REVIEW 2 cited by
GenAudit: Fixing Factual Errors in Language Model Outputs with Evidence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
LLMs can generate factually incorrect statements even when provided access to reference documents. Such errors can be dangerous in high-stakes applications (e.g., document-grounded QA for healthcare or finance). We present GenAudit -- a tool intended to assist fact-checking LLM responses for document-grounded tasks. GenAudit suggests edits to the LLM response by revising or removing claims that are not supported by the reference document, and also presents evidence from the reference for facts that do appear to have support. We train models to execute these tasks, and design an interactive interface to present suggested edits and evidence to users. Comprehensive evaluation by human raters shows that GenAudit can detect errors in 8 different LLM outputs when summarizing documents from diverse domains. User studies demonstrate that using GenAudit can substantially improve the performance of humans at finding errors in LLM-generated summaries. We release our tool (GenAudit) and fact-checking model for public use.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FRED: Financial Retrieval-Enhanced Detection and Editing of Hallucinations in Language Models
Fine-tuning small language models on synthetic financial errors yields high detection and editing scores, but the evaluation is limited to synthetic data from the same pipeline.
-
HAVE: Head-Adaptive Gating and ValuE Calibration for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models
HAVE uses head-adaptive gating and value calibration to build token evidence and fuse it with the LM distribution, yielding modest QA gains over DAGCD.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.