Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.16258 v2 pith:Y6MJ7HRW submitted 2023-08-30 cs.CV

Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNs

classification cs.CV
keywords designprinciplesrobustarchitecturaladversarialcnnsaccomplishaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our research aims to unify existing works' diverging opinions on how architectural components affect the adversarial robustness of CNNs. To accomplish our goal, we synthesize a suite of three generalizable robust architectural design principles: (a) optimal range for depth and width configurations, (b) preferring convolutional over patchify stem stage, and (c) robust residual block design through adopting squeeze and excitation blocks and non-parametric smooth activation functions. Through extensive experiments across a wide spectrum of dataset scales, adversarial training methods, model parameters, and network design spaces, our principles consistently and markedly improve AutoAttack accuracy: 1-3 percentage points (pp) on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, and 4-9 pp on ImageNet. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/poloclub/robust-principles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Generalized Certified Robustness with Multi-Norm Training

    cs.LG 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CURE is the first multi-norm certified training method that improves union robustness across l_p norms and unseen perturbations on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and TinyImagenet.

  2. FastAT Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Fair Evaluation of Fast Adversarial Training Methods

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    The FastAT Benchmark standardizes evaluation of over twenty fast adversarial training methods under unified conditions, showing that well-designed single-step approaches can match or exceed PGD-AT robustness at lower ...

  3. Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CR 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Survey of harmful fine-tuning attacks on LLMs, their variants, defense strategies, mechanical analysis, and evaluation methodologies.