Don't Lie to Me! Robust and Efficient Explainability with Verified Perturbation Analysis
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:YCDYAOHDrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
A variety of methods have been proposed to try to explain how deep neural networks make their decisions. Key to those approaches is the need to sample the pixel space efficiently in order to derive importance maps. However, it has been shown that the sampling methods used to date introduce biases and other artifacts, leading to inaccurate estimates of the importance of individual pixels and severely limit the reliability of current explainability methods. Unfortunately, the alternative -- to exhaustively sample the image space is computationally prohibitive. In this paper, we introduce EVA (Explaining using Verified perturbation Analysis) -- the first explainability method guarantee to have an exhaustive exploration of a perturbation space. Specifically, we leverage the beneficial properties of verified perturbation analysis -- time efficiency, tractability and guaranteed complete coverage of a manifold -- to efficiently characterize the input variables that are most likely to drive the model decision. We evaluate the approach systematically and demonstrate state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Weight Perturbation to Feature Attribution for Explaining Fully Connected Neural Networks
XWP and XWP_c are novel attribution methods for FCNNs that estimate feature importance by perturbing attached weights to avoid added bias and out-of-distribution issues in occlusion approaches.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.