 [astro-ph.HE]
2016 arXiv
-
[94]
The Impact of Star Formation and Gamma-Ray Burst Rates at High Redshift on Cosmic Chemical Evolution and Reionization,
E. Vangioni, K. A. Olive, T. Prestegard, J. Silk, P. Petit- jean, and V. Mandic, “The Impact of Star Formation and Gamma-Ray Burst Rates at High Redshift on Cosmic Chemical Evolution and Reionization,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 447, 2575 (2015), arXiv:1409.2462 [astro- ph.GA]
2015 arXiv
-
[95]
On the Properties of massive popula- tion III stars and metal-free stellar populations,
Daniel Schaerer, “On the Properties of massive popula- tion III stars and metal-free stellar populations,” Astron. Astrophys. 382, 28–42 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0110697
2002 arXiv
-
[96]
The Luminosity function and stellar evolution,
Edwin E. Salpeter, “The Luminosity function and stellar evolution,” Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955)
1955
-
[97]
Compact Remnant Mass Function: De- pendence on the Explosion Mechanism and Metallicity,
Chris L. Fryer, Krzysztof Belczynski, Grzegorz Wik- torowicz, Michal Dominik, Vicky Kalogera, and Daniel E. Holz, “Compact Remnant Mass Function: De- pendence on the Explosion Mechanism and Metallicity,” Astrophys. J. 749, 91 (2012), arXiv:1110.1726 [astro- ph.SR]
2012 arXiv
-
[98]
New solar metallicity measurements,
Sunny Vagnozzi, “New solar metallicity measurements,” Atoms 7, 41 (2019), arXiv:1703.10834 [astro-ph.SR]
2019 arXiv
-
[99]
The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars,
Krzysztof Belczynski, Daniel E. Holz, Tomasz Bulik, and Richard O’Shaughnessy, “The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars,” Nature 534, 512 (2016), arXiv:1602.04531 [astro- ph.HE]. 9 Appendix A: The T eukolsky equation The Teukols...
2016 arXiv
Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.