Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are Multiagent Systems Resilient to Communication Failures?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1710.08500 v1 pith:XT3V6V2U submitted 2017-10-23 cs.GT cs.MAcs.SYeess.SYmath.OC

classification cs.GTcs.MAcs.SYeess.SYmath.OC
keywords agentscommunicationfailuresagentcausesystemsgame-theoreticharm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A challenge in multiagent control systems is to ensure that they are appropriately resilient to communication failures between the various agents. In many common game-theoretic formulations of these types of systems, it is implicitly assumed that all agents have access to as much information about other agents' actions as needed. This paper endeavors to augment these game-theoretic methods with policies that would allow agents to react on-the-fly to losses of this information. Unfortunately, we show that even if a single agent loses communication with one other weakly-coupled agent, this can cause arbitrarily-bad system states to emerge as various solution concepts of an associated game, regardless of how the agent accounts for the communication failure and regardless of how weakly coupled the agents are. Nonetheless, we show that the harm that communication failures can cause is limited by the structure of the problem; when agents' action spaces are richer, problems are more susceptible to these types of pathologies. Finally, we undertake an initial study into how a system designer might prevent these pathologies, and explore a few limited settings in which communication failures cannot cause harm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why do AI agents communicate in human language?

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper argues that natural language is structurally mismatched to LLM internal representations, so future AI agents should abandon it for inter-agent communication and train models with structured communication primitives.

Pith tools