Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tighter Bounds for Local Differentially Private Core Decomposition and Densest Subgraph

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18020 v1 pith:YEEOKBVX submitted 2024-02-28 cs.DS cs.CR

classification cs.DScs.CR
keywords coredecompositionlocalapproximatemechanismsadditiveboundserror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Computing the core decomposition of a graph is a fundamental problem that has recently been studied in the differentially private setting, motivated by practical applications in data mining. In particular, Dhulipala et al. [FOCS 2022] gave the first mechanism for approximate core decomposition in the challenging and practically relevant setting of local differential privacy. One of the main open problems left by their work is whether the accuracy, i.e., the approximation ratio and additive error, of their mechanism can be improved. We show the first lower bounds on the additive error of approximate and exact core decomposition mechanisms in the centralized and local model of differential privacy, respectively. We also give mechanisms for exact and approximate core decomposition in the local model, with almost matching additive error bounds. Our mechanisms are based on a black-box application of continual counting. They also yield improved mechanisms for the approximate densest subgraph problem in the local model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Practical and Accurate Local Edge Differentially Private Graph Algorithms

    cs.DS 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    New LEDP k-core and triangle-counting algorithms replace edge-count error bounds with degree- and degeneracy-based bounds, and are evaluated in a distributed simulation with reported accuracy improvements.

Pith tools