Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Intersectional Two-sided Fairness in Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02816 v2 pith:XTXOLWVS submitted 2024-02-05 cs.IR cs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.CYcs.LG
keywords fairnessintersectionaltwo-sidedgroupsapproachdifferentitemloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fairness of recommender systems (RS) has attracted increasing attention recently. Based on the involved stakeholders, the fairness of RS can be divided into user fairness, item fairness, and two-sided fairness which considers both user and item fairness simultaneously. However, we argue that the intersectional two-sided unfairness may still exist even if the RS is two-sided fair, which is observed and shown by empirical studies on real-world data in this paper, and has not been well-studied previously. To mitigate this problem, we propose a novel approach called Intersectional Two-sided Fairness Recommendation (ITFR). Our method utilizes a sharpness-aware loss to perceive disadvantaged groups, and then uses collaborative loss balance to develop consistent distinguishing abilities for different intersectional groups. Additionally, predicted score normalization is leveraged to align positive predicted scores to fairly treat positives in different intersectional groups. Extensive experiments and analyses on three public datasets show that our proposed approach effectively alleviates the intersectional two-sided unfairness and consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Equity by Design? On the Trade-Offs in Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets

    cs.GT 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The 'free fairness' result for producer constraints vanishes for multi-item recommendations; a CVaR group-fairness objective and business constraints can be added with moderate trade-offs.

Pith tools