REVIEW 3 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNs
read the original abstract
Our research aims to unify existing works' diverging opinions on how architectural components affect the adversarial robustness of CNNs. To accomplish our goal, we synthesize a suite of three generalizable robust architectural design principles: (a) optimal range for depth and width configurations, (b) preferring convolutional over patchify stem stage, and (c) robust residual block design through adopting squeeze and excitation blocks and non-parametric smooth activation functions. Through extensive experiments across a wide spectrum of dataset scales, adversarial training methods, model parameters, and network design spaces, our principles consistently and markedly improve AutoAttack accuracy: 1-3 percentage points (pp) on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, and 4-9 pp on ImageNet. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/poloclub/robust-principles.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Towards Generalized Certified Robustness with Multi-Norm Training
CURE is the first multi-norm certified training method that improves union robustness across l_p norms and unseen perturbations on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and TinyImagenet.
-
FastAT Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Fair Evaluation of Fast Adversarial Training Methods
The FastAT Benchmark standardizes evaluation of over twenty fast adversarial training methods under unified conditions, showing that well-designed single-step approaches can match or exceed PGD-AT robustness at lower ...
-
Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey
Survey of harmful fine-tuning attacks on LLMs, their variants, defense strategies, mechanical analysis, and evaluation methodologies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.