Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Polymer (imperfect) single-file diffusion: A phase diagram

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dilute polymer chains in a narrow tube move freely, then in single file, then either cooperatively or by swapping, and the paper maps which route wins as chain length and tube width change.

desk verdict A useful polymer phase diagram with a clean LD confirmation of Do→t^1/2→DR, but the switching-regime prediction is biased by a first-switch-time proxy and censored runs. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12164 v1 pith:Y6P4DBY3 submitted 2025-05-17 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Hanyang Wang , Gary W. Slater This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords single-filediffusionpolymerdynamicsRousemodelLangevinlatticeMonteCarlonanochannelconfinementphasediagramentropicbarrier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a dilute solution of flexible polymer chains confined in a narrow toroidal tube passes through a universal sequence of diffusion regimes, and that the long-time outcome has two distinct routes. First the chains diffuse freely, then they enter single-file diffusion with mean-square displacement growing as $t^{1/2}$; at long times either the whole chain population moves cooperatively with diffusion coefficient $D_o/N$, or, if the chains can swap positions, a switching regime appears with a larger coefficient $D_s$. The authors identify molecular weight $M$, tube width $h$, and chain spacing as the control parameters, and summarize the behavior in a phase diagram based on the intermediate-time exponent $\alpha$. They also build a one-dimensional lattice Monte Carlo model that reproduces the same physics with two parameters, one for chain overlap and one for disentanglement. Knowing which route dominates matters for nanochannel experiments, DNA mapping, and one-dimensional electrophoresis, where molecular weight and channel width are tunable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the switching time $t_s$, the mean interval between chain-exchange events, and its ratio to the cooperative time $t_\lambda$. The load-bearing identity is Eq. 12, $D_s = \sqrt{8t_o/(\pi t_s)}\,D_o = \sqrt{t_\lambda/t_s}\,D_R$, which converts a local event rate into a macroscopic diffusion coefficient. The paper estimates $t_s$ from the mean first-switching time $\langle t_1\rangle$, whose empirical fit grows exponentially as the effective tube width $h-2$ shrinks, because chain exchange requires crossing an entropic barrier set by the number of blobs $M/g(h) \sim M/(h-2)^{3/2}$. The lattice Monte Carlo model carries the same mechanism through two parameters, $P$ for overlap and $Q$ for disentanglement, giving $t_s \sim 1/(PQ)$ and hence $D \propto \sqrt{PQ}$, which matches the long-time data.

What would settle it

Measure the full waiting-time distribution between successive chain-swap events in the Langevin-dynamics model over times much longer than the current runs, without discarding no-swap trajectories; if the steady-state mean inter-swap time differs from $\langle t_1\rangle$ beyond statistical error, the estimate of $D_s(h)$ and the switching-regime boundaries need revision. A complementary check would track labeled DNA molecules in nanochannels and test whether the asymptotic diffusivity is independent of the number of chains $N$ when swapping dominates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that polymer chains in narrow channels behave differently from hard particles: they can exchange order even when the channel is narrower than twice their size, because two chains can entangle, co-diffuse, and then disentangle. This single fact creates two different pathways to normal long-time diffusion. If the time $t_s$ between switching events exceeds the cooperative time $t_\lambda$, the system follows the hard-particle sequence $D_o \to F t^{1/2} \to D_R = D_o/N$. If $t_o < t_s < t_\lambda$, the chains enter a switching regime with $D_s = F/t_s^{1/2} = \sqrt{8t_o/(\pi t_s)}\,D_o = \sqrt{t_\lambda/t_s}\,D_R$, so that $D_s > D_R$ and the Rouse regime disappears. Using Langevin dynamics of Rouse chains, the paper measures the mean first-switching time $\langle t_1\rangle$, fits its exponential divergence with $(h-2)^{-1.4}$, and uses it to estimate $D_s(h)$. A lattice Monte Carlo model with overlap probability $P$ and disentanglement probability $Q$ reproduces the phase diagram and shows $D/D_o \propto \sqrt{PQ}$, independent of the number of chains $N$, exactly as the switching-time formula predicts.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the average time to the first chain-swap event, measured only over simulation runs where a swap actually occurred, equals the steady-state switching timescale that controls long-time diffusion; if runs without swaps are censored or rare first events skew the mean, the predicted switching diffusivity and phase boundaries shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The intermediate-time exponent $\alpha$ in $\langle x^2\rangle \sim t^\alpha$ serves as a single scalar order parameter for the phase diagram: values near $1/2$ mark strong single-file behavior, values near $1$ mark free or wide-tube diffusion, and intermediate values mark the coexistence zone.
  • When chain switching dominates, the long-time diffusion coefficient $D_s$ is predicted to be independent of the number of chains $N$, unlike the cooperative Rouse value $D_R = D_o/N$; the Monte Carlo data confirm this $N$-independence.
  • The switching time diverges exponentially as the effective tube width $h-2$ decreases, so single-file behavior is robust for chains that form many blobs, and the switching regime appears only in a relatively narrow range of tube widths.
  • The lattice Monte Carlo model with parameters $P$ and $Q$ reproduces the Langevin-dynamics phase diagram, and the proposed mappings $h \sim \sqrt{P}$ and $M \sim 1/(Q P^{1/6})$ suggest the two simulation approaches describe the same physical regimes.
  • For a fixed molecular weight, increasing the tube width moves the system from the cooperative Rouse regime through the switching regime to free diffusion, so the asymptotic diffusion coefficient rises monotonically from $D_o/N$ to $D_o$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper measures the first-switching time only over runs where a swap occurs, a renewal-theory estimate using the full steady-state waiting-time distribution between swaps could replace the empirical fit and would be a natural follow-up.
  • The two-pathway picture suggests a design rule for nanochannel separations: in the switching window, $\langle t_1\rangle \sim M^3$ makes the long-time mobility strongly molecular-weight dependent, which could be exploited to sort chains by size.
  • For polydisperse or bimodal mixtures, chains of different lengths have different switching times, so the model points toward single-file-triggered segregation or local ordering along the tube, an extension the paper mentions but does not develop.
  • The mapping between the two simulation models relies on the scaling $t_d \sim M^2 h^{2-1/\nu}$ for the disentanglement time; direct Langevin-dynamics measurements of disentanglement times would test whether that scaling actually holds for the bead-spring model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the crossover from single-file to normal diffusion for dilute flexible chains in a narrow toroidal tube using Langevin dynamics (LD) and a two-parameter lattice Monte Carlo (LMC) model. The theory predicts the sequence Do -> F t^{1/2} -> DR = Do/N for hard-core particles, and additionally a switching regime with Ds > DR when neighboring chains exchange positions. LD simulations confirm the Do -> F -> DR sequence through the rescaling collapses in Fig. 4 and measure an SFD exponent 0.52(1); the MC model reproduces the same phenomenology and shows D/Do proportional to sqrt(PQ) in the switching regime. The paper proposes M-h and P-Q phase diagrams and a heuristic mapping between the two models.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely and experimentally relevant question, and its core scaling scenario is well supported by internal evidence: the predicted transition times in Eqs. (21)-(22) produce good collapses in Fig. 4, the measured SFD exponent is consistent with 1/2, the displacement distributions are Gaussian, and the MC result D/Do proportional to sqrt(PQ) with no N-dependence (Fig. 11) is a clear testable prediction. The two-parameter MC model is economical, and the phase diagrams in Fig. 9 are informative. If the switching-regime analysis is made quantitative, the paper would provide a useful framework for nanochannel experiments. The main weakness is that the LD switching-regime prediction currently rests on a biased first-passage statistic.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV C, Eqs. (25)-(26), Fig. 6] The predicted switching-regime diffusion coefficient is built from a censored, system-wide first-passage statistic rather than the per-particle switching time defined in Sec. II A. In Sec. II A, ts is the mean time between switching events involving a given particle (text after Eq. 10), but Sec. IV C records t1, the time of the first chain-switch anywhere among N=5 chains, and runs with no switch are discarded (as noted in the text). Replacing ts by <t1> in Eq. 26 is biased in two ways: for Poisson switching with rate lambda per gap, <t1> is approximately 1/(N lambda) = (2/N) ts, so for N=5 Eq. 26 overestimates Ds by sqrt(N/2) ~ 1.58 and introduces an N-dependence that Eq. 12 asserts should not exist; and censoring no-switch runs biases <t1> downward close to the Rouse-to-switching boundary, shifting the onset of the switching regime to smaller h. Because <t1> is also fitted by Eq. 25, the dashed curve in Fig. 6 is not an independent quantitative prediction. The existence of a switching branch remains plausible from the MC data, but a direct per-particle switching-rate measurement or an extreme-statistics correction is required for the LD prediction.
  2. [Sec. IV D, Fig. 7(a)] The wide-tube boundary of the M-h phase diagram is set by h = 5 Rg(M), with the factor of 5 stated to be arbitrary. This line is used to separate the intermediate regime from the free-diffusion regime, so the quantitative placement of the switching region on the phase diagram is not derived. If the phase diagram is to be a predictive map, this criterion should be replaced by a measured or derived condition (for example, to ~ ts) or explicitly labelled as illustrative rather than theoretical.
  3. [Sec. V, Eq. (28), Fig. 12] The proposed mapping between the LD parameters (M,h) and the MC parameters (P,Q) is not validated. Equation (28) is assembled from the postulated proportionalities td ~ 1/Q, M h^{-1/nu} ~ 1/(PQ), and tau_c ~ M; the text acknowledges that the first two are assumptions. The visual similarity of Fig. 12 is not by itself evidence for the mapping, since both phase diagrams are organized by similarly monotone axes. A direct comparison of LD and MC at matched parameter values, or at least a sensitivity analysis of the assumed proportionalities, is needed before the mapping can be presented as an established connection.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 6 caption vs Sec. IV C] The caption of Fig. 6 states ell_o = 11 for M = 10, while the text and Eq. (26) use ell_o = 13 (= M + 3). Please reconcile; if the data were taken at ell_o = 11, the dashed line is evaluated at the wrong spacing.
  2. [Sec. IV C, Eq. (23)] The estimate <t1>_infinity approximately ell_o^2/(2 Do) should be reconciled with Eq. (2), which gives t_o ~ ell^2/(8 Do) for the same closing process; the factor of four and the use of ell_o versus ell = ell_o - Sx should be clarified.
  3. [Sec. IV C, Fig. 5(c)] Please report the fraction of runs with no switching event for each (M,h) condition; this quantifies the censoring of <t1> and lets the reader judge where the average is reliable.
  4. [Sec. IV E, Fig. 9] The dashed lines in Fig. 9 are derived from the linear fit in Fig. 11; the text should state explicitly that these are empirical boundaries fitted to the same data rather than independent theoretical predictions.
  5. [Sec. V, Eq. (28)] Writing M ~ 1/QP^{1/6} is ambiguous; M ~ 1/(Q P^{1/6}) would avoid misreading, and the choice nu = 3/5 here versus nu ~ 0.68 elsewhere should be justified.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No central circularity: the SFD-to-Rouse and switching scalings are derived from standard theory and separately reproduced, but the Ds estimate in Eq. 26 imports the fitted, censored first-switching time from the same simulations it is compared against.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV C, Fig. 5(c), Eqs. 25-26 and Fig. 6]
    "We can obtain an estimate the h-dependence of the diffusion coefficient in this transition regime using Eq. 12, replacing ts with the value of ⟨t1⟩: ... In spite of all the approximations needed for this estimate, the corresponding dashed line in Fig. 6 is in decent agreement with the general trend."

    The switching timescale that enters the theoretical Ds formula is not a first-principles quantity: ⟨t1⟩ is measured from the same LD simulations whose long-time MSD produces the Dt≫tλ data plotted in Fig. 6, and it is fitted by the empirical exponential Eq. 25 before substitution. In addition, ⟨t1⟩ is defined as the time of the first chain-switch anywhere in the N=5 system, with no-switch runs discarded, whereas Eq. 10's ts is the mean per-particle interval between switching events; the two differ by construction. The dashed curve is thus a self-consistency estimate rather than an independent prediction, although the relation Ds=F/√ts itself is derived from Eqs. 3 and 10 and is not forced by the fit.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The hard-particle sequence Do→Ft^(1/2)→DR (Eqs. 1-8) follows from standard SFD theory (Harris, Levitt) and is quantitatively reproduced by the LD simulations in Figs. 3-4. The second pathway to normal diffusion, the switching regime, is derived from the same equations (Eqs. 10-13) and its N-independence prediction is tested independently with the lattice-MC model, which uses different parameters and larger ensembles (Fig. 11). The self-cited blob-size calibration from Wang & Slater (ref 22) is an empirical input used mainly for estimates, not a load-bearing uniqueness argument. The main circularity-adjacent issue is the use of the fitted, censored first-switch time ⟨t1⟩ in Eq. 26; the Q=C/P contours in Fig. 9 are inversions of the Fig. 11 fit and are contour labels rather than independent derivations. These issues lower quantitative confidence but do not make the phase diagram itself circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; its model postulates are the two-parameter MC dynamics (P, Q), the faithful-proxy assumption for ⟨t1⟩, and the heuristic mapping between MC and LD parameters. Many quantitative inputs come from fits to the authors' own simulation data (Eqs. 18, 19, 20, 25, and the Fig. 11 fit), which limits how much independent predictive content the phase diagram carries beyond the simulations it was built from.

free parameters (8)
  • Sx proportionality coefficient = 3.391(1)
    Eq. 20 fits axial span Sx to axial radius of gyration Rgx across the simulated M and h values; used to convert chain conformation to effective particle size.
  • Rgx(M,h) scaling coefficients = 0.22(1), 1.02(2), -0.47(3)
    Eq. 18 from prior work (Wang & Slater 2024) fits the axial radius of gyration; used in estimating blob numbers and switching barriers.
  • g(h) coefficient = 1.3 (h-2)^(3/2)
    Eq. 19 fits the blob size; sets the M = 1.3(h-2)^(3/2) phase boundary in Fig. 7.
  • first switching time fit = 0.23(4) exp([6.9(8)/(h-2)]^1.4(1)) in units of M^3
    Eq. 25 fits ⟨t1⟩/M^3 to the simulated first-switching times; then used in Eq. 26 to estimate the long-time diffusion coefficient in the switching regime.
  • Fig. 11 linear fit slope = 1.50(2)
    Linear fit D/Do = 1.50√PQ used to draw the phase boundaries Q = C/P in Fig. 9 (C = 45, 180, 1110).
  • arbitrary factor 5 in phase boundary = 5
    Boundary h = 5 Rg(M) in Fig. 7(a); the authors state 'the factor 5 is arbitrary'.
  • effective width shift h-2 = 2 (monomer diameters)
    The paper replaces h by h-2 throughout to account for finite bead size, without a derivation; this shift affects the switching barrier fits and phase boundaries.
  • MC parameters P and Q = varied (0 to 1)
    Ad hoc collision and disentanglement probabilities that parametrize the LMC model; the mapping to physical [M,h] is via heuristic Eq. 28.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Rouse chain dynamics: Do(M) = D1/M and the Rouse diffusion coefficient of an aggregate is divided by N
    Used throughout Sec. II B and IV B; standard polymer physics (Doi-Edwards, Rouse).
  • standard math Gaussian displacement distribution holds in all regimes (Eq. 9)
    Assumed in Sec. II A; supported by the inset of Fig. 3(a) for one parameter set.
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic interactions are screened along the tube and can be neglected
    Stated in the Introduction with refs 9,10; affects all LD results.
  • ad hoc to paper The mean first switching time ⟨t1⟩ is a faithful proxy for the switching timescale ts
    Used in Sec. IV C to connect Eq. 12 (switching diffusion coefficient) to the simulations via Eq. 26; the proxy is not derived and the measured ⟨t1⟩ is censored.
  • domain assumption Blob scaling for confined chains, including Flory exponent nu ≈ 0.68 in the simulation model
    Sec. II B and IV A use de Gennes blob arguments and the fitted nu from the authors' previous paper (Eqs. 18-19).
  • ad hoc to paper The LMC rules with P and Q capture the essential physics of polymer entanglement and disentanglement
    Sec. III B; the rule that all n particles in a site move together with probability 1/n and separate with probability Q is a modeling choice not derived from polymer physics.
  • ad hoc to paper The parameter mapping M h^(-1/nu) ~ 1/(P Q) and the resulting Eq. 28 connect the MC and LD models
    Sec. V; the authors state 'we will thus assume' these relations and only show a qualitative similarity between Fig. 7(a) and Fig. 12.
  • ad hoc to paper Entropic cost of overlap scales as P^nf and disentanglement as Q
    Sec. III B; the exponential-in-nf acceptance rule and the Q probability are imposed to mimic entropy, not derived from a microscopic model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polymer (imperfect) single-file diffusion: A phase diagram." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y6P4DBY3

@misc{pith2026250512164,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polymer (imperfect) single-file diffusion: A phase diagram},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y6P4DBY3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12164}
}
abstract

We use Langevin dynamics (LD) simulations to investigate single-file diffusion (SFD) in a dilute solution of flexible linear polymers inside a narrow tube with periodic boundary conditions (a torus). The transition from SFD, where the time (t) dependence of the mean-square displacement scales like $\langle x^2\rangle \sim t^{1/2}$, to normal diffusion with $\langle x^2 \rangle \sim t$, is studied as a function of the system parameters, such as the size and concentration of the polymer chains and the width of the tube. We propose a phase diagram describing different diffusion regimes. In particular, we highlight the fact that there are two different pathways to normal long-time diffusion. We also map this problem onto a one-dimensional Lattice Monte Carlo model where the diffusing object represents the polymer center of mass. Possible extensions of this work to polydisperse polymer solutions, one-dimensional electrophoresis and DNA mapping are discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12164 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic view of the two simulation models. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Free polymers can be characterized by their radius-of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Log-log plot of the polymer size ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Mean-square displacement (MSD) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a)-(b) Simulation examples showing the time dependence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) presents a M −h phase diagram (for a system with N = 5 chains) based on the exponent α found when the scaling law ⟨x 2 (t)⟩ ∼ t α is used to fit the MSD data in the SFD regime. Systems with the strongest SFD regime (α near 1/2) are located on the left, shown in blu…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Scaled asymptotic diffusion coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows a range of typical simulation results (mean￾square displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Scaled asymptotic diffusion coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Phase diagram presented in Fig. 9 (a) with both axes re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author A. L. \ Hodgkin \ and\ author R. Keynes ,\ title title The potassium permeability of a giant nerve fibre , \ @noop journal journal J. Physiol \ volume 128 ,\ pages 61--88 ( year 1955 ) NoStop

    work page 1955

  2. [2]

    Gupta , author S

    author author V. Gupta , author S. Nivarthi , author D. Keffer , author A. V. \ McCormick , \ and\ author H. T. \ DaVIS ,\ title title Evidence of single-file diffusion in zeolites , \ @noop journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett \ volume 247 ,\ pages 596 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    author author J. B. \ Freund \ and\ author M. M. \ Orescanin ,\ title title Cellular flow in a small blood vessel , \ doi:10.1017/S0022112010005835 journal journal J. Fluid Mech \ volume 671 ,\ pages 466 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112010005835 2011

  4. [4]

    author author S. H. \ Bryngelson \ and\ author J. B. \ Freund ,\ title title Capsule-train stability , \ 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.033201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Fluids \ volume 1 ,\ pages 033201 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.1.033201 2016

  5. [5]

    Wang , author Y

    author author Y. Wang , author Y. Lu , \ and\ author J. Chen ,\ title title Spontaneous spatiotemporal ordering of single-file water flow in narrow nanotubes , \ 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01214 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. C \ volume 128 ,\ pages 12488--12494 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01214

  6. [6]

    Sané , author J

    author author J. Sané , author J. T. \ Padding , \ and\ author A. A. \ Louis ,\ title title The crossover from single file to fickian diffusion , \ @noop journal journal Faraday discussions \ volume 144 ,\ pages 285--299 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    author author Q. H. \ Wei , author C. Bechinger , \ and\ author P. Leiderer ,\ title title Single-file diffusion of colloids in one-dimensional channels , \ 10.1126/science.287.5453.625 journal journal Science \ volume 287 ,\ pages 625 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1126/science.287.5453.625

  8. [8]

    Villada-Balbuena , author A

    author author A. Villada-Balbuena , author A. Ortiz-Ambriz , author P. Castro-Villarreal , author P. Tierno , author R. Casta\ neda Priego , \ and\ author J. M. \ M\'endez-Alcaraz ,\ title title Single-file dynamics of colloids in circular channels: Time scales, scaling laws and their universality , \ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033246 journal journal Phys....

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033246

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    author author K. D. \ Dorfman , author D. Gupta , author A. Jain , author A. Muralidhar , \ and\ author D. R. \ Tree ,\ title title Hydrodynamics of dna confined in nanoslits and nanochannels , \ 10.1140/epjst/e2014-02326-4 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics \ volume...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author J. J. \ Jones , author J. R. C. \ van der Maarel , \ and\ author P. S. \ Doyle ,\ title title Intrachain dynamics of large dsdna confined to slitlike channels , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.068101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett \ volume 110 ,\ pages 068101 ( year 2...

    doi

  3. [11]

    collisions

    author author T. E. \ Harris ,\ title title Diffusion with “collisions” between particles , \ 10.2307/3212197 journal journal J. Appl. Probab. \ volume 2(2) ,\ pages 323--338 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  4. [12]

    author author D. G. \ Levitt ,\ title title Dynamics of a single-file pore - non-fickian behavior , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.8.3050 journal journal Phys. Rev. A. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 3050--3054 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973 doi

  5. [13]

    Doi \ and\ author S

    author author M. Doi \ and\ author S. F. \ Edwards ,\ @noop title The Theory of Polymer Dynamics \ ( publisher Oxford Science Publications, Oxford ,\ year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  6. [14]

    author author R. J. \ Rubin , author J. Mazur , \ and\ author G. H. \ Weiss ,\ title title Spans of polymer chains. \ 10.1351/pac197646020143 journal journal Pure and Appl. Chem. \ volume 46(2–4) ,\ pages 143--148 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author J. D. \ Weeks , author D. Chandler , \ and\ author H. C. \ Andersen ,\ title title Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids , \ 10.1063/1.1674820 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 5237--5247 ( year 1971...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Praprotnik , author C

    author author M. Praprotnik , author C. Junghans , author L. D. \ Site , \ and\ author K. Kremer ,\ title title Simulation approaches to soft matter: Generic statistical properties vs. chemical details , \ 0.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.018 journal journal Comp. Phys. Comm. \ volume 179...

    2008

  9. [17]

    author author G. S. \ Grest \ and\ author K. Kremer ,\ title title Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3628 journal journal Phys. Rev. A. \ volume 33 ,\ pages 3628--3631 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    Coffey , author Y

    author author W. Coffey , author Y. P. \ Kalmykov , \ and\ author J. T. \ Waldron ,\ @noop title The Langevin Equation: with applications in physics, chemistry, and electrical engineering \ ( publisher Singapore, River Edge, World Scientific ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  11. [19]

    Weik , author R

    author author F. Weik , author R. Weeber , author K. Szuttor , author K. Breitsprecher , author J. de Graaf , author M. Kuron , author J. Landsgesell , author H. Menke , author D. Sean , \ and\ author C. Holm ,\ title title Espresso 4.0 -- an extensible software package for si...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author M. V. \ Chubynsky \ and\ author G. W. \ Slater ,\ title title Optimizing the accuracy of lattice monte carlo algorithms for simulating diffusion , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.016709 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 85 ,\ pages 016709 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Daoud \ and\ author P

    author author M. Daoud \ and\ author P. G. D. \ Gennes ,\ title title Statistics of macromolecular solutions trapped in small pores , \ 10.1051/jphys:0197700380108500 journal journal Journal de Physique \ volume 38 ,\ pages 85--93 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author H. Y. \ Wang \ and\ author G. W. \ Slater ,\ title title Field-driven polyelectrolyte-polymer collisions in nanochannels , \ 10.1063/5.0195302 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 160 ,\ pages 194902 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Arnold \ and\ author S

    author author A. Arnold \ and\ author S. Jun ,\ title title Time scale of entropic segregation of flexible polymers in confinement: Implications for chromosome segregation in filamentous bacteria , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031901 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 76 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Kremer \ and\ author K

    author author K. Kremer \ and\ author K. Binder ,\ title title Dynamics of polymer chains confined into tubes: Scaling theory and monte carlo simulations , \ 10.1063/1.447549 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 6381--6394 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    Qiao \ and\ author G

    author author L. Qiao \ and\ author G. W. \ Slater ,\ title title Capture of rod-like molecules by a nanopore: Defining an 'orientational capture radius' , \ 10.1063/5.0002044 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 152 ,\ pages 144902 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author P. E. \ Rouse ,\ title title A theory of the linear viscoelastic properties of dilute solutions of coiling polymers , \ 10.1063/1.1699180 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 1272--1280 ( year 1953 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Nikoofard , author S

    author author N. Nikoofard , author S. M. \ Hoseinpoor1 , \ and\ author M. Zahedifar ,\ title title Accuracy of the blob model for single flexible polymers inside nanoslits that are a few monomer sizes wide , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062603 journal journal Phys. Rev. E. \ volume ...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Dai , author C

    author author L. Dai , author C. B. \ Renner , \ and\ author P. S. \ Doyle ,\ title title The polymer physics of single dna confined in nanochannels , \ 10.1016/j.cis.2015.12.002 journal journal Advances in Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 232 ,\ pages 80--100 ( year 201...

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    author author S. W. P. \ Turner , author M. Cabodi , \ and\ author H. G. \ Craighead ,\ title title Confinement-induced entropic recoil of single dna molecules in a nanofluidic structure , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.128103 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 12...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author S. W. P. \ Turner , author A. M. \ Perez , author A. Lopez , \ and\ author H. G. \ Craighead ,\ title title Monolithic nanofluid sieving structures for dna manipulation , \ 10.1116/1.590419 journal journal J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B \ volume 16 ,\ pages 3835--3840 (...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Wang , author D

    author author Y. Wang , author D. R. \ Tree , \ and\ author K. D. \ Dorfman ,\ title title Simulation of dna extension in nanochannels , \ 10.1021/ma201277e journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 44 ,\ pages 6594--6604 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  24. [32]

    Rubinstein \ and\ author R

    author author M. Rubinstein \ and\ author R. Colby ,\ @noop title Polymer Physics \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.