Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Treating disk clumps as spinning test bodies lets a general-relativistic model fit the twin kilohertz QPOs of eight neutron-star X-ray binaries without inventing an effective cosmological constant, and the fits read out the disk's internal

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 05:05 UTC pith:XULPTIWB

load-bearing objection Plausible MPM extension of the RPM with MPD spin corrections, but the statistical preference over SdS is not established from the printed evidence table. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22322 v1 pith:XULPTIWB submitted 2026-07-24 gr-qc

The macroscopic precession model of quasi-periodic oscillations for rotating compact objects

Orlando Luongo , Marco Muccino This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords kilohertz QPOsneutron star X-ray binariesrelativistic precession modelMathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equationsspin-curvature couplingaccretion disk internal structureKerr spacetimeSchwarzschild-de Sitter degeneracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the twin kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) seen in eight neutron-star X-ray binaries can be explained entirely within standard general relativity if the clumps and inhomogeneities in the accretion disk are treated not as structureless test particles but as small spinning bodies. Using the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations, it derives first-order spin-curvature corrections to the Keplerian and radial epicyclic frequencies and fits the observed lower–upper frequency pairs. The resulting model beats or matches the previously favored Schwarzschild-de Sitter fits, removes the need for a physically unmotivated de Sitter phase, heals the unphysical masses and spins that plague the Kerr-based relativistic precession model, and clusters around a disk-like internal structure (n = 2) in most sources. The significance is that QPO data, through the fitted power-law index, can in principle select the internal structure of the accreting matter itself.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the frequency splitting of twin kilohertz QPOs can be reproduced by non-minimal spin-curvature coupling of macroscopic disk inhomogeneities, without any ad hoc modification of the Kerr or Schwarzschild spacetime. By adopting the specific spin tensor S^tr = C_n r^n, the model yields modified azimuthal and radial epicyclic frequencies whose leading corrections depend on the power-law index n. Monte Carlo Markov chain fits to eight neutron-star sources show that the macroscopic precession model in Schwarzschild spacetime outperforms the effective Schwarzschild-de Sitter model in five sources and is statistically equivalent in three, while the Kerr version never

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon (MPD) system for a spinning test body, together with the Tulczyjew-Dixon spin condition and the extra symmetry condition that the spin is orthogonal to the orbital plane. The spin tensor ansatz S^tr = C_n r^n, with fixed integer n = 1, 2, 3, encodes the geometry of the accreting flow (filament-like, thin-disk, thick-disk). The first-order-in-spin corrections to the Keplerian frequency and to the squared radial epicyclic frequency, equations (A.1)–(A.4), carry the entire physical effect; they replace the effective cosmological constant of the Schwarzschild-de Sitter model by a genuine spin-curvature interaction term.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the internal spin structure of disk clumps is exactly a power law, S^tr = C_n r^n, with a fixed integer n and a freely fitted amplitude; if real disk inhomogeneities do not follow this form, the claimed selection of internal structure and the statistical success over the Schwarzschild-de Sitter model would be artifacts of that parametrization.

What would settle it

A clean falsifier is a neutron-star (or black-hole) QPO source whose best-fit requires κ ≳ 1 in the emitting region, since the test-particle approximation would fail exactly where the model claims to work. A second falsifier is a robust statistical preference for the Kerr version of the model with well-constrained physical mass and high spin — such a source would indicate that central rotation, not disk spin, drives the frequency splittings, contradicting the paper's conclusion that the Schwarzschild version is favored.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The plain Schwarzschild relativistic precession model (RPM-S) is statistically always disfavored by the eight sources, so it is effectively ruled out as a description of twin kHz QPOs.
  • The phenomenological Schwarzschild-de Sitter model (RPM-SdS), which previously dominated the fits, is overtaken or matched by the spinning-test-body model in all eight sources, suggesting the apparent cosmological constant is a surrogate for neglected spin effects.
  • In six of eight sources the fitted disk index is n = 2, i.e., a disk-like internal structure, while two sources prefer n = 3; this is the first QPO-based hint that the data select the internal structure of accreting matter.
  • The Kerr-based version of the model (MPM-K) restores physically acceptable neutron-star masses and spins wherever the RPM-Kerr model gave absurd values, even though rotation of the central object does not statistically improve the fits.
  • The inferred disk radii satisfy the radial ordering condition and provide an absolute upper bound on the disk radius where the test-particle approximation breaks down, giving a concrete, testable scale for each source.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the power-law ansatz for the spin tensor were replaced by a physically derived model of disk turbulence or clump formation, the fitted index n would acquire a direct microphysical meaning; the current n-clustering is an invitation to construct such a model.
  • The analysis suggests a sharp observational test for black-hole binaries: a measured QPO source with independently known spin j that strongly prefers the Kerr version of the model (with n = 1) would indicate that central rotation, not disk structure, is being probed.
  • The degeneracy between the amplitude C_n and the mass M in the fits deserves closer scrutiny; a dedicated posterior-correlation analysis would clarify whether the claimed preference for n = 2 reflects genuine disk structure or merely absorbs the freedom in the ansatz.
  • If the spin-curvature mechanism is correct, the ratio of the lower to upper QPO frequency should deviate from the geodesic RPM relation in a way that depends on n; a precision measurement of this ratio in a single source could discriminate n without full MCMC.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'macroscopic precession model' (MPM) in which the twin kilohertz QPOs of eight neutron-star X-ray binaries are produced not by structureless test particles but by small spinning bodies governed by the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations. The authors compute first-order spin-curvature corrections to the Keplerian and radial epicyclic frequencies in Kerr and Schwarzschild backgrounds, parametrize the spin tensor by the power-law ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n, and perform MCMC fits for n=1,2,3. They compare MPM with the standard relativistic precession model (RPM) in Schwarzschild, Kerr, and Schwarzschild–de Sitter variants, and claim that MPM-S outperforms RPM-SdS in five sources, clusters toward n=2 ('thin-disk' configurations), and removes the need for an effective cosmological-constant term, while healing the unphysical masses and spins found in RPM-K.

Significance. If the central claim were robust, this would be an interesting contribution: it offers a physically motivated alternative to the phenomenological SdS phase in QPO fitting and suggests that QPO data could constrain the internal structure of accreting matter. The perturbative MPD formalism is standard, and the paper is transparent about the explicit spin corrections in Appendix A. The use of a common MCMC pipeline across models and the articulation of two falsifiability tests in the conclusions are also positive features. However, the significance is presently limited by three load-bearing problems: the statistical evidence is not reported consistently, the quoted mass prior is violated by the displayed RPM-K best fits, and the power-law spin ansatz is introduced by hand. These issues prevent the paper from supporting its headline statistical and physical conclusions as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 and Table B.1] The statistical criterion is internally inconsistent and does not reproduce the text's headline claim. The text defines Δ = lnB_i − lnB_0 with lnB_0 = min{lnB_i}, then states that 0≤Δ≤1 means 'weakly excluded'; under this definition the best model has Δ=0 and is automatically 'weakly excluded', which is contradictory. More seriously, Table B.1 does not support the claim that MPM-S outperforms RPM-SdS by Δ>6 in five sources. For example, GX 17+2 lists Δ=0 for both models; Cir X1 lists 3 vs 7 (difference 4); 4U1608–52 lists 1 vs 5 (difference 4). Only Sco X1 and 4U0614+091 show differences larger than 6. Since the abstract's conclusion is explicitly a statistical selection, the evidence values need to be recomputed, clearly defined, and reported with a consistent reference model before the central claim can be assessed.
  2. [§2.1, Eq. (20)] The physical content of the model is fixed by the ad hoc ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n, with n restricted to 1,2,3 and C_n a free parameter per source. No derivation from disk turbulence, vorticity, or clump formation is provided; the labels 'filament-like', 'thin-disk', and 'thick-disk' are interpretive. The claimed 'data select the internal structure' therefore only selects among three imposed power laws, not the structure itself. Since the amplitude C_n is also unconstrained independently, it could absorb part of the frequency shift that RPM-SdS attributes to the effective cosmological constant. To support the central claim, the paper should either derive the power-law profile from a microphysical disk model or compare against alternative profiles and show that the n≈2 clustering is not an artifact of the parametrization.
  3. [§3, Eq. (30a) and Table B.1] The reported RPM-K best-fit masses are inconsistent with the stated prior. Equation (30a) gives M∈[0,5] M⊙ for the MCMC analysis, yet Table B.1 lists RPM-K best fits of M=5.118, 8.602, 6.352, 5.938, 6.566, and 7.708 M⊙ for Cir X1, GX 17+2, Sco X1, 4U1608–52, 4U1728–34, and 4U0614+091, respectively. Either the prior was not enforced for these runs or the table quotes results obtained with a different pipeline/prior. As printed, this contradicts the claim that all models were analyzed with the same pipeline, and it weakens the argument that RPM-K is rejected because it gives unphysical masses.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table B.1] There are typos in the model labels: 'PRM–SdS' should be 'RPM–SdS' in the 4U1728–34 block, and 'MPD-S' should be 'MPM-S' in the same block.
  2. [§2.2] The sentence 'It easy to prove that all the formulas reduce...' is missing 'is'. More substantively, the Schwarzschild limit should be stated more carefully: the limit g_{tφ}→0 is not the same as a→0 off the equatorial plane, although it is valid for equatorial circular motion.
  3. [§3] The paper refers to 'Bayesian evidence lnB_i' but reports −ln Lbar in Table B.1. The relationship between the quoted log-likelihood maxima and the evidence differences Δ should be stated explicitly; currently the reader cannot reconstruct Δ from the printed LLH values.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Partial circularity: RPM-SdS is implemented via the same n=3 spin ansatz, so the 'spin replaces SdS' claim is partly a renaming; the n=2 preference is a genuine fit, but the reported evidence table is internally inconsistent.

specific steps
  1. renaming known result [Sec. 3 (model comparison and statistical criteria); Eq. (20); Table B.1]
    "For RPM-SdS we consider an effective n=3 to ensure the correct physical dimensions of the cosmological constant R_0 (Boshkayev et al. 2023b), as discussed in Bianchini et al. (2025). ... accounting for spinning test particles has the net effect to reduce the index n=3 of the effective RPM-SdS model to the mostly preferred n=2 of the MPM-S case."

    RPM-SdS is fitted with the same power-law index n=3 of the spin ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n (Eq. 20), so its frequency corrections are the n=3 member of the MPM family. The paper's claim that spin replaces the de Sitter phase is therefore a renaming of the fitted parameter (C_3 in place of R_0) in the n=3 cases, not a test of the physical origin. Table B.1 confirms the degeneracy: where MPM-S selects n=3 (GX 5-1, GX 17+2), it is statistically equivalent to RPM-SdS (Δ=0 in both rows).

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and Sec. 3; Eq. (20)]
    "We now specify the specific spin tensor, by embedding in it the symmetry of the accretion flow through the ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n. ... Regarding the power-law index n, we fix it to the values n={1,2,3} and assess, case by case, the best choice. ... Our statistical analyzes show that the data select the internal structure of the accreting matter."

    The 'internal structure' said to be selected by the data is the exponent n of a hand-inserted ansatz, with C_n freely fitted per source. The clustering around n=2 is thus a comparison among three pre-chosen power-law curves, i.e. a fit output, not a derivation of disk structure from the MPD equations. Presenting this as 'the data select the internal structure' elevates the fitted index to a model discovery, though the paper is transparent that n is fixed beforehand.

full rationale

The MPD frequency calculation (Eqs. 1-19 and Appendix A) is self-contained and not circular: the spin corrections are derived from the MPD equations and the stated metric, and the test-particle limit is recovered. The ansatz Eq. (20) is an input, not an output, and fitting C_n is standard. The main partial circularity is the SdS comparison: RPM-SdS is implemented with 'an effective n=3' of the same spin-ansatz family, so the n=3 MPM-S and RPM-SdS are the same functional family; the claim that spin explains SdS is then a reparametrization (C_3 ↔ R_0). This is not a full circularity because six of eight sources prefer n=2, a distinct functional form that outperforms SdS, giving the central claim independent content. I did not count the self-citation to Bianchini et al. (2025) as load-bearing: the MPM-S fits are reproduced in Table B.1 and Fig. B.1 of this paper. Separately, the statistical section contains an internal inconsistency: it defines Δ = lnB_i − lnB_0 with lnB_0 = min{lnB_i}, which would make the best model 'decisively excluded'; Table B.1 uses the opposite convention (best model Δ=0). This undermines the reproducibility of the evidence but is a reporting error, not a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard MPD equations plus four fitted/free ingredients: M, j, C_n, and the discrete choice n. The spin ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n is the clearest ad-hoc input: it is not derived from accretion physics, and the paper's headline result ('data select internal structure') is formally a statement about which of three hand-assigned power laws fits best. The ROC and r_disk from κ≃0.2 are additional modeling choices. No new spacetime entity is introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • C_n (spin amplitude) = values of order 10^-4 to 10^-3 in km^(1-n), source-dependent (Table B.1)
    Amplitude of the spin tensor ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n (Eq. 20). It is a free parameter fitted by MCMC and directly controls the strength of the spin correction.
  • n (power-law index) = discrete: fitted among {1,2,3} (Table B.1)
    Index in the spin ansatz S^{tr}=C_n r^n (Eq. 20). It is chosen by hand among three values and then selected by the fit; the paper's central claim that 'data select internal structure' hinges on this discrete selection.
  • M (compact object mass) = values in [1.1, 2.4] M_⊙ for MPM-S/K, source-dependent (Table B.1)
    Central mass is a free parameter in the MCMC fit, with uniform prior [0,5] M_⊙ (Eq. 30a). It enters the Keplerian and epicyclic frequencies.
  • j (Kerr spin parameter) = MPM-K values in [-0.39, 0.44]; RPM-K values sometimes >0.9 (Table B.1)
    Dimensionless spin of the compact object, fitted with Gaussian prior N(0,1/3) ensuring j in [-1,1] (Eq. 30c). Only active in MPM-K/RPM-K.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Test-body spin is small: κ=|S^0|/(m r) ≪ 1 and the TPA holds (Eq. 2).
    The MPD corrections are computed perturbatively to first order in κ; if the disk clumps were large or strongly spinning, the expansion would break down. The paper later imposes κ≲0.2 by defining r_disk.
  • domain assumption The disk clumps move on equatorial circular orbits with spin orthogonal to the orbital plane (ESC, Eq. 7b).
    This is a symmetry choice, labeled in the text as 'extra symmetry conditions'; real disk inhomogeneities will have some vertical structure and radial migration.
  • ad hoc to paper The spin tensor is parametrized as S^{tr}=C_n r^n (Eq. 20).
    Not derived from disk physics; this is the central phenomenological input. The paper maps n=1,2,3 to filament/disk/thick-disk qualitatively, but no self-consistent accretion model is given.
  • domain assumption The lowest-order frequencies are given by the standard RPM identifications: f_L=(Ω_ϕ−Ω_r)/(2π), f_U=Ω_ϕ/(2π) (Eqs. 19, 28).
    The MPM inherits the RPM identification of twin QPOs with periastron precession and Keplerian frequency; if the real QPO mechanism is not this, the entire fit is moot.
invented entities (1)
  • Macroscopic disk spin distribution S^{tr}=C_n r^n no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode the internal structure of orbiting matter and produce spin-curvature corrections to the QPO frequencies.
    The power-law spin ansatz is not derived from any observable or microphysical model of disk turbulence/clumping. The paper provides no independent handle on C_n or n beyond the QPO fits themselves.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 11724 in / 8945 out tokens · 64020 ms · 2026-08-01T05:05:31.453186+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The relativistic precession model (RPM) interprets the twin kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) as geodesic frequencies of test particles orbiting in the spacetime of X-ray binaries hosting either a neutron star (NS) or a black hole. In several NS X-ray binaries, QPOs are well reproduced by effective geometries nearly degenerate with a Schwarzschild-de Sitter (SdS) spacetime, hindering independent determinations of the mass, the angular momentum and other observables. We propose how to solve this physical limitation by incorporating the effects of orbiting matter spin, culminating in introducing the macroscopic precession model (MPM). We treat the disk inhomogeneities as spinning test bodies governed by the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon (MPD) equations and obtain non-minimal spin curvature corrections to the azimuthal and the radial epicyclic frequencies. We perform Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) fits, based on the Metropolis algorithm, and model eight NS X-ray binary sources. Our statistical analyzes show that the data select the internal structure of the accreting matter, without requiring corrections to Kerr and Schwarzschild spacetimes through the introduction of any correcting de Sitter phase. Physically, the MPM paradigm explains why an effective SdS-like structure could be statistically favored if spin is not employed, through non-minimal spin-curvature coupling, leaving unaltered the test particle hypothesis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ingram, A. R. and Motta, S. E. , title =. New Astronomy Reviews , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  2. [2]

    McHardy, I. M. and Kording, E. and Knigge, C. and Uttley, P. and Fender, R. P. , title =. Nature , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  3. [3]

    Motta, S. E. and Mu\ noz-Darias, T. and Sanna, A. and Fender, R. and Belloni, T. and Stella, L. , title =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  4. [4]

    Quasiperiodic oscillations for spherically symmetric regular black holes

    Boshkayev, Kuantay and Idrissov, Anuar and Luongo, Orlando and Muccino, Marco. Quasiperiodic oscillations for spherically symmetric regular black holes. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.044063. arXiv:2303.03248

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Motta, S. E. and Belloni, T. M. and Stella, L. and Mu\ noz-Darias, T. and Fender, R. , title =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2013 , month = nov, doi =

    2013

  6. [6]

    and Idrissov, A

    Boshkayev, K. and Idrissov, A. and Luongo, O. and Muccino, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  7. [7]

    and Luongo, O

    Boshkayev, K. and Luongo, O. and Muccino, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  8. [8]

    and Török, G

    Bakala, P. and Török, G. and Karas, V. and Dovčiak, M. and Wildner, M. and Wzientek, D. and Šrámková, E. and Abramowicz, M. and Goluchová, K. and Mazur, G. P. and Vincent, F. H. , title =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  9. [9]

    and Rahimov, O

    Turimov, B. and Rahimov, O. , title =. Universe , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  10. [10]

    and Nampalliwar, S

    Bambi, C. and Nampalliwar, S. , title =. EPL (Europhysics Letters) , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  11. [11]

    Loomis, S. P. and Brown, J. D. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  12. [12]

    Plyatsko, R. M. and Stefanyshyn, O. B. and Fenyk, M. T. , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume =. 2011 , month = sep, doi =

    2011

  13. [13]

    and Fenyk, M

    Plyatsko, R. and Fenyk, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2012 , month = may, doi =

    2012

  14. [14]

    , title =

    Lukes-Gerakopoulos, G. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , month = nov, doi =

    2017

  15. [15]

    and Geralico, A

    Bini, D. and Geralico, A. and Vines, J. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2017 , month = oct, doi =

    2017

  16. [16]

    Santos, E. B. and Batista, C. , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2020 , month = may, doi =

    2020

  17. [17]

    Generalizing the relativistic precession model of quasi-periodic oscillations through anharmonic corrections

    Giamb \`o , Roberto and Luongo, Orlando and Muccino, Marco and Rossi, Alessandro. Generalizing the relativistic precession model of quasi-periodic oscillations through anharmonic corrections. JCAP. 2026. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/026. arXiv:2504.18403

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    and Abramowicz, M

    Török, G. and Abramowicz, M. A. and Kluźniak, W. and Stuchlík, Z. , title =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  19. [19]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Information criteria for astrophysical model selection. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00306.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0701113 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    Measuring the effective complexity of cosmological models

    Kunz, Martin and Trotta, Roberto and Parkinson, David. Measuring the effective complexity of cosmological models. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023503. arXiv:astro-ph/0602378

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India , year = 2002, month = sep, volume =

    The maximum mass of neutron stars. Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India , year = 2002, month = sep, volume =

    2002

  22. [22]

    Extended Bodies in General Relativity: Their Description and Motion

    Dixon, W. Extended Bodies in General Relativity: Their Description and Motion. Isolated Gravitating Systems in General Relativity. 1979

    1979

  23. [23]

    Numerical solution of Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations for spinning test particles in a Kerr metric

    Velandia-Heredia, Nelson and Tejeiro-Sarmiento, Juan Manuel. Numerical solution of Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations for spinning test particles in a Kerr metric. 2017. doi:10.15446/mo.n57.73391. arXiv:1712.01404

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Black hole spin measurements through the relativistic precession model: XTE J1550-564. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt181 , archivePrefix =. 1312.3114 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Precise mass and spin measurements for a stellar-mass black hole through X-ray timing: the case of GRO J1655-40. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2068 , archivePrefix =. 1309.3652 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    , title =

    van der Klis, M. , title =. Adv. Space Res. , volume =. 2006 , month = dec, doi =

    2006

  27. [27]

    and van der Klis, M

    Hasinger, G. and van der Klis, M. , title =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =

  28. [28]

    Shirey, R. E. and Bradt, H. V. and Levine, A. M. and Morgan, E. H. , title =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. 1998 , month = oct, doi =

    1998

  29. [29]

    and Ford, E

    van Straaten, S. and Ford, E. C. and van der Klis, M. and Méndez, M. and Kaaret, P. , title =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. 2000 , month = sep, doi =

    2000

  30. [31]

    , keywords =

    Twin Peaks kHz QPOs: Mathematics of the 3:2 Orbital Resonance. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/56.3.553 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0403341 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [32]

    , keywords =

    The Importance of Discovering a 3:2 Twin-Peak Quasi-periodic Oscillation in an Ultraluminous X-Ray Source, or How to Solve the Puzzle of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422810 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402012 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    Mass-Angular-momentum Relations Implied by Models of Twin Peak Quasi-periodic Oscillations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/138 , archivePrefix =. 1408.4220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [34]

    and Boutloukos, Stratos

    Lamb, Frederick K. and Boutloukos, Stratos. Accreting Neutron Stars in Low-Mass X-Ray Binary Systems. Short-Period Binary Stars: Observations, Analyses, and Results. 2008. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6544-6_5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6544-6_5 2008

  34. [35]

    , keywords =

    kHz Quasiperiodic Oscillations in Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries as Probes of General Relativity in the Strong-Field Regime. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.17 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9812124 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [36]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , volume=

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime , author=. Living Reviews in Relativity , volume=. 2011 , eprint=

    2011

  36. [37]

    An axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved spacetime , author=. Phys. Rev. D , volume=. 1997 , eprint=

    1997

  37. [38]

    Self-force via a Green's function decomposition , author=. Phys. Rev. D , volume=. 2003 , eprint=

    2003

  38. [39]

    Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle motion

    Mino, Yasushi and Sasaki, Misao and Tanaka, Takahiro. Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle motion. Phys. Rev. D. 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.3457. arXiv:gr-qc/9606018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  39. [40]

    Axiomatic approach to radiation reaction of scalar point particles in curved space-time

    Quinn, Theodore C. Axiomatic approach to radiation reaction of scalar point particles in curved space-time. Phys. Rev. D. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.064029. arXiv:gr-qc/0005030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  40. [41]

    and Mottola, Emil

    Mazur, Pawel O. and Mottola, Emil. Gravitational vacuum condensate stars. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2004. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402717101. arXiv:gr-qc/0407075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [42]

    Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation

    Bambi, Cosimo and others. Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation. 2025. arXiv:2505.09014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    Semi-classical dust collapse and regular black holes

    Malafarina, Daniele. Semi-classical dust collapse and regular black holes. 2022. arXiv:2209.11406

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [44]

    Negative refraction from optical properties of spacetime media

    Luongo, Orlando. Negative refraction from optical properties of spacetime media. Class. Quant. Grav. 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae187f. arXiv:2504.09987

    arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    Belloni, T. M. and Stella, L. , title =. Space Sci. Rev. , volume =. 2014 , month = aug, doi =. 1407.7373 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [46]

    , title =

    Wang, J. , title =. Int. J. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 2016 , month = jan, doi =

    2016

  46. [47]

    , title =

    Swank, J. , title =. AIP Conf. Proc. , volume =. 2004 , doi =. astro-ph/0402511 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  47. [48]

    Lewin, W. H. G. and van Paradijs, J. and van der Klis, M. , title =. Space Sci. Rev. , volume =. 1988 , month = sep, doi =

    1988

  48. [49]

    , title =

    van der Klis, M. , title =. Astronomical Time Series , publisher=. 1997 , doi =. astro-ph/9710016 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  49. [50]

    Smith, K. L. and Tandon, C. R. and Wagoner, R. V. , title =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. 2021 , month = jan, doi =. 2011.05346 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    Belloni, T. M. , title =. The Jet Paradigm , pages =. 2009 , month = oct, publisher =. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8_3 , url =. 0909.2474 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [52]

    and Gierliński, M

    Done, C. and Gierliński, M. and Kubota, A. , title =. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. , volume =. 2007 , month = aug, publisher =. doi:10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 , url =. 0708.0148 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [53]

    , title =

    van der Klis, M. , title =. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. 1989 , month = nov, doi =

    1989

  53. [54]

    , title =

    Tagger, M. , title =. Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, Volume 27 , series =. 2007 , month = mar, adsurl =

    2007

  54. [55]

    The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    Poisson, Eric and Pound, Adam and Vega, Ian. The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime. Living Rev. Rel. 2011. doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-7. arXiv:1102.0529

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [56]

    Filipe O

    Costa, L. Filipe O. and Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Georgios and Semer \'a k, Old r ich. Spinning particles in general relativity: Momentum-velocity relation for the Mathisson-Pirani spin condition. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.084023. arXiv:1712.07281

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [57]

    and Altamirano, D

    Boutloukos, Stratos and van der Klis, M. and Altamirano, D. and Klein-Wolt, M. and Wijnands, R. and Jonker, P. G. and Fender, R. P. Discovery of twin kHz QPOs in the peculiar X-ray binary Circinus X-1. Astrophys. J. 2006. doi:10.1086/518858. arXiv:astro-ph/0608089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [58]

    Cherepashchuk, A. M. and Khruzina, T. S. and Bogomazov, A. I. Parameters of the X-ray binary system Scorpius X-1. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2515. arXiv:2109.00967

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [59]

    The Distance, Mass, and Radius of the Neutron Star in 4U 1608-52

    Guver, Tolga and Ozel, Feryal and Cabrera-Lavers, Antonio and Wroblewski, Patricia. The Distance, Mass, and Radius of the Neutron Star in 4U 1608-52. Astrophys. J. 2010. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/964. arXiv:0811.3979

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [60]

    The bursting behavior of 4u 1728-34: parameters of a neutron star and geometry of a ns-disk system

    Shaposhnikov, Nickolai and Titarchuk, Lev and Haberl, Frank. The bursting behavior of 4u 1728-34: parameters of a neutron star and geometry of a ns-disk system. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2003. doi:10.1086/378255. arXiv:astro-ph/0307215

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  60. [61]

    The highest-frequency kHz QPOs in neutron star low mass X-ray binaries

    van Doesburgh, Marieke and van der Klis, Michiel and Morsink, Sharon. The highest-frequency kHz QPOs in neutron star low mass X-ray binaries. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1404. arXiv:1805.11361

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [62]

    The macroscopic precession model: describing quasi-periodic oscillations including internal structures of test bodies

    Bianchini, Gabriele and Luongo, Orlando and Muccino, Marco. The macroscopic precession model: describing quasi-periodic oscillations including internal structures of test bodies. submitted to PRD. 2025. arXiv:2512.12242

    arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    , keywords =

    Quasi-periodic oscillations in rotating and deformed space-times. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1388 , archivePrefix =. 2312.03630 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    The Spin Parameter of Uniformly Rotating Compact Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/12 , archivePrefix =. 1011.3563 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    Contemporary Physics , keywords =

    Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology. Contemporary Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1080/00107510802066753 , archivePrefix =. 0803.4089 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [66]

    , keywords =

    Lense-Thirring Precession and Quasi-periodic Oscillations in Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/311075 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9709085 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv