REVIEW 3 cited by
Yet another lesson on the stability conditions in multi-Higgs potentials
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We discuss a rather common but often unnoticed pitfall which arises when deriving the bounded-from-below (BFB) conditions in multi-Higgs models with softly broken global symmetries. Namely, necessary and sufficient BFB conditions derived for the case with an exact symmetry can be ruined by introducing soft symmetry breaking terms. Using $S_4$ and $A_4$-symmetric three-Higgs-doublet models as an example, we argue that all published necessary and sufficient BFB conditions, even those which are correct for the exactly symmetric case, are no longer sufficient if soft symmetry breaking is added. Using the geometric formalism, we derive the exact necessary and sufficient BFB conditions for the 3HDM with the symmetry group $S_4$, either exact or softly broken, and review the situation for the $A_4$-symmetric case.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Scalar Lie point symmetries of the Standard Model with one or two real gauge singlets
SM+S has four and SM+2S has eleven inequivalent maximal scalar Lie point symmetry algebras of the field equations, with parameter-based algorithms to identify them.
-
Systematic analysis of 3HDM symmetries
A systematic catalogue of realisable Higgs-family, general-CP, and GOOFy/T-GOOFy symmetries in three-Higgs-doublet models, with new invariant potentials and a corrected U(1)◦V4 group structure.
-
Flavor Constraints in a Generational Three Higgs Doublet Model
A generational three-Higgs-doublet model is constructed, and flavor constraints show that its additional Higgs bosons can be as light as about 1.5 TeV if the only flavor violation is the minimal amount needed to repro...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.