Recommendations from the Ad Hoc Committee on SETI Nomenclature
read the original abstract
The Ad Hoc Committee on SETI Nomenclature was convened at the suggestion of Frank Drake after the Decoding Alien Intelligence Workshop at the SETI Institute in March 2018. The purpose of the committee was to recommend standardized definitions for terms, especially those that are used inconsistently in the literature and the scientific community. The committee sought to recommend definitions and terms that are a compromise among several desirable but occasionally inconsistent properties for such terms: 1) Consistency with the historical literature and common use in the field; 2) Consistency with the present literature and common use in the field; 3) Precision of meaning; 4) Consistency with the natural (i.e. everyday, non-jargon) meanings of terms; 5) Compatibility with non-English terms and definitions. The definitions in this report are restricted to technical, SETI contexts, where they may have jargon senses different from their everyday senses. In many cases we include terms only to deprecate them (in the sense of "to withdraw official support for or discourage the use of...in favor of a newer or better alternative", Merriam-Webster sense 4). This is a consensus document that the committee members all endorse; however, in many cases the individual members have (or have expressed in the past) more nuanced opinions on these terms that are not fully reflected here, for instance Alm\'ar (2008, Acta Astronautica, 68, 351), Denning (2008, NASA-SP-2009-4802 Ch. 3 pp.63-124), and Wright (2018, arXiv:1803.06972).
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Methodological Synergies between Technosignature and UHE Neutrino Searches
The paper proposes methodological synergies between technosignature and UHE neutrino searches through adapted CW mitigation, joint spatiotemporal feature spaces, and background-only anomaly ranking to enable a preserv...
-
Searches for Technosignatures in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Advocates for technosignature searches as a compelling theme in the Astro2020 Decadal Survey, citing advances in astrobiology and technology despite past limited support.
-
Searches for Technosignatures: The State of the Profession
This position paper states that technosignature searches receive almost no US federal support due to NASA institutional inertia and recommends Astro2020 explicitly prioritize funding and training for the field.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.