Pith. sign in

REVIEW

FairFly: A Fair Motion Planner for Fleets of Autonomous UAVs in Urban Airspace

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.09297 v1 pith:Y6MZLO2H submitted 2020-08-21 eess.SY cs.SY

FairFly: A Fair Motion Planner for Fleets of Autonomous UAVs in Urban Airspace

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords missionsuavsenergyfairfairflyurbanairspaceautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a solution to the problem of fairly planning a fleet of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that have different missions and operators, such that no one operator unfairly gets to finish its missions early at the expense of others - unless this was explicitly negotiated. When hundreds of UAVs share an urban airspace, the relevant authorities should allocate corridors to them such that they complete their missions, but no one vehicle is accidentally given an exceptionally fast path at the expense of another, which is thus forced to wait and waste energy. Our solution, FairFly, addresses the fair planning question for general autonomous systems, including UAV fleets, subject to complex missions typical of urban applications. FairFly formalizes each mission in temporal logic. An offline search finds the fairest paths that satisfy the missions and can be flown by the UAVs, leading to lighter online control load. It allows explicit negotiation between UAVs to enable imbalanced path durations if desired. We present three fairness notions, including one that reduces energy consumption. We validate our results in simulation, and demonstrate a lighter computational load and less UAV energy consumption as a result of flying fair trajectories.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.