pith. sign in

arxiv: 1503.02045 · v1 · pith:Y56YPUUYnew · submitted 2015-03-01 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Estimation after Parameter Selection: Performance Analysis and Estimation Methods

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords estimatorparameterestimationselectionpsmlboundcrammethods
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In many practical parameter estimation problems, prescreening and parameter selection are performed prior to estimation. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating a preselected unknown deterministic parameter chosen from a parameter set based on observations according to a predetermined selection rule, $\Psi$. The data-based parameter selection process may impact the subsequent estimation by introducing a selection bias and creating coupling between decoupled parameters. This paper introduces a post-selection mean squared error (PSMSE) criterion as a performance measure. A corresponding Cram\'er-Rao-type bound on the PSMSE of any $\Psi$-unbiased estimator is derived, where the $\Psi$-unbiasedness is in the Lehmann-unbiasedness sense. The post-selection maximum-likelihood (PSML) estimator is presented .It is proved that if there exists an $\Psi$-unbiased estimator that achieves the $\Psi$-Cram\'er-Rao bound (CRB), i.e. an $\Psi$-efficient estimator, then it is produced by the PSML estimator. In addition, iterative methods are developed for the practical implementation of the PSML estimator. Finally, the proposed $\Psi$-CRB and PSML estimator are examined in estimation after parameter selection with different distributions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.