Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating Premature Convergence in Co-optimization of Morphology and Control in Evolved Virtual Soft Robots

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09231 v1 pith:YB7BZ45U submitted 2024-02-14 cs.RO cs.NE

classification cs.ROcs.NE
keywords morphologyco-optimizationsoftworkcontrolproblemrobotsvirtual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evolving virtual creatures is a field with a rich history and recently it has been getting more attention, especially in the soft robotics domain. The compliance of soft materials endows soft robots with complex behavior, but it also makes their design process unintuitive and in need of automated design. Despite the great interest, evolved virtual soft robots lack the complexity, and co-optimization of morphology and control remains a challenging problem. Prior work identifies and investigates a major issue with the co-optimization process -- fragile co-adaptation of brain and body resulting in premature convergence of morphology. In this work, we expand the investigation of this phenomenon by comparing learnable controllers with proprioceptive observations and fixed controllers without any observations, whereas in the latter case, we only have the optimization of the morphology. Our experiments in two morphology spaces and two environments that vary in complexity show, concrete examples of the existence of high-performing regions in the morphology space that are not able to be discovered during the co-optimization of the morphology and control, yet exist and are easily findable when optimizing morphologies alone. Thus this work clearly demonstrates and characterizes the challenges of optimizing morphology during co-optimization. Based on these results, we propose a new body-centric framework to think about the co-optimization problem which helps us understand the issue from a search perspective. We hope the insights we share with this work attract more attention to the problem and help us to enable efficient brain-body co-optimization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmiths

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLMgineer combines VLM-generated URDF tool designs with evolutionary search to co-design tools and action plans, outperforming human-specified and existing tools on a new simulated manipulation benchmark.

Pith tools