Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Criteria for Feasible Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulations of Bosonic Markovian Open Quantum Dynamics

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A factorized diffusion matrix makes phase-space Monte Carlo simulation of open bosonic quantum dynamics feasible, and in the high-occupancy limit the Wigner distribution is always simulation-ready.

desk verdict Useful sufficient conditions for phase-space Monte Carlo, but the high-occupancy PSD claim overreaches: subleading 1/N corrections can make the exact diffusion matrix indefinite for finite N. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06056 v1 pith:XUNFYWK5 submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

Toma Yoneya , Kazuya Fujimoto , Yuki Kawaguchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords openquantumsystemsGKSLequationphase-spacemethodsstochasticdifferentialequationsFokker-PlancktruncatedWignerapproximationquasiprobabilitydistributionshigh-occupancylimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Bosonic open quantum systems described by the GKSL master equation can be studied by Monte Carlo sampling of stochastic differential equations in phase space only when the Fokker–Planck diffusion matrix is positive semidefinite, i.e. the stochastic noise has no negative-variance directions. This paper provides a general sufficient condition for that property: if the blocks $\lambda^s_{mn}$ and $\Lambda^s_{mn}$ of the diffusion matrix can be written as symmetrized products of two arbitrary complex functions $F^s_m$ and $G^s_m$, then the diffusion matrix is positive semidefinite and an explicit stochastic differential equation follows. For the Wigner function, a concrete operator-level version of the condition is proven for quadratic jump operators, and in the high-occupancy limit the Wigner diffusion matrix is claimed to be always positive semidefinite, whatever the jump operators are. The paper also identifies the jump-operator forms for which the mean-field (first-order) description breaks down in the high-occupancy limit, making the stochastic simulation necessary, and gives sufficient conditions under which higher-order quantum-fluctuation terms vanish, making the stochastic simulation exact. The value of these results is that feasibility is reduced from a case-by-case numerical check on the diffusion matrix to checkable conditions on the Hamiltonian and jump operators.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $2M\times 2M$ Hermitian diffusion matrix $$A_s = 2\begin{pmatrix} \Lambda^s & \$\lambda$^s \\ \$lambda^{{s*}}$ & \$Lambda^{{s*}}$ \end{pmatrix},$$ whose entries $\lambda^s_{mn}$ and $\Lambda^s_{mn}$ are built from first and second derivatives of the s-ordered phase-space symbols of the jump operators, contracted with the strengths $\gamma_k$ and with the $\star_s$ product, the s-ordered multiplication that encodes operator ordering. The load-bearing identity is the factorization $$\$\lambda$^s_{mn}=\tfrac12($G^{{s*}}$_mF^s_n+F^$s_mG^{{s*}}$_n),\qquad \Lambda^s_{mn}=\tfrac12($G^{{s*}}$_mG^s_n+F^$s_mF^{{s*}}$_n),$$ which makes $A_s$ a sum of manifestly non-negative rank-one terms and yields the explicit noise matrix $B_s$ from $F^s$ and $G^s$. In the high-occupancy limit $N\to\infty$ the $\star_s$ product reduces to the identity and only the leading-order parts of $\lambda$ and $\Lambda$ survive, so the factorization holds automatically for the Wigner function; the dissipative drift $K^s_m$ plays the complementary diagnostic role, with its leading and next-to-leading parts vanishing exactly when the mean-field description fails.

What would settle it

For a model with a Hermitian jump operator at a large but finite per-mode occupation $N$, assemble the full $\lambda_{mn}$ and $\Lambda_{mn}$ from Eqs. (27)-(28) without discarding subleading terms and diagonalize $A_{s=0}$. The high-occupancy positive-semidefiniteness claim would be refuted if the smallest eigenvalue is negative at any such $N$; a uniform positive lower bound as $N\to\infty$ would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that feasibility of the stochastic Monte Carlo method for the GKSL equation is decided by a factorization of the diffusion matrix. For the s-ordered quasiprobability functions ($s=1,0,-1$ for the Glauber–Sudarshan P, Wigner, and Husimi Q functions), the second-order truncation is a Fokker–Planck equation with diffusion matrix $A_s$, and an equivalent stochastic differential equation exists only when $A_s$ is positive semidefinite. The paper proves that $A_s\succeq 0$ holds whenever $$\$\lambda$^s_{mn}=\tfrac12($G^{{s*}}$_mF^s_n+F^$s_mG^{{s*}}$_n),\qquad \Lambda^s_{mn}=\tfrac12($G^{{s*}}$_mG^s_n+F^$s_mF^{{s*}}$_n),$$ and that the noise matrix can then be constructed explicitly; summing finitely many such terms generalizes the criterion to jump operators that couple different degrees of freedom. It further claims that, in the high-occupancy limit, the Wigner-function diffusion matrix is always positive semidefinite regardless of the Hamiltonian and jump operators, so a stochastic differential equation always exists there, even in the cases where the mean-field description breaks down. Finally, it derives sufficient conditions, summarized in tables, under which third- and fourth-order quantum fluctuations vanish identically, so that whenever a stochastic differential equation exists the Monte Carlo simulation reproduces the exact GKSL dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the Wigner diffusion matrix is always positive semidefinite in the high-occupancy limit rests on dropping the subleading $1/N$ corrections to $\lambda$ and $\Lambda$; if the surviving leading-order matrix has a flat direction, those dropped corrections could in principle make the full matrix slightly indefinite at finite occupation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Whenever the diffusion entries admit a single factorization, the stochastic differential equation is explicitly known and uses only two Wiener processes rather than $2M$, avoiding numerical diagonalization or decomposition of $A_s$ at every time step.
  • For the Wigner function and jump operators that are at most quadratic, the operator condition $\sum_k\gamma_k[\hat L_k^\dagger,\hat L_k]_- = \sum_m(l_m\hat a_m+\bar l_m\hat a_m^\dagger)+\mathrm{const.}$ guarantees $A_{s=0}\succeq 0$, so explicit stochastic differential equations follow for models such as unidirectional incoherent hopping with an interacting Hamiltonian.
  • In the high-occupancy limit the Wigner-function diffusion matrix is always positive semidefinite, so stochastic simulation remains feasible exactly in the regime where it becomes necessary because the classical first-order description fails.
  • The mean-field description breaks down in the high-occupancy limit whenever the leading and next-to-leading parts of the dissipative drift vanish, which includes Hermitian jump operators and equal-strength Hermitian-conjugate pairs; there the second-order stochastic description is indispensable.
  • Under the sufficient conditions of Sec. 6, the GKSL equation reduces exactly to the Fokker–Planck equation in phase space, so the stochastic Monte Carlo simulation is exact; the three-site benchmark shows that the first-order approximation misses the steady-state current while the second-order Wigner simulation matches the exact result.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the factorization conditions are sufficient but not necessary, they suggest a low-cost numerical diagnostic: attempt to fit the instantaneous $\lambda^s$ and $\Lambda^s$ to the $F,G$ form and use the fit residual as a feasibility alarm during a simulation.
  • The high-occupancy proof keeps only leading-order terms in $1/N$; a natural testable extension is a perturbation analysis around null directions of the leading-order diffusion matrix to see whether subleading terms ever violate positive semidefiniteness at finite large occupation.
  • The mean-field breakdown criterion picks out dissipative processes with Hermitian or Hermitian-paired jump operators; such systems are natural hunting grounds for fluctuation-driven transport or ordering that survives the thermodynamic limit, a direction the paper itself leaves open.
  • The exactness conditions effectively certify reference models: any setup meeting them can be used as an exactly simulated benchmark for other numerical approaches to open many-body dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies when the Fokker–Planck approximation to a bosonic Markovian open quantum dynamics, obtained from an s-ordered phase-space path integral, admits a Monte Carlo simulation via stochastic differential equations. The main formal result is a sufficient condition, Eqs. (37) and (38), under which the diffusion matrix A_s factorizes and is positive semidefinite, with an analytic square root B_s; Sec. 4.2 extends this to sums of such factorizations, and Sec. 4.3 gives an explicit operator condition for the Wigner function for quadratic jump operators. In the high-occupancy limit the paper classifies jump operators according to whether the classical (mean-field) equation remains valid, and it claims that for s=0 the diffusion matrix is always positive semidefinite in this limit, so that an SDE always exists. It also gives sufficient conditions for higher-order quantum fluctuations to vanish and benchmarks the resulting SDEs against exact dynamics for two- and three-site models.

Significance. If the claims hold, the criteria would be practical and general: they give a constructive route to analytic F/G decompositions, avoid numerical eigen-decompositions, identify models where stochastic simulation is necessary rather than optional, and delimit exact second-order descriptions. Appendix B is a clean exact proof of positive semidefiniteness under the factorization conditions, and the benchmark comparisons with exact correlation dynamics for the small models are a genuine strength. The high-occupancy universal PSD claim, however, is not proven as stated: the leading-order factorization in Sec. 5.3 controls only the N→∞ limit, not finite large N, and the exact finite-N diffusion matrix can be indefinite while its leading part is PSD. This weakens the paper's headline claim but does not undermine the Sec. 4 and Sec. 6 sufficient-condition results, which remain valid.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5.3, Eqs. (69)–(71)] The argument proves positive semidefiniteness only for the leading-order matrices λ^{s=0(LO)} and Λ^{s=0(LO)}, obtained by replacing L_s with L_s^{(LO)} and ⋆_s with 1. Positive semidefiniteness is not stable under O(1/N) perturbations when the leading-order matrix has a null direction, and the paper provides no estimate of the discarded subleading contributions. This is not a purely formal concern. For H=0, s=0, and the jump-operator Wigner symbol L = α1α2 + α1 (corresponding to \hat L = \hat a1 \hat a2 + \hat a1), a direct evaluation of Eqs. (27) and (28) at α1=α2=√N gives λ=0 and Λ = (γ/4)[[(r+1)^2 - 1/2, r(r+1)-1/2],[r(r+1)-1/2, r^2 - 1/2]], whose determinant is -γ²/32. Hence the exact matrix A_{s=0} has a negative eigenvalue for every finite N, although its leading-order part is the rank-one PSD matrix (γ r²/4) ww† with w=(1,1). The statement in Sec. 5.3 that a well-defined stochastic differential equation can always be constructed is therefore false if read at finite N, and Eq. (35) requires PSD of the exact matrix at each time step. The authors should either prove that the subleading corrections are nonnegative on the leading null space, or explicitly restrict the universal claim to the rescaled leading-order diffusion matrix in the strict N→∞ limit.
  2. [Sec. 5.3 and Sec. 7] The numerical benchmarks do not test the universal high-occupancy PSD claim. Every SDE used in Sec. 7 is derived from the exact sufficient conditions of Sec. 4 (Tab. 1, Eq. (53), or the exactly solvable two-site correlation hierarchy), not from the leading-order factorization of Eqs. (69)–(71). Thus the null-space issue described above is not addressed by the good agreement shown in Figs. 2–6, and the universal statement in the Abstract and Introduction remains unsupported both analytically and numerically.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 7.3, text before Eq. (100)] The phrase 'by substituting by substituting' is duplicated; please remove one occurrence.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption specifies 'U/(ℏγ)' while the main text specifies 'U11/(ℏγ) = 1'; please unify the notation.
  3. [Sec. 5.1 and Abstract] The term 'thermodynamic limit' is used for the high-occupancy limit defined by the scaling assumptions α_m=O(N^{1/2}), η_m=O(N^{-1/2}), and the corresponding parameter scalings; using 'high-occupancy limit' consistently throughout would avoid confusion with the standard thermodynamic limit.
  4. [Sec. 7.1, Eq. (75)] The standard-error expression should state more explicitly that the limit N_initial→∞ is taken at fixed N_stoch, because the prefactor 1/√N_initial refers to initial-condition sampling only.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sufficient conditions are proved by direct factorization and the SDEs are validated against independent exact solutions; the high-occupancy claim has an unproven 1/N-correction caveat, but this is a correctness gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. Section 4 proves the sufficient condition (37)-(38) by an explicit sum-of-squares identity in Appendix B, which is a self-contained algebraic theorem. The examples and the Wigner condition (53) are derived from the stated lambda and Lambda formulas, with the star-product identities in Appendix D; no target positive-semidefiniteness conclusion is inserted as an assumption. The reliance on Refs. [16,17] for the path-integral representation and the explicit diffusion-matrix formulas (27)-(28) is a normal use of the authors' prior parameter-free derivations, and the new contribution is the analysis of those expressions rather than a fit to a predicted quantity; benchmarks in Sec. 7 are compared with independent closed hierarchies and exact GKSL solutions. The only notable weakness is Sec. 5.3: the paper proves positive semidefiniteness of the leading-order matrices (69)-(70) and then states that a well-defined stochastic differential equation can always be constructed in the high-occupancy limit, without bounding the discarded O(1/N) corrections. Since leading-order positive semidefiniteness does not guarantee positive semidefiniteness of the exact finite-N matrix when the leading matrix has null directions, this is an unproven robustness claim about the limit, but it is not a circular step: Eqs. (69)-(70) are not defined in terms of the conclusion, and the argument does not rename a fitted parameter as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results add no free parameters and no invented entities. The paper's new sufficient conditions are stated in terms of the diffusion matrix inherited from the authors' prior path-integral formalism, and the benchmark constants are physical inputs. The main axioms are the correctness of that inherited formalism and the high-occupancy scaling assumptions.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The phase-space path-integral representation of the GKSL equation and the resulting definitions of λ^s and Λ^s (Eqs (27),(28)) from Refs [16,17] are correct for arbitrary bosonic Hamiltonians and jump operators.
    All new PSD conditions are conditions on these matrix elements; no re-derivation is given in this paper (Sec 3.3).
  • domain assumption The expansion of the Lagrangian up to second order in quantum fields η (Eq (22)) is a valid approximation; neglected higher-order terms are 'small quantum fluctuations' whose regime is not specified in general.
    Sec 3.3 and Appendix A; the paper later gives sufficient conditions for higher-order terms to vanish, implying they do not vanish generally.
  • ad hoc to paper For the high-occupancy limit, the scaling assumptions α_m=O(N^{1/2}), relevant η_m=O(N^{-1/2}), and parameter scaling such that contributions to the action remain O(1) define the thermodynamic-like limit.
    Sec 5.1; this is a modeling choice specific to the paper, needed for the mean-field breakdown and PSD claims.
  • domain assumption For Sec 4.3 and Sec 6, jump operators are at most quadratic in bosonic creation and annihilation operators, and in Table 5 the Hamiltonians satisfy the stated derivative conditions (often non-interacting).
    Sec 4.3, Sec 6, Tabs 3-5; the general higher-order vanishing results are restricted to quadratic jump operators.
  • standard math The Cahill-Glauber s-ordered quasiprobability mappings with s=-1,0,1 and real-valued phase-space functions are valid representations of the GKSL equation.
    Sec 3.1, Eqs (2)-(9); standard phase-space mapping background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Criteria for Feasible Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulations of Bosonic Markovian Open Quantum Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XUNFYWK5

@misc{pith2026260806056,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Criteria for Feasible Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulations of Bosonic Markovian Open Quantum Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XUNFYWK5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06056}
}
read the original abstract

The Monte Carlo sampling of the stochastic differential equations (SDEs) based on the quasiprobability distribution function, such as the Glauber--Sudarshan P, Wigner, and Husimi Q functions provides a powerful framework for investigating bosonic open quantum many-body dynamics described by the Gorini--Kossakowski--Sudarshan--Lindblad (GKSL) equation, while considering the effects of quantum fluctuations beyond the mean-field approximation. However, the stochastic Monte Carlo simulation is possible only when the corresponding Fokker--Planck equation has a positive-semidefinite diffusion matrix, and the general conditions for the diffusion matrix to be positive semidefinite have remained unclear. In this work, starting from the path integral formulation, we first derive the sufficient conditions under which the diffusion matrix is positive semidefinite for an arbitrary Hamiltonian, jump operators, and choice of quasiprobability distribution functions. We also analytically derive the corresponding SDEs to be solved. We then investigate the dynamics of the GKSL equation in the thermodynamic limit and show that, depending on the form of the jump operators, the mean-field approximation may fail to describe the dynamics accurately, making stochastic Monte Carlo simulations indispensable. Furthermore, we derive the sufficient conditions under which the higher-order quantum fluctuation terms beyond the Fokker--Planck description vanish identically, even when the jump operators contain quadratic terms. Under these conditions, whenever the corresponding SDEs can be derived, the stochastic Monte Carlo simulation reproduces the exact dynamics. These results clarify the conditions under which the stochastic Monte Carlo simulations are both feasible and necessary for accurately describing the dynamics governed by the GKSL equation in phase space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06056 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic images of (a) the path-integral represe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relaxation dynamics of a two-site system of non-in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relaxation dynamics of a two-site system of non-in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relaxation dynamics of a two-site system of non-in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relaxation dynamics of a two-site system of non-in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relaxation dynamics of three-site non-interacti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hillery, R

    M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, E. P . Wigner, Di stribution functions in physics: Fundamentals, Phys. Rep. 106 (3) (1984) 121

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    Lee, Theory and application of the quantum phase-s pace distribution functions, Phys

    H.-W . Lee, Theory and application of the quantum phase-s pace distribution functions, Phys. Rep. 259 (3) (1995) 147

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    C. W . Gardiner, P . Zoller, Quantum noise, 3rd Edition, Springer-V erlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2004

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    D. F. Walls, G. J. Milburn, Quantum optics, 2nd Edition, S pringer-V erlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1, 1st Edition, Springer-V erlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. 33

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2, 1st Edition, Springer-V erlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Gorini, A

    V . Gorini, A. Kossakowski, E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completel y positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17 (5) (1976) 821

    work page 1976

  8. [8]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi groups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi groups, Commun. math. Phys. 48 (1976) 119

    work page 1976

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    R. J. Glauber, Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radi ation Field, Phys. Rev. 131 (1963) 2766

    1963

  2. [10]

    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of Semiclassical and Qu antum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 277

    1963

  3. [11]

    Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. 40 (1932) 749

    1932

  4. [12]

    Husimi, Some Formal Properties of the Density Matrix , Proc

    K. Husimi, Some Formal Properties of the Density Matrix , Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 22 (4) (1940) 264

    1940

  5. [13]

    R. J. Glauber, Optical Coherence and Photon Statistics . In Quantum Optics and Electronics, edited by C. Dewitt, A. Blandin and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Gordon and Breach, New Y ork, 1965

    1965

  6. [14]

    Huber, P

    J. Huber, P . Kirton, P . Rabl, Phase-space methods for si mulating the dissipative many-body dynamics of collec- tive spin systems, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 045

    2021

  7. [15]

    Olsen, L

    M. Olsen, L. Plimak, S. Rebi ´c, A. Bradley, Phase-space analysis of bosonic spontaneous emission, Opt. Com- mun. 254 (4) (2005) 271

    2005

  8. [16]

    Y oneya, K

    T. Y oneya, K. Fujimoto, Y . Kawaguchi, Path-integral formulation of truncated Wigner approximation for bosonic Markovian open quantum systems, Ann. Phys. 479 (2025) 17007 2

    2025

  9. [17]

    Y oneya, K

    T. Y oneya, K. Fujimoto, Y . Kawaguchi, Path-integral formulation of bosonic markovian open quantum dynamics with monte carlo stochastic trajectories using the glauber –sudarshan p, wigner, and husimi q functions and hybrids, Ann. Phys. 485 (2026) 170325

    2026

  10. [18]

    M. J. Steel, M. K. Olsen, L. I. Plimak, P . D. Drummond, S. M . Tan, M. J. Collett, D. F. Walls, R. Graham, Dynamical quantum noise in trapped Bose-Einstein condensa tes, Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 4824

    1998

  11. [19]

    Sinatra, C

    A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, Y . Castin, The truncated Wigner met hod for Bose-condensed gases: limits of validity and applications1, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 (17) (2002) 3599

    2002

  12. [20]

    Blakie, A

    P . Blakie, A. Bradley, M. Davis, R. Ballagh, C. Gardiner , Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Adv. Phys. 57 (5) (2008) 363

    2008

  13. [21]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Ann. Phys. 325 (8) (2010) 1790

    2010

  14. [22]

    Schachenmayer, A

    J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, A. M. Rey, Many-Body Qua ntum Spin Dynamics with Monte Carlo Trajectories on a Discrete Phase Space, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 011022

    2015

  15. [23]

    S. M. Davidson, A. Polkovnikov, SU(3) Semiclassical Re presentation of Quantum Dynamics of Interacting Spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 045701

    2015

  16. [24]

    Wurtz, A

    J. Wurtz, A. Polkovnikov, D. Sels, Cluster truncated Wi gner approximation in strongly interacting systems, Annals of Physics 395 (2018) 341–365

    2018

  17. [25]

    B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, J. Schachenmayer, A generalized phase space approach for solving quantum spin dynamics, New J. Phys. 21 (8) (2019) 082001

    2019

  18. [26]

    S. M. Davidson, D. Sels, A. Polkovnikov, Semiclassical approach to dynamics of interacting fermions, Ann. Phys. 384 (2017) 128. 34

    2017

  19. [27]

    Piñeiro Orioli, A

    A. Piñeiro Orioli, A. Signoles, H. Wildhagen, G. Günter , J. Berges, S. Whitlock, M. Weidemüller, Relaxation of an Isolated Dipolar-Interacting Rydberg Quantum Spin Syst em, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 063601

    2018

  20. [28]

    Lepoutre, J

    S. Lepoutre, J. Schachenmayer, L. Gabardos, B. Zhu, B. N aylor, E. Maréchal, O. Gorceix, A. M. Rey, L. V ernac, B. Laburthe-Tolra, Out-of-equilibrium quantum magnetism and thermalization in a spin-3 many-body dipolar lattice system, Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 1714

    2019

  21. [29]

    Takasu, T

    Y . Takasu, T. Y agami, H. Asaka, Y . Fukushima, K. Nagao, S. Goto, I. Danshita, Y . Takahashi, Energy redistribu- tion and spatiotemporal evolution of correlations after a s udden quench of the Bose-Hubbard model, Sci. Adv. 6 (40) (2020) eaba9255

    2020

  22. [30]

    Nagao, Y

    K. Nagao, Y . Takasu, Y . Takahashi, I. Danshita, SU(3) truncated Wigner approximation for strongly interacting Bose gases, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) 043091

    2021

  23. [31]

    C. D. Mink, A. Pelster, J. Benary, H. Ott, M. Fleischhaue r, V ariational truncated Wigner approximation for weakly interacting Bose fields: Dynamics of coupled condens ates, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 051

    2022

  24. [32]

    C. D. Mink, M. Fleischhauer, Collective radiative inte ractions in the discrete truncated Wigner approximation, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 233

    2023

  25. [33]

    Nagao, S

    K. Nagao, S. Y unoki, Two-dimensional correlation prop agation dynamics with a cluster discrete phase-space method, Phys. Rev. A 111 (2025) 023315

    2025

  26. [34]

    Kordas, D

    G. Kordas, D. Witthaut, P . Buonsante, A. V ezzani, R. Bur ioni, A. Karanikas, S. Wimberger, The dissipative Bose-Hubbard model: Methods and examples, Eur. Phys. J.: Sp ec. Top. 224 (2015) 2127

    2015

  27. [35]

    Vicentini, F

    F. Vicentini, F. Minganti, R. Rota, G. Orso, C. Ciuti, Cr itical slowing down in driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattices, Phys. Rev. A 97 (2018) 013853

    2018

  28. [36]

    Deuar, A

    P . Deuar, A. Ferrier, M. Matuszewski, G. Orso, M. H. Szym a´nska, Fully Quantum Scalable Description of Driven-Dissipative Lattice Models, PRX Quantum 2 (2021) 01 0319

    2021

  29. [37]

    Carusotto, C

    I. Carusotto, C. Ciuti, Spontaneous microcavity-pola riton coherence across the parametric threshold: Quantum Monte Carlo studies, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 125335

    2005

  30. [38]

    Dagvadorj, J

    G. Dagvadorj, J. M. Fellows, S. Matyja ´skiewicz, F. M. Marchetti, I. Carusotto, M. H. Szyma ´nska, Nonequilib- rium Phase Transition in a Two-Dimensional Driven Open Quan tum System, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 041028

    2015

  31. [39]

    Keßler, J

    H. Keßler, J. G. Cosme, C. Georges, L. Mathey, A. Hemmeri ch, From a continuous to a discrete time crystal in a dissipative atom-cavity system, New J. Phys. 22 (8) (2020) 085002

    2020

  32. [40]

    Seibold, R

    K. Seibold, R. Rota, V . Savona, Dissipative time crysta l in an asymmetric nonlinear photonic dimer, Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020) 033839

    2020

  33. [41]

    V . P . Singh, H. Weimer, Driven-Dissipative Criticalit y within the Discrete Truncated Wigner Approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 200602

    2022

  34. [42]

    C. D. Mink, D. Petrosyan, M. Fleischhauer, Hybrid discr ete-continuous truncated Wigner approximation for driven, dissipative spin systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (2022) 0 43136

    2022

  35. [43]

    Huber, A

    J. Huber, A. M. Rey, P . Rabl, Realistic simulations of sp in squeezing and cooperative coupling e ffects in large ensembles of interacting two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 10 5 (2022) 013716

    2022

  36. [44]

    Polkovnikov, Quantum corrections to the dynamics of interacting bosons: Beyond the truncated Wigner approximation, Phys

    A. Polkovnikov, Quantum corrections to the dynamics of interacting bosons: Beyond the truncated Wigner approximation, Phys. Rev. A 68 (5) (2003) 053604

    2003

  37. [45]

    L. I. Plimak, M. K. Olsen, M. Fleischhauer, M. J. Collett , Beyond the Fokker-Planck equation: Stochastic simulation of complete Wigner representation for the optic al parametric oscillator, EPL 56 (3) (2001) 372. 35

    2001

  38. [46]

    Hepp, The classical limit for quantum mechanical cor relation functions, Commun

    K. Hepp, The classical limit for quantum mechanical cor relation functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 35 (4) (1974) 265

    1974

  39. [47]

    Spohn, Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynamics : Markovian limits, Rev

    H. Spohn, Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynamics : Markovian limits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 569

    1980

  40. [48]

    L. G. Y affe, Large N limits as classical mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 (1982) 407

    1982

  41. [49]

    G. S. Agarwal, E. Wolf, Calculus for functions of noncom muting operators and general phase-space methods in quantum mechanics. I. Mapping theorems and ordering of func tions of noncommuting operators, Phys. Rev. D 2 (10) (1970) 2161

    1970

  42. [50]

    G. S. Agarwal, E. Wolf, Calculus for functions of noncom muting operators and general phase-space methods in quantum mechanics. ii. quantum mechanics in phase space, Ph ys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 2187

    1970

  43. [51]

    G. S. Agarwal, E. Wolf, Calculus for functions of noncom muting operators and general phase-space methods in quantum mechanics. iii. a generalized wick theorem and mult itime mapping, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 2206

    1970

  44. [52]

    K. E. Cahill, R. J. Glauber, Ordered expansions in boson amplitude operators, Phys. Rev. 177 (5) (1969) 1857

    1969

  45. [53]

    K. E. Cahill, R. J. Glauber, Density operators and quasi probability distributions, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 1882

    1969

  46. [54]

    P . D. Drummond, C. W . Gardiner, Generalised P-representations in quantum optics, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 13 (7) (1980) 2353

    1980

  47. [55]

    F. A. M. de Oliveira, s-order nondiagonal quasiprobabilities, Phys. Rev. A 45 (19 92) 5104

  48. [56]

    L. I. Plimak, S-ordered phase-space path integrals and time-s-ordering of Heisenberg operators (reseach notes), 2009, arXiv:0906.2757

    2009 arXiv

  49. [57]

    B. Berg, L. I. Plimak, A. Polkovnikov, M. Olsen, M. Fleis chhauer, W . P . Schleich, Commuting Heisenberg operators as the quantum response problem: Time-normal ave rages in the truncated Wigner representation, Phys. Rev. A 80 (3) (2009) 033624

    2009

  50. [58]

    Marinov, A new type of phase-space path integral, Phy s

    M. Marinov, A new type of phase-space path integral, Phy s. Lett. A 153 (1) (1991) 5

    1991

  51. [59]

    Dittrich, C

    T. Dittrich, C. Viviescas, L. Sandoval, Semiclassical propagator of the Wigner function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (7) (2006) 070403

    2006

  52. [60]

    Dittrich, E

    T. Dittrich, E. A. Gómez, L. A. Pachon, Semiclassical pr opagation of Wigner functions, J. Chem. Phys. 132 (21) (2010) 214102

    2010

  53. [61]

    Gozzi, C

    E. Gozzi, C. Pagani, M. Reuter, The response field and the saddle points of quantum mechanical path integrals, Ann. Phys. 429 (2021) 168457

    2021

  54. [62]

    Pagani, M

    C. Pagani, M. Reuter, Time evolution of density matrice s as a theory of random surfaces, Ann. Phys. 455 (2023) 169361

    2023

  55. [63]

    Gerlich, Die verallgemeinerte Liouville-Gleichun g, Physica 69 (2) (1973) 458

    G. Gerlich, Die verallgemeinerte Liouville-Gleichun g, Physica 69 (2) (1973) 458

    1973

  56. [64]

    W . H. Steeb, Generalized liouville equation, entropy, and dynamic systems containing limit cycles, Physica A 95 (1) (1979) 181

    1979

  57. [65]

    Risken, The Fokker-Planck equation, 2nd Edition, Sp ringer-V erlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996

    H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck equation, 2nd Edition, Sp ringer-V erlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996

    1996

  58. [66]

    Garbe, Y

    L. Garbe, Y . Minoguchi, J. Huber, P . Rabl, The bosonic sk in e ffect: Boundary condensation in asymmetric transport, SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 029

    2024

  59. [67]

    H. P . Breuer, F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, 2007. 36

    2007

  60. [68]

    P . E. Kloeden, E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochas tic Differential Equations, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

    1992

  61. [69]

    R. R. J. Barlow, Statistics: A Guide to the Use of Statist ical Methods in the Physical Sciences, The Manchester physics series, Wiley, 1989

    1989

  62. [70]

    Eisler, Crossover between ballistic and di ffusive transport: the quantum exclusion process, J

    V . Eisler, Crossover between ballistic and di ffusive transport: the quantum exclusion process, J. Stat. Me ch. Theory Exp. 2011 (06) (2011) P06007

    2011

  63. [71]

    M. V . Medvedyeva, F. H. L. Essler, T. c. v. Prosen, Exact b ethe ansatz spectrum of a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 137202

    2016

  64. [72]

    Barthel, Y

    T. Barthel, Y . Zhang, Solving quasi-free and quadratic lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2022 (11) (2022) 113101

    2022

  65. [73]

    Žunkovi ˇc, Closed hierarchy of correlations in markovian open quant um systems, New J

    B. Žunkovi ˇc, Closed hierarchy of correlations in markovian open quant um systems, New J. Phys. 16 (1) (2014) 013042

    2014

  66. [74]

    Temme, M

    K. Temme, M. M. Wolf, F. V erstraete, Stochastic exclusi on processes versus coherent transport, New J. Phys. 14 (7) (2012) 075004. 37

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.