Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 79 references

This paper establishes that in the lowest-Landau-level regime, cold quark matter with both quark and isospin chemical potentials has a pressure that grows monotonically with both chemical potentials, a positive (paramagnetic) magnetization,

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:14 UTC pith:XXKRIXZP

load-bearing objection A legitimate but narrow HDLpt extension to isospin chemical potential; the algebra is coherent, but the plotted window violates the paper's own weak-coupling/LLL hierarchy, so the numbers are illustrative, not quantitative. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.25167 v1 pith:XXKRIXZP submitted 2026-07-28 hep-ph

One-loop HDL thermodynamics of a strongly magnetized isospin asymmetric cold quark matter

Salman Ahamad Khan , Sarthak Satapathy , Sumit This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords hard-dense-loop perturbation theorystrong magnetic fieldlowest Landau levelisospin chemical potentialcold quark mattermagnetizationpressure anisotropyequation of state
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish the one-loop thermodynamics of strongly magnetized, isospin-asymmetric cold quark matter using hard-dense-loop perturbation theory (HDLpt). The authors derive resummed quark and gluon self-energies in a strong magnetic field at zero temperature, with flavor-dependent chemical potentials, and compute the longitudinal pressure, magnetization, and pressure anisotropy. They find that the pressure increases monotonically with both the quark and isospin chemical potentials, that the magnetization is positive (paramagnetic), and that the transverse pressure is suppressed relative to the longitudinal pressure in the strong-field regime. If correct, the result supplies an equation of state relevant for neutron-star cores and compact-star mergers, where strong magnetic fields and isospin imbalance coexist.

Core claim

At zero temperature, in a strong magnetic background where only the lowest Landau level is populated, the one-loop hard-dense-loop free energy of two-flavor cold quark matter is computed with distinct up- and down-quark chemical potentials set by μu=μq+μI/2 and μd=μq−μI/2. The quark contribution is evaluated through dense sum integrals, and the gluon contribution through the magnetized gluon self-energy with a vacuum counterterm renormalization. Within the stated ranges of μq, μI, and eB, the resulting longitudinal pressure is larger than the ideal-gas pressure and grows monotonically with both chemical potentials and with the field; the magnetization is positive, implying paramagnetism; and

What carries the argument

Hard-dense-loop perturbation theory (HDLpt), the finite-density counterpart of HTLpt, resums soft quark and gluon modes through medium-modified propagators. In a strong magnetic field the quark propagator is projected onto the lowest Landau level (LLL), which dimensionally reduces the dynamics from 3+1 to 1+1 dimensions and ties the transverse pressure to the magnetization. The quark self-energy is decomposed into four form factors a, b, c, d; the gluon self-energy is decomposed into projection tensors in a magnetized medium. The central identity is P⊥ = PL − eB·M, which converts the calculated positive magnetization into a direct suppression of the transverse pressure, and the dense sum int

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation assumes that only the lowest Landau level matters and that the QCD coupling is weak enough to satisfy gμf ≪ μf; in the quoted numerical window the u-quark chemical potential comes within about one percent of the LLL threshold and the coupling is not small, so if either condition fails the computed pressure and magnetization are not reliable.

What would settle it

Perform the same one-loop calculation including the first excited Landau levels (l=1,2) at identical μq, μI, and eB values and check whether the longitudinal pressure and magnetization change substantially or whether the magnetization changes sign; alternatively, a lattice QCD determination of the magnetization of two-flavor deconfined quark matter at eB≈1–2 GeV² and high density would directly test the paramagnetic prediction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The HDLpt equation of state for magnetized isospin-asymmetric cold quark matter can serve as input for neutron-star and binary-merger simulations that require anisotropic pressure.
  • The positive magnetization implies paramagnetic behavior, meaning strongly magnetized quark matter is energetically pulled toward the field rather than repelled by it.
  • The suppressed transverse pressure means the matter is compressed along the magnetic-field direction, affecting stellar deformation and potentially observable gravitational-wave signatures from magnetized neutron stars.
  • The monotonic rise of pressure with the isospin chemical potential indicates that flavor-asymmetric matter is stiffer than symmetric matter at the same average density, which matters for neutron-rich matter.
  • The ratio of HDL pressure to ideal pressure approaching 1 as μq and μI grow is consistent with the onset of asymptotic freedom in the cold, dense regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If higher Landau levels are included, the sign of the magnetization is not guaranteed: the diamagnetic orbital contribution grows as the field weakens, so the transition from paramagnetic to diamagnetic response as μf²/(2|qfB|) approaches 1 is a concrete testable extension.
  • Because P⊥ = PL − eB·M, a future lattice or effective-model determination of the magnetization and longitudinal pressure would fix the transverse pressure without a separate calculation—the anisotropy is itself a direct probe of the magnetic response.
  • The restriction to μq > μI/2 leaves the pion-condensed regime unaddressed; extending the calculation toward μI ≈ 2μq and checking whether the pressure varies continuously across the boundary would show how the LLL-HDL results connect to the known condensed phase.
  • The quantitative numbers may shift under higher-order resummation because the coupling in the plotted window is not small; the structural predictions of monotonic pressure growth and a paramagnetic magnetization could be tested for stability under such corrections.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a one-loop hard-dense-loop perturbation theory (HDLpt) calculation of the thermodynamic functions of strongly magnetized, isospin-asymmetric cold quark matter in the lowest Landau level (LLL). The authors derive flavor-dependent quark and gluon self-energies, construct the resummed quark and gluon free energies, and then evaluate the longitudinal pressure, magnetization, and transverse pressure as functions of quark and isospin chemical potentials and magnetic field. The central claims are that the pressure increases monotonically with μ_q, μ_I, and eB; the magnetization is positive (paramagnetic response); and the transverse pressure is suppressed relative to the longitudinal pressure.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, this would be the first HDLpt equation of state for magnetized isospin-asymmetric cold quark matter, with potential implications for neutron-star and magnetar phenomenology. The algebraic structure is coherent: the dense sum integrals are tabulated in Appendix A, the gluon divergence is handled by an explicit counterterm, and the combination I210−I201 is finite. However, the numerical applicability is compromised by the choice of parameter window, and there appears to be an inconsistency in the logarithm appearing in the quark free energy. These issues are load-bearing for the quantitative claims and for the qualitative conclusion that P/P_ideal > 1.

major comments (2)
  1. [Secs. II and IV, Eq. (II.4), Figs. 3–6] The numerical window violates the paper's own stated hierarchy. At μq=0.8 GeV, μI=0.7 GeV and eB=1 GeV², μu=1.15 GeV and 2|q_uB|=4/3 GeV², so μu²/(2|q_uB|)=0.99; at eB=1.5 and 2.0 GeV² the ratios are ≈0.66 and 0.50. These are not small, so the LLL-truncated loop propagator is uncontrolled even though l=1 is unoccupied. Moreover, using Eq. (IV.1) with Λ=2μ and Λ_MS=176 MeV gives α_s≈0.3–0.4 (g≈2), so gμ_u≈2.3 GeV is not ≪ μ_u. The one-loop O(g⁴) HDLpt truncation is therefore not reliable in the plotted window, and Sec. V itself states that higher-LL corrections become important when μ_f²/(2|q_fB|) is no longer small. The quantitative values of P_L, M, and P⊥ in Figs. 3–6, and the conclusions drawn from them, are outside the paper's own domain of validity.
  2. [Eq. (III.19) vs Eqs. (II.39)–(II.40)] The logarithmic argument in the quark free energy is inconsistent with the self-energy. The u-quark form factor contains log[e^{γ_E} Λ²/(π(μ_I+2μ_q)²)] = log[e^{γ_E} Λ²/(4π μ_u²)], and the d-quark analog is similar. Equation (III.19), however, uses log[e^{γ_E} μ_f²/(πΛ²)] and log[e^{γ_E} μ_f²/(πΛ_f²)] (Λ_f is undefined). At representative values used in the plots (Λ=2μ_q, μ_q=0.7 GeV, μ_u=0.85 GeV), the correct argument is ≈0.38, while the printed argument is ≈0.21; the O(g²) term changes by more than 50%. Since this term controls the sign and magnitude of the interaction correction, the plotted P/P_ideal ratio (Fig. 4) and all derived quantities must be re-evaluated after correcting the logarithm.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (III.19)] The notation Λ_f appears only in the squared-log term and is not defined. It should presumably be Λ or a flavor-dependent scale defined explicitly.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (IV.1)] The statement Λ=2μ should specify whether μ is μ_q or some average of μ_u and μ_d. Flavor-dependent scales would change the numerical values and the interpretation of the running coupling.
  3. [Sec. IV, after Eq. (IV.4)] The authors state that they drop the vacuum contribution −B²/2. Because Figs. 3–6 then refer only to thermomagnetic corrections, the tiny P⊥ values in Fig. 6 should be accompanied by a reminder that the full physical transverse pressure includes the magnetic-field vacuum contribution.
  4. [Sec. II.A] There is a typo, 'upto' for 'up to'. Also, the sentence introducing the d-quark form factor is grammatically awkward and should be rephrased.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] In the left-panel label inside the figure, 'eB = 1.0 GeV²' appears twice; clean up the duplicated label.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; only a minor, contextual self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the claimed results. The one-loop quark contribution, Eq. (III.19), is obtained by inserting the computed form factors a_u, a_d, b_u, b_d from Eqs. (II.39), (II.40), (II.45), and (II.46) into the expanded determinant in Eq. (III.18), and then evaluating the dense sum integrals via Eq. (A.2). No parameter is fitted to the final pressure or magnetization. The gluon contribution, Eq. (III.27), follows from the external projection-tensor form factors of Ref. [73], and the divergence is removed by a counterterm in Eq. (III.28). The identity P_⊥ = P_L − eB·M in Eq. (IV.3) does not by itself force the sign conclusion; the claim P_⊥ < P_L is driven by the computed positive magnetization, not by construction. The only self-citation, Ref. [66], appears in the introduction as context ('Recently, we have also studied...') and is not load-bearing for any equation of the present calculation. The concern that parts of the plotted window may violate the stated LLL or weak-coupling hierarchy is a regime/correctness limitation acknowledged in Sec. V, not a circularity: the numerical results do not reduce to their inputs by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation adds no new particles or forces. Its numerical output rests mainly on the LLL cutoff, the weak-coupling hierarchy, neglect of pion condensation, and the scale choice Λ = 2μ.

free parameters (1)
  • Renormalization scale Λ = Λ = 2μ (used in all plots)
    The scale is a convention, not fixed by the theory; numerical pressure and magnetization depend on it. No scale-variation estimate is given.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Lowest Landau level dominance: higher Landau levels are negligible, l_max ≃ 0 (Eqs. II.2–II.3).
    The entire calculation confines quarks to the LLL; this is load-bearing for the 1+1-dimensional dynamics and for the density of states.
  • domain assumption Hard-dense-loop hierarchy gμ_f ≪ μ_f ≲ sqrt(2|q_fB|) holds in the plotted regime (Eq. II.4).
    The paper states this as the regime of applicability, but the plotted parameters violate the weak-coupling part (g ≈ 2.7–2.9).
  • domain assumption The equilibrium state is normal quark matter; pion-condensed/superfluid phases are not included for μI > m_π.
    At T = 0 QCD with finite isospin chemical potential is known to form pion condensate for μI ≳ m_π ≈ 0.14 GeV, while the paper plots μI = 0.5–0.7 GeV and only excludes the μ_d < 0 case.
  • domain assumption Quarks are massless: m_f ≪ μ_f, sqrt(q_fB).
    Current quark masses are neglected throughout (Sec. II.A), which is standard at these scales but is an approximation.
  • standard math Dense sum integrals Eq. (A.2) from Gorda et al. are valid under dimensional regularization.
    The T/μ → 0 limit of finite-T sum integrals is used to evaluate the one-loop quark free energy; the paper cites Ref. [74] for this formalism.
  • standard math The gauge-boson self-energy structure of Ref. [73] applies in the LLL magnetized medium.
    The gluon form factors are taken directly from a prior decomposition of the magnetized gluon self-energy; this determines the gluon contribution to the free energy.
  • domain assumption The vacuum −B²/2 term is dropped; results are thermomagnetic corrections only.
    Sec. IV states the vacuum contribution is removed before computing pressure and magnetization, so the quoted positive magnetization is a medium-only quantity.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21681 in / 22349 out tokens · 199823 ms · 2026-08-01T03:14:39.823414+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We have computed the longitudinal pressure and magnetization of strongly magnetized cold QCD matter in the presence of both quark and isospin chemical potentials using the hard-dense-loop perturbation theory (HDLpt). For that purpose, we have first obtained the resummed quark and gluon propagators in the presence of a strong magnetic field and isospin density. We have found that pressure gets monotonically enhanced with both chemical potentials. Magnetization is found to be positive, which indicates the paramagnetic nature of the cold quark matter. We also discuss the resulting pressure anisotropy, where the transverse pressure is suppressed relative to the longitudinal pressure in the strong-field regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25167 by Salman Ahamad Khan, Sarthak Satapathy, Sumit.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Feynman diagram for quark self-energy in the presence of a strong magnetic field (one loop). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Quark loop contribution to the gluon self-energy in the strong magnetic field. Double straight lines show the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Variation of longitudinal pressure with isospin chemical potential at different values of the quark chemical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Variation of ratio of HDL pressure to the ideal pressure with isospin chemical potential at different values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Variation of magnetization with isospin chemical potential at different values of the quark chemical potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Variation of the transverse pressure with isospin chemical potential at different values of the quark chemical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 70 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The QCD Equation of State to O(µ6 B) from Lattice QCD,

    A. Bazavov, H. T. Ding, P. Hegde, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, Y. Maezawa, S. Mukherjee, H. Ohno and P. Petreczky, et al. “The QCD Equation of State to O(µ6 B) from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no.5, 054504 (2017) [arXiv:1701.04325 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Equation of State in 2+1 Flavor QCD at High Temperatures,

    A. Bazavov, P. Petreczky and J. H. Weber, “Equation of State in 2+1 Flavor QCD at High Temperatures,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.1, 014510 (2018) [arXiv:1710.05024 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    QCD equation of state at nonzero chemical potential: continuum results with physical quark masses at order mu2,

    S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti and K. K. Szabo, “QCD equation of state at nonzero chemical potential: continuum results with physical quark masses at order mu2,” JHEP 08, 053 (2012) [arXiv:1204.6710 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    The QCD equation of state at finite density from analytical continuation,

    J. N. Guenther, R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti and K. K. Szabó, “The QCD equation of state at finite density from analytical continuation,” Nucl. Phys. A 967, 720-723 (2017) [arXiv:1607.02493 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Higher order quark number fluctuations via imaginary chemical potentials in Nf = 2 + 1 QCD,

    M. D’Elia, G. Gagliardi and F. Sanfilippo, “Higher order quark number fluctuations via imaginary chemical potentials in Nf = 2 + 1 QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no.9, 094503 (2017) [arXiv:1611.08285 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Two-loop hard thermal loop pressure at finite temperature and chemical potential,

    N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa and M. Strickland, “Two-loop hard thermal loop pressure at finite temperature and chemical potential,” Phys. Rev. D 87, no.10, 105007 (2013) [arXiv:1212.1797 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Three-loop HTL gluon thermodynamics at intermediate coupling,

    J. O. Andersen, M. Strickland and N. Su, “Three-loop HTL gluon thermodynamics at intermediate coupling,” JHEP 08, 113 (2010) [arXiv:1005.1603 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    NNLO hard-thermal-loop thermodynamics for QCD,

    J. O. Andersen, L. E. Leganger, M. Strickland and N. Su, “NNLO hard-thermal-loop thermodynamics for QCD,” Phys. Lett. B 696, 468-472 (2011) [arXiv:1009.4644 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    Three-loop HTLpt thermody- namics at finite temperature and chemical potential,

    N. Haque, A. Bandyopadhyay, J. O. Andersen, M. G. Mustafa, M. Strickland and N. Su, “Three-loop HTLpt thermody- namics at finite temperature and chemical potential,” JHEP 05, 027 (2014) [arXiv:1402.6907 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    NLO quark self-energy and dispersion relation using the hard thermal loop resumma- tion,

    Sumit, N. Haque and B. K. Patra, “NLO quark self-energy and dispersion relation using the hard thermal loop resumma- tion,” JHEP 05 (2023), 171 [arXiv:2201.07173 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars,

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. Nättilä and A. Vuorinen, “Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars,” Nature Phys. 16, no.9, 907-910 (2020) [arXiv:1903.09121 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Quark Star Phenomenology,

    B. Freedman and L. D. McLerran, “Quark Star Phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D 17, 1109 (1978)

    1978

  13. [13]

    Fermions and Gauge Vector Mesons at Finite Temperature and Density. 3. The Ground State Energy of a Relativistic Quark Gas,

    B. A. Freedman and L. D. McLerran, “Fermions and Gauge Vector Mesons at Finite Temperature and Density. 3. The Ground State Energy of a Relativistic Quark Gas,” Phys. Rev. D 16, 1169 (1977)

    1977

  14. [14]

    Nonabelian Gauge Theories of Fermi Systems: Chromotheory of Highly Condensed Matter,

    V. Baluni, “Nonabelian Gauge Theories of Fermi Systems: Chromotheory of Highly Condensed Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 17, 2092 (1978)

    2092

  15. [15]

    Perturbative QED and QCD at Finite Temperatures and Densities,

    T. Toimela, “Perturbative QED and QCD at Finite Temperatures and Densities,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24, 901 (1985) [erratum: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 26, 1021 (1987)]

    1985

  16. [16]

    The Role of quark mass in cold and dense perturbative QCD,

    E. S. Fraga and P. Romatschke, “The Role of quark mass in cold and dense perturbative QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 105014 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0412298 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  17. [17]

    Cold Quark Matter,

    A. Kurkela, P. Romatschke and A. Vuorinen, “Cold Quark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 105021 (2010) [arXiv:0912.1856 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    Approximately selfconsistent resummations for the thermodynamics of the quark gluon plasma. 1. Entropy and density,

    J. P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and A. Rebhan, “Approximately selfconsistent resummations for the thermodynamics of the quark gluon plasma. 1. Entropy and density,” Phys. Rev. D 63, 065003 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005003 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  19. [19]

    Interacting quark matter equation of state for compact stars,

    E. S. Fraga, A. Kurkela and A. Vuorinen, “Interacting quark matter equation of state for compact stars,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 781, no.2, L25 (2014) [arXiv:1311.5154 [nucl-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Constraining neutron star matter with Quantum Chromo- dynamics,

    A. Kurkela, E. S. Fraga, J. Schaffner-Bielich and A. Vuorinen, “Constraining neutron star matter with Quantum Chromo- dynamics,” Astrophys. J. 789, 127 (2014) [arXiv:1402.6618 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State,

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela and A. Vuorinen, “Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.17, 172703 (2018) [arXiv:1711.02644 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Pressure of Cold Quark Matter: Leading Logarithm,

    T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, P. Romatschke, S. Säppi and A. Vuorinen, “Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Pressure of Cold Quark Matter: Leading Logarithm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.20, 202701 (2018) [arXiv:1807.04120 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Cold quark matter at N3LO: Soft contributions,

    T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, R. Paatelainen, S. Säppi and A. Vuorinen, “Cold quark matter at N3LO: Soft contributions,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.7, 074015 (2021) [arXiv:2103.07427 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,

    P. Adhikari, M. Ammon, S. S. A vancini, A. Ayala, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. Blaschke, F. L. Braghin, P. Buividovich, R. P. Cardoso and C. Cartwright, et al. “Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,” [arXiv:2412.18632 [nucl-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Magnetic susceptibility and equation of state of Nf = 2 + 1 QCD with physical quark masses,

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, F. Negro and F. Sanfilippo, “Magnetic susceptibility and equation of state of Nf = 2 + 1 QCD with physical quark masses,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.5, 054506 (2014) [arXiv:1310.8656 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Quark-gluon plasma in an external magnetic field,

    L. Levkova and C. DeTar, “Quark-gluon plasma in an external magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, no.1, 012002 (2014) [arXiv:1309.1142 [hep-lat]]. 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields,

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrödi, S. D. Katz and A. Schäfer, “The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields,” JHEP 08, 177 (2014) [arXiv:1406.0269 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    QCD equation of state at nonzero baryon density in an external magnetic field,

    N. Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov and A. A. Roenko, “QCD equation of state at nonzero baryon density in an external magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.9, 094511 (2024) [arXiv:2403.07783 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Speed of sound in magnetized nuclear matter,

    R. Mondal, N. Chaudhuri, P. Roy and S. Sarkar, “Speed of sound in magnetized nuclear matter,” Phys. Rev. C 109, no.5, 054911 (2024) [arXiv:2312.03310 [nucl-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Speed of sound and isothermal compressibility in a magnetized quark matter with anomalous magnetic moment of quarks,

    R. Mondal, S. Duari, N. Chaudhuri, S. Sarkar and P. Roy, “Speed of sound and isothermal compressibility in a magnetized quark matter with anomalous magnetic moment of quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.5, 054010 (2024) [arXiv:2408.04398 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    One-loop QCD thermodynamics in a strong homogeneous and static magnetic field,

    S. Rath and B. K. Patra, “One-loop QCD thermodynamics in a strong homogeneous and static magnetic field,” JHEP 12, 098 (2017) [arXiv:1707.02890 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Pressure of a weakly magnetized hot and dense deconfined QCD matter in one-loop hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory,

    A. Bandyopadhyay, B. Karmakar, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, “Pressure of a weakly magnetized hot and dense deconfined QCD matter in one-loop hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.3, 034031 (2019) [arXiv:1702.02875 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Anisotropic pressure of deconfined QCD matter in presence of strong magnetic field within one-loop approximation,

    B. Karmakar, R. Ghosh, A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, “Anisotropic pressure of deconfined QCD matter in presence of strong magnetic field within one-loop approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.9, 094002 (2019) [arXiv:1902.02607 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Hot perturbative QCD in a very strong magnetic background,

    E. S. Fraga, L. F. Palhares and T. E. Restrepo, “Hot perturbative QCD in a very strong magnetic background,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.3, 034026 (2023) [arXiv:2303.12140 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Cold and dense perturbative QCD in a very strong magnetic background,

    E. S. Fraga, L. F. Palhares and T. E. Restrepo, “Cold and dense perturbative QCD in a very strong magnetic background,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.5, 5 (2024) [arXiv:2312.13952 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Magnetars,

    V. M. Kaspi and A. Beloborodov, “Magnetars,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 261-301 (2017) [arXiv:1703.00068 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Schaffner-Bielich, Compact Star Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    J. Schaffner-Bielich, Compact Star Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Equation of State of a Dense and Magnetized Fermion System,

    E. J. Ferrer, V. de la Incera, J. P. Keith, I. Portillo and P. L. Springsteen, “Equation of State of a Dense and Magnetized Fermion System,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 065802 (2010) [arXiv:1009.3521 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    A N ICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation,

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous and D. Chakrabarty, et al. “A N ICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, no.1, L21 (2019) [arXiv:1912.05702 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from N ICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter,

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho and J. M. Lattimer, et al. “PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from N ICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, no.1, L24 (2019) [arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM- Newton Spectroscopy,

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, S. M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Choudhury and J. S. Deneva, et al. “A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM- Newton Spectroscopy,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, no.2, L27 (2021) [arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data,

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer and M. Loewenstein, et al. “The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, no.2, L28 (2021) [arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state,

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.16, 161101 (2018) [arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817,

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817,” Phys. Rev. X 9, no.1, 011001 (2019) [arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter,

    R. Kumar et al. [MUSES], “Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter,” Living Rev. Rel. 27, no.1, 3 (2024) [arXiv:2303.17021 [nucl-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Fermions at finite density in the path integral approach,

    A. Podo and L. Santoni, “Fermions at finite density in the path integral approach,” JHEP 02, 182 (2024) [arXiv:2312.14753 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    QCD at finite isospin density,

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD at finite isospin density,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), 592-595 [arXiv:hep-ph/0005225 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  48. [48]

    QCD at finite isospin density: From pion to quark - anti-quark condensation,

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD at finite isospin density: From pion to quark - anti-quark condensation,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64 (2001), 834-842 [arXiv:hep-ph/0011365 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  49. [49]

    Isospin chemical potential and the QCD phase diagram at nonzero temperature and baryon chemical potential,

    D. Toublan and J. B. Kogut, “Isospin chemical potential and the QCD phase diagram at nonzero temperature and baryon chemical potential,” Phys. Lett. B 564 (2003), 212-216 [arXiv:hep-ph/0301183 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  50. [50]

    The Finite temperature transition for 2-flavor lattice QCD at finite isospin density,

    J. B. Kogut and D. K. Sinclair, “The Finite temperature transition for 2-flavor lattice QCD at finite isospin density,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), 094501 [arXiv:hep-lat/0407027 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [51]

    The QCD phase diagram at nonzero baryon, isospin and strangeness chemical potentials: Results from a hadron resonance gas model,

    D. Toublan and J. B. Kogut, “The QCD phase diagram at nonzero baryon, isospin and strangeness chemical potentials: Results from a hadron resonance gas model,” Phys. Lett. B 605 (2005), 129-136 [arXiv:hep-ph/0409310 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  52. [52]

    Pion and kaon condensation at finite temperature and density,

    J. O. Andersen, “Pion and kaon condensation at finite temperature and density,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007), 065011 [arXiv:hep-ph/0609020 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  53. [53]

    The critical line of two-flavor QCD at finite isospin or baryon densities from imaginary chemical potentials,

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, M. D’Elia, A. Papa and F. Sanfilippo, “The critical line of two-flavor QCD at finite isospin or baryon densities from imaginary chemical potentials,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), 094512 [arXiv:1202.5700 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    Quark mass and isospin dependence of the deconfining critical temper- ature,

    E. S. Fraga, L. F. Palhares and C. Villavicencio, “Quark mass and isospin dependence of the deconfining critical temper- ature,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009), 014021 [arXiv:0810.1060 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  55. [55]

    Pion Condensation in a two-flavor NJL model: the role of charge neutrality,

    J. O. Andersen and L. Kyllingstad, “Pion Condensation in a two-flavor NJL model: the role of charge neutrality,” J. Phys. G 37 (2009), 015003 [arXiv:hep-ph/0701033 [hep-ph]]. 18

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  56. [56]

    Fluctuations in the quark-meson model for QCD with isospin chemical potential,

    K. Kamikado, N. Strodthoff, L. von Smekal and J. Wambach, “Fluctuations in the quark-meson model for QCD with isospin chemical potential,” Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013), 1044-1053 [arXiv:1207.0400 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    QCD phase diagram at finite baryon and isospin chemical potentials in Polyakov loop extended quark meson model with vector interaction,

    H. Ueda, T. Z. Nakano, A. Ohnishi, M. Ruggieri and K. Sumiyoshi, “QCD phase diagram at finite baryon and isospin chemical potentials in Polyakov loop extended quark meson model with vector interaction,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) no.7, 074006 [arXiv:1304.4331 [nucl-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Thermodynamics of (2+1)-flavor strongly interacting matter at nonzero isospin,

    R. Stiele, E. S. Fraga and J. Schaffner-Bielich, “Thermodynamics of (2+1)-flavor strongly interacting matter at nonzero isospin,” Phys. Lett. B 729 (2014), 72-78 [arXiv:1307.2851 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Stressed Cooper pairing in QCD at high isospin density: effective Lagrangian and random matrix theory,

    T. Kanazawa and T. Wettig, “Stressed Cooper pairing in QCD at high isospin density: effective Lagrangian and random matrix theory,” JHEP 10 (2014), 055 [arXiv:1406.6131 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Three-loop hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory thermo- dynamics at finite temperature and finite baryonic and isospin chemical potential,

    J. O. Andersen, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa and M. Strickland, “Three-loop hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory thermo- dynamics at finite temperature and finite baryonic and isospin chemical potential,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) no.5, 054045 [arXiv:1511.04660 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Magnetic structure of isospin-asymmetric QCD matter in neutron stars,

    G. Endrödi, “Magnetic structure of isospin-asymmetric QCD matter in neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.9, 094501 [arXiv:1407.1216 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    Finite Isospin Chiral Perturbation Theory in a Magnetic Field

    Prabal Adhikari, Thomas D. Cohen, Julia Sakowitz, “Finite Isospin Chiral Perturbation Theory in a Magnetic Field ” Phys. Rev. C 91, 045202 (2015)

    2015

  63. [63]

    Isospin asymmetric matter in uniform and nonuniform strong magnetic fields

    Yuan Wang and Xin-Jian Wen, “Isospin asymmetric matter in uniform and nonuniform strong magnetic fields” Phys. Rev. C 109, 015201 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    The Equation of state for dense QCD and quark stars,

    J. O. Andersen and M. Strickland, “The Equation of state for dense QCD and quark stars,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 105001 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0206196 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    Equation of state of cold and dense QCD matter in resummed perturbation theory,

    Y. Fujimoto and K. Fukushima, “Equation of state of cold and dense QCD matter in resummed perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.1, 014025 (2022) [arXiv:2011.10891 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Thermodynamics of strongly magnetized dense quark matter from hard dense loop perturbation theory,

    S. Satapathy, Sumit and S. A. Khan, “Thermodynamics of strongly magnetized dense quark matter from hard dense loop perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.11, 116025 (2025) doi:10.1103/ngdq-fpq9 [arXiv:2503.00824 [nucl-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Hard dense loops in a cold nonAbelian plasma,

    C. Manuel, “Hard dense loops in a cold nonAbelian plasma,” Phys. Rev. D 53, 5866-5873 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9512365 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  68. [68]

    Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals,

    V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, “Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals,” Phys. Rept. 576, 1-209 (2015) [arXiv:1503.00732 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Fermion self-energy and damping rate in a hot magnetized plasma,

    R. Ghosh and I. A. Shovkovy, “Fermion self-energy and damping rate in a hot magnetized plasma,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.9, 096018 (2024) [arXiv:2402.04307 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Strong-field physics in QED and QCD: From fundamentals to applications,

    K. Hattori, K. Itakura and S. Ozaki, “Strong-field physics in QED and QCD: From fundamentals to applications,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104068 (2023) [arXiv:2305.03865 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Basics of Thermal Field Theory,

    M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, “Basics of Thermal Field Theory,” Lect. Notes Phys. 925, pp.1-281 (2016) Springer, 2016

    2016

  72. [72]

    Hard Thermal Loop—Theory and applications,

    N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, “Hard Thermal Loop—Theory and applications,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 140, 104136 (2025) [arXiv:2404.08734 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    General structure of gauge boson propagator and its spectra in a hot magnetized medium,

    B. Karmakar, A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, “General structure of gauge boson propagator and its spectra in a hot magnetized medium,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.8, 658 (2019) [arXiv:1804.11336 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Augmenting the residue theorem with boundary terms in finite-density calculations,

    T. Gorda, J. Österman and S. Säppi, “Augmenting the residue theorem with boundary terms in finite-density calculations,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.10, 105026 (2022) [arXiv:2208.14479 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Hard thermal loop resummation of the free energy of a hot gluon plasma,

    J. O. Andersen, E. Braaten and M. Strickland, “Hard thermal loop resummation of the free energy of a hot gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2139-2142 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9902327 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  76. [76]

    Ther- momagnetic evolution of the QCD strong coupling,

    A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, S. Hernandez-Ortiz, L. A. Hernandez, M. Loewe, D. Manreza Paret and R. Zamora, “Ther- momagnetic evolution of the QCD strong coupling,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.3, 031501 (2018) [arXiv:1805.08198 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Second-order quark number susceptibility of deconfined QCD matter in the presence of a magnetic field,

    B. Karmakar, N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, “Second-order quark number susceptibility of deconfined QCD matter in the presence of a magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.5, 054004 (2020) [arXiv:2003.11247 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Exploring anisotropic effects in magnetized quark matter,

    S. A. Ferraris, J. P. Carlomagno, G. A. Contrera and A. G. Grunfeld, “Exploring anisotropic effects in magnetized quark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 113, no.3, 034026 (2026) [arXiv:2511.05701 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Paramagnetic squeezing of QCD matter,

    G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi and A. Schafer, “Paramagnetic squeezing of QCD matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 042301 (2014) [arXiv:1311.2559 [hep-lat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014